Home Blog Page 175

Editorials: Permission to defend the Caribbean?; Say WHAT?; and Vote Blue

0
Vene ship
The FSO Nabarima, listing from a flooded engine room in Venezuelan waters, not far from Trinidad. Photo by Fishermen and Friends of the Sea.

Political delay of sea rescue threatens fisheries of at least two nations

The Panamanian-flag tanker Ícaro, after having received US permission to avoid being blacklisted, is headed to the Gulf of Pariato offload oil from the stricken floating bunker oil ship FSO Nabarima. The ship has been in distress since at least early August, and were she to sink her cargo would ruin not only part of Venezuela’s fishery, but also that of Trinidad and Tobago, as the island of Trinidad is less than 10 miles away.

The ship is a partnership deal between Venezuelan and Italian companies. So why no Italian tankers to the rescue? It’s because US sanctions blacklist any ship that takes on oil at Venezuela. Donald Trump has taken his time granting an exception and has risked the fisheries of at least two countries just he’s that capricious. He doesn’t even care about the health of the American people, let alone the viability of a Caribbean fishery that feeds nations that he scorns.

Panama is also a Caribbean nation. It has happened in years past, for example, that medical wastes illegally dumped off of Venezuela have been carried by a current that runs along the shore from there to Yucatan have ended upon the beaches of Colon province. The health of the Caribbean Sea is a national security issue for Panama.

Boycotts that answer to the claims, even the whims, of other nations are a national sovereignty issue for Panama. Because the main line of defense for the Panama Canal is a neutrality that allows all nations of the world to use the waterway, our facile and servile embrace of other countries’ boycotts can also become a national security issue for us.

It’s good that a Panamanian-flag vessel comes to the rescue of the Caribbean Sea, and bad that there are floating oil depots like the FSO Nabarima that pose inherent threats to many nations. It’s a matter of international law that needs to be taken up at the United Nations. It’s a matter of Panamanian law with respect to which activities we allow in our national waters. In no case should unilateral US sanctions be allowed to impede the defenses of an ocean planet.

  

  

2

 

  

3
Long lines of people before sunrise to vote early in Marietta, Georgia. Yes, the Republicans are out in force. But Democrats are, too, and usually that is not the case. Every possible trick will be pulled, but white supremacy may take a surprise beating in that state. Anonymous photo from Twitter.

Not just Trump who needs to go

Things are not going well in the polls for Donald Trump and he’s acting that way. His base will turn out to vote in force. He will lose a few usual Republican votes over objections to his performance in office. Republicans almost always do vote and that gives him some hope. Huge turnouts by registered Democrats and independents in the early voting of places like Georgia, North Carolina and Texas are the main indicator that’s out of the ordinary in this plague year election. That’s what gives Trump reason for despair.

Joe Biden is not a candidate for sainthood but he is clearly the best viable candidate for president of the United States. His idea that American needs to be built back better after a long decline, a disastrous presidency and an ever more catastrophic epidemic is the basic orientation that the United States needs, while Trump just offers lies and insults.

But would Biden be elected, only to be stymied by a Republican US Senate and Supreme Court? That would happen if the Republicans retain control of the senate, or even if they lose but it’s close enough that they can get a Democrat vote or two to continue their blocks against all Democratic legislation.

Two weeks out, polls suggest that Democrats have a good chance to take 10 seats in the US Senate from the Republicans, while only two Democratic seats appear vulnerable. There can and probably will be movement either way. How people vote will be distorted by Donald Trump’s and the Republicans’ vote suppression tactics – from the destruction of some 700 mail sorting machines so as to exclude properly sent absentee ballots, to gunmen showing up at polling places to intimidate voters, to myriad laws and practices designed to make it harder to vote.

There is a need for a new Voting Rights Act. No democracy should have to put up with the stuff that Trump and his party are pulling. But such reform we will not get if it’s not a landslide sweep that drives the Republicans to the political wilderness for years to come. Which is what ought to happen. Vote blue, and bring some other people to vote blue, too.

For those voting from abroad, it’s past time to get your ballot in via the embassy mailbox. If you are registered to vote, you can get your ballot to the clerk in a “vote by mail” jurisdiction by sending it DHL. Some places even let you register on election day. In about half the states, you can register and vote by email or fax. Click on Vote From Abroad if you need help with this.

 :

 

Bear in mind…

 

Lying increases the creative faculties, expands the ego, and lessens the frictions of social contacts.

Clare Booth Luce

 

A wise man gets more use from his enemies than a fool from his friends.

Baltasar Gracian

 

Every generation imagines itself to be more intelligent than the one that went before it, and wiser than the one that comes after it.

George Orwell

 

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Bolivians head to the polls for national elections

0
voting
Bolivians at the polls, a year after a right wing Evangelical coup. Photo by AS.

Nearly a year after the coup, Bolivians vote

by John Queally — Common Dreams

Following a “violent right-wing coup” last year that led to the ouster of President Evo Morales, the people of Bolivia headed to polling stations in large numbers on Sunday for long-delayed national elections that could see the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) party retake hold of the government.

In the run-off style elections, a candidate needs more than 50% during a first round vote — or 40% of the vote with at least a 10-point edge over the next candidate — to be declared a winner. If that threshold is not met, a runoff will be held at the end of November.

According to the Guardian:

Polls suggest the MAS candidate, Morales’s UK-educated former finance minister Luis Arce, has the edge over his main challenger, centrist journalist and former president Carlos Mesa.

“They [MAS] are in the driver’s seat and if they can mobilize voters this weekend — and they are the only party with the capacity to do that — they could do very well,” said Eduardo Gamarra, a Bolivia expert at Florida International University.

Gamarra thought a second round — which 67-year-old Mesa would probably win — remained the more likely prospect. If no candidate secures an outright majority, or 40% of the votes with 10% breathing space, a run-off will be held on 29 November. The third major candidate is Luis Fernando Camacho of the new rightwing Creemos (“We believe”) alliance. Áñez withdrew her candidacy last month saying she did not want to split the conservative vote.

Long lines of voters could be seen in MAS strongholds Sunday and after Arce cast his ballot near La Paz, he said: “We hope that the whole process will be peaceful.”

Incredibly long queues outside this polling station in Sopocachi, La Paz. The Bolivian regime promised to open more voting centres to prevent crowds & reduce risk of Covid19 contagion. That clearly hasn’t happened. pic.twitter.com/q9aj1w7xxs

— Ollie Vargas (@OVargas52) October 18, 2020

The elections arrive with bitter memories of the roll played by the US-backed Organization of American States (OAS) when it bolstered and gave legitimacy to claims from right-wing forces within the country that the 2019 elections, which Morales and his party won, were fraudulent.

Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) in Washington DC, warned Friday that the OAS remains poised to created mischief again as it aligns itself with the “care taker” Bolivian government of Jeanine Áñez, which seized power after Morales was forced to flee the country last year.

“The OAS played a leading role in creating the conditions for the military overthrow of Bolivia’s democratic government, following last year’s elections in Bolivia,” Weisbrot said in a statement. “It quickly cast doubt on the preliminary results that showed Evo Morales with a first-round victory with a false statement about the day after the election, and it repeated this falsehood in multiple releases. As The New York Times has reported, the OAS’s ‘flawed’ analysis ‘fueled a chain of events that changed the South American nation’s history.’ This included the military coup of November 10.”

Let’s hope today’s election in Bolivia finally brings justice and victory to the brave indigenous people who courageously resisted the US-sponsored right wing coup https://t.co/fGqLBZbpkf

— Charles Idelson (@cidelson) October 18, 2020

As CEPR noted in its statement, the OAS could still play a possible role in undermining the voice of Bolivians in Sunday’s election:

On September 30, OAS Secretary General Luis Almagro met with the de facto interior minister of Bolivia, Arturo Murillo, at the OAS’s Washington, DC headquarters. Following the meeting, Almagro tweeted that Murillo had “conveyed his concern about the possibility of a new fraud” in Bolivia’s October 18 elections. Almagro agreed to “strengthen” the observation mission the OAS will have on the ground for the vote. Despite Almagro’s rhetoric about possible MAS fraud, numerous polls show MAS candidate Luis Arce in first place — and close to the margin necessary to avoid a second-round run-off election.

On Sunday, Morales — who remains in exile in Argentina –tweeted support for his people and called for the legitimate results to be respected both in Bolivia and abroad.

“Elections must always be a democratic party in which we meet again beyond differences,” the ousted leader tweeted (translation from Spanish). “Our diversity is the richness of our identity and is the source of our unity.”

Morales called on his people not to fall prey to provocations, saying the “great lesson that we must never forget is that violence only generates violence and that with it we all lose.”

“It is very important that each and every one of us calmly wait for each and every vote to be counted,” Morales said, and he further called on the nation’s “Armed Forces and the Bolivian Police to faithfully fulfill their very important institutional and constitutional role” as the results come in.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Médicos Especialistas del Hospital Santo Tomás, NO a una reforma inconsulta

0
 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 
Dinero

The Lazy Man starts a new farm

0
magic circle
A basic building block of the way that John Douglas does organic permaculture is the “magic circle.” It’s both a way to build topsoil on land that is not particularly fertile and in the meantime produce food. 

Starting a new farm at age 70

notes by Eric Jackson, photos by John Douglas

John Douglas, the self-styled “Lazy Man,” does organic permaculture. He taught it as a Peace Corps volunteer. He retired from that but he teaches it to current Peace Corps volunteers, among others, to this day. Until recently he taught it at La Finca Perezosa (the Lazy Man’s Farm), a 10-hectare hillside on the banks of the Zarati River in Churuquita, northeast of Penonome.

That famous farm has been sold, and now, closer to Penonome in Sonadora — six clicks to the northwest of the city center — he’s starting anew. The plan is to improve the land, demonstrate organic permaculture to those interested and feed himself and others.

 

To start a magic circle, choose a spot and gather plant debris. What you are thinking about growing and sun conditions of the particular spot are important considerations.

 

This is, after all, Panama. Unless you have the right political connections or surname, somebody might come along and insist on inspections or permits. (The law here generally lets you farm in peace.) Here, the circular hole having been dug and some logs placed around it, the inspector checks it out and approves.

 

In the loose dirt and organic debris at the edges, plant what you want to grow. Throw whatever organic stuff to compost into the bottom of the circle — but you WANT the depression in the soil, because that collects water and helps you get through the dry season. The things with the big leaves are otoes, local staples with edible tubers. The stems and leaves are not part of the ordinary Panamanian cuisine, but they are edible and tasty. Like the roots, otoe greens must be cooked before eating so as to neutralize toxins. The little tiny plant front and center? With any luck that will grow into a fruitful papaya tree in short order. Its roots will grow down to drink the moisture that collects a the bottom of the magic circle. And if things don’t go that well? What you have to chop down with your machete, you toss into the middle of the circle to add to the compost.

 

He’s just setting up, but John plans to do demonstrations and tours, and to sell seedlings and cuttings for your little farm, be it many hectares or the planter box on your condo balcony. Call him at 6435-7686 or send him an email at johnarthurdouglas@yahoo.com if you are interested.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

¿Wappin? FORWARD! — as before / ¡Pa’lante! — como antes

0
hasta la victoria siempre
The city boys and the country boys, they come from miles around
To defy their king and country, and save the poor folks from the hand
Of the thieving dukes and abbots and the gentry of the land…

Progress toward an old tradition
Progreso hacia una vieja tradición

ELO – Poor Boy (The Greenwood)
https://youtu.be/Kgqw9FXBmvY

Patti Smith – Gimme Shelter
https://youtu.be/dBQTKkuMdAw

Steel Pulse – Mass Manipulation
https://youtu.be/MdJ-NyUPO3Y

Holly Near & Ronnie Gilbert – Harriet Tubman
https://youtu.be/-6MpN2GfBCQ

Ani DiFranco – Do or Die
https://youtu.be/quSvEOzZqhI

Stevie Wonder & Gary Clark Jr. – Where Is Our Love Song?
https://youtu.be/RLMB5o5vtLs

Luci & The Soul Brokers – Suena Panamá
https://youtu.be/7i11Nsb2TlU

Zoé – Soñé
https://youtu.be/HJqlA_HTEU8

Haydée Milanés & Kelvis Ochoa – Cuando el Corazón
https://youtu.be/CN7_dOnAxtg

Jethro Tull – Bourée
https://youtu.be/pqxwXla3-Bw

The Velvet Underground & Nico – Femme Fatale
https://youtu.be/r_4wKYrky4k

10,000 Maniacs – Trouble Me
https://youtu.be/2QRWUtxZ3H0

Garcia, Crosby, Kaukonen, Lesh & Casady – PERRO Sessions Jan.1971
https://youtu.be/fLdMfFY9guo

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

npp

 

FB CCL

 
Dinero

Jacob Lawrence’s “The American Struggle”

0
Harriet
“Forward,” another famous Lawrence painting about a later period in US history, is not part of this show. The woman with the pistol is militant abolitionist and Underground Railroad “conductor” Harriet Tubman. She would not and could not allow anyone to turn back during the slave escapes she ran.

The American Struggle: Jacob Lawrence
at The Metropolitan Museum of Art

by Sam Ben-Meir

“The paintings which I propose to do will depict the struggles of a people to create a nation and their attempt to build a democracy” – this is how Jacob Lawrence described his project in 1954. Over sixty-five years later his proposal has, if anything, become only more urgent. Two days after this exhibition closes, Americans will vote in what is arguably the most significant election in a generation, an election that will measure our commitment to preserving that democracy, the struggle for which was Lawrence’s mighty theme.

Jacob Lawrence is among the most recognized and celebrated African American painters of the twentieth century. Yet the series to which this exhibition is devoted – Struggle: From the History of the American People (1954-56) – has received relatively scant attention. Lawrence intended an immensely ambitious project: a series of sixty paintings beginning with European colonization and ending with World War I and America’s ascendance to the world stage. Ultimately, however, the series would comprise thirty small-scale tempera paintings on hardboard, detailing significant historical moments in the period lasting from 1775 to 1817; moments which will often underscore the role, and the experience, of people of color in the creation of the republic and its formative years.

The panels commence with a painting that draws its title from Patrick Henry’s famous “liberty” speech defending the colonial cause: “…Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” We begin, then, with the stirring scene of a crowd that stands roused, their arms upraised, their fists clenched, and their eyes fixed on the commanding orator elevated above the rest. Henry’s right hand grasps a bayonet, while his left hand hovers above the chaotic scene, drawing the viewers eye to a dark wall that drips with blood, reinforcing our awareness of the bloody conflict that is to ensue.

This painting is immediately followed by the “Massacre in Boston” – particularly notable for its central foregrounding of a dying Crispus Attucks, the seaman of African and Wampanoag descent who escaped slavery to become the first martyr of the American Revolution. The fifth panel confronts the experience of slavery head-on, drawing its title from the petition of an enslaved man to the Province of Massachusetts Bay: “We have no property! We have no wives! No children! We have no city! No country!” It is a frightful scene of violence, with bayonets and knives flashing, naked brown bodies dripping blood, accentuated throughout by Lawrence’s sharp, angular lines.

The ninth installment is “Defeat”, a deeply moving reflection on the physical and emotional toll that military setbacks and the brutal winter took on Washington’s army. We see the backs of the men as they turn away from the dying warhorse that lies partially covered in the foreground, a poignant symbol of their desperate condition. It is an excellent example of Lawrence’s brilliant sense of economy, his ability to compress the greatest amount of meaning and emotional energy within the smallest surface. We are clearly in the presence of an artist who has thought long and deeply about his subject – and indeed we know that he spent “long hours” researching the period at the 135th Street Branch of the New York Public Library (now the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture). Each of his compositions require an active participation on the viewers part, a readiness to engage with Lawrence not only in the exercise of our historical imagination, but in reexamining the ways we reconstruct, and mythologize the past – what gets left out, what is elided, and what is buried.

The next painting – about the crossing of the Delaware River on the night of December 27, 1776 – is a case in point. Lawrence takes a theme which was immortalized in Emanuel Leutze’s, “Washington Crossing the Delaware” (1851), also in the Metropolitan Museum, and transforms the meaning of the event – where it is less about the heroism of one man, General George Washington, and more about the “excessively severe” night, “which the men bore without the least murmur” – to quote from Washington’s military aide Tench Tilghman, whose firsthand observations served as a key source. In other words, Lawrence underscores the shared, collective struggle, and the bravery, resilience and sheer nerve of all the men who took part.

“And a Woman Mans a Cannon” is an important addition to the series because it reminds us that women also took part in the fighting – in particular, Margaret Cochran Corbin, who took her husband’s place when he fell in the Battle of Fort Washington. She boldly fought on until wounded and captured. Lawrence emphasizes her spiritedness and bravery – with her dead husband at her feet, and a pistol at her side, her standing figure extends almost the full height of the panel, imposing, dauntless and resolute.

The fifteenth painting takes its title from the preamble of the Constitution – “We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility…” – and once again Lawrence challenges the tendency to idealize, or in this case to mythologize the making of the constitution in Philadelphia 1787. In Lawrence’s depiction, the delegates are not bathed in heavenly light but in a dark room; they are not all standing erect as if modeling for a statue, but so utterly exhausted they can hardly sit upright; they are not cordially interacting and observing decorum, but gnashing, panting and gesticulating madly as the sweat rolls off their faces. Is it realism then Lawrence is after? Far from it. Seven sword hilts gleam in the foreground, symbolizing the seven states that were needed for ratification. Lawrence is also guided by an idea – the idea that this country was born out of struggle, and conflict, whether on the battlefield or in the halls of state. These delegates who are giving birth to the constitution look as though they are literally suffering the pangs of labor. Lawrence, to his credit, has not forsaken idealism – he has given us an idea that can inspire us today; one that is rooted in action, and sacrifice, courage and perseverance in defeat.

The eighteenth panel captures a memorable moment from the expedition of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark. In August of 1805, Clark recorded in his journal that their translator and guide, a Lemhi Shoshone woman named Sacagewea, was reunited with her brother, Chief Cameahwait, from whom she had been separated since childhood. Lawrence depicts this moment of recognition between brother and sister by focusing our attention on their faces, unmistakably tinged with sadness, even as their eyes interlock. Its tenderness is underscored by Lawrence’s title, which records President Jefferson’s order to the explorers to treat all the natives they encounter “in the most friendly and conciliatory manner…” The painting becomes a painful reminder of how little the country in fact heeded the example set by Lewis and Clark in their interactions with the indigenous peoples of the American West.

Every panel in the series bears close examination and engagement. Lawrence recognizes the significance of those that have been under-represented, marginalized or oppressed. As he observed: “I don’t see how a history of the United States can be written honestly without including the negro.” Unfortunately, some of the paintings have been lost and are only known by black and white reproductions, others have been completely lost and only their titles are known. Still, enough remains that this exhibition is a profoundly rewarding experience, coming at a time when we desperately need to reinvigorate our commitment to democracy and universal enfranchisement, to the struggle against authoritarianism, and the cult of personality.

Sam Ben-Meir is a professor of philosophy and world religions at Mercy College in New York City.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

AI, COVID-19 y derechos humanos

0
police
Foto por la Policía Nacional.

La pandemia del COVID-19 no debe ser pretexto para violar derechos humanos

por Amnistía Internacional

Los Estados de las Américas deben priorizar el enfoque en derechos humanos al combatir la pandemia de COVID-19 que ha puesto de manifiesto las grandes brechas de desigualdad y discriminación de la región, dijo Amnistía Internacional en una carta abierta a los y las jefes de Estado que asistirán a la Asamblea General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos.

“La estrategia para combatir la pandemia del COVID-19 en muchos países de las Américas se ha caracterizado por el empleo de medidas represivas y el uso innecesario de la fuerza. Estas medidas, sumadas a los desafíos estructurales y las grandes brechas sociales y económicas que anteceden a la pandemia, coadyuvan a perpetuar la desigualdad y la discriminación en el continente”, dijo Erika Guevara Rosas, directora para las Américas de Amnistía Internacional.

En países como El Salvador, Paraguay y Venezuela, entre otros, las estrictas medidas tomadas para combatir el COVID-19 incluyeron que decenas de miles de personas fueran confinadas en centros de cuarentenas administrados por el estado bajo custodia policial o militar. La imposición de cuarentenas obligatorias bajo control del estatal, sin conocer el tiempo de su duración, en entornos que carecen de medidas mínimas de prevención y control de las infecciones, y sin garantías de procedimientos independientes que cumplan con lo establecido por el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos, podría constituir una detención arbitraria. Asimismo, si los centros de cuarentena propician situaciones discriminatorias y las autoridades estatales no proporcionan agua, alimentación y atención médica adecuada, estas condiciones podrían constituir tratos crueles, inhumanos o degradantes y una violación del derecho a la salud.

Por otra parte, en países como Chile y Nicaragua, donde en años recientes se han cometido violaciones de derechos humanos e incluso crímenes del derecho internacional – como tortura – es indispensable que los Estados miembros de la OEA, en virtud de la obligación compartida de garantizar derechos humanos, urjan a las autoridades nacionales competentes a investigar seria y exhaustivamente dichas situaciones.

En el caso particular de Nicaragua, es imperativo que se tomen medidas para prevenir el contagio del COVID-19 en el país, se libere a las personas detenidas sólo por ejercer sus derechos y se implementen acciones para proteger a quienes se desempeñan en el sistema de salud nicaragüense, ante las medidas intimidatorias que sufren por disentir con las políticas del gobierno.

Por otro lado, la cooperación entre los Estados de las Américas debe garantizar que los tratamientos médicos para combatir el COVID-19 y la potencial vacuna estén disponibles y sean accesibles sin discriminación, estableciendo medidas especiales para apoyar a los grupos específicos que corren un mayor riesgo ante el virus, o cuya posición marginal significa que podrían quedar rezagados al acceso a las vacunas o a los tratamientos.

“Los Estados de las Américas deben procurar evitar enfoques exclusivamente nacionales en la asignación de tratamientos y eventual vacuna contra el COVID-19, la cooperación internacional debe centrar sus esfuerzos a fin de evitar que acuerdos bilaterales se impongan sobre las necesidades regionales de toda la población continental en su conjunto, debiendo ser los criterios orientadores, para esta asignación, siempre acordes con las normas y estándares de derechos humanos”, dijo Erika Guevara Rosas.

Asimismo, Amnistía Internacional considera que en este momento histórico es indispensable contar con un sistema Interamericano de derechos humanos fortalecido. En este sentido, la organización exige a los Estados miembros de la OEA y a su Secretario General que respeten la autonomía y la independencia de los órganos del sistema interamericano de derechos humanos. Además, la organización llama a instaurar los canales de investigación independientes que permitan dar un curso adecuado a las denuncias que se puedan haber planteado desde el seno de la CIDH, asegurando así el cumplimiento de todas las garantías para las partes, la transparencia en la gestión pública, y eventualmente, si correspondiera, la determinación de responsabilidades y medidas de reparación.

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

npp

 

vote final

 
Dinero

Hightower & Bendib, Where the GOP is really at

0
DTs
Delirium tremens up top, ever more violent racism in the rank-and-file. Cartoon by Khalil Bendib — OtherWords.

Republicans unleash their inner Jim Crow

by Jim Hightower – OtherWords

If you’re a rich Republican who’s done nothing in the House of Representatives for so long that you’re essentially seen as a piece of furniture, what do you do when faced with a popular, well-organized, grassroots opponent who’s about to overtake you?

Apparently, you unleash your inner racist.

Across the country, endangered Republican incumbents are resorting to a shameful, Jim Crow-era political tactic in a panicky effort to deflect attention from their own records: assailing their challengers as zealots who will let Black, Latino, and other “criminal elements” rampage through white neighborhoods.

Take longtime Texas congressman Michael McCaul. Used to strolling to victory, McCaul has found himself in a dead heat with Democrat Mike Siegel, a former schoolteacher with a progressive-populist program of Medicare for All and worker and environmental protections. Siegel has forged a surging and enthusiastic movement for change.

So here comes McCaul with a last-minute, down and dirty, million-dollar TV blitz, howling that Siegel is a crazed criminal justice radical who’ll shut down the police and empty prisons. McCaul himself doesn’t appear in this ludicrous dog-whistle piece of racist fabrication. Instead, he’s put Joe Trimm, a white Republican constable (wearing his official uniform), on camera to do the dirty work.

The partisan constable cartoonishly tries to gin up voter fear: “Take it from me,” he dramatically intones, “Mike Siegel is a threat to your family.”

Problem is, Trimm is a notorious right-wing race baiter who justifies police violence against peaceful Black Lives Matter protesters, calling them “thugs.” But he’s just the dummy — McCaul is the ventriloquist mouthing fear and hate to save his political hide.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Fundación Libertad, Perspectiva liberal sobre matrimonio igualitario

0
fundies
Unos 300 manifestantes ‘pro-familia’ (anti-LGBT) frente a la Corte Suprema de Justicia.

Libertad para todos sin discriminación

por la Fundación Libertad

El país que defendemos es uno libre, sin discriminación, donde el estado de derecho impera y todos los ciudadanos son iguales ante la ley. Sin embargo, el país que queremos y defendemos no es el país que tenemos y no lo será mientras los derechos fundamentales de las personas estén siendo negados, utilizando como pretexto valores morales y religiosos ajenos al derecho civil.

Hablando específicamente del matrimonio igualitario, desde Fundación Libertad vemos con preocupación las manifestaciones de grupos que llaman a perpetuar la discriminación en base a la orientación sexual de las personas, y coartándoles, a través de la negación a su derecho al matrimonio, la oportunidad de realizar su plan de vida de forma plena, así como una serie de derechos civiles y económicos.

Desde una perspectiva liberal, es importante entender que la institución del matrimonio no es exclusiva de ninguna religión y que su propósito, más allá de la procreación, procura a sus partes provisiones jurídicas, económicas y de seguridad social, fundamentales para la vida en sociedad. Bajo esta premisa, ceder a presiones de grupos opresores de las libertades de los individuos atenta contra el estado de derecho y la soberanía de nuestro país.

El matrimonio es un derecho básico del ser humano, el cual en nuestro país está siendo violentado mientras nuestras instituciones de gobierno guardan silencio ante la tiranía de las masas. Entre tanto este o cualquier otro derecho no sea accesible a todos los ciudadanos por igual, estamos como sociedad coartando el plan de vida de nuestros compatriotas, incluyendo hermanos, amigos y a nuestros propios hijos.

En Fundación Libertad queremos hacer un llamado al respeto de los derechos humanos de todos los ciudadanos por igual y denunciamos cualquier tipo de discriminación que atente contra las libertades individuales y la plena realización del ser humano.

Exhortamos también a nuestras autoridades de justicia a mantenerse firmes en el deber sagrado de proteger los derechos de todos los panameños, por encima de sus intereses particulares y de las presiones de grupos que ven en los derechos humanos como un privilegio.

Solo así, a través del respeto de todos y cada uno de los individuos que conforman el tejido social de nuestro Panamá, podremos decir que somos genuinamente una nación libre, soberana y próspera.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Finn, What the militias believe

0
fascist insects
Pete Musico, left, is one of the founding members of the Wolverine Watchmen, as is Joseph Morrison, right. Both were charged in the plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. (Jackson County Sheriff’s Office via AP)

Plot to kidnap Michigan’s governor grew from the militia movement’s mix of constitutional falsehoods and half-truths

by John  E. Finn, Wesleyan University

The U.S. militia movement has long been steeped in a peculiar – and unquestionably mistaken – interpretation of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and civil liberties.

This is true of an armed militia group that calls itself the Wolverine Watchmen, who were involved in the recently revealed plot to overthrow Michigan’s government and kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

As I wrote in “Fracturing the Founding: How the Alt-Right Corrupts the Constitution,” published in 2019, the crux of the militia movement’s devotion to what I have called the “alt-right constitution” is a toxic mix of constitutional falsehoods and half-truths.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer addressing the state.The men arrested were charged in a plot to kidnap and place on trial Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. Michigan Office of the Governor via AP

Private militias

The term “militia” has many meanings.

The Constitution addresses militias in Article 1, authorizing Congress to “provide for organizing, arming and disciplining, the Militia.”

But the Constitution makes no provision for private militias, like the far-right Wolverine Watchmen, Proud Boys, Michigan Militia and the Oath Keepers, to name just a few.

Private militias are simply groups of like-minded men – members are almost always white males – who subscribe to a sometimes confusing set of beliefs about an avaricious federal government that is hostile to white men and white heritage, and the sanctity of the right to bear arms and private property. They believe that government is under the control of Jews, the United Nations, international banking interests, Leftists, Antifa, Black Lives Matter and so on. There is no evidence of this.

On Oct. 8, the FBI arrested six men, five of them from Michigan, and charged them with conspiring to kidnap Whitmer. Shortly thereafter, state authorities charged an additional seven men with, according to the Associated Press, “allegedly seeking to storm the Michigan Capitol and seek a “civil war.” Included were the founders and several members of the Wolverine Watchmen.

As revealed in the FBI affidavit accompanying the federal charges, the six men charged claimed to be defenders of the Bill of Rights. Indeed, some of the men in April had participated in rallies in Lansing, the state capital, where armed citizens tried to force their way onto the floor of the State House to protest Governor Whitmer’s pandemic shut-down orders as a violation of the Constitution by a “tyrannical” government intent upon sacrificing civil liberties in the name of the COVID-19 fight.

According to the FBI’s affidavit, the conspirators wanted to create “a society that followed the U.S. Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient.”

Militia members imagine themselves to be “the last true American patriots,” “the modern defenders of the United States Constitution in general and the Second Amendment in particular.

Hence, the Bill of Rights – and especially the Second Amendment, which establishes the right to bear arms – figure prominently in the alt-constitution. It is no accident that the initial discussions about overthrowing Michigan’s so-called tyrannical governor started at a Second Amendment rally in June.

According to most militias, the Second Amendment authorizes their activity and likewise makes them free of legal regulation by the state. In truth, the Second Amendment does nothing to authorize private armed militias. Private armed militias are explicitly illegal in every state.

William Null at a statehouse protest in Michigan.
William Null (right), arrested in the plot to kidnap Whitmer, also participated in this rally on April 30 in the Michigan State Capitol to protest the state government’s pandemic measures. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images

No restrictions on rights

Additional foundational principles of militia constitutionalism include absolutism. Absolutism, in the militia world, is the idea that fundamental constitutional rights – like freedom of speech, the right to bear arms and the right to own property – cannot be restricted or regulated by the state without a citizen’s consent.

The far right’s reading of the First and Second Amendments – which govern free speech and the right to bear arms, respectively – starts from a simple premise: Both amendments are literal and absolute. They believe that the First Amendment allows them to say anything, anytime, anywhere, to anyone, without consequence or reproach by government or even by other citizens who disagree or take offense at their speech.

Similarly, the alt-right gun advocates hold that the Second Amendment protects their God-given right to own a weapon – any weapon – and that governmental efforts to deny, restrict or even to register their weapons must be unconstitutional. They think the Second Amendment trumps every other provision in the Constitution.

Another key belief among militia members is the principle of constitutional self-help. That’s the belief that citizens, acting on their inherent authority as sovereign free men, are ultimately and finally responsible for enforcing the Constitution – as they understand it.

Demonstrating this way of thinking, the men arrested in Michigan discussed taking Gov. Whitmer to a “secure location” in Wisconsin to stand “trial” for treason prior to the Nov. 3 election. According to Barry County, Michigan Sheriff Dar Leaf – a member of the militia-friendly Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officer Association – the men arrested in Michigan were perhaps not trying to kidnap the governor but were instead simply making a citizen’s arrest.

Leaf, who appeared at a Grand Rapids protest in May of Gov. Whitmer’s stay-at-home order along with two of the alleged kidnappers, mistakenly believes that local sheriffs are the highest constitutional authority in the United States, invested with the right to determine which laws support and which laws violate the Constitution. The events in Michigan show how dangerous these mistaken understandings of the Constitution can be.

There will be more

The Wolverine Watchmen are not a Second Amendment militia or constitutional patriots in any sense of the word. If they are guilty of the charges brought against them, then they are terrorists.

The FBI and Michigan law enforcement shut down the Watchmen before an egregious crime and a terrible human tragedy unfolded. But as I concluded just last year in my book, “there is little reason to think the militia movement will subside soon.”

Unfortunately, I did not account for the possibility that President Trump would encourage militias “to stand back and stand by,” which seems likely to encourage and embolden groups that already clearly represent a threat. Expect more Michigans.

 

This story incorporates material from a story published on April 15, 2019 in The Conversation.The Conversation

John E. Finn, Professor Emeritus of Government, Wesleyan University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet