Home Blog Page 371

Democrats Abroad by-laws question 4: meetings

0

us4

By-laws Question 4

Proposed amendment to Article XVII of the
Democrats Abroad Panama by-laws (meetings)

Add two new sections, to read:

17.9 Democrats Abroad Panama shall acquire its own Skype address, which shall be made known to the membership and be shall used at our meetings to make it easier for members who cannot attend in person to participate and to avoid the technical and scheduling problems that have been experienced using the Democrats Abroad international WebX account.

17.10 Democrats Abroad Panama shall establish a fund to help defray the travel costs:

  1. . of officers and board members who in order to participate in meetings must travel into Panama City from homes outside the metro area or to places with usable Internet service from homes with unusable connections; and

  2. . of those who must travel physically or incur special costs to participate electronically while representing Democrats Abroad Panama at regional or international Democrats Abroad meetings.

 

vote final

Democrats Abroad Question 3: Change the rule on removing a board member

0

us3

By-laws question 3

Proposed amendment to the rule
on removing a board member

(new parts in bold, strike parts with a line)

14.2 Any Officer or Member-at-Large may be removed from office by a majority vote of:

  1. . those present or attending online at a duly convened meeting of the membership or;
  2. . those voting in a duly organized vote by mail or electronic ballot (e.g. e-mail, web) on the question;
  3. . notice of any meeting under this section must be given in writing to the full membership at least 30 days in advance;
  4. . any such notice, at the time of the notice, must state the time and the place of the meeting.

 

vote final

Democrats Abroad proposed by-law: Change the nominations procedure

0

us2

By-laws Question 2

Proposed amendment to change
the nominations procedure

(a line through stricken parts, new parts in bold)

Article XIII: Nominations

13.1 At least two months prior to the annual meeting, a committee to nominate candidates (the “Nominations Committee”) for positions on the Board shall be named by the Chairperson with the approval of the Board.

13.2 At the meeting approving the appointment of the Nominations Committee, the Board shall decide, in view of local circumstances and to promote the greatest participation, whether the elections shall be conducted (i) by e-mail ballot (to be counted at the annual meeting), and/or (ii) by vote (in person or by proxy) held at the annual meeting and shall adopt the rules with respect to the election.

a. The Nominations Committee may also bifurcate the elections process, with an election of the Chair in a first round of the process, then after a Chair has been elected the elections of the other officers and board members in a second round.

b. For Chair, the Nominations Committee shall submit the names of all qualified members who wish to run for the post to the membership as candidates. This does not relieve the Nominations Committee of its obligation to seek out a good candidate, and if others want to run, an arguable better candidate.

13.3 The Nominations Committee shall announce its nominees to the membership no later than 30 days prior to the annual meeting.

13.4 If the elections are to be conducted by mail or by electronic processes (e.g.e-mail, web) any member of the organization wishing to run for office as an Officer or a Member-at-Large and not nominated by the Nominations Committee shall declare his/her candidacy at least 14 days before the annual meeting by letter, fax or e-mail addressed to the chairperson of the Nominations Committee.

The Secretary shall send ballots by mail, fax, or e-mail to members of the organization no earlier than 13 days before the annual meeting and no later than 10 days before such meeting.

13.5 Nominations for all positions to be filled may be made from the floor of the annual meeting.

 

vote final

Democrats Abroad proposed by-law: Question 1, The Reform Amendment

0

usBy-laws Question 1

The Reform Amendment

A “stand alone” new addition to our by-laws

Preamble: Democrats Abroad Panama is a democratic association of free individuals who are members of the Democratic Party and affiliated with its international organization, Democrats Abroad. As a country chapter we are as autonomous and as bound as would be any county organization in a US state. We run our own affairs on a democratic basis and only in unusual circumstances, with full prior knowledge of all board members, do we seek advice about our local affairs from regional or international levels of Democrats Abroad or from the Democratic National Committee. Our members, and those of them who have been entrusted with positions on the board of directors, are expected in all Democrats Abroad activities to be civil and honest with one another and to work for the Democratic Party and its commonly held principles, setting aside all personal and pecuniary promotions. Acute breaches of these principles have caused the organization great distress. To remedy these problems, and in general to reach out to larger constituencies rather than to maintain the attitudes of an inward-looking clique, we add this Reform Amendment to the Democrats Abroad Panama bylaws.

Article I — Our communications

1. There will be no announcement sent out to just a part of the Democrats Abroad Panama email list. Every announcement of a party meeting or function goes out to everybody.

2. No member or officer shall publish his or her portrait, promote a personal or business website or affect any title or credential other than simply the relevant office which she or he holds within Democrats Abroad Panama in any announcement sent out via our email list. A message to the email list may include an email address or telephone number through which an officer or board member may be reached. The use of private website archives for the limited purpose of more convenient links in our emails to documents germane to Democrats Abroad Panama activities is allowed so long as this is not used as an endorsement or promotion of such website.

3. Our Democrats Abroad Panama – open group Facebook page, our social gatherings and our meetings — at appropriate times and in appropriate manners — are proper places for people to introduce or describe themselves. Announcements on our email list and postings on our Democrats Abroad Panama – party Facebook page are not proper places for such discourse.

4. We may advertise fundraising events for Democrats Abroad Panama via our email list and our Facebook pages, but taking great care not to append commercial messages for other businesses in these announcements. If we are to meet in a bar or restaurant, we may say where it is but we may not insert one of their advertisements into our communications.

5. Any announcement of any membership meeting that will vote to elect or remove any officer, board member or to expel any member of the organization shall be made separately from any announcement of any other matter. If a slate or candidate is to be proffered, that candidate or those members of the slate should be identified in the announcement. If a board member or member of the organization is to be removed or expelled, the specific reason or reasons for this must be particularly stated in the announcement. In any announcement of a membership meeting to elect, remove or expel anyone, the date, time and location of the meeting must be given at least 30 full days before the vote in an email announcement to the entire membership. Such notices shall also be posted in both of the organization’s Facebook pages.

6. The people who are authorized to post the email announcements and who run the Facebook pages — or any other communications media for Democrats Abroad Panama — need not be members of the board of directors. Whether they are board members or not, they are subject to the direction of the board.

7. Technologies and communications services evolve and change over time, but the principles in this article shall also apply to such new media as Democrats Abroad Panama come to use and embrace.

Article II — Our meetings

1. Participation in votes taken at Democrats Abroad Panama annual and general membership meetings shall be regulated to on the one hand prevent unethical practices and on the other hand to encourage the maximum participation of the membership.

2. In general, board of directors and membership meetings shall be open to online participation by way of WebX or whatever comparable service Democrats Abroad’s regional or international offices are offering, or by Skype or such similar service as DA Panama should designate. When possible such connections should also be used to record the meetings.

3. Participation in Democrats Abroad Panama meetings by telephone is discouraged due to the cost and due to the possibilities of abuse, wherein votes might be rigged by the insertion of unidentifiable disembodied voices. When there is to be telephone participation this must be arranged in advance with the informed consent of the entire board of directors, it should include only those registered and verified to be members prior to the meeting and at the start of the meeting — or as soon as possible after the start of the telephone connection — anyone participating by telephone shall identify himself or herself.

4. It is prohibited for any employer, private or public, to organize, encourage or require his, her or its employees to participate in any Democrats Abroad meeting, function or vote. People mobilized under such conditions shall be considered to be acting under economic coercion and ineligible to participate in that condition.

5. Proxies are not allowed in any vote to elect anyone as an officer or board member, or on any motion to remove any such person from his or her post or to expel any member.

6. As an additional part of the live meetings, there will be remote electronic voting, either by email, chat or some other system, for all elections of officers or board members and on any motion to remove the same or to expel any member. Such electronic voting shall be conducted in a transparent manner so that any board member, officer or member of the organization may freely see, examine and count such votes, and may be coordinated with other levels of Democrats Abroad or sister country chapters playing observer roles.

7. A regular meeting schedule at a regular place, even in months when a quorum of the board or membership cannot be mustered, is important to our cohesion as a social group and for people to conveniently come to join us. Such a regular meeting place should be barrier free with a short distance from the parking lot to the meeting table so as to be as a practical matter open to those using walkers or wheelchairs. The meeting place, if in a restaurant, should have modest prices. The meeting place should not be in a bar or other establishment that forbids entry to minors. The meeting place should be convenient to those who use public transportation.

Article III – Representation and participation

1. Within 30 days after the results of any Democrats Abroad Global Primary are announced, the respective supporters of each candidate who received at least 10 percent of the votes of Democrats Abroad Panama shall elect a member of the board of directors, in addition to the directors already in place. These candidates’ representatives shall be among the designated electors that Democrats Abroad Panama sends to the following international Democrats Abroad convention to select Democratic National Convention delegates and members of the Democratic National Committee. These candidate’s representatives shall continue as members of the board in the new board that is elected in the following year, but at that time not to represent any particular candidate or faction but to ensure that Democrats Abroad Panama remains as pluralist and inclusive an organization as the Democratic Party in general.

2. Those young activists who are not yet old enough to vote but who work for Democrats Abroad Panama campaigns or activities are welcome at all of our board and general membership meetings as observers and, by leave of the board, to participate with voice or vote in meetings. Such younger Democrats shall be encouraged should the decide to organize themselves into a local youth branch of our party.

3. The United States has tens of millions of citizens and residents who speak Spanish as a first language and many US citizens in Panama are dual nationals whose native tongue is Spanish. Democrats Abroad Panama is thus authorized and encouraged to conduct some of its activities in Spanish.

4. Under international Democrats Abroad rules, membership is restricted to US citizens. However, there are:

  1. Green Card holders who already have some legal rights to participate in US politics such as by donating to campaigns;

  2. spouses and children of American citizens who do not have US citizenship (and in the latter case, some of whom Democrats Abroad supports in their yearning to expand the rights to American citizenship of all children of Americans such as themselves);

  3. Americans not now resident in Panama who are of the Panamanian or Canal Zone diasporas and with whom Democrats Abroad Panama maintains relations both to turn out the Democratic vote in Panama and to do likewise in the diaspora communities of the USA; and

  4. friends and fellow social justice activists with whom Democrats Abroad Panama interact in varous contexts although they are not US citizens;

whom we welcome at our meetings, on our Facebook pages and in our activities.

 

vote final

Top of the agenda: Round two over an Electoral Tribunal seat

0
The National Assembly, which traditionally runs way ahead of the pack in a close race with the Supreme Court for the distinction of Panama’s most reviled public institution. Photo by the Asamblea Nacional.

Top of the agenda, the unfinished brawl
over an electoral magistrate post

by Eric Jackson

When the National Assembly convenes after the holidays, the archbishop will give his blessing and President Varela will make his speech. Then the legislators will get down to legislating, with a bit of old business at the top of the agenda. That’s the selection of an Electoral Tribunal magistrate to replace the retiring Erasmo Pinilla, who has served two 10-year terms on the body. Among Panama’s public institutions, this three-member election court ranks highly in public esteem, albeit that they are never as popular as the bomberos. Since the end of the 22-year military dictatorship there hasn’t been a presidential election stolen or nullified and Panamanians appreciate that.

Pinilla’s term is set to run out on December 31, but it may last a few days longer because the deputies were unable to agree on a replacement before the regular legislative session ended with the month of October. There were bitter allegations and recriminations for the missed deadline. It was not the first time that regular session ended with an appointment not made. Usually in such cases a special session is called to finish the job. But this time there were too many factors up in the air, no party has a majority in the legislature and attempts to browbeat seemed unlikely to do more than further poison a partisan atmosphere, so President Varela declined to call such a session. It’s really no big deal as a procedural matter — the official to be replaced remains in office until his or her replacement takes office, so it’s perhaps and extra paycheck for Pinilla.

The lineup in the National Assembly is like this: the PRD, in which a bitter fight for control of the party was coming to its climax at the end of October, has 26 deputies. Ricardo Martinelli’s Cambio Democratico party (CD), thanks in large part to judicial dysfunctions and disinclinations to deal with vote buying in any serious way, has 23 seats, or when you count their junior sidekicks MOLIRENA, 25. President Varela’s Panameñista Party can muster 17 votes, one of them from a Partido Popular ally. Then there is the lone independent, Ana Matilde Gómez.

Everyone who works at the Electoral Tribunal is theoretically nonpartisan but in many cases this is not so. Its three members are appointed in a rotation in which the Supreme Court, the President and the National Assembly each get turns making an appointment of both a magistrate and an alternate (suplente) when it’s their insitutional term. As these terms are for a decade, not every president and not every legislature gets to appoint somebody. But behind all pretenses one can look at the political background from whence an individual came and who held power in the appointing institution to assign an estimated party label. Eduardo Valdés was one of the first post-dictatorship appointees in 1990, by the Supreme Court. During the dictatorship the courts entrusted him with some important jobs but he wasn’t particularly identified with either the military regime or its vocal critics. He was reappointed by a somewhat PRD-dominated high court in 2010. Heriberto Araúz was a Ricardo Martinelli appointee who might well be described as an old creature of the dictatorship who along with many others of that background migrated from the PRD entourage to Cambio Democratico orbit. Pinilla came to the tribunal from the PRD. In a sense, to balance things out one might expect a person who has never been closely identified with the party but has a certain affinity for the Panameñista Party to get that post. But the two biggest parties, the PRD and CD, are both divided and for their own different reasons feel existentially threatened. Give the soon to be vacant seat to a CD person and there would be the real or perceived danger that Ricardo Martinelli will be running the next elections. Give it to the someone associated with the PRD and it would raise fears of a tilt in that direction. Given that since the invasion Panamanians have always voted out the sitting president’s party, Pinilla’s replacement might be kingmaker (or queen maker, but probably the former).

In the first round of wrangling, CD came up with a roster sordid partisan figures, which of course were nonstarters. The PRD, then headed by party president Benicio Robinson, came up with the hardly less partisan former legislator Raúl Rodríguez. Early on the Panameñistas backed legislative functionary Alfredo Juncá, a civil servant rather than a politician as such. So is Juncá nonpartisan enough to pass muster with anyone other than the Panameñistas? Even if he arguably is, he hails from the disreputable legislature.

CD and the PRD, both divided, punted at the end of the last legislative session. The Panameñistas were furious, essentially arguing that the other parties had a duty to come to an agreement by the deadline.

The PRD had its convention and Robinson was eclipsed within the party by fellow legislator Pedro Miguel González, the new secretary general. This appointment will be a big test of how the PRD behaves in the National Assembly under new leadership. The party dropped Rodríguez and went with a long-time Electoral Tribunal employee, Yara Campos, who after years within the institution became an alternate magistrate in 2006.

CD, enmeshed in a struggle for leadership between former canal affairs minister Rómulo Roux and former labor minister Alma Cortés — with Washington harboring the fugitive Martinelli and appearing to favor Roux, but the potential for abrupt changes in US government policies — has dropped its initial roster of nominees and is set to meet to define its position. Most likely the fractured party will be looking to see whether it’s the PRD or the Panameñistas who offer them a better deal.

According to La Prensa, the Panameñista fall-back candidate if Juncá falls short would be the electoral prosecutor’s Varela-appointed suplente, Ceila Peñalba. Filling the vacancy left by Peñalba would leave some trading possibilities, but the big unsolved problem for the rule of law in Panamanian elections is the electoral prosecutor himself, Martinelli appointee Eduardo Peñaloza, a sneeringly partisan character who took flagant dives in cases of clear election crimes by Martinelistas in the 2014 campaign but survives because the divisions in Panamanian politics preclude his easy removal.

By operation of the most applicable laws, 2014 election crimes are mostly now past the statutes of limitations and the Electoral Tribunal has no jurisdiction over Martinelli himself. That makes the urgency of self-preservation less acute for CD deputies in the current negotiations. Also easing the situation for them is an apparent consensus among the parties that vote buying is acceptable and encouraged, so long as it’s not with public funds.

Outside of those sorts of consensuses is the legislature’s lone, independent, former attorney general Ana Matilde Gómez. She says that she is going to vote for a woman to fill Pinilla’s seat, but won’t say which one. The selection of a female magistrate would break of an exclusive boys’ club on the tribunal that has prevailed since the post-invasion ouster of Noriega’s notorious election judge Yolanda Pulice.

 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.

 

vote final

original colors button

FB_2

Tweet

Gush Shalom, An international consensus on Israeli settlements

0
racism in Hebron
Apartheid system: settlers trying to drive out the Palestinian majority in Hebron. If you say that the JDL doesn’t represent the thinking of most Jews, you’re right. But such attitudes drive the policy of the State of Israel and the world condemns it. Photo 2008 by Magne Hagesæter.

It’s an international consensus: settlements are illegal and harmful

by Gush Shalom — the Israeli peace bloc

At the Security Council, a rare international consensus was achieved. It was clearly and unequivocally resolved that the establishment of settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories is an impermissible act, contrary to International Law, and that the State of Israel must cease immediately and completely construction and expansion of settlements. The resolution was adopted by the votes of all Security Council Members, represent all parts of the Earth, First World and Third World alike – Europe and North America, South America and Africa and Asia, as well as Australia and New Zealand (which itself shared in presenting the resolution to the vote). There was not a single country in the entire world to speak in favor of continuing the settlement enterprise and theft of Palestinian lands.

The achievement of this consensus was made possible thanks to President Obama’s decision to cease the policy of automatic veto. It was this automatic veto which had led the Government of Israel to live in a virtual reality and continue plunging us deeper into the abyss of occupation, oppression and the eternal conflict with the Palestinians. It is well Obama broke the veto policy, even if at his last moment in office.

As is well known, within a month Donald Trump is about to enter the White House. Trump’s strident voice on the subject of the settlements was already heard out of the mouth of the manifestly undiplomatic Ambassador to Israel which he appointed. The Israeli cabinet ministers who act as if the Messiah has come would be well-advised to be more cautious. Linking up the future of the State of Israel to a man who by all indications will be one of the most controversial presidents in US history is a short-sighted and highly dangerous policy. Trump will come, cause damage and disappear. Israel will remain facing the worldwide opposition to the settlements.

 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.

 

vote final

original colors button

FB_2

Tweet

¿Wappin? International Christmas sounds

0
Bethlehem
Christmas Midnight Mass as the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, Palestine. Photo by A. Morgan, Ecumenical Accompaniment Program in Palestine and Israel / World Council of Churches.

Christmas music in several languages, including Jesus Christ’s native tongue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

little donor button

FB_2

Tweet

vote final

Spanish PayPal button

Harrington, Tufillo de corrupción

0
ANIMALS!
Conspiración para cometer periodismo: Okke Ornstein, Eric Jackson y Kimberlyn David en el tribunal municpal en Ancon. Foto por Gille Frenken.

Tufillo de corrupción

por Kevin Harrington

La reciente reducción de pena al periodista holandés Okke Orrnstein recuerda el caso de Rosie Simms –periodísta científica canadiense que divulgó el maltrato a indígenas panameños, por mineras canadienses en Petaquilla.

Los reportajes de Orrnstein lograron retirar el socio holandés del consorcio que financia la (misteriosa) hidroeléctrica Barro Blanco.

Orrnstein también se opone a Petaquilla….

Ambos periodistas reflejan el terror a la transparencia, que caracteriza al régimen que nos gobierna –tanto en su versión original, como en su actual re-edición….

El 20 de enero 2012 la señorita Simms fue detenida en Tocúmen por Migración, por considerar que su propuesta colaboración en un documental de la CBC sería “un riesgo a la seguridad nacional”.

El habeas corpus interpuesto inmediatamente, TARDÓ CUATRO AÑOS en declarar que la canadiense de 24 años realmente no constituía tal peligro. Como canciller de la época, el hoy presidente de la República ha de saber cómo, a las pocas horas de su detención, Simms pudo retornar al Canadá con un caso pendiente ante un Órgano Judicial presuntamente “autónomo”….

Hoy, ya conforme a sus atribuciones legales, don Juan Carlos Varela redujo la pena de Orrnstein –porque se lo exigió en su discurso de apertura de la Conferencia Anti-Corrupción “caiga quien caiga” don José Ugaz.

Huelga decir que la condena de Orrnstein por calumnia e injuria habría sido solicitada por abogados de alto perfil en el Partido Panameñísta reinante.

Ambos casos corroboran que, en la mal-llamada “república” de Panamá, los cambios significativos llegan desde fuera. Y que nuestro Estado de derecho no es más que (otra) ficción jurídica…

Subrayan además cómo la auto-censura del periodismo local demora aún más nuestro (urgente) desarrollo integral.

Así las cosas, resulta fácil entender qué pasó en el (vergonzoso) Caso Waked.

“Para muestra, un botón.”

Los medios locales TODOS han acallado la noticia traída al tapete por la mentada Estrella de Panamá.

Según la Decána, fue el representante personal del presidente Varela ante su aliado en Washington quien interpuso formal denuncia por (supuesta) extorsión de parte del director de un medio digital. Ello lo mantiene desde hace meses con sus huesos en la cárcel El Renacer, mientras los tiempos de la “Justicia” se mueven al paso de la procesión de Taboga, como suele suceder cuando se trata de un clásico “incidente confuso”, donde la realidad choca con el Poder y/o Don Dinero.

Ni La Estrella le dio seguimiento a su inusual primicia.

Ello, a pesar que el caso en su fondo se desvirtúa el debido proceso legal, que supondría proteger al periodismo de tales excesos de poder.

Pero aparentemente NINGÚN “comunicador” –ni quienes gozan de inmunidad legislativa– comparte que una “extorsión” al plenopotenciario en nuestro principal destino diplomático no fuera (ex oficio) del interés-público…. pese a que todos reclaman ese derecho a la información como su modus vivendi….

 

~ ~ ~
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Spanish PayPal button

Tweet

FB esp

12 causes to support for a more just and intelligent world

0
Okke
“The most potent weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed,” Steven Biko said. This goes a long way toward explaining why Okke Ornstein, here covering a protest in Panama, was thrown in jail. There are big efforts by powerful people and institutions to cut off information that does not come from them.

A dozen better causes than
Santa Claus for socialites

a holiday guide with a bias toward intelligence and freedom

If you are celebrating the victory of post-truth and gloating over the suffering of those unlike yourself that this will enhance in the coming year, this may seem hilarious to you. If your are concerned about the rise of irrationalism and suppression of information and would rather not be kept in the dark about the world around you, there are people and groups that you would be well advised to support if you can. Regular readers of The Panama News, and particularly those of you who follow our Facebook postings, will recognize many of these groups and causes. It has been a rough year for most of them, in part because progressive folks in the USA and the American diaspora spent a lot of their disposable money promoting the Bernie Sanders campaign that may have set the stage for things to come but fell short of victory. Across much of Latin America as well as in the USA, repressive and truth-unfriendly forces have gained the upper hand and moves as quickly as possible to muffle critical voices. Yes, freedom of expression is under threat, but probably worse is the flip side of this, your endangered right to accurate information and intelligent commentary about it. Here are 12 year-end investments that you can make to shore up your right to know. These graphics are all interactive and will get you to the respective donation functions.

CEPR
The Center for Economic and Policy Research is one of the least endangered institutions on this list, and also one of the most valuable. The plutocrats have a glut of well financed think tanks that churn up unworthy stuff for corporate politicians and media to repeat. CEPR is OUR think tank.

 

Mozilla
The for-profit Google is an imperialist monster whose search engine gets gamed by Nazis so that you “know” that the Holocaust never happened, and the for-profit Microsoft churns out software with planned obsolescence so that you will have to buy new computers with new programs when the old stuff worked well enough. And then there is Mozilla, the not-for-profit folks who created the Firefox browser and who stand with a few others at the forefront of the crucial battle for a free and open Internet.

 

Laura
The Americas Program is one of the progressive media that had a very hard time in 2016. Based in Mexico, it’s the online home of Laura Carlsen, whose journalism is indispensable if you want to know about what’s going on in Mexico and, thanks to other folks who publish on this website, Latin America in general.

 

Sherman...
The Wayback Machine isn’t Sherman and Peabody’s toy anymore. It’s the nonprofit Internet Archive that does much to keep hackers and other scoundrels from erasing the electronic public record in order to keep you in the dark. In many ways it’s the cutting edge library that’s holding the line against a new Dark Age.

 

ALAI
ALAI started out in Brazil, with some Liberation Theology Catholics at its core. It has grown into the multilingual information agency and forum of Latin America’s left, publishing articles in English, Spanish, French and Portuguese. It’s not the property or tool of any particular government or political party and that makes it all the more valuable when progressive forces need critical friends rather than dull sycophants.

 

COHA
The Council on Hemispheric Affairs started back in the dark days of the 1970s “Dirty Wars,” when the dominant Washington narrative was about those wonderful freedom fighters, the death squads and the dictators, who were winning the Cold War for freedom and democracy by stealing or canceling elections and disappearing those with different ideas. Nowadays the same kind of folks who thought General Pinochet was a wonderful guy tend to proclaim the wonderful victories of the War on Drugs and COHA systematically debunks that stuff. A very important aspect of this think tank is that it has a core of veteran Latin Americanist professionals surrounded by a much larger group of student interns, and is thus training the next generation of activists, academics and journalists.

 

PS
The Project Syndicate is the opinion section for those who ignore the deceptive or ignorant memes but pay attention to the well-reasoned opinions of those with whom they disagree. You will find opinions and analysis that you will like there, however. Their stall of contributors includes Nobel laureates, former top diplomats and government ministers and leaders of industry and academia. You get heads up about what’s about to come down and insights on what just happened here.

 

Tikkun
God’s a southpaw and some of the fingers of God’s left hand are Jewish. This is the progressive, intelligent and decent publication that Rabbi Michael Lerner started, the Jewish expression of the liberation theology, if you will, but now reaching out to a network of spiritual progressives from many denominations.

 

Okke
Corporate coverage of what happens in Panama is awful. The Google News filiter of what it lets through about this country is one of the best arguments for an alternative search engine of the global South. Especially on the English-language side, the ragtag little band who cover The Crossroads of the World is terribly short-handed and Okke’s part can’t be spared. As these words are written, we expect Okke Ornstein to be released from prison shortly. However, his legal bills are not paid, we don’t know the terms of his release and what further legal battles will be necessary, and there is still the fight in Europe to unfreeze his Bananama Republic website, which was obtained by hustlers wielding a reprehensible Panamanian court decision. So just because this irreverent Dutchman gets on the loose again doesn’t mean that his need for our support goes away.

 

RSN
So WHY should The Panama News add to the cacophony of the constant Reader Supported News fundraising campaigns? Because both as a news aggregator and as a publisher of original stuff, RSN is worthy. Screechy falsehoods and celebrity trivia they don’t do — because you have more important things to read.

 

OtherWords
OtherWords is gringocentric and people-oriented. It’s one of Jim Hightower’s hangouts and home to the cartooning of Khalil Bendib. Those two features are usually overshadowed by something or another in their weekly postings, but even without all of the other contributors those two make this media project well worth saving and expanding.

 

TPN
Finally, The Panama News has been covering the isthmus for quite some time. Our 22nd anniversary is later this month. We have weathered all sorts of attacks that would have put other small media out of business. We have done that by a solid commitment to the truth and no commitment at all to the power brokers who would control all stories. Help us continue the fight, and expand at least enough to bring in a younger generation to keep it going for another 22 years and more.

 

 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.

 

vote final

original colors button

FB_2

Tweet

Protesters on a sad anniversary

0
the divine rolled-up newspaper of People's Justice smites the running dogs
On the morning of December 20, protesters gathered at the entrance to the American Embassy to mark the anniversary of the bloody 1989 US invasion. Photo by Silvio Sirias.

Sad and angry memories

 

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.

 

vote final

original colors button

FB_2

Tweet