Home Blog Page 88

Editorials: Panama’s impasse; and MAGA gets manic

0
talks in Penonome
Talks in Penonome, where agreement has been elusive on key issues. Ministry of Economy and Finance photo.

We slide toward a relatively nonviolent dictatorship

The business alliance centered around the Chamber of Commerce is demanding everything and rejecting all other forces in society. They are not at the table in Penonome and it would not help matters if they were.

The three alliances at the table with the government in Penonome are on many issues at an impasse with the government. On the issues over which agreements have been reached, the big business crowd says they don’t recognize them and some of them are openly flouting them.

So, without an agreement, the government decreed a price reduction for many medications and broke up the exclusive importer / distributor mafia. The latter, with support from most of the rabiblanco media, are raising spurious technical objections.

In some of the grocery stores, some of the price controlled items have just disappeared, and for some others the legal price limits have been ignored. So the government has sent in ACODECO to hand out fines for the egregious defiance. There is also a business-instigated rice shortage, as there was widespread mislabeling of rice quality until ACODECO stepped in about that, too.

In the Ngabe-Bugle Comarca there was hardly any food price relief at all, which led the indigenous alliance to walk out of the talks. But then, the government stepped in with a promise to set up state food stores through the Agricultural Martketing Institute (IMA) in each of the comarca’s districts.

Perhaps President Cortizo might be personally persuadable to move against corruption, but his own party’s legislative caucus, local officials and patronage beneficiary base are unlikely to go along with the serious changes to the constitution and laws needed to deal with it.

There are this and that real technical issues, and some legitimate concerns, but what’s happening is that the privileged, asserting high-sounding principles, are digging in their heels to defend the untenable.

They don’t agree, they weren’t at the table, so forget that? Were any of the micro-businesses that make a living using the Internet in the room when wireless Internet rates went way up? Was there even a hearing? And what about the largest economic sector of all, in terms of the number of people involved – are the informal businesses in which about half of the economically active population labors ever consulted about anything?

Look at the structure of things here. There is a series of impasses, largely driven by a few family businesses that have called dibs on the national economy. Those jams are broken by presidential decrees or by commands to public institutions. It might be necessary to work that way under the circumstances. Nito may not be cut from the Benito Mussolini or Fidel Castro mold. However, democracy and civil discourse are being sidelined by presidential decrees. Perhaps necessary, but it’s not a good sign.

  

The social media screech of an already disturbed man falling into madness.

Whom the gods would destroy, they first drive mad

There are still more than two months to go before US Election Day, but that things would be turning as they are was foreseeable months ago.

After all the preposterous lies and the January 6 stunt, a guy who lost the popular vote by some seven million votes in 2020 had a weak hand for starters. He managed to overplay it at about every turn.

The big blunder was by the GOP-packed Supreme Court, not only by repealing Roe v Wade by threatening such privacy rights as legal contraceptives, and same-sex couples being able to marry. It delighted the zealots and bigots, but annoyed most Americans and set of some serious organizing that handed Republicans unexpected defeats in a Kansas referendum and an upstate New York special election.

They made waving assault rifles around one of their usual gestures, then blame shifting after each day’s massacre the next part of their routine.

They put up a gallows in front of the Capitol to threaten Mike Pence into going along with their plans to overturn the 2020 election result. They wiped Secret Service and Pentagon cell phones. But snobs that they are, they let the people they deluded into assaulting Congress fend for themselves. Also the lawyers that they sent in to make unethical motions and who are now being disbarred. Of course some of the people who did their dirty work are turning state’s evidence against them. The MAGAs who haven’t completely lost their minds will see justice coming and some of them have good reason to fear it. Today that side of the political equation is being scattered by winds for which they had not prepared.

In the meantime, the MAGAs by and large “won” the Republican primaries. It’s likely to cost them in November. Especially so, because a con man from the bizarre universe of “reality TV” has recruited a dumb jock, a quack TV doctor and other unsuitable candidates to lead a Republican charge to take back the houses of Congress. Theirs is a hardened but shrinking base.

Democrats need to do their work between now and then to pull off that rare midterm election where the president’s party picks up seats in Congress. Nothing is to be taken for granted.

Then, are there stateswomen and statesmen in the Democratic ranks? Those sorts of people will not be looking to “reach across the aisle” to those who would hang them so much as create the conditions for a working majority and a loyal opposition, a good country rather than a would-be great empire, a calm country with reasonable fact-based arguments among people who will never fully agree, and with fair elections to decide the issues that can’t be compromised for the time being.

Papa Madiba. ILO Photo.

It always seems impossible until it’s done.

Nelson Mandela

Bear in mind…

There are times when dreams sustain us more than facts.

Helen Fagin

You can cut all the flowers but you cannot keep spring from coming.

Pablo Neruda

The ache for home lives in all of us, the safe place where we can go as we are and not be questioned.

Maya Angelou

 

The Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit…

0
3d

…such as the feds will release (PDF file)

Read the redacted affidavit here.

2

77. Based upon this investigation, I believe that the STORAGE ROOM, FPOTUS’s residential suite, Pine Hall, the “45 Office,” and other spaces within the PREMISES are not currently authorized locations for the storage of classified information or NDI. Similarly, based upon this investigation, I do not believe that any spaces within the PREMISES have been authorized for the storage of classified information at least since the end of FPOTUS’s Presidential Administration on January 20, 2021.

78. As described above, evidence of the SUBJECT OFFENSES has been stored in multiple locations at the PREMISES. …

 

3

 

Editor’s note: Do we give Donald Trump, who ran roughshod over the presumption of innocence for so many people, less than what’s due to any other person who has a run-in with the law? Notwithstanding basic considerations of reciprocity, we should and will. To this editor’s mind, certain things are suggested, but let’s see what the FBI found and what courts may determine about their legal significance.

It does appear that Donald Trump is in huge trouble, with this coming down after most of a primary season — in which his loyal followers won big on the GOP side — has come and gone, and about a week before the traditional Labor Day start of the fall campaign. Notwithstanding Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, promoters of gerrymandered electoral maps and the legions of officials and vigilantes deployed to keep people from voting, the US electorate will decide the political significance. These will include many American citizens living in Panama, who have the right to cast absentee ballots from abroad.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Democrats Abroad, On this anniversary of American women’s right to vote…

0
Suffragettes
How it used to be. The right to vote was not some gift given by men. It was the fruit of a victory won by years of hard work, sacrifice, expense and astute politicking. 

Women’s Equality Day — what does it mean today?

by the Democrats Abroad Global Women’s Caucus

Today is Women’s Equality Day, which commemorates the anniversary of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Passed in 1920, the 19th Amendment prohibits States and the Federal Government from denying people the right to vote on the basis of sex. Bella Abzug, (D-NY), one of the DA Global Women’s Caucus founders, introduced the resolution in Congress, which designated August 26 as Women’s Equality Day in 1973.

102 years later, we mark Equality Day not so much with celebration as with a sober assessment of the emergency we find ourselves in. The reality is that American women have fewer rights today than they did 10 years ago. Gains made by generations of women are systematically being legislated away from us. And the roadmap for the Republicans is clear as they openly gerrymander districts, change voting laws, and institute policies and practices to disenfranchise women, minorities, people with disabilities and – last but not least – us, the overseas voters.

Right now, we have a narrow window of opportunity to turn the tide and stop the theft of our rights, our autonomy, and our dignity. The GWC has assembled a list of simple actions that you can take – the Get Out the Vote for Equality –  help increase voter turnout and protect women’s equality. Want to do more? Join our volunteer teams, phonebank with us, or donate, and help us Get Out the Vote.

Join us in commemorating and celebrating this struggle by helping to mobilize our base for the ‘22 midterms so that we can all continue to exercise our right to vote. With nearly 9 million Americans living abroad, we have the power to make impactful and lasting changes this election.

November marks the pivotal moment in deciding our future. As the Republicans pursue tactics to undermine the democratic practice of free and fair elections, we will fight back by voting in numbers and sending the loud and clear message that we cannot and will not be silenced.

We have the chance to ensure that pro-choice and pro-equality candidates win their seats, and WE NEED YOU! It’s as easy as 1, 2, 3:

  1. Register to vote in your State to receive your absentee ballot here.
  2. Help us Get Out the Vote, by contacting everyone you know who is eligible to vote and making sure they are ready to cast their ballot as well.
  3. Reach out to your friends and family – check out our GOTV Equality toolkit here.

We stand on the shoulders of generations of women who marched, fought, and died for our rights. We will not let them down.

2
Democrats Abroad — join us.

 

 

Contact The Panama News by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

STRI, Árboles tropicales resisten que los rayos

0
zap
Un estudio de varios años en los bosques tropicales del Canal de Panamá, encontró que las especies impactadas con mayor frecuencia por los rayos tienden a ser las más capaces de sobrevivir esos impactos Los rayos caen sobre los bosques tropicales millones de veces al año y su frecuencia podría aumentar en el futuro debido al cambio climático. Fotos por Stephen P. Yanoviak y Jeffrey Burchfield.

Algunos árboles tropicales resisten el embate de los rayos

por STRI

Refugiarse debajo de un árbol durante una tormenta eléctrica no es la mejor idea, dado que los rayos suelen impactar la cosa más alta que haya alrededor. Sin embargo, puede que no pensemos mucho en el destino de los árboles en sí, al menos no tanto como un equipo de científicos cuya investigación sobre los efectos de los rayos en los bosques tropicales se publicó recientemente en Nature Plants.

Combinando la experiencia de científicos que estudian los rayos y biólogos de campo tropical, incluido Steve Yanoviak, de la Universidad de Louisville e investigador asociado en el Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales, Jeannine Richards, ex becaria postdoctoral en su laboratorio, y Evan Gora, becario Tupper en el Smithsonian y también ex alumno en el laboratorio de Yanoviak— el estudio investigó durante varios años los efectos de los rayos en los bosques del Monumento Natural Barro Colorado, localizado en el Canal de Panamá.

Yanoviak y sus colegas estiman que los rayos caen sobre los bosques tropicales millones de veces al año y debido a que la frecuencia de los rayos podría aumentar en el futuro debido al cambio climático, su objetivo fue comprender cómo la susceptibilidad a los rayos puede variar entre las especies de árboles.

En cierto modo, la notable biodiversidad de los bosques tropicales también los hace más resistentes a las amenazas. Así como el trabajo en equipo exitoso se basa en reconocer las fortalezas y debilidades de los miembros del equipo, los bosques tropicales biodiversos dependen de las contribuciones de cada organismo en el ecosistema para prosperar. Los científicos encontraron que a algunas especies les fue bastante bien después de ser impactadas por un rayo, especialmente a las que tenían más probabilidades de ser alcanzadas, mientras que a otras les fue mal. Las palmas, en particular, eran las más propensas a morir.

“Las especies de árboles más frecuentemente impactadas por los rayos tendían a ser las mismas especies con mayor capacidad para sobrevivir a los impactos”, comentó Gora. “Esto sugiere que los rayos son una importante fuerza selectiva con implicaciones para la ecología y la evolución de los bosques tropicales”.

Las especies de árboles más resistentes a los rayos también tenían algunas cosas en común. Su madera era más densa, tenían vasos más grandes para transportar agua y sus hojas eran más ricas en nitrógeno.”Los árboles con madera más densa tienden a vivir más y almacenar más carbono, por lo que encontrar esta característica correlacionada con la tolerancia a los rayos es un mecanismo interesante de compensación en que el aumento en la frecuencia de rayos podría favorecer a las especies que almacenan mejor el carbono”, comentó Richards.

En otras palabras, las especies de árboles con una mayor capacidad para eliminar el dióxido de carbono de la atmósfera también parecen estar mejor equipadas para sobrevivir a los rayos, lo cual es una característica valiosa para enfrentar el aumento de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero y el cambio climático.

“Los resultados de este estudio son especialmente interesantes porque sugieren que los cambios en la frecuencia de los rayos podrían influir en la composición de los bosques tropicales a largo plazo”, comentó Yanoviak.

Combinando la experiencia de científicos que estudian los rayos y biólogos de campo tropical, un nuevo estudio en Nature Plants analizó durante varios años los efectos de los rayos en los bosques del Canal de Panamá. Fotos por Steve Paton, Jeannine Richards y Stephen P. Yanoviak.

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

FB CCL

 
Dinero

Seminario de actuación de método de primer nivel llegará a Panamá

0
Lizi

Fundación FAE y Actable presentarán capacitación con destacado intérprete del Actors Studio de Nueva York

por Agenda Cultural Infoarte

La Fundación pro Artes Escénicas y Audiovisuales (FAE), en alianza con la organización estadounidense, Actable, dando seguimiento a sus objetivos de coadyuvar a la capacitación y actualización del gremio escénico nacional, estará presentando la Clase Maestra y el Taller Intensivo “Explorando la escena”, con el destacado actor, director y miembro del Actors Studio de Nueva York, Javier Molina.

Molina, con amplia trayectoria teatral, cinematográfica y televisiva, actuando, dirigiendo, escribiendo y enseñando, es Miembro Vitalicio del Actors Studio, la legendaria asociación y academia que cambió la manera de actuar en el mundo con su famoso “Método”, que perfeccionó el profesor y director Lee Strasberg a partir de los años 50 y a los que han pertenecido grandes intérpretes como Marlon Brando, Robert De Niro, Harvey Keitel, Sissy Spacek, Dustin Hoffman, Shelley Winter y Al Pacino, entre otros.

La Clase Maestra será una jornada de aproximación a las ideas y técnicas de actuación propias de este método, el lunes 29 de agosto, en el Estudio Multiuso del GECU, para concluir esta jornada de capacitación internacional con el Taller Intensivo del martes 13 al jueves 15 de septiembre, en el Cine Universitario, que profundizará en las herramientas que permitirán ejercitar la creatividad, comprender mejor el trabajo escénico, liberarse de los bloqueos que impiden seguir los impulsos y ser atrevidos en el uso de la imaginación. Ambas actividades iniciarán a las 7 pm a precios módicos y con cupos limitados. Para mayor información y reservaciones escribir a theactableapp@gmail.com o al whats app +507 6980-7095.

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

FB CCL

 
Dinero

Hightower, Chick-fil-A hasn’t gone quite that Biblical yet, but…

0
junk food
One Chick-fil-A store tried paying drive-through workers in chicken sandwiches. It didn’t go over well. Shutterstock photo.

Billion dollar franchises are paying workers chicken feed

by Jim Hightower — OtherWords

America’s stringent system of corporate capitalism keeps carving out new depths of worker exploitation. Take Chick-fil-A — a right-wing, Atlanta-based fast-food operation that likes to boast about following “biblically-based” principles.

Like slavery?

Well, Chick-fil-A hasn’t gone quite that Biblical yet, but one of its North Carolina franchises recently pioneered a novel labor compensation innovation that comes close: literally paying some workers “chicken feed.”

This outlet of the $11-billion-a-year chain recently called on area residents to “volunteer” for its new Drive Thru Express — but in lieu of wages, they were offering chicken sandwiches! Join the Express team and you’d be “paid” five chicken items per shift.

That worked out to less than minimum wage… plus indigestion.

What we have here is one more absurd illustration of the empty promise that you’ll get ahead if you just work hard enough, keep your nose to the grindstone, and stay loyal to the corporate order for life — no matter how vacuous.

But the game is up, for workers across the economy are now seeking more from life than 50 years of serving the company. They’re even organizing anti-workaholism groups like “I don’t want a career,” “Rest is Resistance,” and the “Nap Ministry.”

But don’t mistake this rebellion as mere satire by a few puckish slackers. Today’s nationwide shortage of workers from truck drivers to teachers is not a momentary economic blip, but a defiant declaration of independence from a form of work that is life-sucking.

People are not afraid of hard work, nor averse to long hours — if the task and the cause are worth both time and effort. And “worth it” is increasingly being measured in higher values than dollars alone.

Fair compensation means work that includes a sense of purpose, community, respect, fairness, and fun. In short, true worthiness… not a chicken sandwich.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Saldaña, Una especie de refugio en línea

0
convo
Matkub2499 — Shutterstock

Internet, un refugio para las personas con fobia social

por Carmina Saldaña García, Universitat de Barcelona

Hay personas que se sienten más cómodas trabajando o estudiando en casa sin necesidad de salir de su zona de confort. Es posible que, gracias a las restricciones debidas a la pandemia por la covid-19, se hayan acostumbrado a establecer sus relaciones personales a través de las pantallas.

Algunas de estas personas pueden tener dificultades para relacionarse cara a cara. Las redes sociales les han facilitado establecer relaciones sociales sin hacer esfuerzos. Para ellas, la vuelta a la normalidad supuso un momento de gran inquietud y malestar. Veamos a quién afecta y por qué ocurre esto.

Ansiedad social elevada

Las personas con ansiedad social tienen miedo intenso a exponerse a una gran variedad de situaciones sociales. La razón es que temen ser juzgadas o valoradas de forma negativa. Si se exponen cara a cara a situaciones sociales, piensan que son el centro de atención, cuando en realidad quieren pasar desapercibidas. Tienen miedo a no saber comportarse, a que la gente se fije en ellas o en su apariencia física.

Para manejar sus miedos se comunican poco, con escaso contacto visual y evitan hablar de ellas mismas. Cuando se relacionan cara a cara, experimentan muchos síntomas fisiológicos como, por ejemplo, sudoración, sonrojo, temblores. Todo ello les produce gran malestar emocional e insatisfacción con su vida. Por ello, evitan asistir a reuniones sociales. La ausencia de contactos hace que tengan menos amigos y sea menos probable que tengan pareja o relaciones sexuales.

Las personas con fobia social no renuncian a tener contactos sociales, a pesar de lo dificultoso que les resulta. Esta es la razón principal por la que, para ellas, internet se convierte en un medio de comunicación más amigable y seguro.

¿Comunicación presencial o por internet?

¿Cómo afecta la comunicación presencial y la comunicación en internet a las personas con fobia social? Para responder a estas cuestiones se han realizado numerosos estudios, la mayoría con adolescentes y estudiantes universitarios. Hasta el momento, se han podido identificar algunos aspectos importantes. La comodidad en su uso y la edad son algunos de ellos.

La comunicación vía internet permite a las personas con fobia social tener y mantener relaciones anónimas de forma cómoda. Esto les genera mayor sensación de seguridad y les evita preocupaciones sobre su apariencia. Además, pueden ocultar su temor a presentar síntomas fisiológicos de ansiedad (por ejemplo, temblar o sonrojarse).

La edad es otro aspecto importante a tener en cuenta para conocer el impacto de la comunicación digital. La utilización de esta forma de comunicarse varía entre las distintas generaciones, ya que tienen diferentes niveles de formación técnica y aceptación de la digitalización.

La generación de los baby booomer tiene mayores dificultades para adaptarse a las nuevas tecnologías y, por tanto, mantiene mayor interés en la comunicación presencial. El miedo les aísla socialmente y les produce sentimientos de soledad y malestar emocional. Sin embargo, cuando se relacionan vía internet, lo hacen de forma más segura y espontánea.

Jóvenes y relaciones sociales cara a cara

Los millennials o generación Y, conocidos como los nativos digitales, y la generación Z, la generación de las redes sociales y la comunicación digital han crecido realizando muchas actividades de relación con los otros a través de internet.

En estos grupos, la ausencia de contactos sociales de forma presencial puede ser una conducta habitual. Por eso es mucho más difícil identificar si es producto de la ansiedad social o incluso de otras patologías. Muchos de ellos aceptan que sus relaciones solo se dan a través de las redes sociales. Esto favorece que pierdan oportunidades de implicarse en muchas actividades que se dan solamente cara a cara.

Además de la comodidad y la edad, el tiempo de exposición a las redes también debe tenerse en cuenta. Las personas con fobia social emplean aproximadamente el mismo tiempo en las redes que aquellas que no tienen fobia social. Sienten que pueden regular mejor la frecuencia y duración de sus contactos sociales cuando se comunican vía internet. Se relacionan cuando quieren, con quién quieren y durante el tiempo que quieren. Esto les permite ir construyendo sus relaciones sociales de forma gradual y en condiciones más controladas.

Resumiendo, cuando se estudia por qué los jóvenes emplean internet en sus contactos sociales se obtienen algunas conclusiones interesantes. Indican que se sienten más cómodos, menos inhibidos, se pueden expresar con mayor libertad y están menos preocupados por lo que piensen otros sobre ellos.

Utilidad de la comunicación digital

Para el Instituto Nacional para la Calidad de la Sanidad y de la Asistencia de Reino Unido (NICE, por sus siglas en inglés), la forma más apropiada para ayudar a las personas con fobia social es el tratamiento cognitivo conductual. Con la ayuda de un profesional de la psicología, se propone a los pacientes que se expongan de forma gradual a las situaciones que temen.

Internet puede ser de ayuda a quienes presentan ansiedad social, pero como en las relaciones cara a cara, la única forma de conocer e incrementar su círculo social es interactuar y compartir experiencias.The Conversation

Carmina Saldaña García, Profesora Emérita en Psicología Clínica e Intervención Psicológica, Universitat de Barcelona

Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en The Conversation. Lea el original.

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

FB CCL

 
Dinero

Bernie on Biden’s student debt relief: a good start

0
Bernie
“At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, education, from pre-school through graduate school, must be a fundamental right for all, not a privilege for the wealthy few.” Bernie Sanders works his constituency. From his Twitter feed.

Biden student debt relief plan a ‘big deal,’ says Sanders, ‘but we have got to do more’

by Jon Queally — Common Dreams

As one of the leading voices for student loan debt cancellation among US lawmakers in Congress, Senator Bernie Sanders on Wednesday issued loud praise for President Joe Biden’s new plan to forgive up to $20,000 for some borrowers even as he said much more must be done to deliver higher education without the crushing financial strain of loans.

“The president’s decision today to reduce the outrageous level of student debt in our country is an important step forward in providing real financial help to a struggling middle class,” the Vermont independent said in a statement.

By reducing “up to $10,000 in student debt for working-class Americans and up to $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients,” Sanders welcomed how the plan would wipe away student debt for an estimated 20 million Americans while reducing the burden of debt for 43 million others.

“The result of this decision,” he said, “is that millions of Americans will now be in a better position to start families, or buy the homes and cars they have long needed. This is a big deal.”

In addition to his statement, Sanders released a video on social media highlighting his participation in the long fight for student debt cancellation and elevating the voices of Americans who have suffered under the overwhelming burden of their student loan obligations.

Going beyond forgiveness of existing debt, Sanders said that policymakers and legislators in the country must be even bolder to ensure that adequate education is made available to all Americans, regardless of age, income level, or zip code.

“We have got to do more,” Sanders said. “At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, education, from pre-school through graduate school, must be a fundamental right for all, not a privilege for the wealthy few.”

Far from alone among progressives, Sanders’ call for much deeper reforms—including the end of student loan debt—was echoed by many including longtime ally Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). She tweeted:

Much further-reaching reforms, Sanders argued in his Wednesday statement, will be necessary if the country is to fulfill the promise of delivering world-class education without saddling people with the economic chains of debt.

“If the United States is going to effectively compete in the global economy we need the best educated workforce in the world, and that means making public colleges and universities tuition free as many other major countries currently do,” he said, “and that includes trade schools and minority-serving institutions as well.”

“In the year 2022, in the wealthiest country on earth,” Sanders concluded, “everyone in America who wants a higher education should be able to get that education without going into debt.”

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Are we almost at the pardon Trump or jail him moment?

0
take him away
“If a president can get away with an attempted coup,” wrote one columnist, “then there’s nothing he can’t do. He is, for all intents and purposes, above the law.” Graphic from Paulus Ar’s Twitter feed, electronically altered by The Panama News.

Critics call out the ‘Let Trump
walk to save democracy’ crowd

by Jessica Corbett – Common Dreams

Amid a flurry of recent claims that prosecuting former President Donald Trump for various alleged crimes would be too dangerous for American democracy, progressive critics are pushing back forcefully to argue that the authoritarian threat will only increase if such lawbreaking is not held to account.

On Tuesday, The New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie delivered a cogent rebuke of the hands-off argument and declared that “fear of what Trump and his supports might do cannot and should not stand in the way of what we must do to secure the Constitution from all its enemies, foreign and domestic.”

His column followed opinion pieces in the Times by Damon Linker and Rich Lowry warning that the US Department of Justice or others pursuing Trump could set a “dangerous precedent” and provoke future unwarranted probes of Democratic elected officials.

Meanwhile, others have even proposed that President Joe Biden offer his 2020 opponent a pardon with the condition that he doesn’t seek elected office again.

The argument that “American democracy might not survive the stress” of investigating or prosecuting Trump, Bouie wrote, “rests on two assumptions that can’t support the weight that’s been put on them.” First, he pushed back against the idea that US politics “has, with Trump’s departure from the White House, returned to a kind of normalcy,” and thus, “a prosecution would be an extreme and irrevocable blow to social peace.”

“The most important of our new realities is the fact that much of the Republican Party has turned itself against electoral democracy,” he argued, citing the ouster of US Rep. Liz Cheney (R-W) and public support for Arizona and Pennsylvania’s GOP candidates for governor, Kari Lake and Doug Mastriano, who both back Trump’s “Big Lie” about the 2020 election.

“Big Lie” supporters “are actively working to undermine democracy for the next time Trump is on the ballot,” Bouie emphasized. According to him:

This fact, alone, makes a mockery of the idea that the ultimate remedy for Trump is to beat him at the ballot box a second time, as if the same supporters who rejected the last election will change course in the face of another defeat. It also makes clear the other weight-bearing problem with the argument against holding Trump accountable, which is that it treats inaction as an apolitical and stability-enhancing move — something that preserves the status quo as opposed to action, which upends it.

But that’s not true. Inaction is as much a political choice as action is, and far from preserving the status quo — or securing some level of social peace — it sets in stone a new world of total impunity for any sufficiently popular politician or member of the political elite.

Now, it is true that political elites in this country are already immune to most meaningful consequences for corruption and lawbreaking. But showing forbearance and magnanimity toward Trump and his allies would take a difficult problem and make it irreparable. If a president can get away with an attempted coup (as well as abscond with classified documents), then there’s nothing he can’t do. He is, for all intents and purposes, above the law.

Journalists, scholars, and other critics of those pushing prosecutors to let Trump walk welcomed Bouie’s piece — which reporter Dave Levitan called a “very clear rebuttal of all the we-can’t-prosecute-him arguments out there.”

Tweeting a link to the column, Adam Serwer, a staff writer at The Atlantic, said that “among the problems with ‘just beat Trump at the ballot box a second time’ is that the same people didn’t accept that the first time, they invented a fantasy for why it didn’t count. If the issue with criminal prosecution of Trump is his biggest fans not accepting the legitimacy of that… [they] won’t accept the legitimacy of any outcome he does not tell them to accept. Can’t get there from here.”

Others highlighted Bouie’s use of American history — specifically, the emergence of the Jim Crow South in the wake of the US Civil War — to drive home his point that the suggestion that declining to pursue Trump criminally will lead to stability “is foolish to the point of delusion.”

“National politics in the 1870s was consumed with the question of how much to respond to vigilante lawlessness, discrimination, and political violence in the postwar South,” Bouie explained. “In the face of lawlessness, inaction led to impunity, and impunity led to a successful movement to turn back the clock on progress as far as possible, by any means possible.”

Summarizing the columnist, Nicholas Grossman, a University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign international relations professor, said, “Not holding Confederates accountable to get social peace led to Jim Crow.”

Quoting Bouie’s argument that “there is a clear point at which we must act in the face of corruption, lawlessness, and contempt for the very foundations of democratic society,” Grossman asserted that “now is such a time.”

Linker on Sunday made clear he believes Trump deserves to be prosecuted by Attorney General Merrick Garland for the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol and potentially mishandling documents seized by federal agents at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month, but also warned of the lack of happy endings, writing that it would “set an incredibly dangerous precedent” for future GOP administrations and likely not prevent Trump from running for president again.

Even if Trump couldn’t run or another candidate — such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis — got the GOP’s 2024 nomination, “How long do you think it would take for a freshly inaugurated President DeSantis to pardon a convicted and jailed Donald Trump? Hours? Minutes?” Linker wrote. “And that move would probably be combined with a promise to investigate and indict Joe Biden for the various ‘crimes’ he allegedly committed in office.”

Some, such as writer and editor Graham Vyse, concluded: “This is well worth reading even if you don’t agree with its conclusion. [Linker] walks us through a bunch of very troubling scenarios. We are in a bad place.”

Michael Sozan, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, similarly said that “I disagree with this [Linker] essay, even though it makes valuable points. No one is above the law, especially someone as dangerous to democracy as Donald Trump. 3-D political chess is impossible to play here; let’s start with basic accountability.”

Columbia University professor Nicholas Christie-Blick tweeted that the path Linker “advocates is basically to throw in the towel — to agree that American democracy is done, that a president cannot be held accountable for even the most egregious crimes. Sorry. I don’t agree.”

Like Linker, Lowry suggested Monday that indicting Trump “would invite retaliation” from the GOP, adding that “all of the criminal investigations of Mr. Trump and his associates — whether related to January 6, his handling of classified material, the Georgia electors, or the Trump Organization — are being handled by partisan Democrats at the federal or local level who have every incentive to nail him to the wall. This isn’t a formula for legitimacy.”

“Another obstacle to the widespread acceptance of a potential indictment of Mr. Trump for January 6 is that, absent smoking-gun evidence we aren’t aware of, it will be far from a clear-cut case,” he also wrote. “An indictment on the grounds that he obstructed Congress or defrauded the US government will depend on novel interpretations of the law and present entirely new legal questions that, at best for the prosecution, will take years to settle and, at worst, ultimately lead to a collapse of the case.”

Several critics of the question in Lowry’s headline — “Can You Tell Me What Would Happen if the FBI Were Investigating a Democrat?” — accused him of what Hussein Ibish, senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington, described as “whataboutism gone bestial.”

Jim Cottrill, an associate professor of political science at St. Cloud State University, tweeted: “This is the biggest pile of horseshit I have read in a long time. The level of false equivalence achieved here is truly remarkable. I began reading it with the assumption it was going to be satirical — alas, it was not.”

Pointing to the lines about who’s behind the Trump investigations, Cottrill said, “Uh, Christopher Wray might beg to differ,” referring to the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, who was appointed by Trump.

Journalist Marcy Wheeler also noted Wray in a detailed takedown.

“Obviously this piece sucks in a 100 different ways,” attorney and podcast co-host Ben Yelin said of Lowry’s column. “But there’s one especially fatal error: He doesn’t even contend with the fact that maybe Trump committing lots of crimes is the reason he’s been targeted!”

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Bernal, Getting past the dictatorship’s constitution

0
A December 1979 experience that neither killed nor intimidated Miguel Antonio Bernal, but in addition to seriously injuring him it did harden the law professor’s attitude about the dictatorship and its constitution, under which Panama is still governed. You have to go to YouTube to see it.

Toward a new constitution

by Miguel Antonio Bernal V.

More than three years ago, the Constituent Movement YA, under the guidance of Don Cristobal Silva (RIP), released “Documento Conceptual y de Principios,” which we note today in this opinion article.

The constitutional crisis had motivated the United Citizens for the Constituent Movement (CUCO) and the Constituent Movement Now to merge our efforts, dedication and actions, to promote a Constituent Assembly as the joint main objective “motivated by the crisis of institutionality that the country is going through, which merits exploring the possibilities for an urgent transformation of the Nation based on a constituent process.”

By publishing the Documento Conceptual y de Principios — made as an initial proposal to be improved – the movement contributed to a national political debate about the need for a new Constitution through a constituent process.

However, it is mandatory to confess that little or no attention was paid to it by civil society and its various professional groups, labor unions, political parties, etc. This has not prevented the need for a constituent process. The idea has not been abandoned. At some point there’s a need to realize the maxim that “public power emanates only from the people.”

The attempt by the lovers of “change” so that nothing changes, to follow Article 314 of the imposed militaristic constitution and impose a “parallel” constitutional process, received a resounding rejection from broad sectors of the population who were not fooled by the fallacies of the gatopardists.*

Today, after the eruption of citizens onto the national stage — people tired of all the inequality, deceit, corruption, privileges, perquisites and impunity — it’s striking that those attending the “Mesa Única”(for dizziness) in Penonomé, have overlooked the need for a new constitution through a constituent process.

By eluding the fact that the matrix of our society’s problem is the imposed militarist constitution, which has served and continues to support all the actions against the public interest, they have once again set the table for the joint criminal enterprise that passes for our government, so that it can continue doing its thing: anti-national, anti-popular and anti-democratic practices.

* The term derives from an Italian novel, which has been made into several movies, about a minor Sicilian prince who, in a time of revolution, explored various schemes of cosmetic change to ensure that nothing would change for his privileged aristocratic caste.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC