News | Economy | Culture | Opinion | Lifestyle | Nature
Noticias | Opiniones | Archive | Unclassified Ads | Home

Volume 14, Number 17
September 7, 2008


Also in this section:
Editorial, Unifying the opposition and Biden vs. Palin
Sirias, The vision that lived on
Endara Hill, The powers that be in Wonderland
Thompson, The first VP candidate since Teddy Roosevelt who can field dress a moose
Clinton, Time to take back the country we love
Pilgrim, Issues vs. perceptions in the US elections
Weisbrot, Labor law reform riding on the November election results
Setrini, Stiglitz has the right idea and Friedman had the wrong one
Human Rights Watch, Mexico City's abortion legalization upheld
Reporters Without Borders, Online journalist slain in Russian police custody
Committee to Protect Journalists, More attacks on journalists in Russia's Muslim regions
Abeyta, The case for extraditing Goni and his accomplice
Greenpeace, Australia's Great Barrier Reef saved from oil shale extraction
Elzufon, Martín's velvet coup
Jackson, Government and its owners lash out at media they don't control
Leis, Citizens' democracy
Bernal, Abuse of authority
Letters to the editor

A mostly gringocentric letters page this time

Editor's note: These past couple of weeks I have received more than the usual number of emails asking about how an American citizen who wants to move to Panama goes about looking for a job here. Usually I just turn the question around and ask about how some Panamanian or other Latin American who wants to pack up and seek a more prosperous life in the USA finds employment there. It's not entirely that simple either way, but both countries have labor and immigration laws based upon the concept --- not necessarily well demonstrated --- that the free movement of working people across international boundaries takes jobs away from people in the places to which migrants go.

What? Is there someone who doesn't think that reciprocity comes into the equation when US politicians rail against illegal immigrants and dozens of Panamanians get swept up along with hundreds of others in a Mississippi factory raid? Don't be a fool --- what goes around comes around.

That said, if you have the right ties to Panama you can, notwithstanding your US citizenship, be recognized as a Panamanian citizen with the full right to live and work here; if you have the right skills that are in short supply here you can get a work permit that's good for a few years; if you have the right corporate sponsor you can hold a managerial or technical job as a foreigner; and if you have enough money to start your own business and hire Panamanians in the process you can live and work here as a foreign investor. Plus, there are people who live and work here illegally, despite the government's frequent promises to crack down on this sort of thing.

But please do understand, if you are tired and frustrated with living in, say, the Great Lakes Rust Belt, that moving to Panama and finding work is by no means the same as trying your luck in Kansas or California. Panama is, after all, an independent country rather than another star on Old Glory.

Were it up to me, part of any move toward economic integration would be the free movement of working people. However, it's not up to me and, as the Latin American proverb goes, "if wishes were horses then beggars would ride." Sorry to be the bearer of news that some of you don't want to hear.

The International Living business model

The IL people have the perfect business model! They sell something that was never theirs! Sort of like selling the Brooklyn Bridge over and over again!

As far as I’m concerned, they are primarily responsible for all the snooty, spoiled and ever so rude extranjeros who have invaded my paradise! Oh, let’s not forget about the “developers” and “flippers” who are now jacking real estate prices way above the heads of the work-a-day Panamanian!

I am not a Panamanian! I too am an extranjero, but I adapted to Panama, instead of trying to make Panama adapt to me! I was here long before Panama was “discovered” by the likes of the IL crowd and I miss the way things were when no body could even find Panama on a map!

Larry Flohaug

Wants perpetual war, censorship

I see there is (another call) for Middle east PEACE.

In an article titled: "Stop the slaughter in Lebanon, Israel and the Occupied Territories! by Michael Lerner, Joan Chittester and Cornell West.

Here's the problem folks:

As I sit here and laugh at such writings and Quacks such as Joan Chittester. I see once again the United States is targeted for being a part to this violence.

Your article, seems to leave out some very important facts. Here Let me help you.

  • 1948 After Israel is declared a nation she is attacked (unprovoked) by Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan (maybe you forgot that) .

  • 1967 Again Israel is attacked and again its unprovoked.

  • Who could forget the 1972 Olympics? (I mean other then you folks and Joan Chittester?)

  • 1981 I seem to remember Sadat was assassinated during the annual 6th October victory parade in Cairo which was ordered by non other then fatwa OH, and who by the way also ordered the 1993 bombing of the WORLD TRADE CENTER.

  • 1981 ABU ABBAS masterminded the hijacking of the cruise ship Achille Lauro and oh by the way, they killed American Jewish tourist Leon Klinghoffer. He was shot and pushed overboard in his wheelchair while is wife watch.

  • 1985 four Palestinians threw hand grenades and fired assault rifles at travelers in the international terminal of Leonardo da Vinci Airport on. About 80 people were wounded. At almost the same time, a terrorist team attacked the Vienna airport, killing 4 people and wounding 47.

See, its always the Unarmed they go after and lest not forget the assassination of the 22 year old Navy kid on the plane too later on that year. As soon as they find themselves in a fight with a bigger dog, whack jobs like Professor West and Joan Chittester yell "stop"

What just happened in 2007 when Hamas "won" in free elections of the Gaza Strip? THE NEXT DAY they sent rockets into Israel. Are you kidding me?

See, people like Joan Chittester claim to be a Catholic nun, but under all that black & white dressing she is as pure evil as they come.

I would suggest before printing their non-sense you folks do a better job at who is doing the writings. For example, Did you know Joan Chittester belongs to the GLOBAL MARSHALL PLAN which was co-founded and the writers of the article to which I'm responding. (Of course you do, they probably own the dam blog)

By the Way - wasn't it "Prof. West" who wrote the book "The LEFT HAND OF GOD" - "Taking back the world from the religious right"

If you didn't know, you do now and, if you already knew then I feel your an irresponsible editor to allow anyone with such affiliations dictate how the USA will Isolate itself from the Muslim world.

You don't get it pal -

WE WANT TO BE APART FROM THE MUSLIM WORLD - These are not good people so I can give a rats ass what the world thinks of the United States.

M. Zito

Editor's note: Your letter seems to leave out some very important facts --- like the Sabra and Shatila massacre of more than 3,000 non-combatant civilians by the Israeli Defense Forces and their Lebanese Christian fascist allies; like the massacre of the inhabitants of the village of Deir Yassin by the precursor of the Likud (the Irgun); like the Bush administration's widespread use of torture, including of many people whom it had to later admit were innocent; and on and on and on. This is not to deny the violence that you cite, or to justify it --- those acts, even if some might want to place them in the context of a "war of national liberation," would nevertheless be war crimes even when viewed in that light. But the omissions in your litany of horrors amount to one-sided distortions in a bigoted call for eternal religious warfare, a demand for censorship of those who disagree with that policy and the unwarranted denigration of the credentials of a prominent Catholic nun and a renowned Ivy League professor.

Over the long run of history Muslims and Jews have generally gotten along well, but this poisonous land dispute set off first by British divide and rule tactics and then a flawed decolonization process has been too long and too vicious. Any Zionist with a conscience and a fair mind, and any supporter of the Palestinian cause with a conscience and a fair mind, has to be embarrassed by some of the awful things that people on his or her side have done.

Any American who understands and values his or her nation's traditions will know that the founders of the republic, for all their flaws, were quite clear about wanting to keep the United States out of religious wars and that this policy has served the country well. What Rabbi Lerner, Sister Chittester and Professor West advocate may or may not command the support of the majority of the American people, but in any case it's in keeping with a long American tradition.

Atrocious violence has been repeatedly tried by people on different sides as a "solution" to the Middle East's problems, and it has always failed. And notice the level of discourse to which those who advocate more of the same have sunk.

Divided opposition goes nowhere

Just to share to briefly share an opinion: no matter the good and sincere intentions these young political leaders have to change the country, I predict they won't go anywhere since opposition as it is now is not united. It happened in 1994 with four opposition candidates which of course gave the victory to the PRD in "bandeja de oro" or golden plate. Will it happen again?


About Sarah Palin

I am a resident of Wasilla, Alaska. I have known Sarah since 1992. Everyone here knows Sarah, so it is nothing special to say we are on a first-name basis. Our children have attended the same schools. Her father was my child's favorite substitute teacher. I also am on a first name basis with her parents and mother-in-law. I attended more city council meetings during her administration than about 99 percent of the residents of the city.

She is enormously popular; in every way she's like the most popular girl in middle school. Even men who think she is a poor choice and won't vote for her can't quit smiling when talking about her because she is a "babe."

It is astonishing and almost scary how well she can keep a secret. She kept her most recent pregnancy a secret from her children and parents for seven months.

She is "pro-life." She recently gave birth to a Down's syndrome baby. There is no cover-up involved here; Trig is her baby.

She is energetic and hardworking. She regularly worked out at the gym.

She is savvy. She doesn't take positions; she just "puts things out there" and if they prove to be popular, then she takes credit.

Her husband works a union job on the North Slope for BP and is a champion snowmobile racer. Todd Palin's kind of job is highly sought-after because of the schedule and high pay. He arranges his work schedule so he can fish for salmon in Bristol Bay for a month or so in summer, but by no stretch of the imagination is fishing their major source of income. Nor has her life-style ever been anything like that of native Alaskans.

Sarah and her whole family are avid hunters.

She's smart.

Her experience is as mayor of a city with a population of about 5,000 (at the time), and less than two years as governor of a state with about 670,000 residents.

During her mayoral administration most of the actual work of running this small city was turned over to an administrator. She had been pushed to hire this administrator by party power-brokers after she had gotten herself into some trouble over precipitous firings which had given rise to a recall campaign.

Sarah campaigned in Wasilla as a "fiscal conservative." During her six years as mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over 33 percent. During those same six years the amount of taxes collected by the city increased by 38 percent. This was during a period of low inflation (1996-2002). She reduced progressive property taxes and increased a regressive sales tax which taxed even food. The tax cuts that she promoted benefited large corporate property owners way more than they benefited residents.

The huge increases in tax revenues during her mayoral administration weren't enough to fund everything on her wish list though, borrowed money was needed, too. She inherited a city with zero debt, but left it with indebtedness of over $22 million. What did Mayor Palin encourage the voters to borrow money for? Was it the infrastructure that she said she supported? The sewage treatment plant that the city lacked? or a new library? No. $1 million for a park. $15 million-plus for construction of a multi-use sports complex which she rushed through to build on a piece of property that the city didn't even have clear title to, that was still in litigation seven years later --- to the delight of the lawyers involved! The sports complex itself is a nice addition to the community but a huge money pit, not the profit-generator she claimed it would be. She also supported bonds for $5.5 million for road projects that could have been done in five to seven years without any borrowing.

While mayor, city hall was extensively remodeled and her office redecorated more than once.

These are small numbers, but Wasilla is a very small city.

As an oil producer, the high price of oil has created a budget surplus in Alaska. Rather than invest this surplus in technology that will make us energy independent and increase efficiency, as Governor she proposed distribution of this surplus to every individual in the state.

In this time of record state revenues and budget surpluses, she recommended that the state borrow/bond for road projects, even while she proposed distribution of surplus state revenues: spend today's surplus, borrow for needs.

She's not very tolerant of divergent opinions or open to outside ideas or compromise. As mayor, she fought ideas that weren't generated by her or her staff. Ideas weren't evaluated on their merits, but on the basis of who proposed them.

While Sarah was mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected city librarian because the librarian refused to consider removing from the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents rallied to the defense of the city librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter. People who fought her attempt to oust the librarian are on her enemies list to this day.

Sarah complained about the "old boy's club" when she first ran for mayor, so what did she bring Wasilla? A new set of "old boys". Palin fired most of the experienced staff she inherited. At the city and as governor she hired or elevated new, inexperienced, obscure people, creating a staff totally dependent on her for their jobs and eternally grateful and fiercely loyal --- loyal to the point of abusing their power to further her personal agenda, as she has acknowledged happened in the case of pressuring the state's top cop (see below).

As mayor, Sarah fired Wasilla's police chief because he "intimidated" her, she told the press. As governor, her recent firing of Alaska's top cop has the ring of familiarity about it. He served at her pleasure and she had every legal right to fire him, but it's pretty clear that an important factor in her decision to fire him was because he wouldn't fire her sister's ex-husband, a state trooper. Under investigation for abuse of power, she has had to admit that more than two dozen contacts were made between her staff and family to the person that she later fired, pressuring him to fire her ex-brother-in-law. She tried to replace the man she fired with a man who she knew had been reprimanded for sexual harassment; when this caused a public furor, she withdrew her support.

She has bitten the hand of every person who extended theirs to her in help. The city council person who personally escorted her around town introducing her to voters when she first ran for Wasilla City Council became one of her first targets when she was later elected mayor. She abruptly fired her loyal city administrator; even people who didn't like the guy were stunned by this ruthlessness.

Fear of retribution has kept all of these people from saying anything publicly about her.

When then-Governor Murkowski was handing out political plums, Sarah got the best, chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission: one of the few jobs not in Juneau and one of the best paid. She had no background in oil and gas issues. Within months of scoring this great job which paid $122,400 per year, she was complaining in the press about the high salary. I was told that she hated that job: the commute, the structured hours, the work. Sarah became aware that a member of this commission (who was also the state chair of the Republican Party) engaged in unethical behavior on the job. In a gutsy move which some undoubtedly cautioned her could be political suicide, Sarah solved all her problems in one fell swoop: got out of the job she hated and garnered gobs of media attention as the patron saint of ethics and as a gutsy fighter against the "old boys' club" when she dramatically quit, exposing this man's ethics violations (for which he was fined).

As mayor, she had her hand stuck out as far as anyone for pork from Senator Ted Stevens. Lately, she has castigated his pork-barrel politics and publicly humiliated him. She only opposed the "bridge to nowhere" after it became clear that it would be unwise not to.

As governor, she gave the legislature no direction and budget guidelines, then made a big grandstand display of line-item vetoing projects, calling them pork. Public outcry and further legislative action restored most of these projects --- which had been vetoed simply because she was not aware of their importance --- but with the unobservant she had gained a reputation as "anti-pork."

She is solidly Republican: no political maverick. The state party leaders hate her because she has bit them in the back and humiliated them. Other members of the party object to her self-description as a fiscal conservative.

Around Wasilla there are people who went to high school with Sarah. They call her "Sarah Barracuda" because of her unbridled ambition and predatory ruthlessness. Before she became so powerful, very ugly stories circulated around town about shenanigans she pulled to be made point guard on the high school basketball team. When Sarah's mother-in-law, a highly respected member of the community and experienced manager, ran for mayor, Sarah refused to endorse her.

As governor, she stepped outside of the box and put together a package of legislation known as "AGIA" that forced the oil companies to march to the beat of her drum.

Like most Alaskans, she favors drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. She has questioned if the loss of sea ice is linked to global warming. She campaigned "as a private citizen" against a state initiative that would have either a) protected salmon streams from pollution from mines, or b) tied up in the courts all mining in the state (depending on who you listen to). She has pushed the state's lawsuit against the Department of the Interior's decision to list polar bears as threatened species.

McCain is the oldest person to ever run for president; Sarah will be a heartbeat away from being president.

There has to be literally millions of Americans who are more knowledgeable and experienced than she.

However, there's a lot of people who have underestimated her and are regretting it.


"Hockey mom:" true for a few years

"PTA mom:" true years ago when her first-born was in elementary school, not since

"NRA supporter:" absolutely true

social conservative: mixed. Opposes gay marriage, BUT vetoed a bill that would have denied benefits to employees in same-sex relationships (said she did this because it was unconstitutional).

pro-creationism: mixed. Supports it, BUT did nothing as Governor to promote it.

"Pro-life:" mixed. Knowingly gave birth to a Down's syndrome baby BUT declined to call a special legislative session on some pro-life legislation

"Experienced:" Some high schools have more students than Wasilla has residents. Many cities have more residents than the state of Alaska. No legislative experience other than City Council. Little hands-on supervisory or managerial experience; needed help of a city administrator to run town of about 5,000.

political maverick: not at all

gutsy: absolutely!

open & transparent: ??? Good at keeping secrets. Not good at explaining actions.

has a developed philosophy of public policy: no

"a Greenie:" no. Turned Wasilla into a wasteland of big box stores and disconnected parking lots. Is pro-drilling off-shore and in ANWR.

fiscal conservative: not by my definition!

pro-infrastructure: No. Promoted a sports complex and park in a city without a sewage treatment plant or storm drainage system. Built streets to early 20th century standards.

pro-tax relief: Lowered taxes for businesses, increased tax burden on residents

pro-small government: No. Oversaw greatest expansion of city government in Wasilla's history.

pro-labor/pro-union: No. Just because her husband works union doesn't make her pro-labor. I have seen nothing to support any claim that she is pro-labor/pro-union.


First, I have long believed in the importance of being an informed voter. I am a voter registrar. For 10 years I put on student voting programs in the schools. If you google my name (Anne Kilkenny + Alaska), you will find references to my participation in local government, education, and PTA/parent organizations.

Secondly, I've always operated in the belief that "Bad things happen when good people stay silent." Few people know as much as I do because few have gone to as many city council meetings.

Third, I am just a housewife. I don't have a job she can bump me out of. I don't belong to any organization that she can hurt. But, I am no fool; she is immensely popular here, and it is likely that this will cost me somehow in the future: that's life.

Fourth, she has hated me since back in 1996, when I was one of the 100 or so people who rallied to support the city librarian against Sarah's attempt at censorship.

Fifth, I looked around and realized that everybody else was afraid to say anything because they were somehow vulnerable.


I am not a statistician. I developed the numbers for the increase in spending and taxation two years ago (when Palin was running for governor) from information supplied to me by the finance director of the City of Wasilla, and I can't recall exactly what I adjusted for: did I adjust for inflation? for population increases? Right now, it is impossible for a private person to get any info out of city hall --- they are swamped. So I can't verify my numbers.

You may have noticed that there are various numbers circulating for the population of Wasilla, ranging from my "about 5,000", up to 9,000. The day Palin's selection was announced a city official told me that the current population is about 7,000. The official 2000 census count was 5,460. I have used about 5,000 because Palin was mayor from 1996 to 2002, and the city was growing rapidly in the mid-90s.

Anne Kilkenny
Wasilla, Alaska
August 31, 2008

Also in this section:
Editorial, Unifying the opposition and Biden vs. Palin
Sirias, The vision that lived on
Endara Hill, The powers that be in Wonderland
Thompson, The first VP candidate since Teddy Roosevelt who can field dress a moose
Clinton, Time to take back the country we love
Pilgrim, Issues vs. perceptions in the US elections
Weisbrot, Labor law reform riding on the November election results
Setrini, Stiglitz has the right idea and Friedman had the wrong one
Human Rights Watch, Mexico City's abortion legalization upheld
Reporters Without Borders, Online journalist slain in Russian police custody
Committee to Protect Journalists, More attacks on journalists in Russia's Muslim regions
Abeyta, The case for extraditing Goni and his accomplice
Greenpeace, Australia's Great Barrier Reef saved from oil shale extraction
Elzufon, Martín's velvet coup
Jackson, Government and its owners lash out at media they don't control
Leis, Citizens' democracy
Bernal, Abuse of authority
Letters to the editor

Left Wing PublicationsRight Wing Publications

Make the Executive Hotel your headquarters in Panama City ---
Find the boat of your dreams through Evermarine ---


© 2008 by Eric Jackson
All Rights Reserved - Todos Derechos Reservados
Individual contributors retain the rights to their articles or photos

email: or

phone: (507) 6-632-6343

Mailing address:
Eric Jackson
att'n The Panama News
Apartado 0831-00927 Estafeta Paitilla
Panamá, República de Panamá