Home Blog Page 237

¿Wappin? Lewd pulsating rhythms

0
a Yoruba beat
Babatunde Olatunji, from the Wikimedia archives. Remembered African rhythms were at the heart of most American popular music from the very start, but this Yoruba percussionist gave the influence strong reinforcement. He came from Nigeria on a Rotary scholarship to study at Morehouse College in Atlanta, quickly influenced many US musical scenes as a performer and composer, toured with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and played for the UN General Assembly. To the extent that Americans understand a concept they call “world music,” that term began with his wildly successful Drums of Passion album.

“Out of 10? I’ll give it a 12, Dick — that beat has taken over my mind”

Veronica Quintero – Repicame los tambores
https://youtu.be/tmNUbQ5xdTQ

Babatunde Olatunji – Shango
https://youtu.be/fWeDev0QWLc

Kodo – O-Daiko
https://youtu.be/C7HL5wYqAbU

Tito Puente, Sheila E & Pete Escovedo – El Rey de Timbal
https://youtu.be/LE2tFN6DOtk

Peter Gabriel – Rhythm of the Heat
https://youtu.be/qjg0iNPi5pU

Surfaris – Wipe Out
https://youtu.be/p13yZAjhU0M

Siddhi Shah & Srishty Patidar – Tribal Fusion Percussion Duo
https://youtu.be/p1HNhnCYZ4k

Iggy, with Clem Burke drumming – Some Weird Sin
https://youtu.be/vJjs7TU4Qek

Ginger Baker – Aiko Biaye
https://youtu.be/Czrxak2tgwI

MecániK InformaL – Deja La Takilla
https://youtu.be/ccAk20HKPPg

Foli – There is no rhythm without movement
https://youtu.be/lVPLIuBy9CY

Mongo Santamaria – Sofrito
https://youtu.be/n__CQt-Xykc

Santana – Soul Sacrifice
https://youtu.be/xBG6IaSQCpU

Fela Kuti – Water no get enemy
https://youtu.be/IQBC5URoF0s

Osvaldo Jorge – I See Altitudes
https://youtu.be/b3vGALEyhbY

 
~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 
Dinero

A PRD president gets grief from legislators of his own party

0
her
Zulay Rodríguez gets all shrieky in the legislature as she accuses immigration director Samira Gozaine of influence trafficking. President Cortizo rejected her call to fire Gozaine, leaving open the possibility that the National Assembly might investigate and act if it chooses to do so. Graphic taken from a National Assembly video and electronically altered by Eric Jackson.

Is the PRD cracking, or is it just a few flakes?

by Eric Jackson

Will they browbeat the president into ceding his power to hire and fire?

Years ago Laurentino “Nito” Cortizo was representing the mostly rural coastal circuit of Colon in the legislature when the body took up the case of magistrate José Manuel Faúndes, who was caught red-handed in two taped telephone conversations negotiating bribes to sway cases before Panama’s high court.

It turned out that most deputies voted to impeach Faúndes, but not the required two-thirds to convict. The tapes having been broadcast for any Panamanian who cared to do so to hear, the establishment was left in a quandary. It was resolved in the first instance by the other magistrates on the suspending Faúndes from taking part in decision and then by the legislature passing a mandatory 70-year-old retirement age to oust the old crook that way.

(The latter solution was applied to other branches of government and did some lasting harm to academic standards at the University of Panama with the ouster of some distinguished professors and unseemly office politics in the scrambles for their jobs.)

Now we have a National Assembly dominated by people who have stolen public funds, most notoriously but not only from the governmental parallel organization to the Panamanian Olympic Committee popularly known as PANDEPORTES. Legislators control both the supposedly non-governmental sports federation members of the Olympic Committee and their governmental purse strings via PANDEPORTES. Now that President Cortizo has announced austerity measures, activists of his Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) may be gathering in small groups in front of the presidential palace to demand jobs, but their best hopes are with the local governments and such dependencies of the National Assembly. The remaining athletes on the PANDEPORTES payroll are thus being fired to make room for people who campaigned for members of the legislature.

For a party with roots in social reforming militarism and membership in the Socialist International but long since become a political patronage machine without any particular set of beliefs, austerity becomes an existential crisis. Especially so, with the comptroller general and anti-corruption prosecutors having come across damning evidence and enough high court vacancies to be filled that the old non-aggression pact wherein the Supreme Court does not convict deputies and the National Assembly does not convict magistrates has a doubtful future.

Cortizo, in his public statements, has been careful not to intrude upon the turf of the legislators and local officials. But he hasn’t been giving them the money they have demanded and he’s not ceding any of his turf to them.

Leave it to the woman whom Cortizo beat in the presidential primary, a legislator who has steadfastly refused to account for the $100,000 she took from PANDEPORTES for an organization and program that by all indications available to the public have existed on paper only, to lead the offensive onto Cortizo’s turf. Zulay Rodríguez, the xenophobe firebrand, has some recordings wherein Samira Gozaine, director of Migracion, PRD stalwart and member of a prominent wealthy merchant family of the PRD persuasion. Gozaine boasts of the prerogatives of her job, which were exercised to waive the paper requirements for immigration of some businessmen for whom her cousin vouched as a friend.

To Rodríguez it’s a straightforward five to eight years in prison for influence peddling. It’s to be distinguished, somehow, from the case that got Zulay thrown off the bench. In that one she waived the statutory provision of no bail for drug defendants for the benefit of some Colombian suspects whom the DEA had been trailing and who made bail and promptly disappeared.

We don’t know the particulars of the people whom Samira let in. A gang of international pedophiles? People fleeing a region where it’s just not possible to get papers in order? Was a bribe paid? Were these friends of family from a place where Panama’s traditionally racist immigration laws don’t allow immigration?

The laws, administrative rather than penal in nature, have often been waived or bent both for corrupt and innocent reasons. Panama’s historic role in world peacemaking processes has often involved the waiver or this or that immigration requirement to let another country makes its arrangements without the complicating presence of a former strongman.

But to Zulay, Samira’s a crook who must be removed. In her patented screeching way, she got up in the legislative chamber and demanded this.

And Cortizo said no. Allowing that the legislature might make some moves of its own account that would be beyond his control, he didn’t much defend Samira, nor did he talk about the particulars of the situation. He just said no.

aaaah
Attendance was relatively good on this occasion. There is a big ongoing argument between the small MOVIN caucus and their colleagues from the parties about whether those deputies who are absent for a given session should get their pay docked for not being there. It seems like a good idea to the independents, but the rest think that so long as enough deputies or their suplentes show up to make a quorum there is no foul for which anyone should be penalzed. Photo by and of the Asamblea Nacional.

Will they browbeat the administration into making the foreigners pay?

Meanwhile, the xenophobe crowd in the legislature’s PRD – MOLIRENA alliance is both determined to make the foreigners pay and feuding with Panama’s richest family, the Mottas, who among other things own control of Copa Airlines and are backers of the Independent Movement (MOVIN), which has five seats in the 72-member legislature.

Iván Eskildsen, administrator of the Panama Tourism Authority, came to the legislature to report on matters in his purview, and was set upon by deputy Raúl Pineda. Pineda’s gripe? He is one of a group of 16 deputies sponsoring a proposal to tax airline passengers who just pass through Tocumen Airport without stopping here. Eskildsen has met with representatives of the Mottas’ company, Copa, but not with their faction. Pineda promises a housecleaning at the tourism authority due to Eskildsen’s lack of support for the tax proposal. But Eskildsen protested that the tax is a matter for the Civil Aeronautics Authority and thus not in his bailiwick. He pointed out that there are reasons for tourism officials to meet with the nation’s principal airline.

The former president of the National Assembly, Cambio Democratico member Yanibel Ábrego, came to her PRD colleague Pineda’s assistance. She pointed out to Copa getting gates in the airport’s new concourse, and to a US carrier getting some of the gates. Deputy Miguel Fanovich, of the PRD coalition junior partner Nationalist Republican Liberal Movement (MOLIRENA), jumped in to advocate the legislature paralyzing the tourism councils, which he said are costly and have dirtied Ekildsen’s hands.

All reason, it was more or less suggested, to treat someone who had met with the Mottas as a serious traitor.

Of course, the entire tourism industry is against that tax and against the venom that some of the legislators are spitting at foreigners in general. By all conventional measures, these are not good ways to attract tourists to visit Panama or international airlines to use Tocumen as a hub.

And 16 deputies? Less than half of the number required to pass the proposed tax. About one-third of which would be needed to convict someone from the executive or judicial branch in an impeachment trial. But enough to leave Cortizo without a majority supporting him in the legislature if they bolt.

We will know soon enough, but do not expect the president to fire Eskildsen to humor Raúl Pineda et al.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

donate

 

npp

 

vote final

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Hightower, Big business won’t save us from itself

0
freedom
Nearly 200 CEOs have signed a pledge to “do better” than serving their own greed. How? They won’t say. Pro-democracy rally at the US Capitol. WikiMedia archive photo by Becker1999.

Big business won’t save us from itself

by Jim Hightower — OtherWords

Ralph Waldo Emerson once wrote of being leery of a fast-talking huckster who visited his home: “The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons,” Emerson exclaimed.

Likewise, today’s workaday families should do a mass inventory of their silverware, for the fast-talking CEOs of 181 union-busting, tax-cheating, environment-contaminating, consumer-gouging corporations are asking us to believe that they stand with us in the fight against… well, against them.

From Wall Street banksters to Big Oil polluters, these profiteers are suddenly trumpeting their future intentions to serve not just their own greed, but every “stakeholder” (which is what they call employees, customers, suppliers, et al).

But vague proclamations are cheap, and it’s worth noting that these new champions of the common good propose no specifics — no actual sacrifices by them or benefits for us.

A few media observers have mildly objected, saying it’s “an open question” whether any of the corporate proclaimers will change how they do business. But it’s not an open question at all. They won’t.

They won’t support full collective bargaining power for workers, won’t join the public’s push to get Medicare for All, won’t stop using monopoly power to squeeze out small competitors and gouge consumers, won’t support measures to stop climate change, and won’t back reforms to get their corrupt corporate money out of our politics.

All told, they won’t embrace any of the big structural changes necessary to reverse the raw economic and political inequality that has enthroned their plutocratic rule.

In fact, their empty proclamation is what West Texas cowboys might call “bovine excrement,” meant to fend off the actual changes that real reformers are advancing. Corporate elites won’t fix inequality for us — they’re the ones doing it to us.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

donate

 

npp

 

vote final

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

What Democrats are saying

0

Dem voices

https://youtu.be/3_Zu30C92CY


ec






 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

donate

 

npp

 

vote final

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

What Republicans are saying

0

GOP voices

 



threat


https://youtu.be/_hQM9Ddf6Ho




 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

donate

 

npp

 

vote final

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Kermit’s birds / Las aves de Kermit

0
da boid
Black-crowned antshrike / Batará pizarroso occidental / Thamnophilus atrinucha
© Kermit Nourse. Larger / Más grande –
click here / toque aquí

Black-crowned antshrike

Scientific name: Thamnophilus atrinucha
Photographed by Kermit Nourse in Parque Nacional Metropolitano
Panama City, Panama

This small bird has a loud and surprising call for its small size. You can hear it on Neotropical Birds – https://download.ams.birds.cornell.edu/api/v1/asset/525018

These birds range from Belize down to northern South America, with several subspecies that may not look all that similar at a glance. In South America there are populations in western Venezuela, western Colombia and along the coast of Ecuador. There are different common names for the bird in different parts of Latin America.

~ ~

Batará pizarroso occidental

Nombre científico: Thamnophilus atrinucha
Fotografiado por Kermit Nourse en el Parque Nacional Metropolitano
Ciudad de Panamá, República de Panamá

Este pequeño pájaro tiene un llamado ruidoso y sorprendente por su pequeño tamaño. Puedes escucharlo en Neotropical Birds – https://download.ams.birds.cornell.edu/api/v1/asset/525018

Estas aves van desde Belice hasta el norte de América del Sur, con varias subespecies que pueden no parecer tan similares de un vistazo. En América del Sur hay poblaciones en el oeste de Venezuela, el oeste de Colombia y a lo largo de la costa de Ecuador. Hay diferentes nombres comunes para el ave en diferentes partes de América Latina

 
~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 

Editorials: No imported state religion; and Let Saudi Arabia fend for itself

0
the rector
“There is no scientific need to create a law that seeks to give an identity to the babies that die in their mothers’ wombs. The statistics of these cases are already kept. Behind this proposal are ideological and religious concepts, to say the least.” Eduardo Flores, rector of the University of Panama, on his Twitter feed.

A move to reverse the verdict
of more than a century ago

In the period when Panama was a part of Colombia, the country was wracked by a succession of civil wars between Liberals and Conservatives. There were various other issues – Liberal merchants and industrialists against Conservative landowners and such – a persistent reason for the wars was that Conservatives intended to make Catholicism the state religion and Liberals were against having an official faith.

But for a few pockets where big Conservative landowners held sway, Panama was mostly Liberal turf. But at the outset of the 1899-1902 Thousand Day War, a Liberal battlefield blunder – foolish men trying to prove their bravery by charging into machine gun fire at the Calidonia Bridge – left Panama City in Conservative hands. There, over the course of the war and afterwards, the Conservatives presided over mass starvation.

Yes, ultimately is was a Panama Railroad Company and Conservative Party coup, backed by the US Marine Corps, that separated Panama from Colombia. Why did Liberals accept this? It would be a good subject for a doctoral dissertation, but surely at the top of the list was that Panamanians of all stripes were sick of Colombia’s never-ending wars.

When it got around to writing a constitution, some compromises were made. It was acknowledged that most Panamanians were Catholic and that catechism would be taught in the schools. It was stipulated that there would be freedom of religion. Priests were forbidden to hold public office. There was a tacit agreement not to teach or discuss a long history of religious persecution and warfare that dated from the time of the Spanish Conquest.

And the party of an official religion? Within a decade of Panamanian independence the Conservative Party was moribund and soon died out entirely.

Now we have a religious fanatic movement imported from abroad – from the neofascist-connected CitizenGO network based in Spain and from the end times Evangelicals of the United States – seeking to impose its religious dogmas through a law that would create an inquisition aimed at women and girls who have miscarriages or whose babies come out stillborn, and in a constitutional amendment that they want which would require a referendum that would override any legislation or court decision or treaty provision on any subject that fits the international religious right-wing network as a “family issue.”

In our own way, imperfectly as it may have been done, Panama decided long ago that we didn’t want government-imposed religion. And it’s worth mobilizing and putting up with a lot of defamation and grief to uphold that early 20th century verdict. The European goose step and North American end times fantasies have no place in Panamanian public affairs.

  

Yemeni school
The Saudis, using US-supplied weapons, bomb schools in Yemen in the course of a war that the Saudis started four years ago. The Saudis also indiscriminately bomb hospitals and residential neighborhoods. So the world is supposed to be shocked and outraged when Yemen hits back at the Saudi oil complex? And the people of the USA, the forces of which is losing in Afghanistan and Iran-Syria, are supposed to clamor for a new war with Iran because of this payback? Photo from the Right Word Yemen’s Twitter feed.

Don’t send guns or troops – let the oil economy go!

Saudi Arabia and a few allies, backed by the United States, the United Kingdom and Israel, have carried out an atrocious Sunni jihad against Yemen, which they want to spread to Iran.

Has five percent of the world’s oil reserve gone up in smoke from the Yemeni counter-attack? The Saudis deserved it. Moreover, with the ongoing calamities of climate change the rest of the world should have long since taken the hint to end the petroleum economy.

Are there financial, industrial and human resources just lying around to be used in a US war over Middle Eastern oil? They should be dedicated to the USA getting by without oil instead.

  

There are two kinds of light – the glow that illuminates, and the glare that obscures.
James Thurber

 

Bear in mind…

  

I never see what has been done; I only see what remains to be done.

Marie Curie

 

Men are more often bribed by their loyalties and ambitions than by money.

Robert Jackson

 

Civilization is a method of living, an attitude of equal respect for all men.

Jane Addams

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

donate

 

npp

 

vote final

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

#RespetoAlDolorDeMadre

0
1

La oposición se reúne en contra
de la extrema derecha religiosa

  

2a


b5


2


4


5a


6


7a




9









~ ~ ~

Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Dinero

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

FB esp

 

FB CCL

Prosecutors move for a Blue Apple trial

0
poisot fruit
Fruit of the toxic tree.

Attorney general moves to try 59 in the Blue Apple public works contracts kickbacks and money laundering case

by Eric Jackson

This past Wednesday, September 11, the Sixth Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s office filed a court motion to bring 59 defendants to trial on various charges in the Blue Apple case. A Friday night notice by the Public Ministry (the attorney general’s office) acknowledged the filing and said that there would be a Monday, September 16 press conference to provide further details and perhaps answer questions from selected media.

Blue Apple was a purported factoring company that was an intermediary in systematic pubic works contract kickbacks during the Martinelli administration. While the Brazilian company Odebrecht and the Spanish company FCC are perhaps more notorious for this racket, the Blue Apple clientele read as a virtual Who’s Who of Panamanian building contractors who bid on government business, or who subcontract for those who do.

Late last year it was known that 62 persons had been named. However, some of the individuals and companies have made plea bargains and would not be involved in the trial, if the courts allow it to proceed. How many potential defendants have been dropped for lack of evidence or diverted to other files due to plea bargains is not know, nor the number and identities of any new defendants added. A dozen people are and have been imprisoned on preventive detention in this case so far.

The two most prominent fugitives in this case are Ricardo Martinelli’s two sons, who are being harbored by the Trump administration in the United States. That might change if extraditions papers are filed in the USA, but the two were arrested for being in the United States illegally, then released on bail rather than given the bum’s rush out of the country as happens to many another undocumented immigrant. A politically exposed person need not even enjoy an opportunity to clog up the courts, but might be summarily expelled from the United States for matters of state.

Might Ricardo Martinelli himself be charged? He and his lawyers say that there can be no criminal proceedings against him, now that he has been “exonerated” on illegal wiretapping and theft charges in a decision seen by nearly everyone except his supporters and those political figures who have a stake in upholding impunity as corrupt. That, supposedly, because of the international legal concept of “exceptionality,” which means that ordinarily a person extradited for one matter may not be tried for another charge. But the concept is not absolute, is not uniformly interpreted around the world, and is not included in one of the two treaties invoked for Martinelli’s extradition. One common interpretation of the rule is that upon acquittal a defendant has the right to return to from whence she or he was extradited. But would the Trump administration let Ricardo Martinelli back into Miami? And if Martinelli doesn’t leave Panama for wherever he may be taken in, does he lose whatever protection he may have had? It is known that as early as this past January the Public Ministry was studying that concept and whether it might apply here. The norm might just be that it says whatever the magistrates are bribed to say it means to say.

Those named as probable defendants also include former first lady Marta Linares de Martinelli, former public works minister Federico José Suárez, former Ministry of Public Works contracting chief Jorge Churro Ruiz and former Global Bank vice president for factoring Joaquín Rodríguez Salcedo. There has been a tight lid on information about which construction companies and their officers or employees are involved.

And why the delay on pursuing this case, which appears to be linked to a number of other cases in which charges have been dropped mostly on procedural grounds? This was a Martinelli administration arrangement, but former president Varela hinted that he was not too interested in pursuing the matter as to his government’s contracting procedures because it might disqualify almost all of the larger construction firms here.

The case moved just as President Cortizo receives a bill passed by the National Assembly  to legalize corporate criminals who have made plea arrangements and paid their fines to bid on government contracts.

This would be a long and complicated trial, involving at least six forms of deception for the laundering of bribes and kickbacks. So what if it extends until after December 31? That’s when Attorney General Porcell’s term ends and the heavily compromised legislature seems agreed on replacing her with somebody who will end all criminal prosecutions for corruption. Under Panama’s constitution the appointment of the attorney general is entirely a legislative matter, although a president can use budget strings to manipulate deputies about these sorts of things.

 







ba7

 
~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 

Privatization bill passes with provision to let criminals participate

0
APP
On September 12 the bill passed third reading in the National Assembly and was sent to President Cortizo to sign.

Now Odebrecht can get public contracts as if nothing happened

by Eric Jackson

All across Latin America notorious bribe paying companies, the Brazilian Odebrecht combine the most notorious among them, are being barred from bidding on public works projects. But it has not been so in Panama. 

First, while the Panamanian court system was jammed up by Ricky Martinelli, his hoods and their phalanxes of lawyers, Odebrecht had been convicted in multiple countries with judgments based on confessions that mentioned Panamanian connections — but the Varela administration took the position that since these judgments did not come out of Panamanian courts, none of these things ever happened.

Finally prosecutors here closed in and got Odebrecht to plead guilty to bribes and kickbacks in exchange for testimony under the plea bargaining provisions of the Adversarial Penal System. But then the courts, and the Varela administration insisted that the criminal penalties imposed in those plea bargains were the only permissible consequences, such that the company still had a RIGHT to bid for public works contracts.

Now that the government is nearly broke — only half a billion in the budget for public works contracts, an old privatization scheme that was rejected in 2011, Public-Private Associations — APPs, by their Spanish initials — has been revived and passed. Now private companies can get concessions to build and operate public infrastructures, or public services, as profit-making private businesses. Under the new law there are possibilities of behind-the-scenes profit guarantees. Generally the government will hold a stake in any APP venture.

The first version of the proposal had barred the participation of companies convicted of crimes — by Panamanian courts only — such as laundering money for drugs or terrorism or paying bribes to public officials. But in the legislative process the PRD raised the banner of social justice for thug companies. As finally passed, the provision is that so long as a company like Odebrecht — or, theoretically, one owned by al Qaeda — pays off all fines and restitution ordered by Panamanian courts, it can bid for APP concessions.

Lowbrow melodrama was provided by PRD deputy and assembly vice president Zulay Rodríguez, who voted to allow Odebrecht to bid on public works contracts and blamed it on independent legislator Juan Diego Vásquez who, along with the other independents, Cambio Democratico and Panameñista deputies. See, when he was not a legislator and she was, Vásquez supported the idea of plea bargaining to clear court dockets and provide a break to persons and entities that turn state’s evidence. Zulay made no great fuss about that when it passed the legislature. But now the law that Zulay just supported is all Juan Diego’s fault — because she’s Zulay, the post-truth politician.

What’s the legislature’s youngest deputy, who got more votes out of the multi-member San Miguelito circuit than Zulay did, to say about that? “I come here to the Assembly having been a private citizen, to speak with arguments and with evidence. I would never dare to say something if I could not support it. Meanwhile others, and some colleagues, are experts in telling lies,” Vásquez told the Martinelista tabloid La Crítica.

Whereupon PRD deputy from Bocas del Toro Benicio Robinson declared that the National Assembly has a bad image because of Juan Diego Vásquez.

The president is expected to sign the bill into law, but he has a line item veto and might nix the free pass for convicted companies. He also could sign it into law as is and on his shift play the bid rigging games that the convicted companies and corrupt officials did, except this time to steer business away from those parties.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

donate

 

npp

 

vote final

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet