Home Blog Page 243

Hightower, How COOL NAFTA 2.0 isn’t

0
lonja
Trump’s new trade deal would encourage multinational meat packers to abandon America’s family ranchers. This uncured pork belly slice – jobs in Iowa, or in Brazil or Asia? And which country’s laws and practices will determine the chemicals that may be in the animal feed? You won’t have any right to know. Wikimedia photo by Rainer Zenz.

Where’s the beef in NAFTA 2.0?

by Jim Hightower – OtherWords

“MAGA,” blusters Donald Trump — Make America Great Again!

America’s ranching families, however, would like Trump to come off his high horse and get serious about a more modest goal, namely: Make America COOL Again.

COOL stands for Country-of-Origin-Labeling, a straightforward law simply requiring that agribusiness giants put labels on packages of steak, pork chops, and other products to tell us whether the meat came from the United States, China, Brazil, or wherever else in the world.

This useful information empowers consumers to decide where their families’ food dollars go. But multinational powerhouses like Tyson Foods and Cargill don’t want you and me making such decisions.

In 2012, the meat monopolists got the World Trade Organization to decree that our nation’s COOL law violated global trade rules — and our corporate-submissive congress critters meekly repealed the law.

Then came Donald Trump and his Made-in-America campaign, promising struggling ranchers that he’d restore the COOL label as a centerpiece of his new NAFTA deal. Ranching families cheered because getting that “American Made” brand on their products would mean more sales and better prices.

But wait — Trump has now issued his new US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, and — where’s the beef? In the grandiose, 1,809-page document, COOL is not even mentioned once.

Worse, it slaps America’s hard-hit ranching families in the face, because it allows multinational meatpackers to keep shipping foreign beef into the US market that doesn’t meet our own food safety standards. Aside from the “yuck” factor and health issues, this gives Tyson and other giants an incentive to abandon US ranchers entirely.

To stand with America’s farm and ranch families against their betrayal by Trump and the Big Food monopolists, contact the National Farmers Union: NFU.org.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Editorials: Medical boards; and Should Dems run on race?

0
doc strike
Striking physicians assemble in Panama City a few years back. That was an argument mainly about pay and benefits, but the doctors also worked and sometimes fought for years to get a professional licensing system with which they AND their patients could live. Now some legislator wants to change that and didn’t even ask them about it? Big provocation. Archive photo by Kermit Nourse.

Dumbed down health care on the National Assembly’s agenda?

Q: “Why couldn’t Jesus get a license to raise the dead in Jerusalem?”

A: “’Cuz he got nailed on the boards.”

A joke doctors’ kids would tell on the Sunday school bus
way back when, especially around the time of Holy Week

The problem? As a PRD legislator from Colon, Mariano López, puts it: “Many doctors come out of the universities and are not permitted to become interns because they have to take an exam that some don’t pass.”

So now we are told that Law 43 of 2004, as amended in 2008 and with implementing regulations decreed after that, must give way some as yet unspecified bit so that those Panamanians who flunk the certification or recertification exams can get job in Panama’s public and private health care system.

Panama’s public and private health care systems have their problems, which are amenable to various solutions that might work. One of which is not eliminating or dumbing down the Technical Council of Health’s certification exams. Demagoguery may be a specialty but it’s not one of the healing professions.

Anyone with any knowledge of US society and history knows what it’s all about — he’s spouting racism to mobilize white voters in places and social strata that he figures would be important to get himself re-elected. The racist violence that he incites he will deny in one way or another. The question is how Democrats respond. Do we reject this stuff and defend our people, but mainly talk about what we would do for the country? Or do we make 2020 an identity politics election and focus mainly on the constituencies whom Trump has insulted?

Should Democrats run on race in 2020?

Really, it’s a suggestion brought up by very few Democratic candidates or leaders. There are candidates touching issues like reparations for slavery, the fate of undocumented people who have been in the USA for years, past stands on issues like mass incarceration for drugs that have disproportionately affected racial minorities and whether association with Barack Obama insulates a candidate from hard questions.

But leave the outright racial appeals to Donald Trump and his party. Within the Democratic Party leave the unseemly assertion of identity politics to the most insecure and grasping of the apparatchiki who, like in 2016, are already calling dibs on hack jobs and consulting contracts, the spoils arising from victories yet to be won and far from assured.

The Democrats, however, have a large and talent-rich field of presidential primary candidates. Assurances will be given to constituencies with this or that identity that their members will not be short-changed or brushed off in order to play to the prejudices or demands of some other group deemed more important. But the questions around which Democrats’ primary choices will be made and on which the campaign will be waged in the fall of 2020 are on their bottom lines economic. How does American confront ever more severe climate disasters – who gains what and who eats which losses? How does America fix the world’s most expensive but far from the best health care system? Can America afford a tax system in which the rich hardly pay? Can America afford wars all over the place with no notion of what victory even is and certainly no end in sight? Can Americans have an education system that gives individuals the freedom and capacity to decide what to do with their lives and also gives the collective nation a well trained and creative talent pool that can compete in any sphere with any other nation?

Let Trump and his crowds hurl the racial insults. The would-be Democratic presidential nominees have their various homeland renovation plans.

Within the Democratic ranks, let those who play variations on the “I’m ____ – you owe me this nomination / job / contract / party leadership post” theme be quietly checked off as unqualified. But let’s not eliminate anyone from consideration over some identity politics pecking order, either.

Yes, if you identify yourself as an Aryan nationalist, Democrats WILL dismiss you. Democrats reject all of those ugly hatreds. But the issue is America’s future. Look for that in the upcoming debates.

Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one’s courage.

Anaïs Nin
Graphic by Waldo Saavedra

 

Bear in mind…

Literature is huge — they can’t fit her even into the Library of Congress, because she keeps not talking English.

Ursula K. Le Guin


Know thyself? If I knew myself, I’d run away.

Goethe


There can’t be a republic in which the people are not secure in the exercise of their own faculties.

Simón Bolívar

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Libertad Ciudadana, In the face of impunity

0
Profound rejection. Photo and alteration by Eric Jackson.

To the citizenry in the face of impunity:
insist, persist, resist and never desist

by Libertad Ciudadana, the Panamanian chapter of Transparency International

Last week three cases bore evidence of the profound collapse of the administration of justice in Panama:

  • The acquittal of all of those involved in a scheme in which Caja de Ahorros funds were used;
  • The cutoff of time to investigate the Odebrecht case; and finally, this past Friday, August 9,
  • The not guilty verdict in the case against former president Martinelli for the illegal interception of communication and various forms of theft related to that.

We have seen justice, instead of being effective, equitable and relevant, turned into a weapon of impunity and the undermining of social and democratic cohesion by way of the destruction of the rule of law and for practical purposes the non-existence of the separation of powers.

The institutional crisis in the administration of justice in this country, which engulfs both the Public Ministry prosecutors and the courts, didn’t arise in one week. It comes from more than a decade, since what was drawn up and established in the State Pact for Justice’s judicial reform road map, the commitments of which have for the most part gone unimplemented, like the judicial civil service. The provisions which that have been implemented, like the accusatory penal system, have been marred by favoritism in the appointment of judges without regard to the civil service laws, which has inundated the system with justice operatives without true independence, people who by all appearances are susceptible to intimidation and corruption and without any mechanism to get effective accountability for their judicial actions. Judges appointed by magistrates who, in turn, are the products of executive appointments for the most part bear the marks of conflicts of interest, inexperience, cronyism and the characteristics forge in mutual impunity pacts with the legislature, which in turn also does not fulfill its role as a balance to executive power.

Former president Martinelli’s case is particularly decisive because the Supreme Court accumulated several criminal cases for public corruption begun against him but did not include those in the extradition process. How can it be expected that the citizenry would like or could obey the law in a system that only guarantees impunity for some and delay for others?

As citizens in a democracy – imperfect as it is, but still a democracy – it’s up to us to act, to demand compliance with the judicial reforms, to support the State Pact for Justice, to incessantly insist and persist in the face of the forces of corruption who want nothing to change because the system serves them as it is.

Of the Public Ministry and the judicial branch we demand: courage, audits and evaluations of every office and every authority, change and modernization of the procedures, investigation of and sanctions for those justice operatives whose performance has been deficient or who have intentionally or negligently omitted their legal duties.

Of the executive branch: that President Laurentino Cortizo keep his word, which he gave upon signing the 2019 Transparency Challenge, and include it among the priorities of this government plan, to wit he promised:

“To nominate independent magistrates and prosecutors, without political, business or family ties to myself or any member of my cabinet, in strict compliance with Law 4 of 1999 concerning equal opportunities.”

If we want to do away with impunity, we need the best justice operatives: upright, independent, with judicial experience and brave in the face of corruption. The executive can help to improve, or can continue to worsen, the independence of the institutions.

We call upon the citizenry to resist corruption in all of its forms and to persist in the search for solutions. We will be publishing a call to convene and unite forces and look for solutions. We conscious citizens with a democratic calling are more than they are.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Bernal, The legitimacy crisis

0
bernal
Miguel Antonio Bernal. Archive photo by Eric Jackson.

The legitimacy crisis

by Miguel Antonio Bernal

The events that are happening in our country make the nature, the dimension and the depth of the crisis we are going through, displace most of the horrors through which we have lived over the last half century.

The crisis of the prevailing political regime’s legitimacy is not just that. It is a crisis that goes much further, with very atypical characteristics. It occurs “cold,” that is, without large mobilizations. It comes in a context of exhaustion of the regime imposed by the militarist constitution.

Inserting ourselves politically into the evolving crisis is imperative if we really want to find a favorable alternative — or any sort of exit for the civic and democratic sectors.

The moral heart attack that, as a result of the legal epilepsy imposed by the Martinelli process, has given us the “not guilty” verdict, will end up sinking the branches of government and their institutions. Without further delay we must leave the fake dichotomy of the not anymore versus the not yet.

The most peaceful, progressive, participatory and popular exit is a constitutional convention. But this process will not crystallize at will. The power brokers idolize the militarist constitution and the status quo of tormenting social, economic, political and cultural inequalities on which they are well fed.

The constitutional convention process must be the result of a determined citizen participation, supported by the concrete claims of the major majorities for which the constituent will be the catalyst element, the lowest common denominator, which will allow the integration of a citizen force that can determine events.

Today, the civic sectors that are jaded and disgusted with the current state of the government, with the decomposition of its branches, with corruption and impunity, with the permanent disappointment of their aspirations as human beings, must set aside the contemplative attitudes of spectators Those who are fed up must assume responsibility as actors since the events will occur with or without them. People have to get involved so that the results are favorable. In a nutshell, long suffering constituents, or protagonists of a new constitutional convention. There is no other way.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Constitutional follies

0
19

Rude questions about Panamanian law…

by Eric Jackson

IT SAYS RIGHT HERE IN PANAMA’S CONSTITUTION…

“ARTICULO 19. No habrá fueros o privilegios ni discriminación por razón de raza, nacimiento, discapacidad, clase social, sexo, religión o ideas políticas.”

[There will be no immunities or privileges nor discrimination on account of race, birth, disability, social class, sex, religion or political ideas.]

So, if a member of the political caste or a family member of one of these beats the rap for, say, running down and killing a little girl on a road in Colon province, or, say, misrepresenting the value of a beach mansion for tax purposes, or, say, conducting a vast and warrantless electronic espionage campaign against the Panamanian people, or, say, stealing vast sums of money from government coffers by way of overpriced public works contracts from which a skim is kicked back to members of the political caste – IF THERE ARE NO IMMUNITIES OR PRIVILEGES NOR DISCRIMINATION ON ACCOUNT OF SOCIAL CLASS, doesn’t everyone else have the same right to engage in legal fictions like the ones upholding such practices?

Or for that matter, doesn’t society have an equal right to indulge in legal fictions? As in, perhaps, ‘You say you were born in Panama to human parents and have this piece of paper that says so, but we are adopting the legal fiction that you were not, and thus that you don’t properly exist on this planet’?

Oh, I am told that there is a fix in the works, wherein “civil society” groups that represent the interests of and are largely composed of the most pompous and inbred of Panama’s wealthiest families get to determine whom elected presidents might appoint to the Supreme Court.

Sometime next year I get to vote “NO” on this proposed change? Will do, even if who gets heard in the referendum campaign will be rigged by the political caste and the elite families and there won’t be anyone whom ordinary people can trust counting the votes.

Oh, LOOK! Dr. Jekyll has slugged down a test tube of the formula and – it’s Mr. Rogers! And…

“…Can you say “constitutional crisis?”

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

A point of international law, and a question

0
law
Forstein, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law

The Specialty Clause

by Eric Jackson

All along since his extradition from the United States, Ricky Martinelli has been insisting that he is protected by the “specialty clause” of the 1904 US – Panamanian extradition treaty. I says it’s misguided because that was not the only treaty invoked in the extradition request. The Budapest Cyber Crimes Convention was also invoked and that has no specialty clause.

ANYWAY, what the specialty clause says is that if you are extradited for one crime or set crimes, you can’t then be tried for something else. Not right away, anyway. You are allowed to return to whence you were extradited, and proceedings over extradition for other crimes might ensue then. Might all be moot, given that Panama has no tolling statute on its statutes of limitation. But not necessarily as regards any proceeds from criminal activities. As long as those assets – say, a NEWSPAPER CHAIN – are under the bad guy’s direct or indirect control, that’s an ongoing money laundering offense.

And what if Panama says, “Fine, Ricky. Go back to Miami and we’ll see you in Round 2” – and then The Donald’s rednecks at la migra decide that THIS Latin American is a scruffy wannabe immigrant who isn’t white enough to get in?

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

¿Wappin? Pre-sentencing memo / Memorando previo a la sentencia

0
it

¿Anda, o lo devuelve a prisión?

Does he walk, or do they take him back to prison?

Raging Fyah – Judgement Day
https://youtu.be/I3WAAFlVsJ4

Silvestre Dangond & Natti Natasha – Justicia
https://youtu.be/7qix3jy5QdA

Bob Marley – Guiltiness
https://youtu.be/w-0pGTVvYPA

Dixie Chicks – Not Ready To Make Nice
https://youtu.be/XYAQayLkzgA

Kany García – Confieso
https://youtu.be/TOgCeRQvzoY

Aisha Davis – Trouble
https://youtu.be/fiq1ZF5whbE

Don Omar – Pobre Diabla
https://youtu.be/u89fN7_tBdU

Séptima Raiz – De Frente con Jah
https://youtu.be/qfEZeC77mcI

The Highwaymen – Ghost Riders in the Sky
https://youtu.be/AjkJqHUYr5w

The Golden Gospel Singers – Oh Freedom!
https://youtu.be/veiJLhXdwn8

Flora Purim – Casa Forte
https://youtu.be/JN9ZsDIasZU

Sarah McLachlan – Fallen
https://youtu.be/lXqslg8Qo_U

Cienfue – La Décima Tercera
https://youtu.be/AGa0ntjZLUk

Hello Seahorse! – Bestia
https://youtu.be/QNDlwHW92OY

Archie Shepp – Cry of My People
https://youtu.be/sU_PTQFJA8s

 
~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

npp

 

FB CCL

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

$$

 

vote final

 
Dinero

For those with US Social Security concerns:

0
1

A notice from the American Embassy

The US Embassy in Panama is pleased to announce that representatives from the Regional Federal Benefits Office will visit Panama City to offer services for beneficiaries or individuals with questions about US Social Security benefits.

Where: Center for English Language Immersion (CELI) – Via España, Edificio Cromos, First Floor.

When: August 19, 20, 21 and 22 from 8 am to 4 pm and August 23rd from 8 am to 1:30 pm.

Walk-in Services – No appointment necessary. First come first served.

What to bring for social security services: (please bring legible copies of all documents to be submitted)

Applying for Social Security Benefits: Bring originals and one copy of the following for all applicants: Birth Certificate and passport. If applying for auxiliary benefits or survivor’s benefits, please also bring marriage certificate and/or death certificate.

SSA Proof of Life Study: In 2019, SSA mailed the questionnaire to beneficiaries receiving their own benefits whose social security number ended in 50 – 99 and beneficiaries over the age of 90 and beneficiaries with a Representative payee. Please bring a copy of your passport and a completed SSA-7162.

Social Security Number Card Application: Bring a copy of your valid US passport, Certificate of Birth Abroad or original birth certificate, and completed form SS-5FS.

Change of Address for Social Security: Bring your current passport.

Medicare Part B Enrollment/Cancellation: To enroll in Medicare, you should complete and sign form CMS-40B. To cancel your enrollment please complete and sign form CMS-2690.

The best way to contact the Regional Federal Benefits Office is by using their online contact inquiry form: http://cr.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/social-security/fbu-inquiry-form/

To learn more about the services offered by the Regional Federal Benefits Office visit: https://cr.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/social-security/

We look forward to seeing you there!

 

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

Maíz en Panamá

0
stri

El Maíz en Panamá: 500 Años y Más

por Sonia Tejada – STRI

¿A quién no se le antoja un bollo, una torreja o un chicheme? El maíz está íntimamente ligado a la dieta y cultura panameña, desde tiempos precolombinos hasta la actualidad. Aprovechando el quinto centenario de la ciudad de Panamá, el Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales (STRI) en alianza con la Comisión de los 500 años de Fundación de la Ciudad de Panamá, inaugurará este lunes, 12 de agosto la exhibición temporal El Maíz en Panamá: 500 Años y Más, en el área del Koala del centro comercial Albrook Mall.

A través de un recorrido visual e informativo, la exhibición invitará al espectador a un viaje en el tiempo, en el que se entrelazan investigaciones científicas sobre la presencia temprana de esta planta alimenticia en el istmo con su historia colonial y republicana, hasta llegar a nuestros días, incluyendo un enfoque sobre sus usos en la Ciudad.

La primera parte nos invita a conocer lo que la ciencia nos ha revelado acerca del maíz. Por medio de análisis arqueobotánicos, investigadores de STRI han demostrado que esta planta tiene casi 8 mil años de presencia en nuestro país, y que su agricultura transformó los paisajes precolombinos para convertirse en el alimento vegetal más dominante en la dieta de gran parte de los antiguos pobladores del territorio istmeño.

Luego nos trasladamos a la llegada de los españoles a Panamá, cuando los cronistas dejaron una huella escrita que detalla la forma en que se consumía el maíz a través de los años, y diversas fuentes nos relatan datos curiosos que atan este alimento a sucesos específicos de nuestra historia. Por ejemplo, que tras el incendio de 1644 y luego a raíz de la Guerra de Siete Años (1756-1763) escaseó el maíz, o que el incremento en la cantidad de mulas por causa de la fiebre del oro lo encareció, puesto que el maíz era su principal alimento.

La exhibición también resalta el uso del maíz en la Ciudad hoy en día, incluyendo maneras en que los chefs jóvenes están explorando con este ingrediente, videos que muestran los métodos de preparación de distintos platillos típicos a base de maíz, así como datos curiosos y encuestas para que los visitantes interactúen con la instalación.

Por medio de un alimento tan arraigado a nuestras tradiciones como es el maíz, STRI espera despertar la curiosidad del público hacia la ciencia que hace el Instituto en el país, al mismo tiempo que celebra los 500 años de la Ciudad. El Maíz en Panamá: 500 Años y Más se podrá disfrutar en Albrook Mall hasta el 23 de agosto, tras lo cual rotará de manera itinerante por otros puntos de interés en la capital.

~ ~ ~

Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web

 

Dinero

 

Tweet

 

Tweet

 

FB esp

 

FB CCL

“Black hole,” “austerity” and the upbeat president who uses those words

0
Atlantic Side Bridge
On Friday, August 2 President Cortizo, Panama Canal Administrator Quijano and invited guests formally opened the new Atlantic Side bridge over the Panama Canal. Part of the mostly rural legislative circuit that Cortizo used to serve is now better connected to the rest of the world than it ever was — no ferries, no swing bridges at the locks, nobody dying while waiting to get across the canal to a hospital. Some 40,000 people live in more than 400 little towns and clusters of houses on Colon’s Costa Abajo. The bridge, a project that this new administration inherited, was built by a Chinese consortium. The country is on short rations for the moment, so we shall see how much Chinese engineering and construction we can afford over the next five years. Surely we shall see more. Photo by the Presidencia.

Nito confronts a budget and debt crisis

by Eric Jackson

Juan Carlos Varela left the presidency a little more than a month ago with a public debt of some $26.612 billion. That was about $8 billion more than what Ricardo Martinelli had left to him.

By comparison, according to the International Monetary Fund Panama’s’ Gross Domestic Product this year is expected to be a bit more than $72.2 billion. Latin America has worse debt crises, but the situation is serious.

However, debt numbers from one administration to the next are always debatable given the games that governments play. A favorite is the turnkey project, wherein one administration pays nothing but when the next government is in office and the job is complete, the whole bill becomes immediately payable. Another time honored tradition is to delay payments to suppliers or other contractors so that the next administration gets to pay — which might be an old standard but when it comes to medicines and hospital supplies it can lead to shortages and deaths.

In the last months of his administration Varela was looking to float $1.2 billion in bonds to pay down government debts. However, he was facing such stiff opposition in the legislature and such hard questions about Odebrecht, Blue Apple and other things that he was unable to close the deal.

Nito Cortizo, however, quickly upped Panama’s sovereign debt by another $2 billion, selling that much in bonds in a single day. He had promised international lenders a standard neoliberal economic package of austerity at home and incentives for foreign investment. But offsetting that, he has also said that he would renegotiate old deals that are unfavorable to Panama, the ones for the ports of Balboa and Cristobal and for the copper mine in western Colon province. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund are not calling for his scalp about those things. His big international economic problems are the fallout from US and Chinese trade wars, plus erratic and sometimes belligerent winds blowing from the White House.

So, what to do with a $2 billion loan, and what sort of austerity measures? First priority is to pay farmers for produce bought by the Agricultural Marketing Institute. Then come back wages for educators and health care workers. Those items will eat up most of the bond issue.

The austerity? Most of all in education and public health. The total Cortizo public budget cut for 2019 is just under $1.484 billion. From the health care sectors divided between the Social Security Fund and the Ministry of Health, there will be a $407.6 million cut. From primary and secondary education there will be an $85 million cut, nearly $30 million will come out of the University of Panama and the Tecnologico, and there will be unspecified cuts in scholarships and subsidies from the Institute for the Formation of Human Resources. (IFARHU).

The legislators are insisting that they are under no circumstances to be investigated for their peculations over the previous years. Meanwhile Rubiela Pitano, Cortizo’s original nominee to head that Secretariat for People with Disabilities (SENADIS), and former PRD legislator Rubén de León are being charged with stealing from the government via the National Assembly’s payroll. Is Cortizo going to just cut the legislature checks for their slush funds as before? Doubtful. And will he continue to allow legislators to run and loot the sports federations, on the dime of the PANDEPORTES, a government agency? Austerity may mean a confrontation between the president and a legislature dominated by his own party, but one convenient thing for presidents here is that they have a line item veto to wield in the event of budget showdowns.

On the new spending side, Cortizo vows to extend the Cinta Costera out to Amador to connect the coming new convention center. He also plans to raise spending on Panama’s 2000 poorest corregimientos, almost all of them rural. Those include every corregimiento in the indigenous comarcas.

One pending problem is a huge inventory of unsold or unoccupied real estate units, built on premises of sale to upscale foreigners or while not so stated for apparent money laundering purposes. But Panama is under international pressure about money laundering and the PRD deputies in the legislature are snarling at and spitting venom at foreigners in general. That real estate is not going to sell to the originally intended buyers anytime soon and there are not enough Panamanians with the money to buy all the condos.

Other big problems are changes in the world and regional economies. Arctic routes and new railroads will be adding new competition for the Panama Canal. The mixes of what gets shipped to and from where versus production near places of consumption will continue to change. Political instability could devastate world trade. None of those things are easy to predict.

But even though the Presidencia’s website talks about a “black hole” in the national economy, Cortizo says he’s optimistic. He’s predicting an administration that starts with some belt tightening in the face of deficits, but ends with budget surpluses.

 

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

 

npp

 

npp

 

vote final

 

npp

 

FB_2

 

Tweet