News | Economy | Culture | Opinion | Lifestyle | Nature
Noticias | Opiniones | Archive | Unclassified Ads | Home

Volume 14, Number 24
December 28, 2008

economy

Also in this section:
Land tenure law set to be jammed through the legislature
DMG money laundering scandal continues to reverberate in Panaman and Colombia
New Tribunal de Cuentas
Sand mine allowed even though the permit specified another location
Sex and money
Business & Economy Briefs


Sex and money: are women regulators different?
by Dean Baker

It is hard not to notice that two of the regulators who stand out for doing the right thing in this incredible financial mess are women. Brooksley Born, as chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under President Clinton, wanted to regulate credit default swaps and other derivative instruments back in the late 90s. Her effort was torpedoed by Clinton’s economic heavyweights: Alan Greenspan, Robert Rubin, and Larry Summers.

More recently, Sheila Bair, the Chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), has been a pesky voice arguing that the purpose of the financial bailouts is not to ensure that the Robert Rubins of the world get to keep their day jobs at the Wall Street banks. She has been arguing that the banks that received public money should be required to rewrite mortgage terms so that more homeowners are able to stay in their homes.

The role of these two women is surprising because finance, and its regulation, continues to be an area that is heavily dominated by men. Therefore it is striking that just about the only regulators who stand out for trying to do the right thing in this tsunami of garbage finance are women.

While some of the luminaries of the economics profession might seek to explain the unusual role of women regulators by biological differences between the sexes, there is a more obvious explanation. Basically, the women who enter the financial world have not been fully integrated into the club. They are still outsiders. Therefore they are more likely to blow the whistle on the sweet deals that can make hundreds of millions for the boys, while leaving the rest of us out in the cold.

This point was made explicitly in a surreptitious campaign to undermine Sheila Bair’s standing in the Obama administration. According to one of the anonymous complainants, Bair is not a team player.

This statement was intended as an indictment of her conduct as FDIC chair, but it actually looks like the highest possible form of praise. After all, this team of financial regulators makes the 1962 Mets look like world champions. If Bair doesn’t fit in, then this is all for the good.

If we needed any further evidence that the financial industry suffered from too much deference to insiders, Bernard Madoff filled the gap. He apparently ran a simple-minded Ponzi scheme for thirty years, stealing tens of billions of dollars from wealthy individuals, private charities, and even large banks.

When some investors and reporters raised suspicions about Mr. Madoff, no one bothered to seriously investigate because he was such a good guy. After all he belonged to all the right clubs, generously supported charities, and was even a founder of the NASDAQ. The regulators don’t investigate respectable people like Madoff and this is precisely the problem.

The regulators are not supposed to be friends of the financial industry. They are the cops who keep the industry from running off with our money. Remember, the big actors in the industry all benefit from a government insurance policy called “too big to fail.”

As any good believer in the free market knows, the finance boys will do everything they can to maximize the value of this government insurance policy. This means taking the biggest possible risks, since at the end of the day the taxpayers, not the firm’s creditors or executives, will pick up the tab. The financial regulators are the ones who are supposed to keep the banks from taking advantage of their government-provided insurance, in addition to keeping them from ripping off pension funds, small city school districts, private charities, and any other suckers they find.

It remains to be seen whether the Obama administration will be prepared to seriously regulate the financial industry. President-elect Obama did pick a woman, Mary Schapiro, to be head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, but her past associations with the financial industry make her look like one of the boys.

In the holiday spirit, perhaps we should give Schapiro --- and Obama --- the benefit of the doubt. But the reality is that the US financial industry is a cesspool. Cleaning it up must be a top priority for the Obama administration. The public must insist on a much smaller, cleaner industry, and long jail sentences for the folks who brought us this economic disaster.


Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer. He also has a blog on the American Prospect, "Beat the Press," where he discusses the media's coverage of economic issues.


Also in this section:
Land tenure law set to be jammed through the legislature
DMG money laundering scandal continues to reverberate in Panama and Colombia
New Tribunal de Cuentas
Sand mine allowed even though the permit specified another location
Sex and money
Business & Economy Briefs


News | Economy | Culture | Opinion | Lifestyle | Nature
Noticias | Opiniones | Archive | Unclassified Ads | Home


Make the Executive Hotel your headquarters in Panama City --- http://ww.executivehotel-panama.com
Find the boat of your dreams through Evermarine ---
http://www.evermarine.com

© 2008 by Eric Jackson
All Rights Reserved - Todos Derechos Reservados
Individual contributors retain the rights to their articles or photos

email: editor@thepanamanews.com or

e_l_jackson_malo@yahoo.com

Cell phone: (507) 6-632-6343

Mailing address:
Eric Jackson
att'n The Panama News
Apartado 0831-00927 Estafeta Paitilla
Panamá, República de Panamá