Most ads are interactive -- click on them to visit the folks who make The Panama News possible
 

news

Also in this section:
Panama News Briefs

Floods bring out the best and worst
Age law may remove Supreme Court president
 



Flood aftermath highlights
the best and the worst

by Eric Jackson, in part from other media

The September 17 rains that left a swathe of death and destruction in parts of San Miguelito and Panama City didn’t seem so severe at the time. At The Panama News office in Perejil, which is located in the leaky-roofed Muchachas Guias Building, there were only a few drips to mop up, as compared to a veritable flood that had this reporter busy with the buckets and mop the day before. In fact the metro area registered some 48 millimeters of precipitation that day, as compared to 66 on the 16th.

But of course, the rains of the 17th fell on already saturated ground, and added to rivers that were already running high.

Thus while it seemed like just an ordinary seasonal tropical cloudburst at the office, at the Juan Diaz home of Naida de Justiniani, who comes in to do paperwork at The Panama News once a week, polluted flood waters were sweeping into her home, destroying most of her and her extended family’s possessions.

The destructive force also took the head of this country’s SINAPROC disaster relief agency, Roberto Velásquez Abood, by surprise. He told La Prensa that he knew it would rain that day, but didn’t expect such an intense storm.

But various factors combined to create an unexpected disaster. Drains that might have been expected to handle the rainy season deluge were clogged by garbage, and in some cases junk cars and blown-down trees. High tide slowed the storm waters’ discharge into Panama Bay. And those were just the “ordinary” risks.

Building practices also contributed to the disaster. In San Miguelito, the red clay of a steep hillside on which nobody should have ever built in the first place turned liquid, coming down and burying homes. Along the Cabra River in Tocumen, people who had built in the flood plain were routed from their homes by the quickly rising waters. In Juan Diaz near the Los Pueblos shopping center, the drains below the access road to the development backed up --- not for the first time in recent years --- driving nearby residents from their homes.

Worst of all was the Prados del Este residential development, built adjacent to the Cabra River and still under construction by PRONAVI and being promoted by Inmobiliaria Hogar Ideal. That project, financed by the Banco Nacional de Panama, is built in a flood plain, and when first proposed the National Environmental Authority rejected the company’s plans for that very reason. Later, however, revised plans were submitted, which called for extensive landfills to raise the homes’ elevations by about five feet and the construction of a levee along the river to mitigate the risks of flooding. Those revised plans were approved, but the company built according to the earlier rejected plans and the consequences were manifested on September 17.

After the flood waters subsided, the company went back to its building activities at Prados del Este, but only very briefly. And angry mob of people who had been flooded out of their homes threatened the construction crews --- all subcontractors who are not directly employed by the developer --- with great bodily harm. Then city engineer Jaime Salas arrived, noticed the discrepancy between the approved plans and what Inmobiliaria Hogar Ideal actually built and ordered a halt to construction work. Later, Panama City Mayor Juan Carlos Navarro opined that the developers should be thrown in prison for what they had done.

But parts of the development had been flooded five times in the previous year, according to residents. None of that seemed to have alerted authorities to the problems at the time, even though a cursory inspection would have revealed that the approved plans were not being followed.

It took several days to find some of the remains and assess the extent of the damage, but the final toll from the September 17 rainstorm is 15 dead, some 13,000 people suffering some property losses and more than 700 whose homes were completely destroyed.

The nation responded with donations of cash, mattresses, blankets, clothing and food, with volunteers presenting themselves at Parque Omar to assist SINAPROC with the relief effort. Foreign embassies also pitched in. President Torrijos declared that the austerity measures he’s imposing in light of the financial mess he inherited wouldn’t be allowed to interfere with relief efforts. First Lady Vivian de Torrijos coordinated much of the distribution of essential supplies. IDAAN sent in tanker trucks to distribute clean water to people whose supplies had been disrupted by the disaster. Several public schools were turned into temporary shelters for flood victims. Utility crews moved in to re-establish disrupted services. The Ministry of Health took measures to treat infections among those affected by contaminated flood waters and prevent epidemics.

Now, however, the response is turning to investigations, in the first instance by a panel appointed by Public Works Minister Carlos Vallarino. Whether there will be a genuine criminal investigation (which would be rare, given the record of our current Attorney General) remains to be seen, but the mayor’s call for prosecution has been getting a lot of support in the daily newspapers’ op-ed columns and editorials, from legislators and from Government and Justice Minister Héctor Alemán.

Meanwhile, a few people have begun to take a longer view. Housing Minister Balbina Herrera warned that a lot of people need to be permanently evacuated from homes built in flood plains. There were calls for the construction and staffing of hydrological stations, as it turns out that nobody was monitoring water levels in the Cabra River, and if proper monitoring had been ongoing there would probably have been enough warning time to save some of the lives and belonging that were lost.


Also in this section:
Panama News Briefs
Floods bring out the best and worst
Age law may remove Supreme Court president

 

News | Business | Editorial | Opinion | Letters | Arts | Review | Community | Fun | Travel
Unclassified Ads | Calendar | Outdoors | Dining | Science | Sports | Español | Front Page
Archive


Back to top