As the administrations in Washington changed, a Republican proposal, the Andean
Regional Initiative, began to take center stage as the next step beyond Plan
Colombia, which was a Colombian proposal that had the strong backing of the
outgoing Clinton administration. In Panama, the Andean Regional Initiative
has been presented mainly in terms of about $20 million for this country,
mostly for law enforcement and for economic development near the Colombian
border. Meanwhile, it has become known that the United States, mostly via
civilian contractors, has been carrying out logistical operations for military
missions throughout the region from Panama's Tocumen Airport, pursuant to
an agreement with the Moscoso administration whose details have been kept
secret from the Panamanian people.
So what does the Andean Initiative mean for Panama, and for the region?
The answers are far from clear, and the perceptions vary widely with the political
perspective of the observer. For example, is the Bush administration policy
an escalation of US involvement in Colombia's civil conflict, or does it mean
that the United States is slowly backing away from a military adventure? For
Panama, does the Bush policy represent a payoff for the use of this country
for Plan Colombia support operations, or is it, as represented, an effort
to prevent Colombia's madness from spreading across our borders?
Given that the military component of Andean Regional Initiative aid to Panama
is negligible, we are dealing primarily with a US Agency for International
Development program. Thus we may want to pay attention to the declarations
of USAID officials, from one of which the following was excerpted. As you
shall see, however, very little is being specifically said about Panama.
From the statement of Michael Deal, Deputy Assistant Administrator Bureau
for Latin America and the Caribbean US Agency for International Development
before the House International Relations Committee Subcommittee on the Western
Hemisphere, June 28, 2001
We are and will continue to strengthen local governments in rural areas
of Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Colombia, and Panama where the lack of basic institutional
and social services has marginalized rural populations.
Where the state is present, it is in the form of an overly centralized,
unresponsive bureaucracy that does not necessarily work or understand the
local interests of a community. Thus, we are training mayors and council members
in identifying and monitoring projects, setting priorities, and handling financial
resources in a more accountable, transparent way. It is a very important part
of bringing democracy to rural areas. And it is an indispensable part of any
program where local empowerment and ownership of national goals --- such as
the war against drug cultivation - will be required to assure the continued
enforcement of agreed upon eradication agreements.
With USAID assistance and through policy dialogue, the decentralization
process in Bolivia helps targeted municipal governments to develop and carry
out action plans in a participatory fashion, engaging civil society at the
local and regional level in the process. As a result, citizen participation
in government has increased, and municipalities have organized themselves
into a nationwide Federation, with departmental associations and an association
of women council members.
Corruption is another very serious problem. The ongoing corruption scandal
from the Fujimori era in Peru has shaken public confidence in the government
institutions of the country. We will work closely with the incoming administration
to strengthen democratic institutions and promote good government. Similar
problems are being encountered throughout the region, where we are working
to strengthen the ability to expose corrupt practices and investigate and
prosecute corrupt officials and very importantly, make citizens realize they
have the right to demand accountability from their governments.