The Chilean Senate has unanimously repealed several provisions
of the country's infamous State Security Law, including one (Article 6b) that
makes it a crime against public order to insult high officials.
First proposed eight years ago, the new "Law on Freedoms of
Opinion and Information and the Practice of Journalism," known as the "Press
Law," passed the Chamber of Deputies on April 10. The Senate approved the
bill on April 18.
After review by the Constitutional Tribunal, President Ricardo
Lagos must sign the bill for it to become law. The president is expected to
do so.
Besides Article 6b, local sources say, the bill repeals several
other articles of the 1958 State Security Law, including Article 16, which authorizes
the suspension of publications and broadcasts, as well as the immediate confiscation
of publications deemed offensive, and Article 17, which extends criminal liability
to the editors and printers of the offending publication.
Under the new law, civilian courts, not military courts, would
hear defamation cases brought against civilians by members of the military.
In addition, the legislation repeals the 1967 Law on Publicity
Abuses, under which judges may ban press coverage of court proceedings. The
bill also guarantees the right to professional confidentiality and the protection
of sources.
Unfortunately, the bill does not remove all "disrespect" (desacato)
provisions from Chile's legal system. The Penal Code, for instance, contains
several articles that make it a crime to insult public officials. Chilean law
also imposes criminal liability for libel and slander.
Even so, the repeal of Article 6b is a significant improvement.
The Penal Code's "disrespect" provisions give defendants more legal protection
than Article 6b, according to Chilean lawyers interviewed by CPJ.
"While we are encouraged by the new Press Law, CPJ believes
that journalists should never be jailed for their work, and that public officials
should not be allowed to shield themselves from criticism by wielding criminal
defamation statutes," said CPJ executive director Ann Cooper. "We urge
Chilean legislators to take this victory for press freedom further by eliminating
all forms of criminal defamation from the legal system."
The bill was passed shortly after the 111th session of the Washington-based
IACHR, held in Santiago de Chile at the request of the Chilean government.
During the session, IACHR representatives met with Chilean officials
to express their concerns about the State Security Law and other legal restrictions
on freedom of expression in the country.
Local media also credit President Lagos with reviving the bill
by returning an earlier version of the bill to Congress with amendments aimed
at achieving consensus on the most controversial items.
Vindication for Matus?
If the new bill becomes law, all pending "disrespect"
cases filed under Article 6b of the State Security Law will become void, which
would allow exiled Chilean journalist Alejandra Matus to return to Chile without
risking detention.
Matus faces criminal defamation charges in Chile stemming from
the April 1999 publication of The Black Book of Chilean Justice, her muckraking
investigation of the Chilean judiciary. Her case began on April 14, 1999, when
Santiago Appeals Court judge Rafael Huerta banned her book one day after it
was published. The ban was imposed in response to a suit filed by Supreme Court
justice Servando Jordán under Article 6b of the State Security Law.
On March 23, 2001, CPJ submitted an amicus curiae brief to the
IACHR in the Matus case, arguing that "public order" is threatened, not
promoted, by the criminalization of defamation and that government officials
should have no special protection from criticism.
The brief, which was prepared by the New York firm of Debevoise
& Plimpton on behalf of CPJ, specifically recommended the repeal of Article
6b.
English and Spanish versions of the brief are currently available
on CPJ's Web site (http://www.cpj.org).
The Committee to Protect Journalists is a nonpartisan, nonprofit
organization dedicated to the defense of press freedom everywhere.