Home Blog Page 214

Hightower, They shortchange and deny health care and call it “choice”

0
hospital wait
In the US corporate-run health system, consumer “choices” are shaped entirely by profit-seeking monopolists. Shutterstock photo.

The lie of health care “choice”

by Jim Hightower – OtherWords

Lyndon Johnson had a saying about special interests trying to get his support to pass some blatantly self-serving legislation: “They can’t make chicken salad out of chicken (bleep)!”

Yet chicken (bleep) is all that the corporate health complex has to work with as it frantically tries to defend its current system of mass malpractice. After all, as most Americans have learned the hard way, profiteering insurance giants, Big Pharma, and hospital chains grossly overcharge us while constantly trying to shortchange — or outright deny — care to millions of our families.

So, unable to win public support on their own merit, the corporatists and their hired political hacks are going all out to continue their gouging and keep control of America’s dysfunctional system. They’re now running a multimillion-dollar PR and lobbying campaign of lies to trash and kill all reforms that would deliver quality, comprehensive care to everyone, at far less cost than they can deliver.

Masquerading as a “Partnership for America’s Health Care Future,” the profiteers warn ominously that such reforms as Medicare for All or a public option for health insurance would take away people’s “choice” and our “control” over health care.

Hello: we presently have no choice or control.

Our “care” is managed by a handful of insurance, drug, and hospital monopolists whose primary objective is not improving our health, but feathering their own cushy nests. And the undeniable, ugly truth is that they can only continue ripping us off by killing real reform.

That’s one reason the American Medical Association and others are dropping out of the Partnership’s political front. Honest health care practitioners no longer believe it’s in their best interest — or the public’s — to be part of its chicken (bleep) PR campaign.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Proyecto Playa Aguas Sucias cayendo

0
dibujo
El dibujo de la Alcaldía.

El plan de playa del alcalde se derrumba

La “consulta ciudadana” del 12 de febrero en una sala en la que solo cabían 300 de los casi 700,000 votantes de la Ciudad de Panamá fue pospuesta por un mes y luego se trasladó a una sala que alberga a 5,000.

El alcalde anunció que traería partidarios en buses para una votación vinculante.

Después, el Tribunal Electoral anunció que no existe una base legal para dicha votación, por lo que no participará como lo anunció el alcalde.

Después, un miembro clave del consejo municipal –el representante PRD de San Francisco– se opuso a toda la idea de una playa artificial.

Después, el Ministerio de Medio Ambiente emitió una declaración de que el alcalde no ha presentado un estudio de impacto ambiental, que tendría que ser analizado y aceptado antes de que dicho proyecto pudiera ser aprobado.

Todo en un contexto creciente de protestas, que se mueven de un énfasis en la insensatez ambiental de una playa artificial en una contaminada Bahía de Panamá a las acusaciones de que todo es un fraude ayudar a los especuladores inmobiliarios a vender condominios en la Avenida Balboa a extranjeros con más dinero que inteligencia y favorecer a ciertas empresas de construcción y minería de arena.

 

MiAmbiente

protest

12 de febrero de 2020

El Tribunal Electoral informa que, previa conversación de los magistrados con el alcalde del distrito capital, José Luis Fábrega, no participará en la consulta ciudadana programada para el jueves 12 de marzo de 2020 por el Municipio de Panamá, con relación al plan de “Recuperación integral de los espacios públicos, la movilidad urbana y las playas de la Bahía de Panamá”.

El proyecto municipal se presentará bajo la modalidad prevista en la Ley de Descentralización, que no implica ninguna votación, razón por la cual no será necesaria la participación del Tribunal Electoral.

 

más

~ ~ ~

Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Dinero

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

FB esp

 

FB CCL

Bernal: Philosopher, political prisoner and patriot Roberto Arosemena

0
Arosemena
I bow in respect on the occasion of the death of Roberto Arosemena Jaén, a combative and consistent patriot. Civilismo has lost a valuable activist. Rest in peace!

Prism of a republic

by Miguel Antonio Bernal V.

A man’s life is measured by its results. The human product is the result that determines the final value of a lifetime.

Sophocles       

Almost 40 years ago, Roberto Arosemena wrote in his work about Octavio Mendez Pereira: “some days men disappear just like the others, however, there is a general commotion indicative of suppressed national values.”

On this past February 9 the death of Roberto Arosemena Jaén deprived Panama of a selfless and committed patriot and citizen, one in favor of freedom and justice. The University and academia lost a distinguished and dedicated teacher who, for several decades, radiated light and knowledge from his chair. Penonome lost an illustrious and meritorious son. We, the men and women who love Panama, lost a combative champion who was faithful to his principles.

Throughout his existence, Roberto sowed principles and values, commitments, knowledge, examples, all palpable testimonies of a quest. A search with stumbles, but always looking for the best orientations, for the best situations. Roberto never limited himself to simply preaching. He always practiced what he preached and he was not just another philosopher or spectator.

For those who knew him and shared ideals, struggles, kilometers of antimilitarist street demonstrations, debates, discussions, concurrences and dissents, joys and frustrations, dreams and hope, his is an irreparable loss because he was, above all, a good man.

In a very concise synthesis, Roberto said that during the 1980s he was a passionate civilista activist. He faced the military who ruled the country between 1968 and 1989 without reservations. Arosema Jaén was a believer of peaceful resistance and did not hesitate to join political movements such as the Popular Nationalist Party (PNP) in the late 1970s and also noted his participation in the Popular Action Party (PAPO). In 1987, when the last great wave of protests against the military broke out with the Crusada Civilista, he was arrested and sent to the penal colony that then existed on Isla Coiba.

“Prism of a Republic” and “Witness of Freedom,” along with various essays and hundreds of articles, are parts of the legacy of this citizen, whose departure leaves a void.

So long, my friend!

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Ms. Pelosi vs Ms. Fu, with editor’s notes and questions — US vs Huawei

0

The editor’s notes and questions

In general

* First, admissions of bias. Yours truly, the editor, is a dual US and Panamanian citizen, a Bernie Democrat as a gringo and an independent and anti-imperialist man of left as a panameño. I have pretty much assimilated the ethical principles of free expression, and the skeptical views of how it tends to be deployed in this world, that run through the journalist profession. This article is written on a Chinese-made Lenovo computer and sent to you via a Chinese-made Huawei wireless Internet modem, with which the editor is generally satisfied.

* Do I want to launch into a diatribe about oligarchy, nepotism, party bosses and controlled news media? Where to point a finger? At China? At the USA? At Panama? Let’s be neither naïve nor hypocritical here.

* Is instinctive trust ever that useful in politics, or in trying to understand the world? I have a sense of trust that was destroyed in childhood and have to look at the world in other ways — empirical ways both personal and as a history major, the sought and collected opinions of others with all due skepticism, deductive reasoning based on the inferences that might be drawn from evidence. Ditch or at least set aside the loyalties and identities when it comes to determining facts. Hold onto the fears based on loyalties and identities but don’t drown in them.

* China is emerging toward becoming the world economic hegemon, with scientific, military and political dominance that could ride their ways to the top on those business power coat tails. As a Panamanian, an even more valuable national customer. As an American, an increasingly serious national rival. As an old antiwar hippie, I say let’s NOT go to war over this. As a history major I say let’s remember the last time that the United States and China went to war, when China had been weakened by decades of civil war and had yet to re-emerge as a major world industrial power, yet the United States could not defeat China in the Korean War.

* My opinions are of somebody who well recalls the bot attack coming out of China that briefly shut down The Panama News, apparently in retaliation for an article we published about Falun Gong activities in Parque Omar. Xi is not Deng, and that bot may have been sent by an annoyed Chinese private citizen rather than the government in Beijing, or may have been sent by a criminal with an entirely different agenda who was posing as Chinese.

The Huawei threat

* To the extent that Nancy Pelosi represents a district in northern California and a party with a lot of US tech industry donors, there might be nothing more sinister about Huawei’s intention to export its 5G technology than the potential success of a business rival.

* Does Donald Trump warn us about Huawei? Ignore that. That man lies all the time and is thus the most unreliable of sources.

* Do the Chinese media protest, and present their country’s interest as all sweetness and light? Perhaps discount or at least treat with suspicion what they tell us because Chinese media, including the YouTube channel that carried the above video, are tightly controlled by the state.

* A number of US allies, including the Conservative British government, have partially or entirely rejected the Trump administration’s allegations about Huawei. The most important, but partial, rejection of the US ban on Huawei comes from the European Union, which is moving to secure its online infrastructures from threats and technological “back doors” coming out of China or anywhere else but is open for Huawei to become a central player on that field all across Europe.

* Do we want to look at the world’s experience with cyberwarfare? The Russians have used it, against the former Soviet republics of Georgia and Estonia, against the United States, against several European countries. The Chinese have used it against Taiwan in particular. The Americans have used it against Iran and most probably many others. The Israelis brag about their abilities, how truthfully beyond widespread Internet propaganda we might debate. Surely many other powers great and small maintain but do not advertise their Internet warfare prowess. It is instructive that the first detailed proofs that the US government got of Russian interference in the 2016 US elections — we can argue about how effective that was but denials are foolish — came from Dutch intelligence. Any US sales pitch about how the world should reject Chinese technology with its possible built-in insecurities and instead opt for American tech and its possible back doors is inane and deceptive.

* The radio waves inherent in wireless Fifth Generation Internet networks are greater than those in previous generations of the technology. Some of the problem has been studied and there are rules about setbacks for towers from residences that have been adopted in many places with respect to the prior Internet generations. There are people who fear and defame all new technologies but concerns should not be blown off as unique to such persons. Panama in particular has a horrible record of suppressing environmental health studies to protect economic interests, but this problem is by no means unique to us. We need to go into 5G development, if and when we do, with eyes wide open, proper safety standards and filters that screen and identify the propaganda of those with particular narrow economic interests.

I’d like to know

* Given the problems detecting Internet viruses and worms, how do people and nations deal with the threats of entire technological platforms that may have intentionally built-in and potentially crippling holes in them — especially if they are kept as “sleepers” pending some great crisis?

* Should Panama’s defense against cyber-attacks be built upon an attempt at impregnability, or should we concentrate on back-ups that make us resilient? Or are there other good approaches to cyber-defense?

* Can China really export its “firewall” of censorship via Huawei 5G networks? And if it can export enhanced censorship capabilities, what sorts of Panamanian, and American, hands should we make special efforts to keep away from the controls?

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Colegio de Sociología, Alto al ataque contra profesionales

0
Santo Tomás
Los médicos extranjeros podrían llenar los vacíos en áreas remotas donde no hay suficientes profesionales de la salud. Pero traer extranjeros para destruir los sindicatos de los sistemas de salud pública no hace nada para resolver el problema principal: la corrupción masiva que deja a nuestros hospitales sin medicamentos ni suministros. Foto del Hospital Santo Tomás.

Alto al ataque de la Cámara de Comercio contra la educación y profesionales

por el Colegio de Sociología y Ciencias Sociales de Panamá

La Cámara de Comercio, Industrias y Agricultura de Panamá (CCIAP) ha hecho un pronunciamiento injurioso contra la educación panameña, especialmente dirigido hacia las y los profesionales nacionales, cuestionando sin pruebas su calidad para así justificar la “importación” sin restricciones de personal especializado de otros países con salarios y emolumentos inferiores a los nacionales, la cual es la real e inconfesable motivación de las y los empleadores de ese gremio empresarial. Una solapada doble explotación laboral.

En una declaración sin base en ningún estudio científico, la directiva de la Cámara de Comercio ha pretendido descalificar al conjunto del sistema educativo panameño, bajo la falsa afirmación de que no contamos “con una educación de calidad mundial”. Es innegable que la educación panameña tiene múltiples dificultades, todas ellas producto de los desaciertos de gobiernos cuestionados por corrupción y que han estado al servicio de capitalistas que lucran de los fondos públicos, por lo que no les ha interesado aumentar el presupuesto respectivo al 6% del PIB, como lo señala la UNESCO. Sin embargo, es falso que el sistema formativo no esté produciendo recurso humano especializado de calidad.

Hace más de cien años el estado ha ido invirtiendo y mejorando la formación profesional y técnica de la fuerza de trabajo que el país necesita. Así se han graduado decenas de miles de profesionales, con distintos niveles de especialización en la educación superior, y a lo largo de varias generaciones, gracias al trabajo de sus docentes, impulsando el desarrollo nacional.

La verdadera intención: aplicar políticas neoliberales

El ataque de la Cámara de Comercio contra la educación, como hacia las y los profesionales de todas las categorías que existen en Panamá, es un elemento más de las políticas neoliberales, lanzadas desde los organismos de saqueo internacional, como el Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI), que han ido destruyendo las conquistas laborales, los derechos sociales y económicos, y que han empobrecido al pueblo panameño y a todas las naciones del planeta.

Esta solicitud de “libre importación de profesionales” es de la misma calaña que la llamada “apertura de mercado” que ha llevado a la crisis la industria y la agricultura nacional. Las políticas neoliberales han pauperizado a las mayorías y concentrado la riqueza en pocas manos haciendo de Panamá, uno de los países más desiguales del mundo.

Respeto a las y los profesionales nacionales, sin xenofobia y persecución

Condenamos las intenciones, que buscan explotar las capacidades de las y los profesionales de otras nacionalidades, desconociendo derechos y la normativa establecida en el Código de Trabajo, buscando crear una ola de xenofobia, que ponga a profesionales nacionales contra las y los profesionales migrantes. Los únicos que parecen haber olvidado la normativa laboral, sobre contratación de personal no nacional, es la clase empresarial que no genera empleo y pisotea el trabajo decente de la gran mayoría del recurso humano especializado.

~ ~ ~

Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Dinero

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

FB esp

 

FB CCL

¿Wappin? Shouldn’t you EXPECT a playlist like this from a guy named Malo?

0
unfreedom
Foto por el Ministerio Público de Panamá.

See, Your Honor, it’s like this
Mire, Su Excelencia, es como así …

Alci Acosta – Preso Número 9
https://youtu.be/0aHIruJJqFY

Big Mama Thornton – Ball and Chain
https://youtu.be/vypSOetzlQo

Billie Eilish – No Time To Die
https://youtu.be/7yJ328yi55c

MC5 – Motor City’s Burning
https://youtu.be/-y871cCYOyU

Desmond Dekker – Shanty Town
https://youtu.be/gKZqyPLUJf4

Natalie Merchant – I’m Not The Man
https://youtu.be/Z3qHkJnYK4E

Robins – Riot in Cell Block #9
https://youtu.be/_0qN6EBrhPU

Slash – I Don’t Live Today
https://youtu.be/dLOeZGy6rxE

Chrissy Hynde – Back On The Chain Gang
https://youtu.be/UQ8kbordCAg

Carlos Martínez – El Presidiario
https://youtu.be/gkAdQF42em8

Sippie Wallace – Murder Gonna Be My Crime
https://youtu.be/6Xzyg5V4Ks8

Patti Smith – Hey Joe
https://youtu.be/ZEkmoawOih0

The Rolling Stones – Citadel
https://youtu.be/n1UHOC16VCk

Bob Marley – Burning and Looting
https://youtu.be/M99nzyiS830

Joan Baez – Mary Hamilton
https://youtu.be/c-Gx7EwN3VY

Bruce Springsteen – Murder Incorporated
https://youtu.be/Jj7hvKQ6Uhc

Bessie Smith – Send Me To The ‘Lectric Chair
https://youtu.be/TZ6w5IlqhSk

Prince – Free
https://youtu.be/uHJFG4tmoeE

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 
Dinero

Kermit’s birds / Las aves de Kermit

0
choip
Cocoa Woodcreeper ~ Trepatroncos Cacao ~ Xiphorhynchus susurrans, encontrado en el Parque Nacional Metropolitano de la capital. © Kermit Nourse.

Cocoa Woodcreeper / Trepatroncos Cacao

foto por Kermit Nourse

The Cocoa Woodcreeper is the most common of the 17 types of woodcreepers found in Panama. They exist at lower altitudes on both sides of the isthmus, but are generally not found in dense forests. This one was found in the capital’s Parque Nacional Metropolitano. These passerine birds behave differently than woodpeckers — they don’t bore holes in trees. The species can be found from the eastern part of central Mexico to northern South America. Before the advent of DNA analysis it was considered a subspecies of the buff-throated woodcreeper.


El Trepatroncos Cacao es el más común de los 17 tipos de trepatroncos que se encuentran en Panamá. Existen en altitudes más bajas en ambas vertientes del istmo, pero generalmente no se encuentran en bosques densos. Este fue encontrado en el Parque Nacional Metropolitano de la capital. Estas aves paseriformes se comportan de manera diferente a los pájaros carpinteros: no perforan árboles. La especie se puede encontrar desde la parte oriental del centro de México hasta el norte de América del Sur. Antes del advenimiento del análisis de ADN, se consideraba una subespecie del trepatroncos gorgianteado.

 


 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

VOTE

 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 
Dinero

Jackson, Panama’s business lobbies: the lost mind of a discredited old order

0
Fábrega's folly
Fábrega’s folly — but other than his party’s retainers, look at who else likes the idea. Of course, the sand miners who would periodically replace the washed-away beach, and associated public works construction contractors. And business organizations, at the behest of those with empty condos across from the Cinta Costera that they want to sell. If the Panamanian Society of Engineers and Architects (SPIA) says that an artificial beach on polluted Panama Bay is too stupid an idea to merit their attention, hey, the Chamber of Commerce and the Panamanian Business Executives Association (APDE) would bring in foreign engineers to testify to the sanity of the mayor’s pet project. Unattributed photo from Miguel Antonio Bernal’s Twitter feed.

Business groups pushing the envelope against resistance

by Eric Jackson

The European Union has once again blacklisted Panama as a financial haven for its tax cheats and thugs. The Chamber of Commerce and the business executives’ association, bogged down over their uninspiring and unpopular proposals for constitutional change, press ahead with support for two new and immediately scorned projects: an artificial beach in front of the Cinta Costera and a huge expansion in permission for foreign professional and managerial people to work in Panama.

There are a lot of stereotypes about Panama and its business scene that may have once been true but are much less true now. The whole “completely objective journalism, with just the facts” notion studiously ignores the fact that which data are important is a matter of opinion – and then look at the pecuniary interests of those who dominate the large Panamanian media.

On the other hand, while any instance of bribery or undue influence is by its nature a conspiracy – two or more persons agreeing to do something illegal plus a material act in furtherance of that agreement – there are apart from all of that “conspiracy theories.” The latter tend to envision these overarching schemes that, were they true, would involve too many people to keep secret. Or they tend to delve into paranoiac ideation, wherein dots of causality are drawn among free-standing facts without any particular justification.

Money laundering has been infamous for a long tie here, with flagrant impunity. It has given rise to a long running tendency for Panamanians to attribute any business model that they don’t understand to the washing of illicit cash. Those who like imported far right conspiracy lore easily collate it with the stereotypes. As in the notion that money laundering is the sport of international bankers, who are approximated with “The Jews,” who run the Panamanian government from Panama City’s banking district.

Well, yes, there is a lot of money, much of it foreign, in the Panama City banking center. Jews are well represented among those who work in the banking district. But most of the large banks here are now foreign-owned and for that reason possessed of only weak levers to use on the Panamanian government. And the banking industry in general saw, in the US economic sanctions that preceded the 1989 US invasion, just how risky a business money laundering is. If the truth is to be told, while a lot of laundered money may end up in this country’s banks the bankers here don’t often launder money and don’t much object to international anti-laundering measures. The rogues among them who get into those sorts of games tend to get driven to the fringes or out entirely by their peers.

There are many other ways to launder money in Panama. In post-invasion Panama the mainstream of that has been real estate developments that make no intrinsic sense, but leave buildings and lands that might someday make sense to somebody and be sold, while in the meantime these non-performing properties can be reported to tax authorities in other countries as great cash cows that turn dirty money into the proceeds of brilliant real estate bets. There are major law firms that do a brisk business forming shell companies, through which dirty money is circuitously moved around the world – that’s what The Panama Papers exposed with respect to just one of these firms, a founding partner of which happened to be a president’s chief of staff.

In the activities of real estate based cash laundries there have always been construction companies on the scene. Then there are the big public corruption scandals directly involving construction firms – the Brazilian-owned Odebrecht, the Mexican-controlled Spansh company FCC, most of the big Panamanian builders via the Blue Apple scheme. The proceeds of the public works schemes are generally washed, but the central issue there is graft, a series of overpriced contracts from which money is kicked back to public officials who make them possible.

So, in a weak economy, what’s left over from years of such games?

Inventory. Lots of unsold, unrented, or once briefly occupied, inventory of upscale housing and business units. Who eats the losses and how? — that’s the big question of our moment.

Can $120 million for a disappearing beach in front of the Cinta Costera fill all those empty and expensive condos across the street and park? Perhaps the artists’ renderings will make Mayor Tank of Gas’s folly into a giant feeder that attracts that rare species of bird, the zillionaire with more money than brains.

Will permission for Chinese companies to bring in all their technical and management people lead to the construction and sale of yet another tony Chinatown? Like another Costa del Este, but this one without Venes to set off Zulay?

We have a government that is starting to utter things about “clusters” again, a redux of the infamous Martín Torrijos sales pitches for the former Canal Zone. If Chinese companies come for the long-term for projects all over Panama, maybe the former Howard Air Force Base might double up on its present role as a US Southern Command forward operating location and become the commuter airport for Chinese businessmen who live nearby and commute to projects in Colon, Bocas or along some new national transportation corridor. Perhaps nearby bridge and tunnel projects would keep up housing demand in a new Chinatown.

Gangsters, they expect to get cheated a little to wash their ill-gotten cash. Beyond that, how many rich people are the world’s tax collectors going to figure that Panama can possibly attract to actually make the real estate investor claim the least bit credible?

Therein lies part of the European Union’s skepticism.

The games of the 1980s, few bankers play anymore, at least not directly. The protests of Panamanian lawyers, nobody anywhere else wants to hear. Perhaps some of the dregs of the profession in other countries might naively want to come here for part of the action. The developers’ quests for new real estate angles will be for naught unless they start building things affordable for people who are already here.

Color the beach on polluted Panama Bay, the opening to foreigners of Panama’s licensed professions on a grand scale, whatever new ruse they may come up with to get the EU off of Panama’s back, with Crayola delirious. As in one last drinking binge for a caste of people who partied their way through US universities and figured that this was a ticket to run a nation’s economy. They did get their management posts in their family businesses when they came back, but generally they ran those into the ground.

There are great adjustments to be made about all of the inventory, there are plenty of unmet needs out and about in the land, there are many outstanding claims for justice. And the banal schemes coming out of the Chamber and APEDE provide realistic answers to none of this.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

A carbon tax for countries like ours, to fund climate change defense?

0
quetzal
A resplendent quetzal (Pharomachrus mocinno) in a cloud forest in Costa Rica. Photo by Francesco Veronesi, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Economist, conservationist, political leaders want tropical carbon tax to halt deforestation

by Mongabay
  • A February 13 comment piece published in Nature urges tropical countries to adopt a tax on carbon emissions in order to halt global warming, species loss, and deforestation.
  • The authors of the piece include Edward B. Barbier, a distinguished professor of economics at Colorado State University in the USA; Ricardo Lozano, Colombia’s Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development; Carlos Manuel Rodríguez, Costa Rica’s Minister of Environment and Energy; and Sebastian Troëng, executive vice-president of US-based NGO Conservation International.
  • “Tropical deforestation and land-use change must be halted to safeguard the climate and global biodiversity,” the authors write in Nature. “The widespread adoption of a tropical carbon tax is a practical way forward.”

A comment piece published in Nature urges tropical countries to adopt a tax on carbon emissions in order to halt global warming, species loss, and deforestation.

The authors of the piece include Edward B. Barbier, a distinguished professor of economics at Colorado State University in the US; Ricardo Lozano, Colombia’s Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development; Carlos Manuel Rodríguez, Costa Rica’s Minister of Environment and Energy; and Sebastian Troëng, executive vice-president of US-based NGO Conservation International.

“Tropical deforestation and land-use change must be halted to safeguard the climate and global biodiversity,” the authors write in Nature. “The widespread adoption of a tropical carbon tax is a practical way forward.”

Some 70% of the world’s biodiversity is found in 17 “megadiverse” countries, the authors note. Thirteen of those megadiverse countries also contain tropical forests, but they collectively lost nearly 7.3 million hectares (more than 18 million acres) of forest in 2018, “an area roughly the size of Panama.” The authors add: “According to our estimates, that represented nearly 30% of global deforestation and may have released about 7% of worldwide carbon emissions.”

Research has shown that so-called “natural climate solutions” — conservation, restoration, and improved land management activities that boost carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas emissions from forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands — can provide 37% of the global warming mitigation needed between now and 2030 to keep temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius. But in many tropical countries, funds for these natural climate solutions is lacking.

That’s where a carbon tax could make a big difference, the authors of the Nature piece argue: “To plug this gap, we urge more countries that have tropical forests to adopt a tropical carbon tax — in South and Central America, Africa, Asia and the Pacific. This is a levy on fossil fuels that is invested in natural climate solutions. Such a policy can reduce the use of oil, gas and coal and mobilize domestic funds for adaptation and mitigation.”

The inclusion of Ministers Lozano and Rodríguez as co-authors of the piece was no accident, as Colombia and Costa Rica serve as the primary examples the authors use to demonstrate the benefits of taxing carbon emissions from fossil fuels.

Costa Rica has collected a 3.5% tax on fossil fuels since 1997, which today generates $26.5 million per year. Through its National Forest Fund, Costa Rica invests that money in forest conservation and restoration as well as agroforestry initiatives. Costa Rica had some of the highest rates of deforestation in the world in the 1980s, but these investments helped forest cover more than double in the country between 1986 and 2013.

Colombia adopted a tax of $5 per metric ton of emitted carbon in 2016, leading to revenues of $148 million in 2017 and $91 million in 2018. Projects waiting to access these funds are still in development, but, via the Colombian Peace Fund, 25% of those revenues will be spent on managing coastal erosion, reducing and monitoring deforestation, conserving water sources, protecting strategic ecosystems, and combating climate change. Another 5% of the revenues will go towards strengthening Colombia’s National System of Protected Areas.

Barbier, Lozano, Rodríguez, and Troëng lay out two scenarios for how tropical countries might implement a carbon tax. In one scenario, countries adopt a policy similar to Colombia’s by introducing a tax of $5 for each metric ton of carbon emitted and using 30% of the revenues to fund natural climate solutions like forest conservation. In the second scenario, a tax of $15 per metric ton of carbon emitted is levied, with 70% of the revenues allocated to natural climate solutions.

“Our own analysis shows that, if 12 other countries roll out a tropical carbon tax similar to Colombia’s, they could raise US$1.8 billion each year between them to invest in natural habitats that benefit the climate,” the authors write.

Some countries, such as Ecuador, India, Malaysia, Mexico, and the Philippines, would stand to gain hundreds of dollars per hectare that could be spent countering forest destruction. Under the second, more ambitious scenario, each country could raise nearly $13 billion every year to fund natural climate solutions. The authors say that “Brazil, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Indonesia would benefit the most, because they currently have the greatest amount of deforestation. Countries that have experience in developing high-quality carbon-offset projects, such as Peru and Ecuador, are well positioned to adopt a tropical carbon tax.”

The authors cite two ways that the international community can help promote widespread adoption of a tropical carbon tax: financial assistance for low-income countries that can’t raise sufficient funds from a carbon tax, and technical support to guide and monitor investments in natural climate solutions.

They write: “We call on governments, development banks, financial investors and non-governmental organizations to support those countries that need financial and technical help to implement this policy, and to ensure that the money raised is spent efficiently and effectively.”

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

What the Democrat runners-up said in New Hampshire

0
dems
Democrats Abroad Panama social gathering ~ Saturday, February 15th at 1 p.m. at the Country Store & Cafe in Balboa (across from the Balboa Union Church, down the hill, across the main street and at the end of the little side street)

A primary contest far from over:
listen to what they have to say





 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

VOTE

 

donate

 

NNPP

 

FB_2

 

Tweet