Home Blog Page 194

The National Assembly’s delay and restart

0
1
Deputy Petita Ayarza (PRD-Guna Yala) at virtual work. Photo by the Asamblea Nacional.

Usually we’d have published it last week…

by Eric Jackson

It’s an annual rite. At the first session of a new legislative year, all of the deputies are supposed to dress in white, the holy man gives his blessing and the president gives his report. Usually everything in those parts is predictable. Sometimes parts get spiced up with some lofty or low-down rhetoric, but usually the identities of the legislature’s new officers are negotiated and publicized beforehand.

So the PRD’s Marcos Castillero Barahona was re-elected to preside over the 2020-2021 legislative year and last year’s first VP was dropped off the leadership ticket. PRD colleague Cenobia Vargas got that spot, with MOLIRENA’s Tito Rodríguez re-elected as second vice president. The Panameñistas and independents had their own nominees for the assembly’s presidency, who of course went nowhere.

The biggest political development, known in advance, is that most of Zulay Rodr’iguez’s colleagues in and out of the PRD caucus have grown sufficiently weary of the histrionics and demagoguery to remove her from the leadership. Another big development, less obvious and harder to assess in longer term importance, is that the Cambio Democratico caucus not only didn’t run any candidates of its own but split on those who were offered.

The usually most interesting thing at the start of a new legislative session is the election of the committee presidents. The worst crooks all usually want to head the budget committee. Among those with higher political ambitions, the Credentials Committee is a big prize. The identities of those assigned to the various committees, and of their leaders, are often predictors of what sorts of things will pass in the coming year.

THIS TIME, the legislators didn’t meet the next day. Nor for the rest of that week. Two PRD deputies were known to be in home quarantine after testing positive, another said he’s recovered after coming down with the virus back in April. Plenty of rumors of other ill legislators — some undoubtedly false and malicious — have flown around. And then it is known that several people who work in non-elected posts at the National Assembly are or have been sick.

In April the legislature passed a rule allowing for online sessions, but a bunch of members never bothered to learn how to operate the computers and programs for that. Some have homes where the telecommunications signals are on a continuum from unreliable to nonexistent. So, no elections of committee heads. And the usual cycle of The Panama News, reporting something about what the president said not long after he said it and then something about the legislature’s new organization for the coming year. Didn’t happen.

Nito Cortizo’s speech was a 40-pager, with its text unpublished, let alone in English translation, in any immediate sense. We did post, in Spanish, the video of the president’s report along with some remarks by a sampling of online critics and supporters, later that same day. There was little to inspire, and little to inflame, despite how long it took.

Then nothing until a July 6 announcement that plenary sessions would resume online the next day, and that a few committees had met online to approve  appointments to the boards of the Metro train system, the Banco Hipotecario and the Aquatic Resources Authority. There were also hearings on a couple of proposed free trade treaties.

Nothing yet on the most consequential business, the membership and leadership of the legislative committees. We might guess at the reasons but we really don’t know.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Movimiento Democrático Popular, Nito y el Poder Ciudadano

0
1
Foto por la Presidencia.

Un decepcionante informe a la nación

por el Movimiento Democrático Popular

Tal como señaló el presidente, Panamá atraviesa por “la más profunda crisis sanitaria, social y económica que ha vivido en su historia”. A esto habría que añadir que dicha crisis también es ambiental, política e institucional, y que se relaciona directamente con el modelo de país implantado después de la invasión de los Estados Unidos en 1989. Justamente por ello existía una gran expectativa en torno al informe que por mandato constitucional debía rendir el señor Cortizo este 1 de julio, pero ha sido grande la decepción ante un informe que no se distingue del acostumbrado listado de promesas, falsedades y ocultamientos a que se nos tiene acostumbrados.

En su informe de gestión de los ocho primeros meses, el presidente afirma que modificó la Ley de Contrataciones Públicas, “reduciendo la discrecionalidad de los funcionarios”, pero calla que esta ley sigue posibilitando que continúen licitando en el país las empresas salpicadas por escándalos de corrupción –como Odebrecht– y que han contribuido a vaciar las arcas del Estado en beneficio de políticos hasta hoy impunes. Eso sí, nos informa con mucho orgullo que hizo aprobar la Ley de Asociación Público-Privada, mediante la cual se entregarán recursos estratégicos del país a la voracidad de la empresa privada, en especial al capital financiero multinacional, continuando así con la fórmula de los cuatro últimos gobiernos: ausencia de un plan de desarrollo nacional, favorecer a los donantes de campaña y poner el gobierno a disposición de clanes económicos que a punta de contratos amañados, evasión fiscal, sobrecostos y coimas, se quedan con las riquezas del país.

También se nos informa que se aprobó la Ley de primer empleo, “Aprender Haciendo”, pero omite que la tasa de desempleo pasó de 6% en 2018 a 7.1% en 2019, lo que representó un aumento de 27,773 personas desocupadas. Además, la tasa de informalidad pasó del 43.6% al 44.9%, un porcentaje que representa a 716,113 personas. Por supuesto, tampoco mencionó que, a pesar de su ley de primer empleo, la tasa de desempleo juvenil pasó de 16% a 18.1%, y que el desempleo femenino subió de 7.6% a 8.8%. Lo anterior es un reflejo de nuestra deriva al no tener un Estado que propicie y defienda el empleo digno y los derechos laborales frente a los abusos de los empresarios, organizados en la Cámara de Comercio y en el Consejo Nacional de la Empresa Privada.

Se informó que el tope de las viviendas beneficiadas por los intereses preferenciales aumenta de $120.000 a $180.000, otorgando una ayuda adicional de 80 millones para la construcción de vivienda. Sin embargo, se omite que el PIB de dicho sector es de 11.983.1 millones, y que en la situación actual será muy difícil que los bancos estén dispuestos a ampliar su cartera hipotecaria. Si a ello añadimos que la mediana de salario en Panamá es de $721.00, y que el 50% de los asalariados gana menos que eso, la esperanza de una vivienda digna es inalcanzable para la mayoría de los panameños.

El presidente continuó afirmando que no nombró amigos ni copartidarios en la Corte Suprema de Justicia (CSJ); sin embargo, se mantiene la conducta de la institución, nada transparente y generadora de sospechas ciudadanas. En contraste, sí cambió la dirigencia investigativa de varios casos de alto perfil, cuyos fiscales fueron rotados a otros puestos por el procurador Ulloa, nombrado en este Gobierno. Igualmente olvidó las jugosas dietas ya pagadas a funcionarios y copartidarios nombrados en distintas juntas directivas de instituciones públicas.

Por otro lado, el presidente hace alarde de su gran triunfo de salir al mercado internacional y obtener 5.800 millones de deuda para pagar otra deuda por 5.300 millones. Existe una gran opacidad y sospecha ante la posible utilización de una parte importante de los dineros obtenidos para mantener la contratación clientelar del Gobierno, cuya muestra se ve en el aumento escandaloso de la planilla de la Asamblea en plena pandemia.

En cuanto al manejo gubernamental de esta crisis, se ha hablado de una dirección adecuada y responsable. No obstante, con el informe del presidente crecen las interrogantes sobre la destitución de la ex ministra de salud, quien dirigiera desde el principio al equipo que ha enfrentado a la pandemia. Lo cierto es que, si bien la tasa de letalidad en Panamá es baja, la de nuevos contagios parece dispararse descontroladamente, sin reconocer que se debe a la imposibilidad de guardar una cuarentena estricta con una población que, de recibir ayuda, era de solo 80 balboas y ahora 100, un monto ridículo que no cubre siquiera la canasta familiar, que es de casi 350 balboas.

El presidente también aseguró que el plan “Panamá Solidario” beneficia a 1.600.000 personas. Sin embargo, o el presidente nos miente, o alguien le ha mentido, pues las denuncias –incluso de miembros del PRD– sobre el manejo clientelista de los bonos y bolsas de comida, han inundado las redes sociales y los medios de comunicación tradicionales.

Las constantes protestas de quienes no han recibido nada en cuatro meses, o que solo han recibido la ayuda una o dos veces, tienen al país al borde de una explosión social. La repartición de la ayuda ha resultado un perverso fracaso que se hubiera evitado impulsando la organización ciudadana en barrios, comunidades y centros de trabajo.

También resulta falso que hubiera recortes de planillas, de viáticos y de gastos de representación en el Gobierno (para muestra, la Asamblea de Diputados). Por otro lado, si bien se sancionó la moratoria hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2020, los bancos ya habían llegado a acuerdos de este tipo con 1.036.417 clientes, pero la medida se ha utilizado para apaciguar el descontento ciudadano y una crisis social causada por el propio Gobierno.

El presidente también asegura haber convertido la crisis de educación en una oportunidad, pero ignora los problemas de conectividad que imposibilitan la educación a distancia para miles de hijos de los de los trabajadores, quienes no pueden adquirir computadoras ni internet, y aun si pudieran, existen graves debilidades en conocimientos de las TICs. Tampoco mencionó el 33% de las escuelas que carecen de luz eléctrica, el 40% que no tienen agua potable, el 80% de las escuelas sin acceso a internet, o de las 1.300 escuelas rancho, como lo muestran datos del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID, 2018).

El Plan para la Recuperación Económica y Social no deja de ser un listado similar al de las promesas incumplidas de campaña, pues ninguna de las acciones prioritarias anunciadas se está ejecutando. Más aun, según el propio presidente, el apoyo a las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas –generadoras del 70% del empleo– no supera los 220 millones, cifra que apenas representa el 0.33% del PIB normal de la economía panameña. Por el contrario, en manos de la banca se pondrá un total de 1000 millones, una cifra 4.5 veces mayor.

Según cifras del INEC, el PIB tuvo un crecimiento de 3% en 2019, el desempeño más bajo desde la crisis financiera de 2009. No obstante, el mandato de Cortizo inició en el segundo semestre del año, de modo que posible analizar el desempeño trimestral.

Así, el tercer y cuarto trimestre de 2019 también tuvieron el peor desempeño desde 2009, con tasas de 2.7% y 3.3% respectivamente. En el primer trimestre de 2020 el crecimiento fue de 0.4%, también comparable con el de la crisis financiera.

Aun así, Cortizo hace alarde de un crecimiento del 4.2% para 2021, lo que, a juzgar por las propuestas neoliberales presentadas en su informe, sólo beneficiará a los más ricos, pues en las décadas recientes se ha observado cómo varía el crecimiento sin incidir en el bienestar de las mayorías. Es una cifra que se debe desagregar para las comarcas, los barrios y el campo, donde solo aumenta la vida sin dignidad.

No podían faltar las promesas de reducir los impuestos a los sectores empresariales importantes, lo que, junto al anuncio de una reducción en la recaudación fiscal y un elevado endeudamiento, levanta la preocupación de que se recurra al alza del ITBMS que paga la población. Pero en plena “guerra” contra el COVID-19, el Gobierno ha sido incapaz de eliminar los gastos de representación y dietas de todos los altos funcionarios del Estado y congelar sus salarios en 3.000 balboas mientras dure la crisis.

Hilando fino en las palabras del mandatario, es claro que se pretenden aplicar las mismas recetas financieras que nos han convertido en uno de los países más desiguales del mundo, aun cuando hoy enfrentamos una pandemia que agudiza los problemas ya existentes en salud, educación, alimentación y derechos humanos. El plan de recuperación ignora totalmente una transformación social, al igual que los procesos de fiscalización o control posteriores a los incentivos.

Reiteramos al jefe del Estado que las promesas de transparencia y lucha contra la corrupción son insuficientes mientras siga mostrando tolerancia hacia los funcionarios que están bajo sospecha de delitos de corrupción en medio de la pandemia. Si usted dice que los fondos públicos son sagrados, ¿qué hay de los casos del hospital modular y de los ventiladores?

Finalmente, quedamos con dudas sobre la referencia a un acuerdo nacional para un nuevo pacto social y un consenso sobre la Caja de Seguro Social, sin fecha de inicio, sin definir a los participantes y sin adelantar una metodología. Tenemos muy mala experiencia con sus iniciativas dirigidas a la falsa reforma de la vigente Constitución.

Son los hechos, y no las promesas, los que permitirán un debate amplio y sincero sobre el actual modelo de crecimiento económico sin desarrollo humano ni social. Solo así podremos construir un Panamá sin desigualdades y transformar la falsa caridad en una lucha sin descanso contra el hambre, la pobreza, la precaria educación y un sistema de salud en bancarrota.

~ ~ ~

Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Dinero

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

FB esp

 

FB CCL

Martinelli Linares brothers charged in the USA, captured in Guatemala

0
In Spanish. Former President Ricardo Matinelli’s two sons arrested at the Aurora International Airport in Guatemala. Although the two men face multiple charges in Panama, this was on a US warrant and extradition request. The video was taken by the Guatemalan National Civil Police.

The US Department of Justice’s statement

Two Defendants Charged for Their Role in Bribery and Money Laundering Scheme Involving Former High-Ranking Government Official in Panama

Individuals Facilitated $28 Million in Bribes from Odebrecht S.A. to the Official

A criminal complaint was unsealed today in federal court in Brooklyn, New York, charging Luis Enrique Martinelli Linares (Luis Martinelli Linares) and Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Linares (Ricardo Martinelli Linares) for their roles in a massive bribery and money laundering scheme involving Odebrecht S.A. (Odebrecht), a Brazil-based global construction conglomerate.

On Dec. 21, 2016, Odebrecht pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of New York to a criminal information charging it with conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) for its involvement in the bribery and money laundering scheme.

The overarching Odebrecht scheme involved the payment of more than $700 million in bribes to government officials, public servants, political parties, and others in Panama and other countries around the world to obtain and retain business for the company. The two individual defendants are alleged to have participated in the scheme by, among other things, serving as intermediaries for approximately $28 million in bribe payments made by and at the direction of Odebrecht to a then high-ranking government official in Panama (Panama Government Official), who was a close relative of the defendants. Luis Martinelli Linares and Ricardo Martinelli Linares were each charged with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.

Luis Martinelli Linares and Ricardo Martinelli Linares were arrested at el Aeropuerto Internacional la Aurora in Guatemala on July 6 pursuant to a provisional arrest request from the United States.

As alleged in the complaint, between approximately August 2009 and January 2014, the defendants facilitated the payment of bribes from Odebrecht to or for the benefit of the Panama Government Official by taking a number of steps that included opening and managing secret bank accounts held in the names of shell companies in foreign jurisdictions. These secret bank accounts were used to receive, transfer, and deliver the bribe payments. The defendants served as the signatories on certain of the shell company bank accounts, and personally sent and caused to be sent wire transfers through the structure of shell company bank accounts to conceal and spend bribery proceeds. Many of these financial transactions were in U.S. dollars and were made through U.S. banks, some of which were located in New York.

The charges in the complaint announced today are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The FBI’s International Corruption squad in New York investigated this case. Trial Attorney Michael Culhane Harper of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, Trial Attorneys Barbara Levy and Michael Redmann of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section, and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alixandra Smith and Julia Nestor of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York are prosecuting the case.

The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs provided substantial assistance. Law enforcement authorities in Guatemala including the Public Ministry of Guatemala and Specialized Unit for International Affairs, and law enforcement authorities in El Salvador provided significant cooperation.

The Fraud Section is responsible for investigating and prosecuting all FCPA matters.

The complaint filed in a federal district court in Brooklyn (PDF)

2
 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 

Aves de islas Jicarón y Jicarita

0
1
Un viaje a la isla Jicarón durante el Bioblitz de Coiba llevó a la publicación de una lista de verificación de aves. Las guacamayas rojas probablemente vuelan entre las islas más pequeñas y la isla de Coiba, donde todavía abundan. Las guacamayas rojas se han extinguido localmente en tierra firme. Foto por Christian Ziegler.

Actualizan la verificación de aves
en islas del Parque Nacional Coiba

por STRI

La primera lista de los registros de aves publicada sobre Jicarón y Jicarita, las islas más australes de Panamá y parte del Parque Nacional Coiba, subraya la importancia de enviar biólogos para explorar nuevos territorios. Se puede acceder a ambas islas desde la más reciente estación de investigación del Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales (STRI) en la isla de Coibita.

En el 2015, el fotógrafo Christian Ziegler (junto con la Liga Internacional de Fotógrafos de Conservación) y el ecologista Omar López (entonces en INDICASAT-AIP, ahora en SENACYT) organizaron biólogos de distintas instituciones para participar en el primer BioBlitz de Coiba, un esfuerzo por documentar la mayor cantidad posible especies en el parque.

“Durante el BioBlitz solo pasamos un par de días en la isla Jicarón, pero eso fue suficiente para agregar a las listas de registros que los ornitólogos Oscar Johnson de la Universidad Estatal de Luisiana comenzaron en el 2004 y George Angehr agregó en el 2015”, explicó Claudio Monteza, ex becario de STRI, ahora estudiante de doctorado en el Instituto Max Planck para el Comportamiento Animal. “Mientras estábamos allí, también notamos que los monos capuchinos pasaban más tiempo en el suelo”.

“Más tarde, Pedro [Castillo] y yo volvimos a estudiar a los monos. Pedro se iba arroyo arriba a lavar los platos del desayuno y se quedaba allí durante media hora fregando, observando aves y agregando nuevas especies a nuestra lista de aves de Jicarón. Una vez, alzó la vista al cielo y observó un Gavilán colifajeado (Buteo albonotatus) sobrevolando sobre el dosel, -un nuevo récord para el parque-, ¡Eureka! Decidimos hacer un estudio adecuado para crear una lista de verificación publicable”.

“Como ornitólogo, hacer una lista de registros de aves en el Parque Nacional Coiba es emocionante e intimidante al mismo tiempo, porque sabes que Alexander Wetmore [sexto Secretario del Instituto Smithsonian 1945-1952] visitó muchas islas e islotes en el parque. En 1957, solo él publicó la primera lista de registros de aves para el Parque Nacional Coiba, registrando 133 especies. Sin embargo, no pudo visitar Jicarón, la segunda isla más grande del parque”, explicó Pedro Castillo, estudiante de último año de la Universidad de Panamá.

Entre el 2004 y el 2019, se registraron un total de 115 especies en la isla Jicarón y 53 en Jicarita, incluidas 23 especies de aves nunca antes reportadas desde el Parque Nacional Coiba. Diez especies son subespecies endémicas (que no se encuentran en ningún otro lugar de la Tierra), y 29 especies son aves migratorias, incluidas siete parúlidos, que dependen del parque a medida que viajan a través del área durante su migración invernal.

Las especies más comunes registradas fueron la paloma Cabeciceniza Leptotila plumbeiceps battyi (de lomo marrón), el colibrí Amazilia Colirrufa (Amazilia tzacatl) y la Reinita mielera (Coereba flaveola).

Las guacamayas rojas, probablemente volando desde la isla de Coiba, ahora están casi erradicadas en tierra firme. Es relativamente fácil ver guacamayos en Jicarón. Coiba es probablemente el refugio más importante para esta especie en Panamá. Los campaneros centroamericanos (Procnias tricarunculatus), que generalmente viven en elevaciones más altas, descienden a 400 metros en la isla de Coiba.

Monteza cree que la observación cuidadosa y ambientalmente consciente de las aves puede ser una forma de apoyar al parque y a los residentes del área en el futuro.

“No hay senderos en Jicarón ni en Jicarita y el terreno es empinado”, explicó Monteza, “pero sería un gran lugar para excursiones en barco”.

“Cientos de piqueros marrones, fragatas y otras aves marinas se reúnen en los acantilados a lo largo de la costa sur de Jicarita al atardecer, donde termina la plataforma continental y se pueden observar aves pelágicas. Es realmente espectacular”. comentó Castillo.

Hay aproximadamente 1500 islas frente a la costa de Panamá. Aunque menos especies de aves viven en las islas que en tierra firme, el hecho de que muy pocas de estas islas hayan sido estudiadas formalmente significa que algunas sorpresas esperan a los observadores de aves y otros biólogos que pueden encontrar los medios para para visitarlas.

“Mi experiencia favorita fue un encuentro cercano con un gallinazo rey (Sarcoramphus papa)”, comentó Monteza. “Pedro y yo estábamos buscando una cámara trampa y de repente estábamos frente a uno, posado en una rama baja de un árbol a solo unos 5 metros de nosotros. Tomamos algunas fotos con mi teléfono y los binoculares de Pedro. En una excursión distinta, también obtuvimos imágenes de un gallinazo rey con cámaras trampa, instaladas por el investigador postdoctoral Kevin McLean. Ambas fotos salieron en una estación de televisión local y llegaron a miles de personas”.

“A pesar de las fuertes tormentas y los aterrizajes tambaleantes, una de las motivaciones para unirse a cada excursión es la oportunidad de observar una especie de ave rara en la isla Jicarón. A veces tenemos suerte. Hay algunas especies raras en nuestra lista de verificación, pero una de las más inusuales es el tirano occidental (Tyrannus verticalis), un raro migrante para Panamá. Nuestro récord es el más austral para esta especie”, comentó Castillo.

2
Aves marinas como este Piquero Marrón, anidan en gran número en los acantilados de la isla Jicarón. Foto por Christian Ziegler.

 

Un Gallinazo Rey tomada con cámara trampa. Foto por Claudio Monteza.

 

Los autores de este estudio están afiliados a STRI, a la Universidad de Panamá, la Universidad de California, Davis, la Estación Científica COIBA-AIP y la Universidad Estatal de Luisiana.

Referencia: Castillo-Caballero P.L., Monteza-Moreno C.M., Johnson O., Angehr G.R. 2020. First annotated checklist of birds of Jicarón and Jicarita: The southernmost islands of the Republic of Panama. Tecnociencia, Vol. 22, N˚2: 123-149.

~ ~ ~

Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Dinero

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

FB esp

 

FB CCL

Editorial: The unwelcome mat; and La Prensa’s assets

0
gag
A typical example of this sort of discourse.

Putting out the unwelcome mat

Do you want to tell people unlike yourself – here in Panama or wherever else you are living – to “go home” on account of their race, ethnicity, beliefs or national origin? Facebook may like and permit that sort of thing, but it will not be allowed on The Panama News Facebook wall.

Looking to post your Trump talking points, to portray black people as suspects, protesters as antifa criminals, white people pulling guns on black people as inherently justified by white fear? Take it elsewhere.

Bullying abuse, wherein you come onto The Panama News wall and hurl threats, or tell the editor to shut up? Do that on your own wall

All that anti-mask stuff, all those Trump wedge issues designed to reduce the vote? You have your far-right places to run that stuff and will not be allowed to wage that campaign via The Panama News. Not that you are prohibited from publishing that stuff.

All this stuff is happening in an increasing and systematic way all over the social media. We know what’s going on. You guys will not be allowed to shout everyone down.

  

1
A big part of the problem is imitation gringo cancel culture via social media trolls. It comes largely out of PRD, Cambio Democratico, the religious far right and xenophobic neofascist circles. When it’s coming from the PRD or the Martinelistas, there is a lot of money behind it.

La Prensa’s frozen assets

If a former president of Panama is defamed in the press, is a multi-million-dollar judgment ever justified?

He or she is a public figure, able to defend against the calumny in public. He or she is not a working person, thrown into penury by bogus publicity that leads to blacklisting and unemployment.

Is the claim that, but for the yellow journalism, he or she would have a political comeback? Do we really want the legal system to say or in any way imply that an elected office other than one to which a person is presently elected is a personal property with a monetary value?

Then, of course, what a judge has done in the Ernesto Pérez Balladares versus La Prensa case is not to hand down or enforce a judgment, but to sequester assets pending a possible judgment. A pompous rabiblanco medium that newspaper might be, but it’s also an endangered species because of the failing advertiser supported business model of the mainstream news corporations. That business collapse is a complicated and international phenomenon. The pre-verdict sequestration of assets, however, might push La Prensa right over the edge.

The feelings of so many of us are bound to be mixed. La Prensa is obnoxious in many ways. They, and the ad agencies with which they are embedded, and some of their most important clients, are notoriously dedicated to monopolistic practices and have been for years. Theirs is the voice of oligarchic privilege and denigration of organized labor. They are absent when the time comes to support anybody’s freedom of the press other than their own.

Set aside the legitimate disgust for the hypocrisy, however. The possibility of multi-million-dollar libel verdicts in favor of prominent political figures, and of pretrial sequestration of assets predicated on that possibility, needs to be banished from Panamanian law. It’s reason infinity plus one why we need a new constitution.

  

2

Bear in mind…

 

Oh peace! How many wars were waged in thy name?

Alexander Pope

 

I’m going to give the politicians a big surprise. I’m designing a system – a political party – in order to get out. They think I am designing a system to stay in.

Omar Torrijos
to Graham Greene, on plans to create the PRD

 

Age is wisdom, if one has lived one’s life properly.

Miriam Makeba

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

El secuestro de bienes de La Prensa, varias reacciones

0
Moncada Luna
La Prensa, como los otros medios rabiblancos, nunca ha apoyado la libertad de prensa como un derecho humano que todos tienen. Por lo tanto, no se dieron cuenta ni registraron ninguna objeción cuando Alejandro Moncada Luna, quien era uno de sus mayores enemigos en los días de Noriega, procesó al editor de The Panama News como fiscal privado de una figura del movimiento de milicias ultraderechistas, “Rex Freeman”. (¿Recuerdas a los Montana Freemen? Tomó ese apellido junto con ellos). La denuncia de calumnia e injuria fue por llamar a “Freeman” un “hustler”. Pero el hombre había pasado tiempo en prisión en el estado estadounidense de Colorado, específicamente por estafa. Foto de la Presidencia.

Que dicen sobre el secuestro de bienes de
La Prensa por Ernesto Pérez Balladares

Teresita

Zu du

peq


CIAM


¡AUSENTE! Ni La Prensa ni nadie en los medios rabiblancos defendieron al periodista Okke Ornstein cuando fue encarcelado por el gobierno de Varela. Fue una batalla solitaria en Panamá. Foto de The Panama News.

~ ~ ~

Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Dinero

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

FB esp

 

FB CCL

Petri, Which COVID-19 drugs work and which don’t?

0
USAF
The US military both conducts medical research and publishes health information. Military doctors urge fighting men and women, some of whom get sent to places where they may be exposed to other health care systems that may or may not be useful for a given condition, to be wary in an atmosphere in which a lot of nonsense is peddled. US Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Abigail Klein, 28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs.

Which drugs and therapies are proven to work, and which ones don’t, for COVID-19?

by William Petri, University of Virginia

I am a physician and a scientist at the University of Virginia. I care for patients and conduct research to find better ways to diagnose and treat infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Here I’m sharing what is known about which treatments work, and which don’t, for the new coronavirus infection.

Keep in mind that this field of medicine is rapidly evolving as our understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 virus improves. So what I am writing today may change within days or weeks.

Below are the treatments that have been tried and for which we have the best knowledge.

Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine – no evidence they work

There are three randomized controlled trials of hydroxychloroquine, all of which have failed to prove or disprove a beneficial or harmful effect on COVID-19 clinical course or clearance of virus. Given this current lack of evidence, these drugs, which normally are used to treat arthritis, should only be used within the context of a controlled clinical trial.

Lopinavir/ritonavir – not helpful

The drug Lopinavir is an inhibitor of an enzyme called HIV protease which is involved in the production of viral particles. Protease inhibitors for HIV were revolutionary, leading to our current ability to effectively treat HIV. Lopinavir also can inhibit enzymes that perform similar functions as the HIV protease in the SARS and MERS coronaviruses. Ritonavir increases the level of Lopinavir in the blood so the lopinavir/ritonavir combination was tested in a randomized controlled clinical trial for COVID-19.

Unfortunately, there was no impact on the levels of virus in the throat or duration of viral shedding, nor did patients’ clinical course or survival change. There therefore is no role for lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of COVID-19.

Steroids – yes for almost all COVID-19 patients

When a synthetic steroid hormone, called dexamethasone, was given to patients with COVID-19 the drug decreased 28-day mortality by 17% and hastened hospital discharge.

This work was performed in a randomized and controlled clinical trial of over 6,000 patients, and while not replicated in another study or yet peer reviewed, is certainly enough evidence to recommend its use.

Tocilizumab – too early to judge

Tocilizumab is an antibody, that blocks a protein, called IL-6 receptor, from binding IL-6 and triggering inflammation. Levels of IL-6 are higher in many patients with COVID-19, and the immune system in general seems to be hyperactivated in those with the most severe disease. This leads many physicians and physicians to think that inhibiting the IL-6 receptor might protect patients from severe disease.

Tocilizumab is currently FDA approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and several other collagen-vascular diseases and for “cytokine storm” – a harmful overreaction of the immune system – that can be caused by certain types of cancer therapy and COVID-19.

A retrospective observational study found that COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab had a lower risk of mechanical ventilation and death. But we lack a randomized controlled clinical trial so there is no way to ascertain if this apparent improvement was due to tocilizumab or from the imprecise nature of retrospective studies.

US Navy
US Naval Hospital Guam Hospitalman Apprentice Rebekah Morrison records the weight of convalescent plasma units collected from sailors who recovered from COVID-19. US Navy photo by Jaciyn Matanane

Convalescent plasma – too early to judge

Convalescent plasma, the liquid derived from blood after removing the white and red blood cells, contains antibodies from previous infections that the plasma donor had. This plasma has been used to prevent infectious diseases including pneumonia, tetanus, diphtheria, mumps and chickenpox for over a century. It is thought to benefit patients because antibodies from the plasma of survivors bind to and inactivate pathogens or their toxins of patients. Convalescent plasma has now been used in thousands of COVID-19 patients.

However, the only randomized clinical trial was small and included just 103 patients who received convalescent plasma 14 days after they became ill. There was no difference in the time to clinical improvement or mortality between those who did and did not receive treatment. The encouraging news was that there was a significant decrease in virus levels detected by PCR.

It is therefore too early to tell if this will be beneficial and controlled clinical trials are needed.

Remdesivir – yes, decreases hospital stay

Remdesivir is a drug that inhibits the coronavirus enzyme that makes copies of the viral RNA genome. It acts by causing premature stoppage or termination of the copying and ultimately blocks the virus from replicating.

Remdesivir treatment, especially for patients who required supplemental oxygen before they were placed on a ventilator reduced mortality and shortened the average recovery time from 15 to 11 days.

ACE inhibitors and ARBs – keep taking them

There was a concern that drugs called ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which are used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure, could increase levels of the ACE2 proteins, the receptor for SARS-CoV-2, on the surface of cells in the body. This would, physicians hypothesized, allow more entry points for the virus to infect cells and would therefore boost the severity of new coronavirus infections.

However, there is no evidence that this is the case. The American Heart Association, the Heart Failure Society of America and the American College of Cardiology all recommend that patients continue to take these medications during the pandemic as they are beneficial in the treatment of high blood pressure and heart failure.

We have made amazing progress in the treatment of COVID-19. Two therapies – steroids and Remdesivir – have already been shown to help. Those who benefit from these treatments owe thanks to patients who volunteered to participate in controlled clinical trials, and the physicians and pharmaceutical companies that lead them.

William Petri, Professor of Medicine, University of Virginia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

¿Wappin? ANYWHERE but there…

0
as

Plague Days Free Form

Forma libre de los días de la peste

Frank Zappa – What’s The Ugliest Part Of Your Body?
https://youtu.be/N1rwkgCAVsc

The Tubes – Don’t Touch Me There
https://youtu.be/QTd3PrTzSPY

Cyndi Lauper – Time After Time
https://youtu.be/VdQY7BusJNU

Rita & Ziggy Marley – One Love/People Get Ready
https://youtu.be/Su2pOkFagAs

The Lumineers – Stubborn Love
https://youtu.be/LBr7bFvD6ZY

Erika Ender – Despacito
https://youtu.be/HnYf6mSx7xo

Peter Tosh – Mystic Man
https://youtu.be/yNPoRSwQdmE

Nattali Rize – Fear & Dread
https://youtu.be/CdqggFN4wBs

David Gilmour – Yes, I Have Ghosts
https://youtu.be/gMioXjmUe5U

Cássia Eller – O segundo sol
https://youtu.be/MLI2QlgjGmA

Thelonious Monk – Ugly Beauty
https://youtu.be/vofbnkQcW_Q

John Prine – Illegal Smile
https://youtu.be/MmjnQjRvPUQ

Melanie Safka – Lay Down
https://youtu.be/hlp3wmE4bbI

Of Monsters and Men – Wild Roses
https://youtu.be/C9LPQmkao8c

Carla Thomas – Gee Whiz
https://youtu.be/vLfOzHK6i9g

Shakira in concert – El Dorado World Tour
https://youtu.be/KtDOsZ9Clq4

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 
Dinero

Two ex-presidents interrogated and get travel restrictions on one day

0
EPASA
Does Ricardo Martinelli go to prison, or a psychiatric ward, over what prosecutors say is his purchase of a media empire with stolen funds while he was president? Or will it do for the government and prosecutors just to strip him of these assets, which are used to publish attacks on people in the legal system like this one and perhaps boost Martinelli’s return to the presidency in 2024. From the El Panama America Twitter feed, promoting yet another dubious legal argument.

Varela and Martinelli before the prosecutors

by Eric Jackson

On July 2, former presidents Juan Carlos Varela and Ricardo Martinelli made their ways to the Avesa Building on Via España to face interrogation by separate prosecutors on separate cases. The two men, once running mates, are bitter political enemies.

Martinelli, who was president between 2009 and 2014, didn’t testify. He asserted his right not to testify in a case in which he is suspected or accused, pursuant to Article 25 of the Panamanian Constitution. The one with questions for him that day was the organized crime prosecutor and the subject matter was “New Business.” As to the former president it’s a money laundering case at the moment.

The affair takes the name of one of a series of shell companies through which it is said that Martinelli, when he was president, diverted state funds to buy himself a media empire, the flagship of which is EPASA, the parent company for the El Panama America and La Critica newspapers. The allegation is of overpriced construction contracts for a legislative office building and the widening of the highway between Arraijan and La Chorrera, the excess skimmed and laundered through 18 companies or foundations, four individuals and a law firm and run through 24 accounts in 13 companies in four countries.

So, what’s Martinelli’s defense to that one? That since he prevailed on lower courts to throw out evidence of illegal eavesdropping and theft sent down to them by the Supreme Court, a principle in the 1904 US-Panama extradition treaty, “specialty,” protects him from being tried for any other crimes. Except that the 1904 treaty was not the only ground for Martinelli’s extradition from the United States and some of the other international agreements, like the Cyber Crimes Convention, don’t include specialty clauses.

In any case, the prosecutor ordered Martinelli not to leave the country and to report every 15 days.

The following day Martinelli had another appointment, for an indagatoria (sworn deposition in a criminal matter before a prosecutor and court reporter) about allegedly taking bribes from the notorious Brazilian construction conglomerate Odebrecht. He didn’t attend. A lawyer submitted a doctor’s note saying he couldn’t handle it.

1
A 2017 prosecutor’s chart outlining the alleged New Business scheme.

On the same day former president Juan Carlos Varela, who was president between mid-2015 and mid-2019, appeared for a second indagatoria session. He was questioned for eight hours. In his case it was before the anti-corruption prosecutor, over alleged bribery by Odebrecht.

Much of the evidence against Varela was developed by foreign courts or prosecutors, particularly but not only in Brazil and Spain. Worse in many ways is that the allegations came first and most prominently from Varela’s erstwhile minister without portfolio, Ramón Fonseca Mora. As in the notorious lawyer whose firm’s archives got pilfered and published and known as The Panama Papers. In the wake of that scandal Fonseca was sacked and prosecuted as Varela caved under international pressure. Fonseca responded with his tales of millions in Odebrecht payoffs and there has been corroboration by some of the people allegedly involved, who made plea bargains.

Varela’s defense was that he didn’t take a cent, that it was all a matter of legal corporate contributions to his Panameñista Party.

The prosecutor ordered Varela not to leave the country and to report every 30 days while this case is pending.

2
In mid-May the National Assembly’s Credentials Committee referred a number of criminal complaints that were made against Varela while he was president to the regular prosecutors of the Public Ministry. There has been some doubt about the seriousness of any public corruption prosecutions, as former Attorney General Kenia Porcell was forced out for improper communications with Varela and others about politically charged cases, and the new attorney general shifted the chief anti-corruption prosecutor to a new assignment in the Interior. At this point it does appear that the Odebrecht cases are going forward, against both Varela and Martinelli, and a host of others. Some of the “others” have made their deals with prosecutors to turn state’s evidence. Asamblea Nacional photo.
 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Red Cross leader sounds off about Bolsonaro and Trump

0
ICRC
Francesco Rocca, from his Twitter feed. The remarks from International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies president Francesco Rocca for lawmakers to heed science came as Trump said the coronavirus is “going to sort of just disappear.”

ICRC chief slams Bolsonaro and Trump
for anti-scientific COVID-19 responses

by Andrea GermanosCommon Dreams

The head of the Red Cross federation on Wednesday expressed grave concern about the continuing spread of the coronavirus in the Americas and criticized Brazilian and US government leaders for their disastrous science-rejecting responses to the pandemic thus far.

Francesco Rocca, president of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), made the remarks at a virtual press conference in Geneva where he warned that “we haven’t yet reached the peak of this outbreak.”

Rocca said the effects of partisan rhetoric and policies out-of-line with science on the pandemic were clear.

“America as a continent is paying the highest price for this kind of division or not following the advice coming from the scientific community,” he said. President Donald Trump in the United States and Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro have faced sustained criticism over their handling of the coronavirus. Bolsonaro, who notably dismissed it as a “little flu,” has, like Trump, refused to wear a face mask in public gatherings.

The two countries lead the world in coronavirus cases. As of press time, the Johns Hopkins tracker showed the USA with the highest number of confirmed cases—over 2.6 million. Brazil is a distant second with over 1.4 million confirmed cases. The countries also have the highest number of Covid-19 related deaths; the United States has had over 128,000 such deaths and Brazil over 60,000.

According to Rocca, Bolsonaro “underestimated the consequences of Covid, and his country is living the consequences.”

“If the scientific community is saying that it is important to avoid to shake hands, and to wear masks, I think that the leaders should follow and listen,” Rocca said when asked about Trump’s mask refusal.

Rocca added that other world leaders too “have been irresponsible” in their response to the coronavirus pandemic and said politicians must “start learning to follow the advice coming from the scientific community.”

Rocca’s remarks came the same day Trump said the virus would “disappear.”

“I think we’re gonna be very good with the coronavirus,” Trump told Fox Business. “I think that at some point that’s going to sort of just disappear, I hope.”

The United States is on a string of record-setting single-day totals for the coronavirus, hitting a fourth record on Tuesday with over 48,000 new cases and over 50,000 cases on Wednesday.

According to the nation’s top infectious disease expert, the daily figure could go even higher.

Speaking before a Senate committee hearing Tuesday, Dr. Anthony Fauci said he “would not be surprised if we go up to 100,000 a day if this does not turn around.”

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet