Home Blog Page 186

Jackson, After the plague (3)

0
San Carlos
Checking for COVID-19 at the Policlinica in San Carlos. CSS photo.

A possible “new normal”
Ending the pandemic

part 3 of 3, by Eric Jackson

Nazis who believe in the positive virtues of “weeding out the weaklings” among humanity tend to love this latest coronavirus. The Republican governor of Alabama also embraced this eugenics doctrine when she ordered her state’s hospitals to deny the use of respirators to the “mentally defective.”

We, the “weaklings,” are sometimes wont to indulge in evil chuckles. Like when the various flavors of fanatics who demonstrably oppose masks, and shutdowns where and when it gets bad, get sick and die. Made a big show of attending Donald Trump’s Tulsa rally without a mask and died of COVID-19 not long afterward? It’s a tragedy, but then so is the demise of the guy who drives onto the wrong side of a freeway and punches the gas pedal to the floor.

Not a laughing matter that there will be lasting demographic effects.

Not just a much higher death rate among the elderly, but also lasting effects among a lot of those struck by the virus who don’t die. Hearing problems. Kidney problems. Neurological issues. Permanently damaged lungs. The medical literature about the aftermath is bound to grow, and the human legacies upon which it will be based will be the stuff for more proposed nazi final solutions.

It’s likely to be as severe a political defeat for those kinds of people as it was for their ideological forebears when the films of what liberating Allied troops found at the concentration camps were shown to worldwide audiences.

More immediately, though, many of the elders of social sectors that have traditionally been in worse health and received worse health care will be gone. Part of ghetto scenes worldwide will be an extra need to care for those with chronic conditions caused by COVID-19 infections.

In the USA, these demographics are bound to exacerbate a previously existing generation gap within African-American communities. In St. Louis the toppling the Clay dynasty by nurse and Black Lives Matter activist Cori Bush may be the most noteworthy event but that’s far from the whole story. A new alignment among black voters realigns the Democratic Party.

In Panama, initial success at keeping the epidemic under control foundered on the class prejudices of the rich and Nito’s eventual compulsion to the pander to these. Unpaid and underprotected health care workers, all the police officers who got sick, most of these will survive and let’s see how many of them will vote for the PRD next time.

The ongoing scandals about the widespread corruption in the Varela and Martinelli administrations may officially end with court findings that nothing ever happened. Nobody will believe it. Of all the political forces in the field, the two biggest left standing would be MOVIN and the left. MOVIN criticizes the obvious corruption but has little to offer in the way of a way out of Panama’s predicament and represents a small upscale base. The left has not surmounted more than a half-century of faction fighting, even if they generally do understand the basic problems and offer some rational responses. So Panama comes out of the pandemic not only economically depressed, but with something of a political vacuum.

And how will it end? The march of science is likely to determine the possibilities, and then social and political things add complications.

Will there be a vaccine? What percentage of people who get it will be immunized, and for how long?

A shot that’s 80 percent effective for 100 days might be just enough, but only if governments get hard-nosed about it.

You’re a Christian Scientist, or that variety of Orthodox Jew who opposes vaccinations, or a New Ager anti-vaxxer? That kid who’s not vaccinated is not allowed into a school. There are all sorts of places – business establishments, government offices, public transportation… – where you are not allowed without showing your vaccination card. Foreigners who preach against vaccinations get to do so back in from whence they came.

For a short-lived vaccine, Panama needs to get its supply in place and then vaccinate everybody at once. Part of that process would be preparations to treat bad reactions, as typically happen with some people with almost every vaccine. Make almost everyone immune all at once, then very carefully monitor and isolate any infections after that. This, and not some laissez-faire nonsense about letting everyone get sick, is how you get herd immunity.

What if a vaccine is developed and gets used as a political weapon by a country that has a monopoly to pursue other ends in less powerful countries? Might a country like Panama decide to wait for the next offer? It might even become the essence of a “national liberation struggle.”

Lots of ifs, and among them possibilities of reputations destroyed by present claims of a vaccine that turn out not to be.

With a vaccine or without, COVID-19 will be with us for a very long time. Just like yellow fever still lurks in some our our remote areas, mostly in the bodies of a few jungle animals. With bad luck and bad sanitation, notwithstanding an available vaccine, that old scourge could also come storming back to infect much of the Panamanian population.

What this reporter expects – opinion, not news, here – is a useful if not perfect vaccine within the next year, and permanently altered social and economic landscapes in the wake of this traumatic experience.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Jackson, After the plague (2)

0
MLs
Will the shedding of these parasites be part of Panama’s healing process? The extradition, trial, conviction and incarceration in the United States of the Martinelli Linares brothers would be a favor of sorts to Panama. But on the down side, we have just been taught a valuable but very painful lesson. Should we quickly unlearn it? We relied on Uncle Sam to rescue Panama again, but the United States can’t rescue itself at the moment, let alone Panama. The gringos aren’t this country’s salvation. Panamanians are. Photo by the Guatemalan National Civil Police.

A possible “new normal”
Panamanian independence

part 2 of 3, by Eric Jackson

The late Raúl Leis once said at a business leaders’ gathering that Panama is usefully seen as two countries, one that lives like Switzerland and the other that lives like Somalia. The polymath playwright / sociologist / educator / activist then became a symbol of what Panama when he died. It was an easily demonstrable wrong post-operative prescription for medication after minor eye surgery. As in medical malpractice provable and giving rise to compensation in almost every legal system in the world, but the way the Panamanian system the Leis family had no recourse.

In more recent news, President Cortizo says that he’s not negotiating with Carlos Slim’s construction company, FCC, over a deal about late charges and other sums owing with regard to a City of Health complex. That project was originally conceived as a center for medical tourism, where people from around the world, but particularly the ultra-expensive United States, would come for sundry health care services.

But not from the world’s top specialists. We’re a small country, so in almost any field the majority of the world’s best will not be Panamanian. In the event that a Panamanian rises to world renown in medicine or some other scientific field, usually she or he emigrates to a place where the pay is better and there is more respect for professionals.

But hey, that leaves plenty of work for the locals, writing doctors’ notes for criminal politicians to submit to overly tolerant judges to get their trials delayed.

Let me not pick on the doctors, especially not at this moment. I am, after all, the son of a mad doctor, expert in his field despite the substance abuse and madness. And I know Panama’s health professionals to be well educated and to practice at a generally high standard notwithstanding a lack of legal accountability. And I know that most of Panama’s health care professionals have made great efforts and great sacrifices during the current crisis. Some of them have given their lives in service of their patients. As an observer of politics and labor relations here, I also have to take notice of doctors, nurses, clinical psychologists and other health professionals perennially at the forefront of social justice and anti-corruption movements.

But monopollistic dibs, very real fears of insult or oppression, a political culture in which the first question is “How much do I get,” a snob culture in which the most expensive and allegedly prestigious brand is always the most appropriate technology and – voilla! An arguably reasonable national development project becomes an international shark feeding frenzy. SOMEBODY got something, but most Panamanians, in ways that we may not directly and clearly see, got to pay for it.

It’s not as if this way of doing business is a secret in the world. A lot of the most prestigious firms avoid doing business here because of it. A lot of the world’s top musicians won’t play Panama because of its reputation for sharp-dealing promoters. The top people in the licensed professions are by and large banned. Probably worst of all, our universities get hardly any international professors and, if you believe all those rankings that Latin American media love to publish, our schools languish at well below mediocre levels.

In any case, we don’t get much medical tourism – Havana, Tijuana and Medellin stomp all over us in that field – and when the pandemic hit we didn’t have a tourism-oriented City of Health to press into national service.

As these words are written Panama edges up toward 1,900 COVID-19 deaths, the economy is a shambles for most people and international economists are talking about a coming “lost decade” for Latin America’s prospects.

How bad is it for us? Consider that in July of 2019, as the Cortizo years were beginning, the top subject of business commentary was about who would eat the losses from unsold inventory – mostly real estate units, but inventories of many kinds. All those empty condo units in the money laundering towers. All those half empty shopping centers grabbing at each others’ tenants. Luxury items without enough upscale buyers. Merchandise piled up in the warehouses of a Colon Free Zone which, until Venezuela’s strangulation, Colombia’s import substitution policies and now a general regional economic decline, has been the main wholesaling and warehousing district for northern South America, the Caribbean and Central America.

Affordable housing, our own food, manufactured goods of any sort? Panama has for decades been producing ever less of that stuff.

The canal business? Yes, the ACP has jacked up tolls and reports record earnings. But notice that they have been looking at schemes to take over the ports, get into recreational investments, take over the nation’s water supply as a for-profit business. The canal will attract business as long as it operates, but its business outlook is a complex matrix. In 2006 we were told it wouldn’t happen, but already we lose business to Arctic routes. The foreseeable end of the fossil fuel economy changes our customer base and what the ships that pass through here buy. 3D printing changes not only the way things are made, but what they are made out of, the weight of these things and where they are made – all of which affect what the Panama Canal’s market will bear. The Nicaragua Canal isn’t happening, but railroads across South America and further up the Meso-American Isthmus probably will be and those will offer alternatives to the Panama Canal.

And then there is money laundering – ahem, “offshore asset protection.” The rest of the world, in many cases hypocritically so, is sick of it. The State of Delaware, the City of London and so on may be as bad or worse offenders, but the extreme concentration of wealth that has been globalization on corporate terms is politically unsustainable and so will be tax havens where the ultra-rich squirrel away their assets. (And yes, Uncle Sam defines “money laundering” as related to drugs, certain forms of graft and other rackets it doesn’t like, but not men defrauding ex-spouses in divorce settlements, nor the Trump gang’s post-prison expatriate living funds.)

Panama is just small enough to be picked upon and just brazen enough to provoke attention. Even our ship registry, also created to avoid taxes, unions and regulations, is fairly or unfairly the focus of international criticism of late. An economy based on impunity through anonymity, and law firms designing international chains of shell companies and numbered bank accounts can’t be sustained. For one thing, no matter what the cryptocurrency hustlers tell you the US National Security Agency is not the only entity in the world that’s capable of intercepting and decoding the electronic trails of financial transactions.

The money laundering economy is doomed. Not only by world demand, but because so few Panamanians share enough in its proceeds to defend it.

So where does Panama go after it crawls out of the pandemic hole? Don’t look to the political caste for salvation or even good ideas. Good thing that Panamanian society is fairly nonviolent, because those people are playing the same old games, the political parties are all discredited and anyone now standing in the wings represents a tiny social base. We could have a bloody revolution, but more likely, given our history, a police coup.

Whoever or whatever ends up on top, the way forward is for a country that produces things.

A country that grows our own food, with an agricultural export sector on the side, not at the center of Panamanian farming. Which harvests seafood from restored natural hatcheries like mangrove forests and coral reefs and from industrial hatcheries – fisheries that hire a lot of people to chase off poachers and let Panamanians bring in sustainable catches.

If we mine copper, some of what is dug up here gets processed in Panamanian foundries and factories into objects made out of copper.

The Chinese or the Americans or whoever want to locate factories here to make products destined for nearby markets? Fine, so long as it involves neither slavery, sweatshops nor poisoned communities.

And what else? All of the things you probably never thought of, from Panama’s largest productive sector, the informal economy. But let it become more formal and prosperous. Like by allowing people to register as doing business under an assumed name or as a sole proprietorship, without the lawyer and CPA bills of incorporation, without the bans on bank accounts and post office boxes.

Ah, but the “What’s my cut?” and “Who’s ever heard of YOUR family?” and “I’m tight with the functionary who can shut you down so I can take over” crowds stand in the way. Panama has little chance of a happy recovery from the current woes unless and until such obstructions are removed.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Jackson, After the plague (1)

0
Joe
Joe Biden on the campaign trail. In law school he would have learned that identifying the issues involved is an essential part of getting the answer right. His opponent has never figured this out and moreover, couldn’t care less. Photo by Gage Skidmore.

A possible “new normal”
US power in the world

part 1 of 3, by Eric Jackson

Joe Biden is a child of the Cold War, whose rise to political leadership coincided with the rise of an economy globalized on corporate terms. As the senator from the corporate tax haven State of Delaware, he would have no great moral objection to that neoliberal order.

But he is also a politician who has tacked with changing times, and who has several times had to rearrange things in his personal life in the face of devastating setbacks. Back in the 70s it was the hippie radicals, not Joe Biden, saying that gay men and lesbians should be able to live their lives with dignity and the same full set of rights and privileges that others have. But it was Joe Biden who, during the Obama administration, announced that public policy was finally coming around to recognizing the LGBT communities and individuals as full citizens.

Biden came to the Democratic nomination through the intervention of a billionaire openly proclaiming first priority for a foreign power. That’s what Mike Bloomberg, “Democratic Majority for Israel” and the half-billon-dollar mudsling against Bernie Sanders are all about. But it’s now a genuine doubt whether Bibi Netanyahu can cling to power in Israel. Whether Israel’s planned final liquidation of the Palestinian lands can come to pass and be sustained is another big question. As it stands now a large portion of American Jews object to Netanyahu, annexation, apartheid and AIPAC.

There is certainly no majority among Democrats for this stuff. But where to go if the old paradigm of acceptability, when Golda Meir in the name of her then nominally socialist party could declare the Palestinians to be “cockroaches” and no Democrat in Washington would be heard to object, when a white supremacist could blow up the federal building in Oklahoma and the first question on CNN was whether it was “terrorists” – meaning Muslims – can no longer be sustained?

Yes, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar were kept away from the recent Democratic convention, the Republican who lied to the UN and the American people to gin up the disastrous invasion of Iraq got to speak, and one of Biden’s aides set off on a Muslim-baiting screed that was not repudiated by the candidate. But despite primary opponents who tried to ride Joe Biden’s coat tails with the backing of dark corporate super PAC money, Tlaib and Omar were re-elected. The Obama administration’s intervention in Syria has failed and that verdict will not be reversed. Rank-and-file Democrats may on the whole still want to honor an old American promise to guarantee Israel’s existence, but we are much closer to J Street than to AIPAC about how that might be done. Moreover, what happens in the Holy Land will not just be up to Democrats, nor to Americans, nor for that matter the Israelis and Palestinians who live there.

The days when Washington can snap its collective bipartisan fingers and make the Middle East, Africa, a large part of Asia and the Americas south of the US border fall into an orderly line are over. That the old Republican generals, spymasters and economic hit men pine for the good old days will not suffice to restore any mid-1950s imperial grandeur. The Cold War is over. Even if the neocons want another one, America can’t afford it.

The Russian threat? Vladimir Putin is wily and ruthless. But while Donald Trump is a militant ignoramus and Putin isn’t, there is a pathos that the two men share. They both lead the damaged shells of old superpowers and use bluster, smoke and mirrors to project holograms of strength.

You would expect that Joe Biden, unlike Donald Trump, would both recognize current realities and refrain from the banana republic practice of inviting foreign powers to intervene in US domestic affairs. If this writer judges it right, not even Israel, notwithstanding the primary campaign boost he got from Mr. Bloomberg.

Biden is going to recognize China as the main geopolitical rival of the United States. He’s also going to recognize the perils its expanding ambitions pose to traditional if currently neglected or insulted friends like Japan, South Korea and the western European countries. And not only to them. Also to troubled giants led by reprehensible strongmen, Russia and India. Also to the entire Muslim world. Biden will notice how Chinese business has all but run the US competition off the field in Latin America.

Donald Trump hasn’t a clue about world realities. He cares only about his personal fortunes and not about the lives and aspirations of the American people. There are too many such people on both sides of the US major parties political divide. Joe Biden isn’t one of them.

But what to do? The Biden coalition sinks, along with Kamala Harris’s ambitions, if America blows its diminished resources on foreign adventures. Surely Joe knows that. A sparing, principled foreign policy in which the United States rarely acts alone is what America can afford. Leadership that works with friends who have common interests rather than sullen bullied lackeys who have been threatened into line is what would work for America.

Mainly, though, a “new normal” that works for Americans is, whatever you want to call it, a new deal that puts people back to work. One that builds the cities and transportation systems and schools and factories and energy grid that’s needed for a better tomorrow. A successful Biden administration would be Americans looking inward to rebuild America.

And you know what? In a better educated, more across-the-board prosperous and more just America, there would be political “herd immunity.” The pathetic Internet troll farms by which foreign powers try to manipulate US divisions would be ineffective.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Prosecutors investigating major ACP software buy

0
Aguas Claras
The Aguas Claras Locks, with Gatun Lake in the background. ACP photo.

A $14 million + PanCanal traffic control computing system that was paid for but never used is under the looking glass

by Eric Jackson

The sterling reputation that the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) has may be an article of faith to many Panamanians, but it’s largely a work of corporate fiction. There have been conflicts of interest in ACP contracts, plus alleged scandals naming ACP directors and managers, since the US administration ended with 1999.

That said, the ACP stacks up rather well when compared to almost any national government ministry. The information control games that the canal authority plays may have something to do with this, but they are also not on the five-year cycle of political patronage hirings and firings like most of the rest of the government.

Now word leaks out, in a terse Public Ministry announcement, in reports largely out of former president Ricardo Martinelli’s media and entourage, and in an EFE wire service story. The prosecutors say it started with unspecified mentions in the social media: “The Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office is initiating an ex officio investigation into the possible commission of the crime of embezzlement to the detriment of the ACP, due to publication on social networks about contracting for a program for the management of processes is indicated in the sum of 14 million.”

The program, which from a Martinelli appointee to the ACP board’s version involved apparent add-ons to total $15.7 million, was bought from Quintiq, a Dutch subsidiary of the French company Dassault Systèmes. Quintiq’s website emphasizes its cloud computing prowess. Some of its major traffic control program customers are the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the DHL courier service and the Copenhagen airport. The ACP board was told about talks with the company in 2016 and was informed that the purchase has been made in April of the next year.

One would expect that with a traffic control program coming into use, PanCanal pilots and tug captains would at least be told about it, if not trained in its use. It might be a matter of the ACP corporate culture, but so far none of these employees are acknowledging that they knew anything about it. The program was never used. An internal ACP audit of the matter is said to have been done, with nothing amiss found.

This was when Jorge Luis Quijano was canal administrator. He left that job nearly a year ago, according to a normal rotation. He is nominated to take over as the top administrator of the Metro commuter train system but that has not come before the National Assembly. Depending on how the investigation goes, it might not.

This matter appears to be a preliminary investigation, with nobody charged with a crime, or even the existence of a crime alleged. However, it’s unusual for the Public Ministry to mention an investigation that’s not serious. Stay tuned.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

¿Wappin? Este Viernes Cultural / This Cultural Friday

0
The Electrifyín’ Mojo is the radio / online persona of a legendary Detroit area DJ and activist. From a sad day and grieving crowd in which we both found ourselves years ago in Ypsilanti, I can tell you that Black Lives Matter is not some chic new cause for him.

Genre bender? This one’s a twist
¿Doblando géneros? Este es un giro

Un Ensayo de Osain del Monte en La Habana
https://youtu.be/SMJd4gtWV6w

Manu Dibango – Soul Makossa (Full Album)
https://youtu.be/4-pkgVyhIuU

St. Vincent – Los Ageless
https://youtu.be/h9TlaYxoOO8

Warren Zevon – Veracruz
https://youtu.be/HcFlFLbYo8c

Esperanza Spalding Live at BRIC
https://youtu.be/OL-aRjjyQpo

John Legend & Common – Glory
https://youtu.be/yuBPb7Es-2o

Natalie Merchant – I’m Not The Man
https://youtu.be/dSbms7U2NIg

Rubén Blades – Heineken Jazzlandia 2018
https://youtu.be/dEbclfXr8Wg

Janis Joplin – Summertime
https://youtu.be/P5ed5bz_5Sc

Billie Eilish – My Future
https://youtu.be/1FvEDuWeB4A

Béla Fleck & Edmar Castañeda: Live at Big Ears Festival 2019
https://youtu.be/phOKmRf5QnU

Rómulo Castro – La Rosa de los Vientos
https://youtu.be/QUoV65mVgss

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 
Dinero

Living in different pandemic universes

0
joims

The partisan pandemic: Do we
now live in alternative realities?

by Andrea Robbett, Middlebury and Peter Hans Matthews, Middlebury

Politics can divide even friends and families. When this happens, we like to tell ourselves that the explanation lies in honest differences in values and preferences. From this standpoint, friends from different political parties won’t really disagree, for example, about the number of workers displaced in the pandemic, but they might differ on who should bear the costs. It’s another matter, however, if political conflict results from differences in information or attachments to alternative realities.

It’s possible to disagree – but still engage – with friends or fellow citizens who evaluate the benefits of test and tracing policies for COVID-19 differently, but how do we communicate with someone who – armed with the same public information – concludes that there is no pandemic?

We are behavioral economists who use controlled experiments in human decision-making to study political behavior. One of our current research programs finds that Americans who identify with a political party – that is, partisans – don’t always vote for what they believe to be correct. Rather, assuming their vote won’t matter much, they use it to express their partisan affiliation, even when their vote is anonymous.

COVID-19 may be the exception to this rule.

Political expression before COVID-19

In our 2018 paper, “Partisan Bias and Expressive Voting,” we found that differences arise along party lines even when people vote on the answers to factual questions about politics. Rather than reflecting sincere differences in belief, we found these responses were largely “expressive,” or a way of affirming political identity.

We conducted an online experiment in which we asked Democrats and Republicans a series of multiple choice questions about climate change, immigration and police shootings, among other topics.

Each question had an objectively correct answer. For example, participants were not invited to evaluate the importance of climate change, about which honest differences exist. Rather, they were asked how much mean global temperature had changed. By asking respondents to identify verifiable facts, we left no role for partisan interpretation. Instead, we focused on their willingness to acknowledge facts that may conflict with their party’s preferred views.

Participants answered multiple choice questions as “individuals” or as members of small groups of “voters.” Individuals received a cash bonus when their own answers were right. Voters got the bonus when a majority of their group was correct.

We speculated that someone affiliated with climate skeptical politicians or parties might choose one answer to the question about temperature change as a voter, but another, less partisan, answer as an individual. The reason is that voters who anticipate that their own response is unlikely to be decisive in determining the group’s answer may prefer to express opinions that are more favorable to their own party, while individuals know that their own answer will definitely determine whether they get the bonus.

We found that, despite the financial rewards for correct responses, a partisan gap did indeed emerge among voters. On most of the questions we asked, there were substantial differences between the choices of Democrats and Republicans, with voters tending to give answers more favorable to their own party’s position.

If these gaps were purely due to differences in beliefs, then we would expect to see similar differences when people answered these questions as individuals. Instead, we found that people answering as individuals were much less partisan than people voting as part of a group.

Additionally, individuals were far more likely than voters to correctly answer questions that challenged their party’s preferred views. This suggests that the partisan differences were primarily due to expression, or the desire to affirm party affiliation, rather than sincere differences in belief. On balance, we found that Republicans were more expressive than Democrats.

Cheering for your team

Our findings provide fresh perspective on a longstanding theory of how and why people vote. Citizens who recognize that their vote is rarely decisive may prefer to cast their votes, not to influence the outcome of an election, but to express themselves or reaffirm their political identities. In this light, voting has been compared to cheering for a favorite sports team. In most cases, we don’t actually believe we will influence the outcome by going to a game or screaming at our televisions, but we do it because it brings us joy and helps us feel connected to fellow fans.

The consequences of such expressive voting behavior can be serious. Polls indicated that the number of Leave voters who regretted their vote immediately after the learning the outcome of the June 2016 Brexit vote was similar to the margin of victory. This suggests that if voters had been less expressive, and had voted for the option they truly wanted, the course of European history might have been different.

Still, our initial research indicated that citizens shared a common set of facts about the world, and so provide some reason for optimism.

Unfortunately, our most recent research suggests that this isn’t the case for the COVID-19 crisis, and that at least some partisans seem to live in alternative realities.

COVID is different

This spring, we returned to the field with questions for more than 600 survey respondents in the United States about the COVID-19 pandemic. We expected to find that, despite sometimes heated rhetoric, Americans understood, or at least didn’t disagree about, the facts concerning estimates of the mortality rate and U.S. testing capacity.

What we found surprised us. We asked, for example, about the number of completed tests per million residents in the USA relative to Italy, one week after the White House announced its “historic public-private testing partnership” on April 13. At the time, Italy had conducted about 3,000 tests per million. Our participants were offered five options for how many tests had been completed in the U.S. per million residents. The correct answer, at the time, was between 100 and 2,000.

The participants who answered as part of a group were told that they would be rewarded if five or more in a random group of nine voted for the correct answer. Consistent with our previous work, voter responses varied with their political affiliation. More than 1 in 3 (34.2%) Republicans chose the answers most favorable to the Trump administration, and claimed that the U.S. performed as many or more tests than Italy. Fewer than 1 in 7 (14.2%) Democrats did. Overall, we found a large gap in the average response provided by Democrats and Republicans who voted.

The surprise was that these percentages did not change much, if at all, for individuals, who were rewarded when their own answer was correct. One in 3 Republicans (33.7%) still chose the incorrect options that were most favorable to President Trump, while the number of Democrats who did likewise fell a little, from 14.2% to 12.6%. Thus, unlike the patterns we observed for non-COVID-19-related questions, we found that little of the difference can be attributed to partisan expression.

We saw a similar pattern with our question regarding the COVID-19 mortality rate. Our research found that Democrats and Republicans held genuine but different beliefs, not just about values or policies, but about basic facts. To the extent that members of different parties evaluate differently the seriousness of COVID-19 and our government’s response to it in their voting decisions, our results indicate that this assessment is due to differences in beliefs rather than partisan expression.

While it is tempting to attribute these results to the polarization of television and radio audiences and the influence of social media – that is, to characterize the choices of our participants as somehow uninformed – it’s worth repeating that we did not see the same partisan gaps in 2016, when we asked questions that were no less salient to partisans.

We can only speculate as to the source of these differences. It may be that the COVID-19 threat overwhelmed our usual impulse for partisan expression, and that conflicting information in the earliest stages of the pandemic allowed separate narratives to take root. It also remains to be seen whether Democrats and Republicans will continue to live in these alternative realities, whether this division will extend to other issues, or what the consequences for the 2020 election will be. Until then, however, we may have to accept that some arguments among family and friends reflect the different worlds we now live in.The Conversation

Andrea Robbett, Associate Professor of Economics, Middlebury and Peter Hans Matthews, Charles A. Dana Professor of Economics, Middlebury

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Hightower & Bendib, Save the Post Office and the right to vote

0
Bendib
Caricaature by Khalil  Bendib — OtherWords.

Save our Post Office — and our right to vote

by Jim Hightower — OtherWords

As the recently departed progressive champion John Lewis warned, your right to vote “is not guaranteed. You can lose it.”

You see, it’s one thing to “have the right” to cast your ballot, but it’s quite another thing to be able to exercise that right. During the past decade, Republican officials and operatives have become experts at voter-suppression, using legal technicalities, poll closures, fraud, fearmongering, and plain old thuggish intimidation to shut out voters inclined to support Democratic candidates.

Rather than winning votes, their game is preventing votes.

And now comes Donald Trump with another pernicious scheme to keep millions of us from having our say in November’s election.

Here’s the story: Because of the spreading COVID-19 health crisis, a majority of Americans are reluctant to risk their lives by voting in crowded polling places. Shouldn’t be a problem, though — just let everyone who’s concerned use our nation’s excellent, reliable, trusted postal service to cast their votes by mail.

But such a sensible solution panicked Trump. Mail-in voting will increase, he shrieked, and that’s bad for me!

Trump can’t just ban voters from using the mail. So he came up with a maniacal Plan B: Simply make it so the US Postal Service so it can’t do its job, thus forcing everyone to risk their health to vote in person — or give up their voting rights.

Sure enough, in March, Trump personally killed a bipartisan provision in the national economic rescue package that would’ve assured timely delivery of our mail. Then, in May, he installed one of his partisan mega-donors as postmaster general, who is now sabotaging delivery times by arbitrarily slashing the hours of postal workers.

Like a tin-hatted potentate, Trump is willing to destroy this prized national asset to cling to power. To help save our public post office — and our right to vote — go to: USMailNotForSale.org.

 

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Kermit’s birds / Las aves de Kermit

0
rawk1
Collared Aracari ~ Tucancillo Collarejo ~ Pteroglossus torquatus.
Encontrado en el Parque Natural Metropolitano, Panamá. © Kermit Nourse.

The Collared Aracari / El Tucancillo Collarejo

The Collared Aracari ranges from central Mexico (around Veracruz) south through northern Venezuela and western Ecuador. It is a fruit eating, Toucan-like bird, usually found in small groups. They are forest, both old growth and secondary, birds. Found all along the Atlantic Side, on the Pacific Side they range from Cocle to Darien. In altitude they range from the lowlands to about 3,000 feet.

El Tucancillo Collarejo se extiende desde el centro de México (alrededor de Veracruz) al sur hasta el norte de Venezuela y el oeste de Ecuador. Es un ave parecida a un tucán que come frutas y que generalmente se encuentra en pequeños grupos. Son aves del bosque, tanto de crecimiento antiguo como secundario. Se encuentran a lo largo del la costa del Caribe, en el lado del Pacífico van desde Coclé hasta Darién. En altitud van desde las tierras bajas hasta unos 900 metros.

 

 

https://youtu.be/nxPtoKzTrTM
 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Editorials: Nito in a world apart; and Voting in the USA from Panama

0
protest
Protesters on Via España, on an afternoon when President Cortizo extolled expanded opportunities for women who can afford to go to the beauty parlors. Photo from Davis Álvarez’s Twitter feed.

Instead of talking about the things that matter most…

The lockdown in Panama and Panama Oeste provinces has been harsh. The restrictions have been widely flouted, but even more widely respected. The huge second wave of illness in death in the metro area is subsiding with the lower infection rate leading a reduced death toll.

The economic news is horrible with only a few bright flashes here and there. The economy we knew, save for banks and telecom companies that are mostly not Panamanian-owned, will not rebound anytime soon. It’s depression times for most Panamanian working people. The informal sector is especially hard hit.

It’s not even a prosperous time for politics as usual. One of their rabiblanca “influencers” fled the country, saying asinine things. How much is coming into PANDEPORTES these days, and what does that do to legislators’ ability to skim away some of it? Worthless nephews and cousins installed in government sinecures are too damned craven, and finding themselves, unlike legislators and cabinet members, unemployed in the face of public indignation.

And what about the PRD old-timers, who lent their efforts to abolish a US colony in Panama’s midst? Donald Trump sent an emissary with marching orders for Panama and by all appearances we can surmise that Nito saluted and complied. Let’s hope that things are not as they seem.

So we get this address to the nation about how long it takes to get hair done at a beauty parlor and the joys of keratin treatment for certain sorts of damaged hair. So very understanding for women who can afford it. Advice from another planet for the much greater female population that’s barely making ends meet.

 

2
If you have a printer and a standard envelope, or have access to a business that can do this for you, click here to download a proper sized ballot return envelope form. Using one of these envelopes you can take your US ballot to the US consulate in the embassy complex at Clayton and send your ballot to the place where you vote absentee via the diplomatic mail.

If you are a US citizen, most likely you can vote for US president from here — BUT…

To vote, you must be at least 18 by November 3. The general rule is that it’s by absentee ballot in the last place you lived in the USA. Some states will bar convicted felons. Those American citizens who have never lived in the United States can generally vote where one of their US citizen parents last lived in the USA, but there are a few states that do not allow this. But FIRST, you must register to vote and order your ballot, which, if you have not already done so, you can do online. Different states have different registration deadlines.

There is no ban against dual US and Panamanian citizens voting and US election officials don’t send your registration data to Panama’s creepy  xenophobes so that they can harass you for being a foreigner. Although you generally have to sign your absentee ballot when voting from abroad, there are no greater invasions of privacy than that.

More that half of the states make it possible for you to cast your ballot by email, fax or online. Do this if you have that option, You get around Donald Trump’s vandalism of the US Postal Service that way.

However, absentee ballots from abroad may be cast by POSTAL MAIL ONLY in these states:

  • Arkansas
  • Connecticut
  • Georgia
  • Iowa
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Virginia
  • Vermont
  • Wisconsin
  • Washington

The most effective way to get your ballot mailed in — but this is a moving target with changing rules and circumstances — is to send your ballot in through the diplomatic pouch. One huge uncertainty has to do with Donald Trump’s vandalism of the post offices, where he has had more than 600 mail sorting machines removed for the specific purpose of inhibiting voting by mail. Sending a ballot by the diplomatic pouch gets it to the USA in an embassy container, but then it gets taken out of the container and put in the US Postal Service mail, which has been intentionally slowed. So, given the slowdown, you should get your ballot mailed as early as possible.

This is what the embassy says about the procedure:

Return Your Completed, Signed Ballot:

Some states allow you to return your completed ballot electronically and others do not. If your state requires you to return paper voting forms or ballots to local election officials by mail, you can do so through international mail, professional courier service, or through US Embassy Panama’s diplomatic pouch.

The diplomatic pouch provides free mail service from embassies and consulates to a US sorting facility. You will need to place your ballots in postage paid return envelopes or in envelopes bearing sufficient US postage, in order for them to be delivered to the proper local election authorities.

If using the diplomatic pouch, ballots can be dropped off to the American Citizens Services section by Ave. Demetrio Basilio Lakas, building #783, Clayton, Panama City from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Please note that all visitors to the Embassy are subject to security screening and you will not be permitted to bring electronic devices, including cell phones, inside the facility. Please note that it can take up to four weeks for mail to reach its destination if sent by an embassy or consulate via diplomatic pouch. All overseas US citizens are advised to submit their forms and ballots accordingly.

There have always been at least a few problems with people who register and order their ballots but do not receive their ballots. In the case of states that send out ballots by postal mail, since Panama’s postal service is closed these would not arrive here. That is why there is a Federal Write-in Absentee Ballot form that can be sent in by people who ordered but did not receive their ballots. Given the US postal slowdown, if you have ordered but not received your ballot and your are in one of those “vote by postal mail only” states, download, print, fill out and cast one of these write-in ballots.

You registered and ordered you ballot, and the state where you vote only accepts absentee ballots by mail and doesn’t send the ballots out until sometime in September? Use the Federal Write-in Absentee Ballot and get it off right now.

There are options in the works — requesting salvoconductos for Americans living outside of Panama province for an exception from the travel ban to come into the consulate to put their ballots in the diplomatic mail, possible courier service from Coronado, possible sending ballots with embassy representatives from outside the city. There are other possibilities. None of these are completely certain. And remember, voters from MOST states can and should send in their absentee ballots by email, fax or on their voting state’s electronic system.

 

                Sometimes I worry about being a success in a mediocre world.

Lily Tomlin                

 

Bear in mind…

 

He who postpones the hour of living rightly is like the rustic who waits for the river to run out before he crosses.

Horace

 

Do not wait for the last judgment. It takes place every day.

Albert Camus

 

If the whole human race lay in one grave, the epitaph on its headstone might well be: “It seemed a good idea at the time.”

Rebecca West

 

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

What Democrats are saying

0
postal
Labor vigil in front of the first US Post Office in Philadelphia, where Benjamin Franklin worked. Photo by Joe Piette.

Dem voices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet