Home Blog Page 143

Panama Maritime Authority in special session over Panama Ports contract

0
Balboa
The Port of Balboa, circa 2019. Panama Maritime Authority photo.

A new ports deal could become
the template for other things

by Eric Jackson

Since this past Thursday, May 27 the Panama Maritime Authority (AMP by its Spanish initials) has been in “permanent session to consider the application of Panama Ports, a subsidiary of Hong Kong based Hutchison Ports, for a 25-year renewal of its 1997-2022 concession contract for the ports of Balboa and Cristobal.

Originally the deal called for a $22.2 million base rent, plus 10 percent of gross revenues. However, these requirements were waived in a 2002 decree by then-president Mireya Moscoso under a “parity” deal with respect to other port operations. The deal was again changed under the 2004-2009 Martín Torrijos administration, with the Panama government acquiring a 10 percent stake and presumably that percentage of profits or dividends. However — and the concept is relevant to other concession contracts — there were usually no profits, nor any dividends. Those were eaten up by overhead expenses and capital investments, some visible at a glance in all of those modern new cranes.

So the allegation against Panama Ports isn’t exactly fraud. It’s mostly that they reinvested their revenues in expanding and improving the ports. In the first 23 years and five months of the concession, Balboa and Cristobal reportedly generated $909 million in gross revenues, but Panama only received $8 million. Now it is claimed that with the canal expansion bringing bigger ships what load and unload more containers, notwithstanding the epidemic that ports are much busier and generate more revenue.

This, just at a time when Panama in free falling into a debt crisis and looking to generate more income. Other companies — Maersk subsidiary APM Terminal is one that’s mentioned — have expressed an interest in taking over from the Hutchison subsidiary if no deal is reached..

There is a deadline of sorts. The contract runs out next January and if no deal is reached then by the terms of the original contract there would be an automatic 25-year renewal.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

STRI: Una nueva especie de cigarra

0
Annette
La Dra. Annette Aiello tiene un sistema de radar en historia natural que la mayoría de nosotros carecemos. La observación del exoesqueleto de un insecto en una maceta puede conducir a la identificación de una nueva especie. Aiello en su laboratorio del Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales. Por lo general, cría orugas para averiguar en qué mariposas se convierten cuando son adultas, pero en este caso, centró su atención en las cigarras que emergen de una planta en su porche en Arraiján, Panamá. Foto por Jorge Alemán — STRI.

El camino hacia el descubrimiento de una nueva especie de cigarra

por STRI

Las cigarras de 17 años que emergen dramáticamente por miles de millones en 15 estados de EE. UU. desde Georgia hasta Nueva York y al oeste de Illinois están haciendo un gran escándalo, un fenómeno exclusivo de América del Norte, pero miles de otras especies de cigarras en el planeta también pasan la mayor parte de sus vidas bajo tierra, muchas de ellas emergiendo por debajo del radar de la percepción humana. Debido a que la mayoría de las especies de cigarras no emergen simultáneamente como las especies del género Magicicada, las cigarras periódicas, se sabe poco sobre su historia natural. Impulsada por una atención inusual a los detalles y la curiosidad, Annette Aiello, entomóloga del Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales (STRI) en Panamá, se unió a un grupo muy selecto de personas que han criado cigarras con éxito, una hazaña que puede revelar sus plantas hospederas, su tiempo de reproducción y otras facetas misteriosas de su naturaleza, y en este caso, puede resultar en la identificación de una nueva especie.

Según los registros publicados, solo tres de los muchos cientos de especies de cigarras en América del Norte, Central y del Sur habían sido criadas previamente de huevo a adulto.

El nivel de percepción de Annette Aiello para estos eventos de historia natural es como un sistema de radar que la mayoría de nosotros carecemos. ¿Cuántas personas enjaularían una planta de interiores y crearían una hoja de datos para registrar cuántas cigarras emergen de una maceta? Eso es lo que hizo Annette después de ver un caparazón de cigarra vacío, un exoesqueleto, en una planta de lengua de suegra o planta espada (Dracaena trifaciata) en Arraiján, Panamá. Varios años después, cuando Brian Stucky estaba en Panamá con una beca de corta duración del Smithsonian para estudiar los parasitoides de las cigarras, Annette, que suele estudiar mariposas y polillas, le contó sobre su experiencia de cría y le mostró la colección de las 29 cigarras: 12 machos y 17 hembras, que habían salido de la maceta. Para la mayoría de ellos, Aiello pudo recolectar tanto el exoesqueleto de la ninfa como el insecto adulto.

“La asombrosa historia de este artículo es que, por cierto, Annette tenía una planta de interior en su porche y notó un exoesqueleto en ella… y luego construyó una jaula enorme para poner toda la planta dentro y obtuvo todos estos datos.”, Comentó Brian. “Me sorprendió varios años después, cuando escribimos el artículo, necesitaba más información sobre cuándo replantó la planta y, por supuesto, tenía esa información por escrito, lo cual fue simplemente increíble”.

El ciclo de vida de la mayoría de las cigarras es simple: las hembras ponen huevos en ramitas u otras partes de las plantas y cuando las ninfas nacen, se arrastran hacia el suelo y pasan la siguiente fase de sus vidas bebiendo agua y minerales de las raíces de las plantas. Algún tiempo después, las ninfas maduras se arrastran fuera del suelo; emergen los adultos; los machos cantan; las hembras los encuentran; se aparean y el ciclo inicia de nuevo. Para la mayoría de las especies de cigarras en el mundo, no se sabe nada sobre en qué plantas ponen sus huevos o qué comen, cuánto tiempo permanecen bajo tierra, qué determina la duración de sus vidas y qué influye en su decisión de emerger del suelo para aparearse.

Annette trasplantó su planta unos 500 días antes de que surgieran las primeras ninfas. Debido a que las cigarras juveniles son muy frágiles, Annette y Brian piensan que los huevos deben haber sido puestos después de que la planta fue trasplantada, por lo que el ciclo de vida completo debe ser menos de 500 días, mucho más corto que las cigarras periódicas en los EE. UU., que tienen ciclos de vida de 13 y 17 años. Y a diferencia de las cigarras periódicas, que emergen todas a la vez, los 29 individuos tardaron 53 días en emerger.

Cuando Brian Stucky, ahora facilitador/consultor de inteligencia artificial en Investigación en Computación en la Universidad de Florida, comparó las cigarras que Annette crió con otras en las colecciones de STRI, el Museo de Historia Natural de Londres y la Colección de Artrópodos del Estado de Florida, que contiene un número bastante grande de especímenes de cigarras de América Central, no encontró otros especímenes que coincidieran exactamente. Cree que probablemente se trata de una nueva especie del género Pacarina, pero no puede estar seguro porque todavía no hay suficiente información sobre este grupo.

Para identificar esta especie, será necesaria una revisión exhaustiva de todos los registros de las especies de Pacarina, grabaciones de sonido de sus cantos únicos y los cantos de especies relacionadas, y más información sobre las plantas hospederas naturales de las especies de este género en sus áreas de distribución.

“El trabajo muy limitado que se ha realizado sobre los ciclos de vida de las cigarras en los trópicos se ha centrado principalmente en las cigarras que son plagas del café”, explicó Brian. “Cuando se estudian estos organismos que pueden tardar una década más o menos en desarrollarse, no es un camino hacia resultados o publicaciones rápidas, por lo que ese tipo de trabajo simplemente no se realiza. Se considera de baja rentabilidad, al menos por la forma en que medimos actualmente la productividad científica”.

Pero Annette, que forma parte del personal de STRI, ha pasado muchos años criando mariposas y polillas a partir de orugas, una tarea más sencilla, pero de ninguna manera sencilla. Para criar orugas, tiene que averiguar qué hojas comen y esperar hasta que la oruga forme una pupa, de la cual emerge la mariposa adulta.

“Cuando comencé a criar lepidópteros, fue solo para descubrir qué mariposas y polillas provienen de qué orugas”, comentó Annette. “Otras personas también han hecho esto. Dan Janzen y Winnie Hallwachs criaron muchas orugas en Costa Rica”.

Cuando llegó por primera vez a Panamá en 1976, Annette pasó mucho tiempo criando una de las mariposas más comunes, Anartia fatima. Su planta huésped es una de las malas hierbas más comunes, Ruellia blechum (familia Acanthaceae) comúnmente conocida como Blechum.

El insecto más desafiante que haya criado Annette fue un escarabajo. Un colega, Bill Eberhard, le trajo un nido de ave que contenía dos larvas de escarabajos. “Lo colgué en un lugar ventilado en un invernadero para que tuvieran ventilación y humedad al mismo tiempo. Uno de ellos hizo un capullo, luego el otro. Mantuve los capullos en jaulas de malla en mi laboratorio hasta que emergieron los dos escarabajos y pude establecer la conexión entre las características de la larva y el adulto. Finalmente, envié a los adultos a un especialista en los Países Bajos que confirmó su identificación”.

Un sitio web llamado cicadamania.com comentó lo siguiente sobre la cría de cigarras: “si decide criar cigarras, considere lo siguiente 1) es posible que el 95% de las cigarras mueran, 2) el cuidado de los huevos es fundamental, 3) use plantas hospederas preferidas según la especie, 4) use una especie con un ciclo de vida corto, 5) use macetas transparentes para que pueda ver las cigarras a medida que se desarrollan”.

Entomólogos como Annette, que es investigadora permanente, y Brian, que apoya su pasión por las cigarras mientras ayuda a los biólogos a utilizar la inteligencia artificial para la investigación de la biodiversidad, seguirán aprendiendo más sobre este misterioso grupo de insectos.

“Lo maravilloso de la historia natural es que puedes ver cosas que nadie más ha visto”, comentó Aiello. “Solo busco algo que parece fuera de lugar”. La información de historia natural que recopilan investigadores como Annette y Brian puede parecer trivial, pero estos son los expertos a los que las personas recurren cuando necesitan identificar plagas de cultivos, o simplemente un insecto inusualmente hermoso en su jardín.

El Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales, en ciudad de Panamá, Panamá, es una unidad de la Institución Smithsonian. El Instituto promueve la comprensión de la naturaleza tropical y su importancia para el bienestar de la humanidad, capacita estudiantes para llevar a cabo investigaciones en los trópicos, y fomenta la conservación mediante la concienciación pública sobre la belleza e importancia de los ecosistemas tropicales. Video Promocional

 

Referencia: Aiello, A. and Stucky, B.J. 2020. First host plant record for Pacarina (Hemiptera, Cicadidae). Neotropical Biology and Conservation. 15(1):77-88. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.15.e40013

 

cicada trap1
Annette colocó esta jaula sobre la planta, Dracaena trifaciata, para capturar las cigarras, Pacarina sp. que se estaban alimentando de las raíces. Este es uno de los exoesqueletos que las cigarras dejaron en la planta cuando emergieron como adultos. Foto por Annette Aiello.

 

Macho de Pacarina sp. criado en una planta de lengua de suegra, Dracaena trifaciata. Foto por Annette Aiello.
 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 
Dinero

Nito’s gold refinery: will he make us “the next Dubai” of conflict gold laundering?

0
gold
“You see, this brighter gold comes from Lugushwa, and the other comes from Namoya. It is easy to tell the difference in the quality,” said George, a gold dealer. Photo by Sasha Lezhnev – Enough Project.

A facility to erase the tell-tale hallmarks of gold’s origins?

brief note by Eric Jackson

You can tell much about a piece of unrefined gold by its chemistry.

Like where it was mined — a place with sanctions like Venezuela? A paramilitary-controlled zone in a country at war?

Or HOW it was extracted or separated. Like with mercury, perhaps in violation of Panamanian environmental laws, or of the UN’s Minimata Convention on Mercury? There is a lot of illegal mercury separation of gold throughout Latin America. People and ecosystems die.

There are not too many certified gold refineries in the world. At an unethical gold refinery the origins of gold can be erased, so that it might be marketed in violation of laws and treaties.

1
 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

¿Wappin? Como dijeron los zoneitas, “pingding”

0
San Carlos by EJ
La playa en San Carlos, foto por Eric Jackson. Mostly cumbia, a little bit of tamborito tonight.

In proper Panamanian Spanish, it’s “pindín”

Nahomi Medina – Carmen la de Pocrí
https://youtu.be/TruTdKroHOk

Ulpiano Vergara – El concertista tipico
https://youtu.be/UwK4QYofAzM

Dorindo Cárdenas – Desolación
https://youtu.be/mX3JyjFw7Mg

Concierto Karen Peralta y Margarita Henríquez
https://youtu.be/tbornvp4O4Y

Nenito Vargas y Los Plumas Negras – Prisionero de Tus Labios
https://youtu.be/bgNojlNud6Y

Samy y Sandra Sandoval – Sábados Típicos
https://youtu.be/8AXBSfR2bcg

Dayra Moreno – Soltera y Sin Compromiso
https://youtu.be/CrRPKV9MSns

Rigo Fuentes y Flia con Jhonathan Chávez – Tamboritos Tradicionales
https://youtu.be/GCUnGWgo7Gw

Estercita Nieto – Mal de Amores
https://youtu.be/ac3nBW_32iw

 

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

VFA_4

 
Dinero

Greenpeace, VICTORY! The people vs Shell Oil

0
GP

After the Shell Oil case

by Nick and the crew at Greenpeace, from New Zealand

In a historic verdict, a Dutch court has just ruled with Greenpeace, and against Shell, that Shell is liable for damaging the climate.

It is the first time that a major fossil fuel company has been held accountable for its contribution to climate change and ordered to reduce its carbon emissions throughout its whole supply chain.

The only reason we were able to bring this case forward against Shell? People like you, powering our work around the globe, and giving us the strength and resources to fight and win wherever we are needed.

You are what makes us powerful and independent, and able to take on the biggest corporations and win.

This climate case has real teeth and could set a precedent in favor of people and the planet for future climate litigation. It’s the first time that a court has ruled a company must specifically reduce climate changing pollution, and Shell is one of the 10 most climate polluting companies in the world. This verdict means that Shell now has to radically change course and reduce its CO2 emissions by 45% in 2030, in line with limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees.

That is a big step towards making oil history for real.

The decision sends a clear signal to the fossil fuel industry. Shell cannot continue to violate human rights and put profit over people and the planet. Coal, oil and gas need to stay in the ground. People around the world demand climate justice.

Here’s the biggest thing out of this case today: You are part of a global climate movement, and together we are making a difference.

Here in Aotearoa we led the way with a relentless campaign over many years, together with iwi, hapū, and countless others to put an end to oil exploration, and this is a reminder that our win is part of a much bigger movement for change.

People are no longer simply accepting that climate destruction is a way of life, the cost of doing business. The fossil fuel industry is a dying industry and a killing industry — and we have never been closer to a world without fossil fuels.

Movements, lawyers and courts, people like you and me, activists everywhere are joining together to hold multinational corporations accountable. We demand an end to the era of fossil fuels in our air, water, democracy, everywhere.

But onwards!

Since our win on banning new offshore oil exploration permits here in Aotearoa, we’ve shifted focus to New Zealand’s biggest climate polluter: industrial agriculture.

Agribusiness — especially intensive dairy — is responsible for about half of New Zealand’s climate emissions. New Zealand has the highest methane emissions per person in the world, and methane has a global heating power 80 times greater than carbon dioxide.

To be serious about climate action, the government must take action to reduce the agriculture sector’s emissions. Cows are to New Zealand what coal is to Australia.

That means regulating two key drivers of industrial agriculture:

Phase out synthetic nitrogen fertilizer (also a river killer and polluter of drinking water)

SIGN THE PETITION

Phase out imported feed such as Palm Kernel Expeller (drives intensification of dairy and contributes to clearing and burning of rainforest)

SIGN THE PETITION

But it doesn’t have to be that way – there are better ways to farm.

Regenerative farming works within the limits of the land, without polluting water or the climate. We’re calling on the government to invest in backing farmers to make the shift.

You play a vital role in driving this critical work — our protest marches, our civil disobedience, our petitions and our work together as Greenpeace here and across the globe.

Thanks for all of the passion, time, and money you have committed to make this day possible.

As we continue to turn the tide against fossil fuels and transform agriculture together, I look forward to reporting even further progress to come!

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

Amnesty International turns 60

0

We stand with humanity

by Amnesty International

A stunning film with Amnesty activists in five iconic global landmarks and dramatic celestial drone art displays is released today to celebrate Amnesty International’s 60th anniversary.

An orchestral version of Peter Gabriel’s haunting human rights anthem ‘Biko’ provides the soundtrack with newly recorded vocals from The Spirituals gospel choir in London and Angelique Kidjo and Nazanin Boniadi, among others, provide the powerful narration of the ‘Ode to Amnesty’ poem written specially by Bill Shipsey for the film and now translated into twenty languages.

“Freedom Flight”, a two-minute long film produced by Art for Amnesty and Celestial, a cutting-edge drone art company, for Amnesty International France was shot on location at Plaza del Zócalo, Mexico City, the Palais de Chaillot, Paris, Sydney Opera House, Jama Masjid Mosque, New Delhi and opposite Robben Island, Cape Town.

Peter Gabriel incorporated the vocals of ‘The Spirituals’ who came together during the last year under Covid-19 as a means of reclaiming and celebrating black spirituals, composers, musicians. Due to time and Covid-19 restrictions, the singers recorded individual tracks on their smart phones and sent them to be assembled just last week.

Gabriel, an Amnesty International Ambassador of Conscience and longstanding champion of the human rights organization, said:

“It was a race against time but definitely worth it. The Spirituals Choir is committed to telling stories of social justice and black history to a new generation which fits very well with the inspiration in the story of Steve Biko.

“Now more than ever, we need as many people as possible to start taking injustice personally and to get involved in any way they can. Amnesty has been doing extraordinary work around the world which I believe is really important and supported for forty years, so I was very happy to be asked to help with this beautiful film.”

Iranian-born actress Nazanin Boniadi, star of spy thriller series Homeland and currently filming for Lord of the Rings in New Zealand, provides the voiceover in English. She said:

“As an artist, it’s important for me to speak out about freedom of expression and as a woman who was born in Iran, I want to amplify the voices of the brave women who have been silenced, tortured, imprisoned and even killed in my homeland, simply for demanding their rights. Amnesty calls out their names and makes their voices stronger, along with other disenfranchised groups around the world and I salute them for that.

“I’m delighted to be able to contribute to this stunning film, marking a major milestone for Amnesty International, for whom I am an ambassador.”

Four-time Grammy Award winner and Amnesty International Ambassador of Conscience, Angélique Kidjo, provides the voice over in French. She said:

“Amnesty’s work, campaigning for freedom of expression and for women and girls around the world to reach their full potential, is very close to my heart and long may it continue.

“The Biko soundtrack is an inspired choice, as Steve Biko’s struggle against apartheid inspired the African continent and beyond, and is just as relevant today.”

“I am honored to be voicing the narrative for this important film, marking a significant milestone for Amnesty International, just as I was honored to receive the Amnesty International’s Ambassador of Conscience Award.”

Sylvie Brigot, Director of Amnesty International France, said:

“The 60th anniversary of Amnesty International is a huge milestone for the world-wide movement and we are delighted to be commemorating this moment with a truly global, ground-breaking and beautiful film. The stars in the sky across the globe represent the millions of activists around the world who make Amnesty International what it is today. And what could be a more fitting location to end the film than the Palais de Chaillot, where the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that we are all fighting for, was adopted?”

Bill Shipsey, Founder of Art for Amnesty, who conceived the idea of the film said:

“This film combining art, music, poetry and technology is a thank you and testament to the contributions of the millions of Amnesty members present and past who have worked tirelessly for human rights over the past 60 years. We hope the film will inspire a new generation of activists to take action for human rights, become members of Amnesty International and support its important work.”

In the film, Amnesty activists ‘release’ lighted drones into the sky which join with scores of other lighted drones, representing Amnesty activists taking action around the world. These lighted drones then morph into the Picasso-designed Amnesty dove.

The giant dove then flies majestically over the locations before finally transforming into an artistic representation of the iconic Amnesty candle in barbed wire above the Palais de Chaillot in Paris.

The final shot scene of the film shows Amnesty activists in South Africa staring into the camera, with the words – We Stand With Humanity on the screen.

An ‘Ode to Amnesty’ written by Art for Amnesty founder Bill Shipsey provides the narrative to the film, telling the story of Amnesty International’s journey since its inception in 1961. The poem has been translated into twenty languages so far including French, Spanish, Arabic, Mandarin, Russian, Portuguese, German, Farsi and Bengali, giving the film a truly global reach.

The first verse refers to the original six ‘Forgotten Prisoners’ featured in an Observer article written by Amnesty International’s founder, Peter Benenson, on May 28th 1961. The second to the work that Amnesty did in the 1970s to ensure that torture was outlawed. The third to Amnesty expanding its mandate from civil and political rights to also embrace economic, social and cultural rights in 2001. The fourth reflects the current strength of Amnesty with its 10 million members and supporters. And the fifth and last, is a call to action to appeal for new members and supporters.

Freedom Flight received support and backing from Bono, the Edge and Peter Gabriel, as well as several Amnesty International sections.

Nick Kowalski, Tony Martin and John Hopkins, founders of Celestial, who created this film, are proud to be involved with the project. They said:

“Celestial is built on strong ethical values. We want to use our tech for good and place messages of hope into the sky using our ground-breaking creative technology. We believe in the Amnesty cause and this project felt like the perfect opportunity to showcase our innovation and inspire people to stand up for human rights.”

You can also read about 60 years of humanity in action

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

ECLAC, Time for a global tax on extractive industries

0
Alicia
Alicia Bárcena Ibarra is a Mexican biologist and public administrator who is the executive secretary of the Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC, or CEPAL by its Spanish initials), a United Nations agency. What follows is about what she has to roundtable convened by the United Nations Secretary-General, António Guterres. ECLAC photo.

The time is ripe for a global tax agreement on extractive industries

by ECLAC

“It is imperative to introduce more progressive and transparent fiscal regimes; the time is ripe for a global tax agreement on extractive industries,” Alicia Bárcena, Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), stated today during a high-level, virtual international event convened by the United Nations Secretary-General, António Guterres.

ECLAC’s highest authority was one of the main speakers at the High-Level Global Roundtable on Extractive Industries as an Engine for Sustainable Development, convened by the United Nations in the framework of the Financing for Development in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond Initiative, which brought together Heads of State and Government, high-level government officials, leaders from the private sector and civil society, indigenous peoples, youth, academia, think tanks, the Executive Secretaries of the five UN regional commissions, and the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy on Financing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Mahmoud Mohieldin.

The global roundtable examined the main recommendations of the Secretary-General’s policy brief on extractive industries – which was released today – and identified the concrete actions and measures that can be implemented on a global, regional and national level, guided by a just transition and the goal of leaving no one behind.

The event was inaugurated by the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, who indicated that extractive industries generate large amounts of foreign exchange earnings, foreign direct investment and government revenue. “They have the potential to drive economic growth and poverty reduction, yet we cannot escape the fact that extractive industries are also potentially associated with a litany of ills…Our shared responsibility is to ensure that the benefits of mineral resources reach all people in society, not just elites, while safeguarding the natural environment today and for future generations,” Guterres declared.

In her presentation, Alicia Bárcena noted that in spite of the devastating economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and the unprecedented fiscal efforts that governments in Latin America and the Caribbean have made, the majority are considered to be middle-income countries and have received limited multilateral support, which has led to a severe contraction in their fiscal space.

“Latin America and the Caribbean is the world’s most indebted developing region, with the general government’s debt stock reaching 77% of regional GDP in 2020 and total external debt service equaling 59% of its exports of goods and services in 2020,” she explained.

“Regrettably, due to better commodity prices and increased demand, some countries are returning to reprimarization as an option for economic recovery. We are sliding backwards in some cases, moving to extractivism at the expense of people and natural resources,” Bárcena warned.

ECLAC’s Executive Secretary said it is estimated that a $1 million dollar investment in mining, without any value added, generates just one job. “Concentration of productivity gains in a few hands or corporations conspires against sustainable development,” she affirmed.

In this area, Alicia Bárcena presented four proposals, the first of which aims to combat illicit financial flows and achieve full disclosure of profits and productivity gains. “We estimate that illicit financial flows of transactions related to non-renewable natural resources originating from Latin America and the Caribbean totaled $131.5 billion dollars in a decade, 3% of annual GDP,” she explained. “That is why it is imperative to introduce more transparent fiscal regimes,” she insisted, advocating for a global and regional agreement between corporations and the governments of developed and developing countries to stop putting pressure on the latter to impose less royalties as a competitive advantage, and to avoid a race to the bottom with tax incentives and tax breaks, which limit public revenues from royalties and other related instruments.

Secondly, she proposed investing in industrialization and technological innovation in countries of origin, emphasizing that the costly transition to sustainable energy and mining should be a co-investment between corporations, countries and societies, where technology is key along with the commitment to integrate Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the value chains.

Thirdly, it is necessary to channel revenue from the extractive sector into sustainable development and implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), using innovative instruments. “Recovery policies must aim for social and political compacts for equality and for a global green and blue transition,” she underscored.

Finally, Alicia Bárcena stressed the importance of promoting natural resources governance that has access to information, participation and environmental justice as its starting point. “The Escazú Agreement and Convention 169 of the International Labor Organization (ILO) are urgent in Latin America and the Caribbean, a region where there are more than 265 socioeconomic conflicts, mainly in sites of natural resource extraction, and where indigenous peoples are fighting and dying every day,” she declared.

“It is critical to rethink fiscal regimes and instruments with planning, public policies and full transparency in the whole cycle related to extractive industries in order to redirect their contribution to sustainable development, climate action and people,” the senior UN official indicated upon concluding her remarks.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

Editorial: Their constitutional process

0
them
What does the picture say? With but a few exceptions, men in suits. With but a few exceptions, white people. Nothing much related to the democratic self-rule of the Panamanian people. Panama Decide photo, from their press conference at the Tribunal Electoral and posted on Twitter.

They don’t speak for Panama, but if the usual manipulators hand them the microphone…

What a downright strange and foreboding event. Panama Decide turned in their 1,800 signatures to the Tribunal Electoral so as to begin a process of petitioning to get their parallel constituent assembly on the ballot.

The magistrates intend the unprecedented procedure of online petitioning. The rules by which that would work? To be announced later.

The tribunal’s presiding magistrate, Heriberto Araúz Sánchez, announced that the process will cost upwards of $52 million. For what? Since the procedure and rules are to be announced, he couldn’t be clear.

The promoters who spoke at their odd ceremony? The heads of some of the lesser parties — Lombana’s party in formation, the PAIS party in formation, the Panameñistas, what’s left of Cambio Democratico now that Ricardo Martinelli has gone his own way. The president of Panama’s bar association, the Colegio de Abogados. “Civil society” in the American Embassy sense — no change of the economic system, suitably respectable when seen from afar by suits in Washington.

The elections for delegates to the assembly are to be partisan and at-large. How the seats are to be apportioned, that’s to be announced.

In other words, a huge partisan campaign for one side only using public funds, as we have seen in past referenda. Big money for the ad agencies, which in this case would deviate from their usual “white models only” racism to put some black and brown faces on billboards and TV ads.

And the particulars of what they would do? 

Bobby Eisenmann suggested who should do it:

I got this draft with 15 names for you to consider or not, and add yours. I do not think prior consensus is difficult to choose people of the stature of: Fernando Berguido G., José Isabel Blandón, Irene Bolívar, Olga De Obaldia, Mario Galindo H., Carlos Ernesto González Ramírez, Mariela Ledezma, Roberto Lombana, Gerónimo Mejía, Edgardo Molina Mola, Carlos Bolívar Pedreschi, Rómulo Roux, Esperanza de Troitiño, Lina Vega Abad and Raúl Zúñiga.

White power. Lawyer power. Corporate power. A collection of honorable people with sharp intellects, perhaps, carefully trimmed to exclude organized labor, consistent human rights defenders, anyone who might not pass muster with the US State Department.

And WHAT ABOUT lawyer power? The editor of The Panama News was once accused of a crime by a militia guy from Colorado — his name is Mark Boswell, but he goes or went by the name “Rex Freeman.” Remember the Montana Freemen? One of that crowd. Having served time for felony fraud in Colorado, he made his way to Costa Rica, selling his investment schemes, then a step or two ahead of Tico authorities, came here. The Panama News wrote about him, and the charge he brought, using one Alejandro Moncada Luna as his private prosecutor, was criminal defamation. It started with a fraudulent translation of what was published. Render “hustler” into “estafador?” It mattered not, given the conviction and incarceration for fraud in Colorado. Moncada Luna, formerly Noriega’s guy for shutting down the opposition press, went on to other things. Like presiding magistrate of the Supreme Court. Like to prison for the millions he made from kickbacks on court construction and renovation projects. And after he served his years in the country’s most comfortable penitentiary, back to the practice of law.

So we are supposed to follow the lead of a bar association that won’t kick a convicted corrupt lawyer out of the profession? It’s a good idea to have some professionally trained legal minds at a constitutional convention, but a corrupted legal profession is one of the monsters that any worthy convention needs to slay.

It’s not just lawyer power. Look at the proposals that this crowd puts forward about the legislature. They play this demagogic populism about how the fewer politicians, the better. NEVER going so far as to eliminate the suplentes and their spots on the payroll, mind you. No, the most often heard formula is a 55-member National Assembly, elected at-large and partisan by province, except for five at-large nationally elected deputies.

That is, to run an effective campaign it can’t be “retail,” with candidates individually meeting the voters. It has to be done through expensive advertising, especially on television. The larger the constituency in which one has to campaign, the more expensive it is to run. Far from “populist,” this crowd’s formula is to make politics a rich person’s sport. Continuing the weird mix of partisan proportional representation we have in multi-member circuits and writing them large on a provincial level adds to the possibilities of manipulation and corruption.

What if, instead of the rabiblanco power scheme that’s bandied about, we eliminated suplentes, INCREASED the number of deputies to 101, and elected them from single-member circuits with equal populations? It might just drive a stake through the heart of the current pestilential in-crowds, and give us something approaching true democracy. 

2
Martinelli and Moncada Luna — do we want these guys or their friends to draft a new constitution for Panama? Photo by the Presidencia, way back when.

So, what to do?

First, don’t sign the petition to bring this process to life. At some point, check to see whether someone has forged you name on the petition and if that is the case, raise a great hue and cry.

However, it seems as if the magistrates are going to find a way to get this on the ballot — there is an awful lot of money at stake, for one thing.

In Chile recently there was an election of delegates to a constituent assembly, rigged by a requirement that a two-thirds vote would be needed for the assembly to pass anything and the expectation that the incumbent right-wing party and those who yearn for the good old days of the Pinochet dictatorship would get enough seats to block meaningful change. However, Chilean voters had other ideas and gave the diverse factions of the protest movement that forced the election a super-majority as against the right. Let’s see what document they draft.

A convention being called under certain controls that goes elsewhere? In the USA in the 1780s, a convention was called to modify the Articles of Confederation, but under George Washington’s leadership they met behind closed doors and drafted the US Constitution. The French Revolution included a royally-convened gathering of the Estates General, which brushed aside the king’s whims and desires and became a revolutionary institution.

Do Panamanians have it within us to take over a rigged process and turn it against the corrupt establishment? We’d have to set aside a lot of divisions for that moment to do it. Our various dissidents would have to grow up fast to pull it off. Perhaps we have already had most of the sense we’d need beaten into us.

If the people lose and a predominantly rich and white set of party elites grabs control of the constituent assembly and does the expected insulting stuff, we get one more chance. A “no” campaign against what they propose.

 

3

I am an anti-imperialist. I am opposed to having the eagle put its talons on any other land.

Mark Twain

Bear in mind…

Cats, as you know, are quite impervious to threats.

Connie Willis

Hell hath no fury like a fanatic asked to find a reason for what he’s doing. He simply wants to do it, and generally he wants to do it because he observes, often unconsciously, that something new is coming into existence and he doesn’t like it, and he’s going out with fire and sword to hold it back.

Gwen Bristow

He attacked everything in life with a mix of extraordinary genius and naïve incompetence, and it was often difficult to tell which was which.

Douglas Adams

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

Ben-Meir, For a worthy peace process to start…

0
YK
Where a not precisely guided missile from Gaza hit a street in Holon, Israel. Wikimedia photo by Yoav Keren.

There will be no peace without
a process of reconciliation

by Alon Ben-Meir

No one should have the illusion that once a ceasefire is established, Israel and the Palestinians should or can negotiate a peace agreement. Given the decades-long deep hatred and distrust, a process of reconciliation must precede such negotiations to achieve an enduring peace.

Righting the Wrong

Since a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinians has been agreed upon, there are those who advocate that peace negotiations between the two sides should commence immediately to prevent future conflagration and bring an end to the destructive seven-decades-old conflict. I could not disagree more. Whereas a peace agreement based on a two-state solution must eventually be the outcome, no agreement can be reached unless it is preceded by a process of reconciliation for a period of at least five years to mitigate the ingrained hatred and distrust between them. Such a process would consist of multiple measures that run simultaneously on government-to- government and people-to-people levels, which can accelerate and enhance the implementation of the reconciliation process.

There are several preconditions upon which Israel must agree to allow reconciliation to advance unimpeded. This includes: no further annexation of a single inch of Palestinian territory, no expanding settlements beyond their established parameters, and maintaining the current status quo of Jerusalem.

Government-to-government reconciliatory measures

Halting the mutually acrimonious public narrative: Israeli and Palestinian leaders must stop their acrimonious public narratives against each other. Indeed, rather than preparing the public for the inevitability of peace and engaging in constructive public dialogue, they have been poisoning the political atmosphere and setting one side against the other, creating the perception that peace is an illusion and that the differences between them are simply irreconcilable.

Establishing an economic relationship: Israelis and Palestinians must develop a strong economic relationship. Other than trade, Israeli investors should be encouraged to invest in the future Palestinian state. Economic exchanges, investment, and development will foster a very close relationship between the two sides.

Modifying school textbooks: Israel and the Palestinians must modify their textbooks to reflect an objectively more accurate and less biased historic account throughout their educational institutions. Both sides must stop disseminating inaccurate historic accounts in their textbooks and reinforce that through their public discourse.

Taking no provocative action: The Palestinians should not turn to the International Criminal Court (ICC) to charge Israel with crimes against humanity, and must prevent any terrorist attack against Israeli targets. Israel on the other hand must not unduly restrict the movement of Palestinians, and must stop the practice of night raids and end the demolition and/or eviction of Palestinians from their residences anywhere, and especially in East Jerusalem.

Maintaining security cooperation: Israel and the Palestinians should not only continue to collaborate on all security matters but further augment future cooperation. Alleviating concerns over security will have both psychological and practical implications, especially as both sides move toward substantive peace talks.

People-to-people measures on the ground

As the above measures are taken, people-to-people interaction becomes a natural process conducted in a constantly improving atmosphere. The following measures are being pursued today on a small scale and should be greatly expanded.

i) Mutual visitation: Israel and the Palestinian Authority must agree to allow mutual visitation. It is hard to exaggerate the value of such visits when ordinary Israelis and Palestinians meet in their respective places of residence to share experiences and understand each other’s grievances and concerns, and often discover that their shared interests and aspirations are far greater than their differences.

ii) Women activism: Activism by Israeli and Palestinian women can be a very important part of the reconciliation process. Israeli and Palestinian women should use their formidable power to demand that their respective leaders end the conflict. The role of women in ending the conflict in Northern Ireland offers a vivid picture of how women can impact the course of events.

iii) Joint sporting events: Sports are an incredibly useful tool in building camaraderie and friendship between the two sides, whether competing against each other or as part of a joint team. Football, basketball, and other sports teams can meet alternately in Israel and Palestine to train and compete, and together they can cheer the generous spirit of the game where the victory is the game itself, not the final score.

iv) Student interaction: Palestinian and Israeli students should connect with one another and talk about their aspirations and hopes for the future. Israeli and Palestinian youth should be taught that they are destined to peacefully coexist and be encouraged to use social media to communicate with each other, as the future rests in their hands.

v) Art exhibitions: There are scores of Israeli and Palestinian artists who have never met or delved into each other’s feelings and mindset to see how their works reflect their lives. Joint exhibitions should take place both in Israel and Palestine. These cultural exchanges can expand to include music festivals, theater performances, and other forms of art.

vi) Public discourse: Universities, think tanks, and other learning institutions should organize roundtable discussions on the inevitability of coexistence and how both sides can remove the barriers to make it not only inevitable but desirable. Such small enclaves can be disseminated online to millions of people, including Israelis and Palestinians, instantly.

vii) Forums to discuss conflicting issues: Joint forums should be established, consisting of qualified Israelis and Palestinians with varied academic and personal experiences who enjoy respect in their field, are independent thinkers, hold no formal position in their respective governments, and have thorough knowledge of the conflicting issues.

viii) The role of the media: Instead of focusing almost solely on violence and acrimonious charges and counter-charges which make headlines, Israeli and Palestinian media should also be encouraged to report on positive developments between the two sides to inform the people that the bilateral relations are not all discouraging. In addition, journalist exchange programs will bring reporters to the field on the other side, where they can see and report on the reality free of political propaganda and bias.

The conflagration between Israel and Hamas, which has caused massive destruction and terrible loss of life, especially among the Palestinians, should remind everyone that this round of hostilities, like all previous ones, will not be the last. Both sides must come to their senses and realize that they must find a way to coexist peacefully, because the alternative is more wars and bloodshed. To achieve a lasting agreement will be impossible given the current hostile atmosphere, which is laden with profound hatred and mistrust. A process of reconciliation first becomes central to achieving an enduring peace.

The US with the strong backing of the EU and the Arab states must use their leverage to pressure both sides to fully adhere to such a process and demonstrate that they are keen on seeking peace or face serious consequences. Otherwise, any new peace talks will be nothing but an exercise in futility.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

Winship & Godfrey-Goldstein, The biggest threat to Israel

0
It would be easy enough to dismiss this video as just Dearborn. But everyone in the crowd was not Palestinian, and all across the USA many Americans, including a lot of Jewish ones, fully agreed with the sentiments expressed here. There has been a qualitative change in US public opinion, especially among younger Americans, to stack upon the nearly unanimous international rejection of the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian lands and the bombing campaigns against Gaza.

The biggest threat to Israel Is the Occupation

interview by Michael Winship with Angela Godfrey-Goldstein — CommonDreams

I first met Angela Godfrey-Goldstein, the Israeli peace and anti-apartheid activist, on a sunny spring Sunday in Jerusalem almost exactly seventeen years ago, in 2004. It was at the end of the second Intifada, and a few of us clambered into a van so that she and a colleague could give us a tour of what it was like to be a Palestinian living in the Occupied Territories. It was revelatory. We’ve remained friends ever since.

Angela’s the director of Jahalin Solidarity, a non-profit dedicated to ending the forcible displacement of Palestinians and defending their rights, including self-determination and an end to the Israeli occupation of their land.

She’s my basic, go-to person on most matters involving Israel and the occupation, so naturally I got in touch when fighting broke out a week and a half ago between the Israeli military and Hamas forces in Gaza and other parts of Israel and the West Bank, the worst since 2014. Rockets by the hundreds have been launched into Israel, bombs have rained down on Gaza. According to USA Today, 12 Israelis including a 5-year-old boy, a 16-year-old girl and a soldier have been killed. Current Palestinian losses are at 230, including 64 children. More than 1600 have been wounded and 58,000 forced from their homes.

The events of recent days, the International Crisis Group’s Mairav Zonszein writes in the UK newspaper The Telegraph, suggest that Israeli policymakers “now seem unable to achieve even the lesser objective they espouse of long-term quiet not just in Gaza but also in occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank and inside Israel proper…

What has unfolded… indicates that Israel’s strategy for achieving long-term quiet is not working — not only with Hamas in Gaza, but on the ‘Palestinian question’ overall.”

Angela and I communicated just as a fragile ceasefire was negotiated that began in the early hours of Friday morning. Our conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

What have your days been like while all of this has been going on?

The mornings are the worst. I wake up groggy. Within an hour I have to decide what to focus on, when all hell is generally letting loose — armed militias on the streets, especially in Palestinian parts of East Jerusalem, and Gaza being pulped. Two nights ago, I slept only an hour, woken by incessant warplanes flying in formation — they’re using F-15s and F-16s. Then you start thinking of them dropping payloads, gifts of death. One guy on a Zoom call of about 70 Israeli and Palestinian peace organizations the other day just lost eight members of his family but kept working — only mentioning it at the end of the call.

There’s analysis to read, focusing on what to share as advocacy resources. Twitter jumping. Stats of the dead. Friends asking how I am. There’s a horrible feeling among peace activists and other Israelis that it’s all falling apart. Dark, dangerous spirits and genies deliberately have been let out of the bottle (real neo-fascists) and no confirmation it can ever go back.

Police violence is more brutal everywhere, giving the distinct impression that this “round of fighting” (a euphemism for genocide?) was deliberately provoked, with [Israeli prime minister] Bibi Netanyahu seen by so many analysts and even members of his party, Likud, as having a vested interest in declaring war on Gaza and the Palestinians of East Jerusalem. Why were the police so harsh? So damned undisciplined? So racist?

Huge damage has been done to prospects for co-existence. Palestinian Israelis are 20% of the population, they’re our fellow citizens and our policies are radicalizing them, while 340,000 Palestinians in East Jerusalem live with almost no civil rights at all – including no one to vote for. The rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territories [OPT] also are without any statehood — 300,000, for example, live in Area C under Israeli military control in what for many, many years now we’ve been saying is an apartheid reality. Now Human Rights Watch and B’Tselem are saying it, too. So, in the early part of the day, it’s a question of trying to stay calm and not panic. Trying to find what’s essential, not get distracted or want to retreat into reading irrelevant stuff in the papers. Or spending time on Google Streetview somewhere in the Sussex countryside or searching for our old home in Mbabane, Swaziland, as an escape!

What’s the significance in this current conflict of Sheikh Jarrah, an East Jerusalem neighborhood settlers have long coveted?

Sheikh Jarrah is in the Holy Basin, just north of the Old City. The settlers with a messianic view see it as part of their birthright. Their intention is to take over the Old City and its surrounds. Watch the new short film Inside the Battle for Jerusalem by Vice News on YouTube or A Walk in the Park by the BBC in 2010. They make no secret of their intentions.

For me, this has nothing to do with Judaism — just as Christian Zionists renounce Jesus’ teachings and instead are gunning for The Rapture — the death cult that’s also riding on this poor horse. Judaism talks of respecting The Other. Of not doing to someone what you wouldn’t have done to you. Of modesty and humility. These people are, in my opinion, just fundamentally wrong. They do not seek peace. They do not want to abide by The Ten Commandments. They want power, they want land, they’re addicted to a Golden Calf. And of course, Donald Trump jumped on all the landmines. Remember Jared Kushner boasted of having solved the Middle East conflict, of having brought peace? Yeah, well, that didn’t work out so well, did it?

Let’s roll back a bit. Americans hear about Gaza and Hamas and then the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Many don’t fully know the geography and the issues and only think of Israel as “America’s friend in the Middle East.”

There’s a lot of commentary right now about the America – Israel relationship over the years. Rome and Sparta, the tail and the dog, and which is doing the wagging? The United States, with a certain level of naivete, has been an enabler since the Sixties. Two young nations established on lands of indigenous people whom they’ve deliberately displaced. Two nations’ pioneering spirit that’s been enabled to go out and conquer and take. Israelis justify it with history: “How can I steal what’s already mine? God gave us this land. We’re the chosen people.”

From my perspective, that mentality doesn’t understand the power of love, the need for empathy to protect your own humanity. Or social needs depending on The Stranger. And then – the Holocaust. “Never again to us” is taught. Not “never again to anyone.” And that trauma’s in the DNA of many – exploited by others. So when Israeli children go to Auschwitz on school trips the message is, “Look what happened when we didn’t have a strong army.”

The lesson’s not taught that we’re in a land with sacred meaning for all three theocracies, each different, yet praying to the same God. Each different, yet all based on similar foundations – love truth, praise God, be a decent human being, have a pure clean heart. Not a closed mean one, harboring murder and hatred and an inability to give. What would Netanyahu or [head of the Religious Zionist Party Bezalel] Smotrich say if a wise man made them choose between killing their dearest treasure or giving it away so it might live?

Is much of this crisis really about Netanyahu trying to divert attention from his alleged crimes and election problems? Is he relying on the notion that putting Israel back into war will solidify support for him?

This question’s on everyone’s lips. In private, even his own Likud party members are said to be deeply distressed – some, like former cabinet member Gideon Sa’ar, have left Likud to set up other right-wing parties. We’re reading testimony coming from court as Netanyahu’s cases (accusing him of bribery, corruption and breach of trust) are heard. The evidence is damning. So this “war” was likely deliberately cooked up as a distraction. And see — he foiled an alternative coalition agreement (having for the fourth time in two years failed to build a coalition himself) that was almost signed.

Also don’t forget the fissures in Israel as a fact of life, much incited and developed by him — he’s targeted the police, the judiciary, the opposition, the media. Fake news isn’t only alive and well in the USA. Netanyahu’s deliberately lying, playing the victim.

So people are even more divided — religious against secular. Settlers against those who want to end the occupation and make peace. Ashkenazi against Mizrahi Jews. Israelis against Palestinian 48’er fellow citizens. Russians are discriminated against. So are Ethiopians. Druze. Bedouin. Sometimes one wonders if the soup’s too thick!! But war has that way of bringing people together, back into the ghetto mentality, the bunker. So yes, it seems this conflict is being deliberately prolonged by those who want to stay in power.

In 1995, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated for trying to make peace, so it’s become that much tougher since. He told the Israeli public, “We’re strong enough to come out of the ghetto.” But even with nuclear deterrence and one of the world’s largest armies, Israelis feel weak and vulnerable – and see themselves as the villa in the jungle without realizing that they’re helping to create a jungle. Anarchy. Impunity. Abandonment of human rights, or the international multilateral system. Justice. Normal life.

Bibi says we must live by the sword – but he’s never tried alternatives. There was never that “generous offer” so beloved of those who believe “Israel right or wrong!” Eldad Yaniv, former aide to ex-prime minister Ehud Barak, incessantly mea culpas on TV saying that was a slogan meant to win (they lost anyhow) an election after the 2000 talks with Palestinian Authority chair Yasser Arafat at Camp David failed. They never realized the public would believe it, but prefer to play the blame game.

That’s why I wrote in 2020 about who started the suicide bombings inside Israel that took the country over to the Right. Yes, Hamas is scary. But our policies of occupation and apartheid, of land-grab and displacement create conditions in which terror thrives. So no, we can’t feel confident deep down that people like us. Or that behind our backs they’re not scheming to stop us… I often say “You’ve got to be really mad to stay sane in all this sickness. Only psychopaths don’t feel emotional empathy with those suffering.” Is it fear in the DNA? Brainwashing and unwillingness to see The Other as human? Or maybe as even more human than you yourself?

So who’s to blame? Are allegations of Hamas provocation valid at all (they did fire many rockets toward Jerusalem and other Israeli sites) or were they themselves provoked? Recognizing that these are just the latest events in decades of discrimination against the Palestinian people, how are the violence and death of recent days different from those of the past? Is this the worst you’ve seen it since 2014 or the second Intifada?

I blame the conditions of our occupation, and the mistakes that were made early on by incoming refugees who desperately did what they thought they had to do – many of whom (check out Zochrot’s website) now regret the policies then adopted. Even [Israel’s first prime minister David] Ben Gurion, when asked years later if he’d made mistakes, acknowledged there were things he wished they hadn’t done.

The Geneva Conventions, a treaty Israel signed in its early years, prevents the acquisition of land by belligerent means. So the 1967 occupied lands should be restored to those who were there before. Not 2000 years ago – we’re talking about living refugees, many living inside the Occupied Palestinian Territories in miserable camps.

And part of this tragedy is that abused families abuse if the cycle of violence and trauma isn’t healed. Not least, it breeds entitlement and carte blanche: “We’re above the law due to our suffering.” I don’t underestimate the impact of that time – my late mother nursed Holocaust survivors from Bergen-Belsen as a student nurse in London. I remember my parents whispering about an evil too monstrous to be comprehensible. Or even talked about. Only whispers and photographs that – too late – were hidden from we children.

Even with the current new ceasefire, are we close to another war, to a third Intifada?

It’s a different scenario, I think, more a state of anarchy, riots and breakdown of the social fabric. Trust is dissipating. Age-old feelings are rising to the surface, neo-fascist urges floating like scum to the top. I think people are funding the sewage lunatics — I was told if I was working in a right-wing NGO, I could easily get a million dollars, no strings attached, not even reporting required. Could it be true? Well, Bibi’s in court about his courting of billionaires. The late Sheldon Adelson last year bought the US Embassy residence, and tried to buy your presidency, right?

There was talk — maybe as part of the ceasefire negotiations’ posturing (because game theory’s their game) — of whether we’ll re-occupy Gaza! Remember we left it when the water ran out underground. And when the Israeli public asked why soldiers were on their knees in military lines searching for their friends’ body parts. We hear of a possible northern front, too. But no talk of real peace.

Israel claims they’ve tried to minimize Palestinian deaths…

Even if it believes it’s pinpointing buildings, why are so many civilian families dying? So many children? And 180 warplanes flying over a strip of land the size of Philadelphia? Only 5% of Gazans have been vaccinated and they just killed the professor responsible for Gaza’s COVID fight. It’s one of the most densely populated places on the planet.

The Iron Dome anti-missile system, supplied by the USA, minimizes Israeli fatalities, and certainly there’s a power imbalance that has nothing to do with proportionality. Bombs every 10 seconds, we read. Trauma to last a lifetime, together with the fast-breeding of hatred, fear, revenge, anger and depression. I know people in Gaza — I can’t pick up the phone. What do I say? “Are you still alive?” That feeling in the pit of the stomach if the phone rings unanswered — as has happened in the past, in 2014.

Israel bombed a media center building in Gaza, housing Associated Press and Al Jazeera, among others. Your reaction?

Hamas isn’t only its military wing — it’s the government of that enclave, a political party… So maybe there was a ministry of women’s affairs there they bombed? Or any other office not part of the armed wing. What I do know is that they bombed a factory with Gaza’s only 3-D printer, which manufactured tourniquets and other medical devices or supplies. So when Netanyahu says there are only two options: continued bombing or re-occupying Gaza, it shows me that he and his ilk — for he’s not alone, decades of militarism have had their impact — never consider trying peace. He says we have no choice but to live by the sword. Is that why so many Israeli kids are living in Berlin? And doctors are leaving? COVID has shown Israelis how many Palestinian doctors keep the hospitals open and functioning.

What is the US not doing that it should be doing? How can we best pressure the Israeli government?

I firmly believe in the progressive wing of the Democrats. Bernie Sanders is the conscience of the party, and maybe the world (pace the Pope) on this. So’s Representative Betty McCollum of Minnesota with her bill to restrict the sale of US weapons so they’re not used in defiance of human rights, especially to harm children or civilians.

Put succinctly: STOP ARMING ISRAEL. When you see your best friend’s a junkie, stop giving them their drug supply! Get the US to recognize the international borders, so it has limits literally and metaphorically.

And end the impunity. Suspend the US veto at the UN Security Council! And recognize Palestine, so it can start its pathway to being a leader — with Israel — of a demilitarized, feminist and federal Middle East. That’s my radical imagination dream of where to focus the next 50 years.

The world’s waking up, even in quiet talks over Friday dinner: “Something’s gone horribly wrong with Israel.”

Is there no compromise to be had? Have the Israelis turned their back on a two-state solution or any solution that does not end with complete subjugation of the Palestinian people?

Bibi Netanyahu and the messianic or hardline rightwing have alienated the Israeli mainstream from choosing peace, even though some 50% still think the two-state solution’s the preferred way forward, and fear the coming tragedy of a bi-national, fully apartheid state. (Already 25% of Israeli Jews believe Israel is indeed an apartheid state, according to polls.)

I’m hoping that now that Palestinian 48’ers [Palestinian citizens of Israel] are uniting with their fellow Palestinians — in Gaza, East Jerusalem, the rest of the OPT and diaspora — the Israeli public will begin to understand that while they were living in a false reality of “quiet,” the racism, supremacy, apartheid and discrimination they were imposing on the Palestinians won’t deliver even quiet now. So, it’s time to rethink. (The Israeli militant right may say it’s not time to change the disc, it’s time to change the magazine — for more ammo.)

Is there any realistic end in sight that does not end in more and more death and bloodshed?

There has to be. We must get another government. Even [Israeli Defense Minister] Benny Gantz (for whom I don’t vote), after the last election said the biggest threat facing Israel is its occupation.

Our occupation corrodes our souls into apathy, encourages supremacist worldviews, and levels of fear and alienation that are scary. Children grow up to hate because they don’t know anyone Palestinian. Football crowds regularly chant “Death to Arabs” while those whose necks are under our boot say “Death to Jews.”

But if we can’t turn the corner and reset, I believe, tragically, this country has no future. Needed in the aftermath of the Holocaust as a haven, Israel has become far from safe or secure, and increasingly is breeding anti-Semitism. So worldwide, Jews are now less safe. Yet they aren’t putting pressure on Israel to end its 53-year occupation, to sit down and recognize the State of Palestine, to deal with the issues arising from the refugees: reparations, return, apologies.

Negotiate! Shoving stuff under the carpet only creates a stink that gradually undermines the very foundations. We must learn how to trust. And for that we must be trustworthy. We have to get back to the essence of Judaism — not the wild messianic versions of the greedy visionaries. And never forget — just before apartheid in South Africa fell, the activists were at their most depressed and hopeless. They didn’t know it was almost over.

In the last few days, a video has been seen on American TV in which a Palestinian woman says to a settler, “Why are stealing my home?” To which the man replies, “If I don’t steal it, someone else will.” I found that breath-taking on several levels. How about you?

Glad you saw that. That was in Sheikh Jarrah. Muna el Kurd is Palestinian and Yaakov Fauci is a Zionist settler from Brooklyn. You can see more of their interchange on a Vice News clip just launched: Inside the Battle for Jerusalem.

I was at Sheikh Jarrah in 2003, and wrote about it. That was my baptism by fire, I guess. The sheer banality of evil. It’s not a movie, with heightened music or dramatic weather effects. It happens in real life. Acts carried out even by people you may know or recognize from TV.

What’s your message to those in the US who keep sending military aid to Israel? What’s your response to those who condemn Palestinian violence but fail to do the same when the violence comes from Israel?

Wake up! You’re helping Israel to destroy itself. If you can’t see what’s happening, you’re willfully blind, prejudiced and have been drinking the Kool-Aid of the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy — the whitewashers. People here want to scapegoat and blame, while knowing they’re carrying out war crimes. But to take responsibility? To see our contribution? No.

What can American citizens do?

At the minimum, speak out. You are not alone. Most of the world accepts the Palestinian narrative by now. Support your enlightened members of Congress in their attempts at peacemaking, so they know they have your back against those whose funding often keeps them quiet. When you see The Onion inviting Israel by Twitter (58.6K likes/16.8K retweets) to bomb its offices all over the world, you can see it’s safe to speak out. John Oliver is, Jon Stewart did. On the right side of history. And conscience. And religious values. On the side of humanity. And freedom.

So, have the courage to voice your opinion. Vote for and support members of Congress who introduce bills to stop arming Israel. If you are part of civil society, organize around that demand, including BDS, and show your representatives in the government that you want sanctions, that you want them to stand up to Israel.

Watch, too, what’s happening elsewhere: in the United Kingdom’s House of Lords, a six-minute speech that’s revolutionary. On June 14, there’ll be a debate on sanctions in the UK, as a result of some 370,000 signatures (in six days) calling for them. Last night, Palestinian Ambassador Husam Zomlot was on Ch4 TV also convincingly setting out the way ahead.

And vote for progressives. Talk to your friends. Read. Come visit to see for yourself. And check what you’re being told, in case it’s spin or fake or “hasbara” – propaganda.

Through all of this, what keeps you and your activist allies going?

When you know people who are suffering, and you see gross injustice, it’s hard to walk away. I lived in South Africa, and saw the racism of the apartheid system there. The Whites always justified it, but deep down, felt superior, even when their leaders were corrupt and war mongering. Since humanity’s inter-dependent, if we aren’t socially responsible each to the other, we live demeaned, even dangerous lives.

Often, no one’s paying us for our activism or our high level advocacy. Neighbors disagree or disapprove (sometimes violently!). But we have a duty to speak out. Not least since we have a voice, whereas when Palestinians say what we’re privileged to be able to say, they’re silenced. And we love the better side of Israel – which still exists.

Our work is trying to change the paradigm. To correct mistakes made. Do we give up in the middle? If this is psychological warfare being waged against us, do we just tuck the tail in, and give up? Is that a response that offers any salvation? No. We need more strong, loving spirits – otherwise we could be in that post-Tahrir phase, when ten years ago the Arab Spring, the revolution, collapsed.

 

Michael Winship is the Schumann Senior Writing Fellow for Common Dreams. Previously, he was the Emmy Award-winning senior writer for Moyers & Company and BillMoyers.com, a past senior writing fellow at the policy and advocacy group Demos, and former president of the Writers Guild of America East. Follow him on Twitter: @MichaelWinship

Angela Godfrey-Goldstein directs Jahalin Solidarity, a Palestinian organization advocating against the Israeli Occupation. An environmental activist in Sinai, Egypt, for four years and a 2018 Rebuilding Alliance Peacemaker awardee, she wrote a chapter about her work for the past 20 years with Bedouin in a 2018 book, published by Veritas, “Defending Hope.”

 

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

donate

NNPP

FB_2

VFA_4

Tweet