Home Blog Page 94

Zimmerman, Prevent theocracy by expanding the US Supreme Court

0
court protest
Six judges shouldn’t get to overturn the will of voters and destroy our rights. Expand the Supreme Court. Shutterstock photo.

How to prevent an American theocracy

by Mitchell Zimmerman

Barely a month ago we lived in a world where all Americans had the right to decide for themselves whether to continue a pregnancy. For much of the country, that’s now history.

Just weeks ago, states could implement at least some common-sense limits on carrying guns. Public school employees couldn’t impose their religious practices on students. And the EPA could hold back our climate disaster by regulating planet-heating carbon emissions from coal plants.

Thanks to an appalling power grab by the Supreme Court’s conservatives, all that’s been demolished too. And they’ve hinted that the right to take contraception, marry someone regardless of your sexual orientation, and even to choose your own elected representatives could be next.

How did we get to this place? Because Republicans spent decades cheating their way to a right-wing Supreme Court majority that enacts an extremist agenda, rather than interpreting the law.

When the very close presidential election in 2000 turned on Florida, five GOP justices halted the vote count, stealing the election for the man most voters rejected, George W. Bush. In return, Bush appointed right-wing judges John Roberts and Samuel Alito.

In 2016, the Republican Senate defied the Constitution by refusing to let President Obama fill a Supreme Court vacancy. Instead, they let another voter-rejected president, Donald Trump, install right-winger Neil Gorsuch. Finally, even as voting was underway in the 2020 election, Republicans rush-approved Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment.

So we now have a hard-right Supreme Court drunk on its own power.

We need a fair balance — and we don’t have decades to set things right. We need to expand the Supreme Court to 13 justices right now, so we have judges who believe in privacy, who allow our government to protect our children from gun massacres, and who allow common sense steps to protect our future from climate change.

Republican politicians will say that changing the number of justices represents “politicizing” the Court. But it is the Republican-appointed justices who have entered politics, unleashing gun lovers to run wild, vetoing climate change regulations, canceling abortion rights, and threatening other personal freedoms.

The danger from the Republican judges is only growing.

Their latest project is destroying the power of regulatory agencies. We will be left with a government that cannot protect babies from dangerous cribs and hazardous toys, cannot prohibit unsafe drugs and contaminated food, cannot protect workers from dangerous workplaces, and cannot limit climate-ravaging carbon emissions.

If we allow this to continue, our political system will look a good deal more like Iran’s theocracy. Like the United States, Iran has elections. But reactionary, fundamentalist religious leaders there set election rules, decide who can run, and often override the decisions of the elected government.

The Supreme Court’s six conservative justices seem dead-set on playing this role here in our system. So the best way to curtail the power of our own black-robed fundamentalists is to increase the size of the Supreme Court.

Under the Constitution, it is for Congress to decide how many justices there will be. Over the years Congress has changed the number six times. It’s time to change them again.

For much of American history, there’s been one justice for each judicial circuit. Today we have 13 circuits, so we should have 13 justices. We cannot simply accept the unfairness of the Republican judicial takeover. We can and must act to restore balance to protect our rights, our lives, and our planet.

Mitchell Zimmerman is an attorney, longtime social activist, and author of the anti-racism thriller Mississippi Reckoning. This op-ed was distributed by OtherWords.org.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Nito pide diálogo mediado por la Iglesia pero los manifestantes lo rechazan

0
Ulloa
El Arzobispo de Panamá, José Domingo Ulloa, invitado a mediar.
2

 

3

 

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

FB CCL

 
Dinero

Diputados, Poquito y tarde

0
oink grunt
2
 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

FB CCL

 
Dinero

¿Hay manatíes en el Océano Pacifico?

0
weed eater par excellence
Hace más de medio siglo, un grupo de manatíes de Bocas del Toro fue trasladado al lago artificial Gatún para controlar la abundancia de plantas acuáticas y por razones de salud pública. ¿Dónde están ahora? Foto por The Spillway, diciembre de 1964, desde los archivos de la Unidad de Memoria Histórica del Canal de Panamá

¿Los manatíes antillanos han cruzado al Océano Pacífico?

por STRI

A mediados de los años sesenta, casi 50 años después de la creación del lago artificial Gatún para las operaciones del Canal de Panamá, la Dirección de Salud de la Compañía del Canal de Panamá (PCC) trajo manatíes (Trichechus manatus manatus) para poblar el reservorio de agua. Las plantas acuáticas, como el lirio acuático (Pontederia crassipes), se habían vuelto abundantes y las autoridades sanitarias temían su potencial como criadero de mosquitos transmisores de enfermedades. Los manatíes, como se había probado en Guyana, eran una especie que podría ayudar a controlar el problema.

El primer manatí que voló al Canal de Panamá no era del Caribe, como estaba previsto. Era un manatí amazónico macho (Trichechus inunguis) de Perú. Otros nueve manatíes fueron transportados desde la provincia de Bocas del Toro en el noroeste de Panamá en aviones de carga C-47. Los dos primeros eran hembras, lo que generó la expectativa de mestizaje, ya que “el hecho de que las nuevas incorporaciones sean hembras dio a los expertos en manatíes de la Oficina de Salud la esperanza de una futura explosión demográfica en la laguna de manatíes…”, según un nuevo artículo publicado en Marine Mammal Science.

Pronto, otros individuos de T. manatus manatus fueron trasladados en avión, incluida una hembra preñada, y para fines de 1965, once manatíes se alimentaban libremente por todo el Canal de Panamá después de que la cerca en el área semicerrada donde habían sido colocados “La laguna manatí” se rompió. Más de 50 años después, en el 2020, se avistó un manatí cerca de las esclusas de Miraflores al oeste, en el lado Pacífico del istmo, lo que provocó búsquedas aéreas y en bote que no tuvieron éxito.

Este hecho llevó al ecólogo marino Héctor M. Guzmán y a la bióloga marina Candy K. Real, del Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales, a preguntarse: “¿han entrado los manatíes antillanos al Océano Pacífico Oriental?”. En otras palabras, ¿ha cruzado un mamífero marino nativo del Caribe a un hábitat desconocido, uno en el que no ha vivido durante varios millones de años? La respuesta es posiblemente sí. Desde 1977, se han reportado más de 50 avistamientos entre el lago Gatún y las esclusas de Miraflores, ubicadas cerca de la entrada del Pacífico al Canal de Panamá.

Si bien el programa de manatíes para controlar el crecimiento de plantas acuáticas se abandonó poco después de su creación, dado que se necesitarían miles de manatíes para lograr un impacto real, los animales continuaron siendo censados ​​en lo que eventualmente se convirtió en la Autoridad del Canal de Panamá (ACP). En el 2015, luego de un censo aéreo, se estimó una población de entre 20-25 manatíes en el lago Gatún.

“Aunque el posible paso se basa en un solo avistamiento en septiembre del 2020 realizado desde un petrolero, la idea no es descabellada”, dijo el biólogo Martín Mitre de la ACP. “Los manatíes, aunque pequeños en número, se mueven libremente por el lago y algunos podrían pasar por las esclusas”.

Según Guzmán y Real, se desconoce si otros manatíes pudieran haber pasado al Océano Pacífico. Sin embargo, es posible. También es mejor evitar que más de ellos se crucen a través de diferentes opciones de gestión y manejo.

“Lo ideal sería capturar a los animales para evitar que crucen al Pacífico, con tres opciones: devolverlos a su región natal (Bocas del Toro), aislarlos dentro de una laguna segura del Canal para que sirvan para educar y promover el turismo, o una combinación de ambos”, dijo Guzmán. “Pero para eso, primero debemos terminar de evaluar el tamaño, la distribución y la genética de la población actual del Canal. Debemos apoyar a la ACP, que lamentablemente heredó este error histórico”.

Agradecemos a la Autoridad del Canal de Panamá por el consentimiento para publicar este primer registro y por otorgar el permiso para investigar el estado y distribución de la población. Un agradecimiento especial a los Capitanes de Piloto Eric Hendrick y el Capitán Ivo Quiroz Jr., Daniel Muschett, Ángel Tribaldos y Ángel Ureña por la asistencia y el apoyo logístico.

Referencia: Guzman, H. M., & Real, C. K. (2022). Have Antillean manatees (Trichechus manatus manatus) entered the Eastern Pacific Ocean? Marine Mammal Science, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12950

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

FB CCL

 
Dinero

Editorial, Settle this

0
Protest
Photo from a SUNTRACS Twitter feed, electronically altered by The Panama News.

Everything grinding to a halt has its
pluses and minuses, but it can’t last

World inflation, that’s beyond the Panamanian government’s control. Actors in the national market place accumulating and abusing monopolistic powers to jack up prices, that the government could control and decided not to. The COVID epidemic? Not the Panamanian government’s fault, but again it bungled the economic response and allowed a predatory political caste to take advantage. An economy in shambles? About THAT a UN agency, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, says that we are farther away from getting back to 2019 levels of per capita Gross Domestic Product than our Latin American neighbors tend to be and that’s mainly about the greed and snobbery of those who hold the most power in this society. Those way below that level who have participated in the ongoing crime wave have mostly hurt those near them, who can afford it the least.

The politicians are keeping up their steady stream of grotesque displays. If it’s the usual radicals who were early to say “STOP!!!” they are far from the only ones. Organized labor is united about this, for sure, but so are the professional associations. You have some yahoos in the business groups calling for an iron fist with the protests, but most business groups and all responsible business leaders are calling for calm and recognizing that the people blocking the roads have been provoked.

It may get worse before it gets better. The legal tools to deal in the short term with the immediate problems exist in the current constitution. However, the politicians have maxed out the national credit card so the resource that we need are not available to do the ordinary things.

So many foreigners here are bewildered and angry at the inconvenience. There are still too many Panamanians looking for foreign intervention — international financial institutions dropping manna from heaven, the gringos coming to Panama’s rescue, or maybe the Chinese.

Panamanians will save Panama. This indignant shutdown is just a start. But it has been a necessary start. It would be nice to have an orderly transition, but from top to bottom in Panamanian society there are maleantes who would impede that in favor of their perceived personal advantages.

We need to talk. And to listen. But to the worst of the politicians and their backers, Panama needs to TELL. Calmly but firmly. We can look to Panamanian history to see some things that have worked and some things that have not.

A cabildo abierto? A coup? A constituent assembly? A confessional and correction of bad habits? Maybe a combination of things?

On the whole, Panama is a poorly educated country. However, even our most ignorant citizens don’t tend to be stupid. There is great wisdom out and about here, which surely trumps what anyone looking on from Washington might want to dictate. Forget the zero-sum competition games, and the big words that most people don’t understand as power tools. Let Panama settle its problems by the whole society talking it out, vetting the ideas good and bad, considering our circumstances and dismissing the pompous, making it clear to those who have been on top what the rest of us will and will not accept, and getting back to work on popularly agreed terms. 

As according to the meaning of the last verse of Panama’s national anthem:

Forward with pick and shovel
to work without further delay
and we will be thus prestigious and orderly
in this fertile land that Columbus saw

 

Tarzan's girl
Jane Goodall explores a wetland with a friend. Photo by William Waterway.

Lasting change is a series of compromises. And compromise is all right, as long your values don’t change.

Jane Goodall

Bear in mind…

Who knows if the spirit of man rises upward and the spirit of the animal descends into the earth? I have seen that there is nothing better for a man than to enjoy his work, because that is his lot. For who can bring him to see what will come after him?

Ecclesiastes 3:21

Happiness is a simple, frugal heart.

Nikos Kazantzakis

Our feelings are our most genuine paths to knowledge. We must key into those feelings and begin to extrapolate from them, examine them for new ways of understanding our experiences. This is how new visions begin, how we begin to posit a new future nourished by the past.

Audre Lorde

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Castro-Rodríguez, Castroism and Internet access

0
Cuban WiFi hot spot
Users of a WiFi Internet HotSpot in Havana, Cuba. Photo by Othmar Kyas, in 2015.

A year ago and today: Biden should provide satellite Internet for silenced Cubans

by Manuel Castro-Rodríguez

On July 11, 2021, Cuba witnessed what was the most significant wave of protests in decades. I am forwarding you the email that I sent on July 19, 2021, to the socialists in the US Congress. Your opinion is very important to me. Thank you so much you for reading.

Rather than give up the effort to see the country free and prosperous, first the South Sea will unite with the North Sea, and a serpent will be born from an eagle’s egg.

José Martí

The 2021 Trafficking in Persons (TIP) report, pursuant to the 2000 Trafficking in Persons Victim Act (TPVA), covers government efforts on trafficking undertaken in the reporting period April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021. Published on July 1st by the Department of State, the report keeps Cuba in Tier 3 for the second year in a row, along with 16 other countries that do not meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and are not making significant efforts to do so.

With this latest report, the United States government has raised the overall tone on the labor exploitation associated with Cuba’s international medical missions. Since March, Cuba has sent roughly 1,500 medical professionals across the world to help fight the Covid-19 pandemic, joining approximately 30,000 Cuban health workers already deployed abroad. However, Cuba healthcare system in peril as cases rise — Cuba has the highest rate of contagion per capita in Latin America. Why?

I invite you to see the reality of Cuban health care. The communist regime wants the world to believe that Cuban hardship in healthcare is caused by the United States embargo. But food and medicine are exempt from the embargo.

Since March 2020, the Cuban government has sent several contingents of medical personnel to support local healthcare systems in over 20 countries, including several in Latin America.

With a constitutional ban on independent private media, Cuba is unique in West. The strict control of information by the Cuban regime has been present for over six decades. All local media are state-owned and no foreign newspapers are sold on Cuba. As Professor Lillian Guerra has said, news mattered because “discourse shaped events and conditioned outcomes by shaping people’s perceptions of what was possible.”

The Cuba’s censorship agency is the Revolutionary Orientation Department (DOR). The Ministry of Informatics and Communications (Ministerio de Informática y Comunicaciones) was formed in 2000 to ensure the Castro’s ideology preached by the DOR is implemented on the Internet. In 2011, dictator Raúl Castro introduced market-style reforms to reinvent “socialism,” which is an euphemism used by Fidel Castro to name his dictatorship.

Internet access in Cuba is something relatively new and is still inaccessible to most citizens. Access to mobile Internet was introduced in December 2018, when some gained the ability to consume and share independent news in a country where all traditional media are run by the state since over 60 years.

In San Antonio de los Baños, a city of about 46,000 people to the west of the capital Havana, chanting “freedom” (libertad) hundreds of Cubans took to the streets on July 11. Protests spread quickly across Cuba until the internet was cut off by the state-owned company Etecsa. This prevents people from sharing information about the gatherings and claims of abuse against authorities known for their repressive tactics to silence criticism.

The marchers were demanding end over 60 years of a totalitarian regime. During his nearly five decades of rule in Cuba, Fidel Castro built a repressive system that punished virtually all forms of dissent. On March 18, 2003, in a coordinated action by agents of the Department of State Security, or Cuban political police, 75 people were arrested, including opponents, journalists and old man leftist economist Oscar Espinosa Chepe, in what we now refer to as Cuba’s Black Spring.

On April 11, 2003, the Executive of the Socialist International denounced “as inadmissible and unjustifiable the severe judgements passed this week by the courts in Cuba against nearly eighty non-governmental, civic and social leaders as well as intellectuals and human rights activists whose crime was to hold opinions different from the government’s.”

On April 11, 2003, after a swift and secret trial, three AfroCubans — Lorenzo Capello, Bárbaro Sevilla and Jorge Martínez — were executed by firing squad convicted of hijacking a passenger ferry to sail to the U.S., although they did not commit acts of blood.

Even figures of the international left like the Nobel laureate José Saramago, Eduardo Galeano, Pedro Almodóvar and Joan Manuel Serrat, harshly criticized Castro’s regime.

In April 2003, 27 Cuban intellectuals signed the ‘Message from Havana for friends who are far away’ (‘Mensaje desde La Habana para amigos que están lejos’), at which they not only defended the executions of three AfroCubans, but also had the indecency to try to get intellectuals from other countries to add themselves to this shameful support.

Eighteen years later, on July 11, Cubans on the island took to the streets demanding freedom. High-profile Cuban musicians take the people’s side showing rare public support to protesters. Chucho Valdés and Leo Brouwer, who were signatories of the letter supporting the executions of 2003, condemned Cuban regime’s brutal repression of the protesters.

“What pain, what sadness to see this abuse of power going on! … I never imagined that the forces of order in Cuba would attack ordinary and peaceful people like us Cubans,” wrote Brouwer. “When Cubans protest, there is no doubt that politics, or rather, political and military power has gone too far! How can they live in peace?” Added the musician, referring to the repressive wave promoted by Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel.

Chucho Valdés, who along with Brouwer the letter supporting the executions of 2003, said he felt very sad for what the Cuban people, including his family, are suffering. “It hurts so much to see the subhuman conditions in which they subsist. Enough of deceit and lies. International humanitarian aid is essential,” added the artist.

According to The Guardian,

High-profile Cuban musicians from salsa band Los Van Van and jazz pianist Chucho Valdés to pop star Leoni Torres have offered rare public support to protesters and criticized Communist authorities’ handling of the worst unrest in decades.

Musicians in Cuba have historically steered clear of addressing political topics that risk bringing them reprisals at home if deemed critical of the government or making them hate figures abroad among Cuban exiles if they appear supportive.

But Sunday’s social explosion, including videos on social media of some violent altercations between protesters and security forces, has changed that.

‘…We support the thousands of Cubans who are claiming their rights, we must be listened to,’ said Grammy winners Los Van Van, for decades Cuba’s most popular band, on Facebook.

‘…We say no to violence, no to clashes, and call for calm on our streets.’

On July 16, 2021, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Socialist Michelle Bachelet, urged dialogue and called for release of detained protesters:

I am very concerned at the alleged use of excessive force against demonstrators in Cuba and the arrest of a large number of people, including several journalists.” … “It is particularly worrying that these include individuals allegedly held incommunicado and people whose whereabouts are unknown. All those detained for exercising their rights must be promptly released.

I deeply regret the death of one protester in the context of protests in Havana – it is important that there be an independent, transparent, effective investigation, and that those responsible are held accountable.

I urge the Government to address the protesters’ grievances through dialogue, and to respect and fully protect the rights of all individuals to peaceful assembly and to freedom of opinion and expression.

She also called for full restoration of access to the Internet and social media.

President Biden, the House of Representatives and Senate should demand ratification by Cuba of the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and for its internal legislation to be harmonized with all international human rights instruments protecting the rights of persons in custody.

During a news conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, President Biden said,

Cuba is unfortunately a failed state and repressing their citizens. There are a number of things that we would consider doing to help the people of Cuba, but it would require a different circumstance or a guarantee that they would not be taken advantage of by the government.

President Biden needs to move fast to provide satellite Internet for silenced Cuban protesters. The Office of Cuba Broadcasting for 2022 has been slashed from around $20 million to under $13 million. Why?

As always I will be an enemy of violence. I reject the movement that started among Florida’s Republican politicians who advocate for a military intervention.

 

Manuel Castro-Rodríguez, who is Cuban, lived in Panama for a number of years and now lives in Miami.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Lofgren, Not unknown throughout history and in other lands

0
jawohl
More and more Americans will believe anything and everything — except facts, evidence, and logic. 

The dangerous rise of the gullible American cynic

by Mike Lofgren — Common Dreams

And you know, you can tell these types of right wingers anything and they’ll believe it, except the truth. You tell them the truth and they become—it’s like showing Frankenstein’s monster fire. They become confused, and angry and highly volatile.

Janeane Garofalo

In 1996, when I was working in government, a colleague remarked on the then-fresh tragedy in which TWA Flight 800 exploded over the waters off Long Island. His “sources” had reason to know that Islamic terrorists had shot it down it with a missile.

The subsequent investigation was one of the most extensive in the history of accident reconstruction. The plane parts were salvaged from the ocean floor, rebuilt, and examined. Various hypotheses as to the cause of the explosion — including terrorism — were eliminated one by one.

The overwhelmingly likely cause was deterioration of the Kapton insulation of the wiring that passed through the center fuel tank. It was such a significant safety issue that this wiring had to be replaced on many older airliners, while earlier airline accidents were reinvestigated in light of the discovery.

None of this impressed my colleague, who fell for one of the first major internet hoaxes. It had to be a missile; the accident investigation was a sham. Never mind that it involved thousands of people from multiple, often rival federal agencies, local coroners, private-sector forensics experts, and Navy divers; somehow, they all got their stories straight and coordinated a perfect coverup that is still in operation a quarter century later.

He had similar views on the 1995 massacre in Srebrenica, Bosnia. It either never happened, was vastly overstated, or the Bosnian Muslims had somehow done it to their own people to provoke Western intervention. There was no shortage of brutality on all sides in this Balkan ethno-religious civil war, but the Srebrenica incident was so outsized, so obvious, and left so much evidence that its existence, and the fact that Bosnian Serbs had perpetrated it, could hardly be rationally denied.

A quarter of a century later, bodies are still being discovered at or near the site — and Bosnian Serbs have concocted a whole martyrology about how it never happened and that they, the Serbs, are being victimized by shadowy globalist forces.

Fast forward to 2014. To all appearances, Russian or Russian-sponsored forces using a mobile Buk9 surface-to-air missile shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 flying over eastern Ukraine. The Flight 17 incident was likely the accidental downing of a civil airliner mistaken for a Ukrainian military transport by Russian-sponsored separatist forces; it could have been settled with an admission of error and financial restitution.

Instead, Russia stonewalled an investigation, spread a fog of defamatory disinformation, and vetoed a UN resolution to create an investigative tribunal. Angry relatives of the victims are in no doubt about Russia’s culpability. Nevertheless, my now-former colleague was in no doubt that this was a false-flag operation: a Ukrainian jet deliberately shot down the aircraft to blame it on the Russians and provoke intervention. Never mind that the Dutch accident reconstruction concluded the damage was characteristic of a Russian surface-to-air missile and that both satellite photography and eyewitnesses on the ground detected a Russian missile battery moving into the launch area before the incident.

All through this period, I had thought that this person was an individual, isolated person with crazy ideas and an axe to grind. But now, in 2022, there are tens of millions of them; they vote, swing elections, make policy, impact the health of every one of us by their medical decisions and social behavior; and they are, many of them, heavily armed.

There has been much debate about the causes of this derangement. Income inequality? Social media? The repeal of the Fairness Doctrine? The rise of the Religious Right? The American creed of rugged individualism? It is probably all those things and more. There is rarely a single cause of mass social behavior, nor is there an arbitrary cutoff date when searching for causes: religious extremism goes back to Plymouth Rock. Rugged individualism in the service of overweening greed dates to 1607, when the ne’er-do-well sons of the English petty gentry hove to inside the Virginia Capes in search of gold, real estate, and their destiny as would-be great men.

My former colleague Jim was an unusually pure specimen of this American syndrome, as lack of education or cultural deprivation could not be held responsible for his condition. But he was merely one example of a social epidemic I call gullible cynicism: the ability to be dismissive, disbelieving, and paranoiacally suspicious, while simultaneously being astoundingly naïve and accepting of the flimsiest fabrication not only at face value, but with a reverential embrace.

Hence the tragic-comic episode of the Covid-19 pandemic, when countless people posited an airtight conspiracy of microbiologists; public health officials at the federal, state, and local levels; hospitals with all their staff; coroners; and the entire media, in order to perpetrate a hoax. Incredibly, their professional counterparts all over the world were pulling off the same deception in perfect coordination with America. Yet these same paranoid cynics would credulously believe some nameless internet blogger recommending horse de-wormer as a sovereign remedy for Covid-19 (assuming they believed the virus even existed).

In a similarly breathtaking display of gullible cynicism, people with the same mindset as the Covid-19 deniers still refuse to accept the evidence of what occurred on national television and in front of thousands of eyewitnesses on January 6, 2021. The mob that constructed a gallows and stormed the Capitol consisted of innocent tourists. Or they were antifa trying to discredit honest patriots (half of all Republicans believe that). Or they were FBI provocateurs. Never mind that 315 Capitol rioters have pleaded guilty thus far, and their bios all match the profiles of Trump supporters. That, too, is no doubt part of the conspiracy.

At present we are going through a particularly nasty flare-up of this syndrome. But it is not unknown throughout history and in other lands. George Orwell commented on this kind of mental state 76 years ago:

To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle. . . . In private life most people are fairly realistic. When one is making out one’s weekly budget, two and two invariably make four. Politics, on the other hand, is a sort of sub-atomic or non-Euclidean world where it is quite easy for the part to be greater than the whole or for two objects to be in the same place simultaneously. Hence the contradictions and absurdities . . . all finally traceable to a secret belief that one’s political opinions, unlike the weekly budget, will not have to be tested against solid reality.

 

Mike Lofgren is a former Republican congressional staff member who served on both the House and Senate budget committees. His books include: “The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government” (2016) and “The Party is Over: How Republicans Went Crazy, Democrats Became Useless, and the Middle Class Got Shafted” (2013).

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Ayubi, Islam and abortion

0
interfaith
Christians, Muslims and Jews make common cause in front of the US Supreme Court. Photo by Ted Eytan.

There is no one Islamic interpretation on ethics of abortion, but the belief
in God’s mercy and compassion is a crucial part of any consideration

by Zahra Ayubi, Dartmouth College

As a scholar of Islamic ethics, I’m often asked, “What does Islam say about abortion?” – a question that has become even more salient since the US Supreme Court reversed 50 years of constitutional protection for the right to get an abortion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling on June 24, 2022.

This question really needs to be reframed, because it implies a singular view. Islam isn’t monolithic, and there is no single Islamic attitude about abortion. The answer to the question depends on what kinds of Islamic sources, scriptural, legal or ethical, are applied to this contemporary issue by people of varying levels of authority, expertise or religious observance.

Muslims have had a long-standing, rich relationship with science, and specifically, the practice of medicine. This has yielded multiple interpretations of right and wrong when it comes to the body, including ideas about and practices surrounding pregnancy.

Islamic frameworks for thinking about abortion

The typical framing of the question of whether abortion ought to be legal hinges upon American Christian debates about when life begins. Muslims who get abortions don’t always ask “when does life begin?” to ascertain Islamic positions on the matter. Rather, as my research in the Abortion and Religion project and forthcoming book “Women as Humans” has found, Muslims who get abortions generally consider under what circumstances abortion would be permitted in the Islamic tradition.

Further, the Quranic verses and hadith – recorded sayings of the Prophet Muhammad – are not about abortion per se, nor the moment when life begins or whether abortion is akin to taking a life. Instead, they are descriptions for people to reflect on God’s miracle of what happens in the womb, or rahm in Arabic, which is part of God’s mercy and compassion.

It is often a deeply theological discussion about human actions in context of God’s will, omnipotence and omniscience when it comes to life and death. The dialogue often yields answers that are specific to the person’s cosmic and religious beliefs about God’s nature and mercy and their circumstances in the abortion decision-making process.

A Muslim woman reads the Quran.Specific verses in the Quran describe the stages of gestation of the fetus. Marvin del Cid/Moment via Getty Images

Many contemporary Muslim jurists and bioethicists point to specific verses in the Quran as well as hadiths with descriptions of the stages of human gestation that are mapped onto the pregnancy timeline in the contemporary abortion debate. The often-cited Quranic verses are 23:12-14: “And indeed We created humankind from an essence of clay. Then We placed him as a sperm-drop in a resting place firm; then We created the sperm-drop into a clinging substance, then We created the clinging substance into an embryonic lump, then We created from the embryonic lump bones, then We clothed the bones with flesh, then We produced it as another creation. So blessed is God, the best of creators.”

Then there is the hadith in which Prophet Muhammad describes what happens in the womb: “The human being is brought together in the mother’s womb for forty days in the form of a drop of fluid, and then becomes a clot of thick blood for a similar period, and then a piece of flesh for a similar period. … Then the soul is breathed into him. …”

These scriptural traditions divide the pregnancy timeline into stages. Muslim jurists consider the 120-day mark of ensoulment (40 days x 3 stages), when God is believed to blow life into the fetus, as the point at which the fetus becomes a legal entity with financial rights. The fetus is believed to have inheritance rights; it can leave an inheritance to its siblings or other kin if it dies, or provide its parents with blood money in the event of a violent action against the mother.

While reference to the scriptural tradition might be enough for many Muslims, some might look to the Muslim legal tradition for precedence. Premodern jurists’ inquiries into stage of pregnancy were mainly to settle questions such as what inheritance laws might come into effect in the event of fetal death. They weren’t asking when life begins to settle abortion questions. And even as they touched on the question of legal personhood of a fetus, they ruled on a case-by-case basis rather than through blanket pronouncements.

Contemporary jurisprudence

Most Muslim jurists and bioethicists today argue that abortion before 120 days of pregnancy is permissible on certain grounds and after this term in cases of mortal danger to the mother. When it comes to abortion, the Islamic legal principle of preservation of life is universally interpreted to mean the mother’s life. Other grounds for abortion vary depending on school of thought but include health concerns for mother or fetus and sometimes include unintended pregnancy, depending on the circumstances of how the pregnancy came about.

Since maternal health can be a nebulous category, acceptance of mental health reasons for abortion may depend on whether people take mental health itself seriously. Concerns might include the mental capacity of a mother to care for herself or a child, or potential suicidal thoughts that put the mother’s life at risk.

Financial affordability is generally frowned upon as a reason for abortion because God is seen as provider, but still accepted in some schools of thought, as the tradition generally promotes mercy above else.

Regardless of contemporary jurists’ positions on the subject, however, Muslims who pursue abortion often do so based on their broad Islamic understanding of God’s compassion rather than in consultation with religious authorities who might act as gatekeepers.

American Muslims post-Dobbs

Part of Islamic discourse’s nuance about abortion is the result of a long relationship between medicine and Islamic thought. For American Muslims, that history is overshadowed by the US Supreme Court upholding the heavy dominance and influence of one Christian view as the only American view on abortion.

A 13th century folio showing a man with a beard and a turban giving herb to a person seated in front of him.Folio from an Arabic manuscript of the Greek doctor Dioscorides, De materia medica, 1229. The Yorck Project (2002), distributed by Directmedia Publishing GmbH via Wikimedia Commons.

There is often a global assumption, which is held by many Muslims as well, that Muslim rules about gender and women’s rights are stricter than dominant Christian American ones. There have been many problematic comparisons of the Dobbs decision and Sharia. Some have called it “Christian Sharia” to characterize the ruling and abortion bans nationwide as religious, yet in doing so they draw on anti-Muslim sentiment and stereotypes of Islam as uniquely gender oppressive.

When American Muslims themselves mirror evangelical Christian views on abortion, however, it may be a form of virtue signaling or out of ignorance of Muslims’ rich historical relationship with medicine.

Even in so-called religiously conservative Muslim countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, laws on abortion are much more liberal than in U.S. states banning abortion. Legally, not only is the life of the mother always prioritized, but because the idea that ensoulment occurs at 120 days is taken seriously, abortion before that point may, and often does, take place in a variety of circumstances such as rape, serial births, mental health issues, untimeliness of pregnancy, etc.

Many American Muslims are speaking in support of the right to abortion. Organizations such as the American Muslim Bar Association, Heart to Grow and Muslim Advocates have issued statements about abortion in Islam and published information on American Muslims’ rights to abortion. The one prevailing commonality among these and diverging Islamic views on abortion is the Islamic concept of God’s mercy and compassion.The Conversation

Zahra Ayubi, Associate Professor of Religion, Dartmouth College

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

Franken, What’s become of my opponent and his party

0
The admiral
The admiral works an Iowa picnic, on the way to being a senator. From Mike Franken’s Twitter feed.

Partisan nonsense that hinders American industry

by Admiral Mike Franken

My statement on the United States Innovation and Competitive Act: There was a time when a hugely bipartisan, year-long effort to craft a bill that supercharges US industry to compete with China would gain rapid approval. Well, not today.

There was a time, maybe some decades ago, when senators like Chuck Grassley, would tell Mitch McConnell to ‘go fish’ when he intended to undermine America. Well, that’s gone as well.

We will lose more manufacturing jobs in America if we permit partisan nonsense to continue in the Senate. This bill is a ‘must pass,’ and Iowa really needs it. Iowa cannot afford to lose more livelihoods while the Senate Republicans, and an obedient Chuck Grassley, play these legislative games. Grassley is not the leader Iowa needs. He appears frightened to stand up to Senator Mitch McConnell — who is threatening to kill a bill to help us compete with communist China — because this legislation also targets his Big Pharma friends by lowering prescription drug costs. We can do better than this political posturing. It’s time for Iowa to elect a senator who will work for them and do what is in their best interests and not the special interests.

The USA behind on semiconductor manufacturing and development? It’s a very real issue with all manner of implications. Graphic by Marco Verch.

Franken, a retired three-star US Navy admiral, is the Democratic nominee for US Senate in Iowa.

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

22ENGdonateBUTTONFB_2

VFA_4

Tweet

PDC

¿Wappin? Times like these / Momentos como estos

0
Kendrick Lamar at this year’s Glastonbury Festival.

Cienfue – Maybe We (Should Be Set Free)
https://youtu.be/pfvic_LLBMc

Of Monsters and Men – Lonely Weather
https://youtu.be/IHxRqJ-9D4M

Leiva & Natalia Lafourcade – Diazepam
https://youtu.be/Xn_Lnat-kEE

Khruangbin & Leon Bridges – Texas Sun
https://youtu.be/sRzpTDx9Poc

Tash Sultana – Jungle
https://youtu.be/TsimteM6F9U

Toots & The Maytals – Pressure Drop
https://youtu.be/DKVB_CtU8XQ

Carole King – Smackwater Jack
https://youtu.be/4ttfcrg-Yow

Peter Tosh – Guide me from my friends
https://youtu.be/vqPcpkx3Pbk

John Lee Hooker – I’m Bad Like Jesse James
https://youtu.be/r_ZVrR6lD4s

War – The World is a Ghetto
https://youtu.be/VIIbT89V7EI

Nneka – Book of Job
https://youtu.be/o13RCkeoaQA

Black Pumas – Colors
https://youtu.be/pbyyRCr60Q8

Joshue Ashby C3 Project – Andy Blues
https://youtu.be/E3VRCcW1t9s

Melanie – Lay Down (Candles in the Rain)
https://youtu.be/sMEN6kWo0S0

Pink Floyd – Delicate Sound of Thunder
https://youtu.be/13m5-0EOwIM

 

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

22ENGdonateBUTTONCIAM

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

FB CCL

 

$$

 
PDC
 
Dinero