Dice el contrato:
~ ~ ~
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web
The Martinelli family has had a rough week. The ex His Excellency got back into some old trouble before the high court, without a word on his behalf from the ultimate beneficiary of his crime.
The former first lady did rise to her jailed husband’s defense, but foolishly. “This is the Bahia Honda case against Ricardo Martinelli,” she tweeted. “The complainant says that he doesn’t know if Ricardo Martinelli was in the place or if he ordered his arrest. They told him that RM was there, that is… this is how they make their cases under our persecuting justice.” As if dozens of families were not driven from the homes and lands they owned without legal process, in two waves in 2010 and 2012. As if the former governor of Veraguas blinked ever so slightly and wrote in his illegal 2010 eviction order that this was due to Martinelli’s presidential order — an annotation that got the guy fired. As if among the many residents who were driven off in the next wave of evictions there were not many who not only identified Ricardo Martinelli the scene but recounted his specific Holy Week threat that whoever did not forthwith sign his or her property over to French-Italian playboy Jean Pigozzi, heir to the Simca auto fortune, would be thrown in jail. As if the dozens of police officers and the crews that demolished people’s homes are going to take the fall for Ricardo Martinelli and testify that the ex-president had nothing to do with it, that this was an idea that just came into their heads.
Ah, but Pigozzi is a philanthropist, a good guy who hangs out with Martha Stewart and Google’s Sergey Brin and Mick Jagger and the Martinellis and Pipo Virzi and Gabriel Btesh and Riccardo Francolini (the latter three out on bail, Ricardo Martinelli in jail in Miami and his two sons fugitives from justice). For the sake of science? The Liquid Jungle Laboratory which Pigozzi established on nearby Isla Canales — which he and then-President Martinelli purported to rename Isla Simca — had been established a few years before. These dispossessions, of people who owned their properties by decades of adverse possession that gave them full ownership rights under Panamanian law, were not for the purpose of scientific research. They were so that Mr. Pigozzi would not have their houses in the view from his house. And one of those who objected, so was arrested, brought his private criminal prosecution, was blown off by prosecutors and summarily thrown out of court by judges, finally got a day in the Supreme Court, which decided on April 10 to continue the disrupted criminal proceedings against the former president. This criminal case is far from over.
(Were anyone to proceed against Pigozzi, she or he would first have to surmount a statute of limitations barrier. That case would be separate from Martinelli’s as Pigozzi is not a member of the Central American Parliament so as to give rise to the high court’s direct jurisdiction over him.)
So add that to the front-burner case of illegal eavesdropping against the former president, along with the more than a dozen other matters at various phases on the docket.
To the scientific institutions that have or had relationships with Pigozzi’s Liquid Jungle Lab, there are revealing denials or evasions. The US quasi-govermental Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute did not respond to this reporter’s question about their current relationship with the lab. In fact, they erased references to such relationship as they had from their website, but did not take into account the existence of cached copies and accounts from other sources. In 2011 and again in 2012, then STRI director Biff Bermingham and Eva Pell, the Smithsonian Institution’s undersecretary for science, toured the Liquid Jungle Lab and did a presentation about a STRI exhibit to be installed there. But less than a month after the 2012 visit the Easter Week expulsions took place, and less than a year and a half after that a crew from Washington DC came to STRI headquarters in Ancon and summarily expelled Bermingham from that organization. There has been a concerted effort since then to erase online references about him and he is the only living ex-director not to be listed as “emeritus”— or at all. Yet as fleeting and cautious as the Smithsonian’s relationship to Pigozzi’s lab might have been, at the time the STRI name was used to validate the operation.
The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute is a private organization with a staff of about 1,000 that’s based in Massachusetts but roams the world’s oceans and seas. Its relationship with Pigozzi was and is older and closer. Colonial mentalities and the fruits thereof be damned when WHOI is dealing with celebrities. They did respond to this reporter’s query, in a way that ought to shock American educational institutions with operations abroad.
In any case acting magistrate Abel Zamorano is the acting prosecutor and magistrate Harry Díaz is the acting judge, with a nine-member panel of magistrates and alternate magistrates to sit in judgment as the jury if the matter ever gets to trial. Zamorano has three months to put his case together and either move to take it to trial or not.
Zamorano and Díaz are both Martinelli appointees, but with the ex-president’s sinking fortunes it seems that such ties are ever less of a factor. What sort of a factor existing vacancies on the court and a political stalemate over filling them may be is an even wilder card in the legal calculations.
A lower court judge had ruled that the prosecutors’ time to bring a case in the Odebrech bribery and kickback scandal had run out, her ruling was upheld by the appeals court, but this week the Supreme Court overturned the appellate decision and remanded the case back down. This reopens the case against an unknown group of individuals, but two of whom are definitely known to be the former president’s sons, Ricardo Martinelli Linares and Luis Enrique Martinelli Linares. They received money from Odebrecht and laundered it through an international chain that went though Andorra and ended up in bank accounts in Switzerland, which the Swiss authorities froze.
Multiple money trails through many jurisdictions involving many people — that’s a complex investigation. However, in the middle of last year a judge of Panama City’s 12th Penal Court ruled that it was not a complex case, thus ineligible for the time extension to investigate those sorts of cases. The appeals after the judge timed the investigation out appear to have ended this past week the high court reversed and gave the prosecution an extra year to investigate their case.
The Martinelli brothers have been unavailable during all of this. While they were on their merry flight a family helicopter was seized by authorities in Mexico but the trail was probably lukewarm then and is much colder now. It would not be until sometime after the investigation is concluded, if formal charges are preferred, before an INTERPOL warrant might be requested in that matter.
It is, however, not the only penal matter for the younger Martinellis.
On April 11 the Supreme Court slapped down a series of impediments interposed by Ricardo Martinelli Linares against a criminal investigation of a gambling offense. It is alleged that during the time of his father’s presidency a scratch-off lottery game, Buko Millionario, was created and approved under someone else’s name, but that Ricardo the son was the actual beneficial owner. That hidden interest would violate Panama’s gambling laws and perhaps some of this country’s skimpy inhibitions against conflicts of interest. But after three years of constant dilatory tactics, the magistrates told the prosecutors that they may continue with their investigation of the case. The court did, however, limit prosecution demands for banking records. It was a 5-4 decision of a full court panel, with alternates and unreplaced magistrates holding over from expired terms participating.
Antonio Ledezma, the former anti-Chavista mayor of metro Caracas, got on Twitter to react to Nicolás Maduro’s 90-day suspension of Copa Airlines flights in and out of Venezuela “What would happen if, as a response to this Madurista madness, the government of Panama would prohibit the passage of ships related to Venezuela through the Panama Canal?” he tweeted.
And there we have it again. A leading figure of the fragmented Venezuelan opposition appeals not to his fellow citizens to unite behind a single challenge to a very unpopular government that’s headed by a man who cheated the voters out of a recall election to which they had a right. In fact, it’s not an appeal to Venezuelans at all — like the opposition has repeatedly done for a couple of decades, the aim is once again for foreign intervention.
Never mind the niceties of international law. By a bilateral US and Panamanian treaty, plus supplemental agreements that have been signed by many Latin American countries, the canal is neutral and open to ships of any nation even in times of war. It’s a cornerstone of Panama’s defense and of order in the region to prevent anyone from having a reason to attack the canal or to go to war to take control of the transit route upon which many of the region’s economies depend.
Never mind the violence that regime change by international intervention would visit on the Venezuelan people. Perhaps Ledezma, the former mayor of one of the world’s most violent cities and a politician not known for any particular success in dealing with that situation, may not much care about the carnage that would be involved.
Should we say never mind the consequences for democratic rule in Venezuela? For a lot of the opposition this is the whole point. They would restore a discredited old oligarchy that looks to foreign approval rather than a democratic mandate to install themselves in power.
The suggestion of drafting Panama into Venezuela’s internal dispute tends to increase the tensions and abuse that Venezuelans living in Panama – the great majority of whom do not like Maduro and did not much like Chávez – face in their daily lives. If Panamanians may have reason to look askance at those who would launder the proceeds of the financial crimes under Venezuelan law in Panama, or who would carry on Venezuelan political strife on Panamanian soil, or who would import elite Venezuelan racism and snobbery into dealings with a more racially tolerant Panamanian society, the many Venezuelans who are not like that and are simply attempting to sink new roots, make a living and add to the social mosaic that is Panama don’t deserve that opprobrium. Ledezma’s suggestion was made without regard for its negative effects on Panama’s Venezuelan community.
Nicky Maduro owes the Venezuelan people a recall election. Venezuela, both in its public and private sectors, owes Panama and above all Panamanian businesses a lot of money. The collapse of Venezuela’s exclusively oil-based economy and the failure of both governing and opposition politicians to deal with the resulting mass hunger has sent hordes of Venezuelans fleeing to wherever they can, which is disruptive to all of the nearby countries including Panama.
You would think that the anti-Chavista opposition would look beyond the probability of manipulation. A corny maneuver may well be the logic behind the snap presidential election that Maduro and his illegitimate constituent assembly have called. However, it’s an opportunity for a weary Venezuelan electorate to depose a failed government, a chance to redeem the recall election to which they were entitled but did not get. But for some of the opposition factions the notion of actually governing Venezuela through a crisis that won’t go away just with a change of government, of responsibly regaining Venezuela’s respectability in the world community of nations, of fixing the damage inflicted by Maduro’s ego on a nation already divided — those things pale beside their personal ambitions.
And so much of the old opposition is calling for a boycott of the May 20 presidential vote, in which Henri Falcón would likely thrash Maduro in any high-turnout process. Falcón may or may not be good for Venezuela but what is more certain is that he does not serve the private ambitions of either Maduro or the leading anti-Chavista politicians of the past 20 years.
The solution to Venezuela’s crisis is not Panama shutting down sea transport to and from that South American country as Maduro has shut down air transport between Caracas and Panama. It’s not a “Group of Lima” founded by sordid crook who has since been driven out of the Peruvian presidency. It’s not by the intervention of Donald Trump, who stands beside Nicolás Maduro in the front ranks of the world’s least competent heads of state. It’s for Venezuelans to vote out whom they cannot stand, then begin to pick up the pieces and, with some help from friends and neighbors, rebuild their nation. It’s something for Venezuelans to do, not something to draft Panama or any other country into doing.
Panama has some genuine issues with Venezuela, including public and private debts, a migrant crisis caused by an oil economy collapse crisis aggravated by a political crisis, and concern about democracy and welfare in a sister Bolivarian republic. The degeneration of bilateral Panamanian – Venezuelan relations with mutual sanctions, including the suspension by Venezuela of Copa Airlines fights between the two countries, is truly sad. The two countries have usually stood by one another in the worst of crises, even at times when one or the other have had the worst of governments. If there is personal venom aimed by Panamanians at Venezuelans on the isthmus these days, that’s an anomaly in our history.
So now comes Donald Trump with praise for Panama’s moves against Venezuela. The appearance is given of Panama being recruited into the foreign policy of the most dangerous and irresponsible character ever to inhabit the White House. It’s an endorsement that should embarrass Juan Carlos Varela.
Menander
Everyone is a prisoner of his own experiences. No one can eliminate prejudices — just recognize them.
Edward R. Murrow
Sojourner Truth
La Estrella, Derechista vene pide a Panamá prohibir a Venezuela uso del canal
Seatrade, World’s first autonomous shipping company
Hellenic Shipping News, Shippers’ fears rise with trade war talk
airlinegeeks.com, Air China begins service between Houston and Panama City
MLB News, Beltré breaks Carew’s hit record
La Estrella, Marissa Thompson: la próxima generación en ecuestre
La Estrella, Ley limitará a tres el número de operadores móviles en el país
Newsroom Panama, A life from Brooklyn to Darien and beyond
TVN, Nidal Waked no tendrá que pagar multa millonaria
Reuters, IADB evaluates ‘guarantee fund’ to back Latin America investments
Bloomberg, Engie ditches coal as Latin America turns to clean power
VOA, US-China rivalry poses risks and benefits for Latin America
La República, Chile modera su optimismo económico
The Washington Post, A ribbit of hope as frogs hop back in Panama
Science Daily, Tracking Aedes mosquito invasions in Panama
Mongabay, New sloth book: amazing photos and busted myths
SciDev.Net, Latin America’s tropical dry forests fading away
Burkepile & Ladd, Coral reefs in crisis – finding ways to restore them
N+1, Elon Musk advierte sobre los riesgos de una inteligencia artificial dictadora
The Economist, Data shine light on Latin America’s homicide epidemic
BBC, El número que acelera la velocidad de tu conexión a internet
NPR, Scientists are amazed by stone age tools they dug up in Kenya
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The farthest star ever seen
VOA, US applauds Panama’s actions against Venezuela
BBC, Las razones de la creciente disputa entre Venezuela y Panamá
La Estrella, Aprueban de manera unánime ley sobre imprescriptibilidad
El Siglo, Detienen a ticos por muerte en Ciudad Magica
Newsroom Panama, Mimito Arias defects from CD
La Prensa, Los varios escandalos de Jimmy Papadimitriu
Mexico News Daily, Mexican business and politicians close ranks against Trump
VOA, Senado mexicano pide suspender cooperación de seguridad con EEUU
Forbes, US Border Patrol reports illegal crossings from Mexico at record low
El Observador, Mujica: Brasil tiene “un Estado de derecho bastante maltrecho”
NACLA, A surprise win for the victims of Bolivia’s gas war
The Guardian, Homophobic laws in Caribbean could roll back in landmark case
Yao: Brasil y Lula entre la soberanía, el poder constitucional y la fuerza
Roy, Decolonize science: time to end another imperial era
Kane, ‘Gender ideology:’ big, bogus and coming to a fear campaign near you
Boff, With Pope Francis the Western Church ends and the Universal Church begins
Taibbi, Can we be saved from Facebook?
Tannenbaum, China’s expanding Caribbean presence
Laboure, Zhang & Braunstein: The rise of silicon China
Stiglitz, Trump’s trade confusion
Singer, Crime and no punishment for the Iraq War
The Intercept, Will John Bolton get us all killed?
Varela, Carta pública al pueblo panameño y a sus autoridades
Blades, Apuntes de la esquina
Gandásegui, Nuestra solidaridad internacional es estratégica
Lewis Galindo, El contralor Humbert y las ‘coincidencias’
Sagel, Despidiendo a los amigos
Variety, Panama recorded 10.1% film box office growth in 2017
Screen International, ‘Panama Al Brown’ director Carlos Aguilar Navarro Q&A
CubaSí, Productora brasileña dedica filme a Lula en festival panameño
De acuerdo con una reciente investigación publicada en la revista PLOS ONE por científicos del Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales (STRI) y el Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología de Panamá, INDICASAT-AIP, los mosquitos del género Aedes, que portan un grupo de virus peligrosos que causan fiebre amarilla, chikungunya y Zika, invadieron la encrucijada de las Américas múltiples veces por tierra y por mar.
“Con el aumento de la globalización, el movimiento humano y la conectividad, la capacidad de los organismos asociados a la especie humana para invadir y proliferar, va en aumento”, comentó José Loaiza, investigador asociado de STRI y científico de INDICASAT-AIP, quien dirigió el estudio. “Como una ruta naviera, imprescindible en el comercio de mercancías en todo el mundo, las conexiones en Panamá lo convierten en una importante puerta de entrada para los polizones invasores, incluido el Aedes”.
Los investigadores estudiaron la diversidad genética de dos de las especies de mosquitos más peligrosas, Ae. aegypti y Ae. albopictus para saber más sobre su origen. Escogieron al azar hogares a unos dos kilómetros de distancia para detectar la presencia de mosquitos adultos y desarrollaron etapas inmaduras en contenedores llenos de agua. En total, tomaron muestras de mosquitos en 30 lugares distintos en las 10 provincias de Panamá. Mediante la secuenciación del ADN mitocondrial a partir de 122 Ae. aegypti y 117 Ae. albopictus, comenzaron a entender cómo estas especies vectores de enfermedades llegaron a existir en diferentes áreas.
Los valores más altos de diversidad genética se encontraban en Panamá Central, donde las dos principales ciudades del país, Ciudad de Panamá y Colón, están ubicadas y conectadas tanto por la carretera Transístmica como por el Canal de Panamá. La diversidad genética también fue alta cerca de la frontera costarricense. La diversidad más baja estaba en la remota y seca Península de Azuero, donde varios de los linajes moleculares estaban completamente ausentes.
“La alta diversidad genética en las áreas más conectadas de Panamá indica que las redes de transporte pueden facilitar la mezcla de diferentes linajes moleculares”, comentó Kelly Bennett, becaria postdoctoral de STRI. “Con base en los patrones que observamos, es probable que la invasión a Panamá no haya ocurrido solo una vez, sino varias veces y posiblemente provenga de diferentes poblaciones de origen. La alta diversidad de mosquitos en Panamá Central, donde se han reportado más de 250 especies, puede dificultar el control de las enfermedades que ingresan al controlar los mosquitos vectores”.
Reportado por primera vez en Panamá en 1912 durante la construcción del canal, la aparición de Ae. aegypti coincidió con epidemias devastadoras de fiebre amarilla. Se contrarrestó con un riguroso programa de erradicación en la antigua Zona del Canal de los EEUU La fumigación agresiva con químicos, incluido el DDT, eliminó a esta especie. Desde entonces, Ae. aegypti se ha restablecido.
Los dos linajes observados de Ae. Aegypti pueden no solo reflejar la historia de su invasión a través de Panamá, sino también la diversidad genética que acumularon en el pasado dentro de sus respectivos rangos de origen. El primer linaje estaba estrechamente relacionado con los mosquitos de Colombia, Brasil, México y los Estados Unidos, lo que sugiere que ha habido invasiones recientes, separadas del norte y del sur.
El mosquito tigre asiático, Ae. albopictus, muestra una historia similar de presentaciones múltiples. Esta especie de mosquito se colectó por primera vez en Panamá en el 2004. El linaje molecular más frecuente en Panamá está más relacionado con las poblaciones europeas y es poco común en otras partes de las Américas. Los otros dos linajes de esta especie estaban más relacionados con los mosquitos en Costa Rica y los Estados Unidos.
“La capacidad de los mosquitos Aedes para expandirse en todo el mundo se ha relacionado con el aumento de los viajes internacionales y también con el desarrollo de un mercado internacional de neumáticos usados”, comentó Loaiza. “La invasión inicial del mosquito tigre en las Américas y su posterior aparición en Brasil y en Sudáfrica está relacionada con la importación de neumáticos de Japón”.
Al menos en Panamá, la propagación de Ae. albopictus está más relacionado con la presencia de carreteras que con la densidad de población, el uso de la tierra o con el clima. El hecho de que un linaje de Ae. albopictus en Panamá está muy relacionado con las poblaciones europeas, podría tener implicaciones para la introducción de arbovirus emergentes como chikungunya y Zika de Europa a Panamá.
“Las especies de mosquitos y sus amenazas de enfermedades asociadas, que alguna vez estuvieron confinadas a un área geográfica única, son ahora de interés mundial, porque han viajado como polizones en nuestras redes de transporte mundial”, comentó Owen McMillan, científico de STRI. “La diversidad genética que observamos refleja la historia de las invasiones de Aedes en Panamá. El resultado, que la población de mosquitos alberga altos niveles de diversidad genética, tiene consecuencias para las enfermedades transmitidas por mosquitos. Puede influir en la capacidad de estos mosquitos para diseminar enfermedades, adaptarse a nuevos entornos y desarrollar resistencia a distintas estrategias de erradicación”.
“Una mejor comprensión de las rutas de invasión nos ayuda a evaluar la amenaza de las enfermedades emergentes transmitidas por mosquitos y predecir los brotes de enfermedades”, comentó Bennett.
Los autores incluyen a Gilberto Eskildsen del Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología de Panamá (INDICASAT-AIP); José Rovira, INDICASAT-AIP, STRI; Octavio Smith, Centro del Agua del Trópico Húmedo para América Latina y el Caribe (CATHALAC); Matthew Miller, Universidad de Oklahoma, INDICASAT-AIP, STRI; Kelly Bennett, STRI; Owen McMillan, STRI; y José Loaiza, INDICASAT-AIP, STRI, Universidad de Panamá.
Referencia: Eskildsen, G.A., Rovira, J.R., Smith, O., Miller. M.J., Bennett, K.L., McMillan, W.O., Loaiza, J.R. 2018. Maternal invasion history of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus into the Isthmus of Panama: Implications for the control of emergent viral disease agents. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194874
El Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales, en ciudad de Panamá, Panamá, es una unidad de la Institución Smithsonian. El Instituto promueve la comprensión de la naturaleza tropical y su importancia para el bienestar de la humanidad, capacita estudiantes para llevar a cabo investigaciones en los trópicos, y fomenta la conservación mediante la concienciación pública sobre la belleza e importancia de los ecosistemas tropicales. Sitio web: www.stri.si.edu. Video.
A friend from overseas sent me the recording of a song. An Arab song, with a soft Arab melody, sung by an Arab girls’ choir, accompanied by a flute.
It goes like this:
Ahed
You are the promise and the glory
Standing as high as an olive tree
From the cradle to the present
Your honor will not be violated
Palestine has been planted in us
As a dock for every ship
We are the land and you are the water
You are covered with blond hair
You are as pure as Jerusalem
You taught our generation how the forgotten people should revolt
They thought the Palestinians are afraid of them because they are wearing armor and holding a weapon?
Palestine has been planted in us
As a dock for every ship
Our nation must be united and resist for the freedom of Palestine and the prisoners
Your blue eyes are a lighthouse
For a country that has every religion
You united the people far away and close
You ignited the spark in all our hearts
Your head is raised up high encouraging us
You ignited the light in our darkness
Despite the softness of your hands
Your hands have shaken the world
Your hands returned the slap to the occupier
And returned esteem to the nation
Palestine has been planted in us
As a dock for every ship
We are the land and you are the water.
If I were an adherent of the occupation, this song would frighten me very much.
Because the force of songs is much stronger than the force of weapons. A gun wears out, but a song lasts forever.
In the early days of the Israeli army, there was a slogan hanging in our mess: “An army that is singing is an army of victory!”
The present Palestinian generation has decided to lower its head and wait until the storm has passed. The coming Palestinian generation may act in a completely different way.
On the eve of my 15th birthday, I joined an underground (or “terrorist”) group that fought against the British colonial regime. Almost eighty years later I remember just about every song of that time, word for word. Songs like “We are unknown soldiers without uniforms…” and many more. Afterwards I wrote an anthem for my company.
I am not a poet. Far from it. But I have written some songs in my time, including “Samson’s Foxes,” an anthem for my commando unit in the Israeli army. So I know the force of a song. Especially a song about the heroism of a 16-year-old girl.
The moment I saw the scene of Ahed al-Tamimi boxing the face of an Israeli army captain, I knew that something important had happened.
The British politician Lord Acton famously wrote: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” I would add: “Occupying another people tends to make you stupid, and a long occupation makes you utterly stupid.”
In my youth, when I was already a member of the anti-British underground, I was working in the office of a British lawyer, many of whose clients were officials of the British administration. I often asked myself: “How can it be that such intelligent people can behave so stupidly?” They were nice people, who treated even a lowly clerk like me politely. But they had no alternative: the occupation compels the occupier to behave stupidly.
It works like this: in order to uphold an occupation regime for any length of time, the occupier must believe in the superiority of his race and in the inferiority of his subjects, who are seen as primitive creatures. Otherwise, what gives him the right to subject another people? That is exactly what has happened to us now.
The moment I saw the face-boxing scene on TV, I knew that something momentous had happened. The Palestinian people now have a national heroine. The Palestinian youth now has a model to emulate.
The Israeli public has got used to the occupation. They believe that this is a normal situation, that the occupation can go on forever. But the occupation is not a natural situation, and some day it will come to an end.
Ten thousand British ruled hundreds of millions of Indians, until a skinny man called Gandhi went to produce salt on the seashore, contrary to the law. The Indian youth arose, and British rule fell away like a leaf from a tree in autumn.
The same stupidity took hold of all the occupation enforcers who dealt with Ahed al-Tamimi. Army officers. Prosecutors, military judges.
If we were wise occupiers — an oxymoron — we would have sent Ahed home long ago. Expelled her by force from the prison. But we are still keeping her locked up. Her and her mother.
True, some days ago the army realized its own stupidity. With the help of Ahed’s devoted (Jewish) advocate, Gabi Lasky, a “compromise” was worked out. Several charges were dropped and Ahed was sentenced to “only” eight months in prison.
She will be released in three more months. But that is too late: the picture of Ahed is already engraved in the mind of every Palestinian boy or girl. Ahed, the girl covered with blond hair, her blue eyes shining like a lighthouse. Ahed the saint. Ahed the savior.
The Palestinian Jeanne d’Arc, the national symbol.
The story of Ahed al-Tamimi happened in the West Bank. But it resounded in the Gaza Strip, too.
For most Israelis, the Gaza Strip is something else. It is not occupied territory. It does not concern us.
But the situation of the Gaza Strip is even worse than straight occupation. The strip is completely surrounded. North and east is Israel, west is the sea, where the Israeli navy shoots at everything except for fishing boats close to the shore. The south belongs to Egypt, which behaves even worse than the Israelis and in close cooperation with them.
The situation in the Gaza Strip is as close to hell as one can get. Food at subsistence level, electricity for two to four hours a day, the water is polluted. Work is extremely scarce. Only the most severely ill are let out.
Why? It has to do with the demon that plagues the Israeli government: the demographic devil.
In historical Palestine, the land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan river, there now live about 13 million people, roughly half Jewish and half Arab, with a slight edge in favor of the Arabs. Numbers are uncertain, but roughly there are 3 million Arabs in the West Bank, 2 million in the Gaza Strip and 1.5 million Arab citizens in Israel. The Arab birthrate is higher than the Jewish average.
These numbers disturb the sleep of many Israeli officials, especially politicians. They look for means to change the balance. They once had the illusion that if the situation in Gaza got unbearable, people from Gaza would emigrate. But it did not happen. Palestinians have become very tenacious.
Then a new fashion came up: just ignore the bastards. Just imagine that the Gaza Strip has sunk into the sea, as one Israeli politician once prayed. No Strip. Two million Palestinian less.
But the Strip is there. True, Gaza is ruled by the Islamic Hamas party, while the West Bank is ruled by Abu Mazen’s PLO, and the enmity between the two is vicious. But that happened in almost all liberation movements in history. In our case, the underground split between the Haganah (“Defense”), which belonged to the official Zionist leadership, and the Irgun (“Organization,” short for National Military Organization). Then the Irgun split, and the even more extreme LEHI (“Fighters for the Freedom of Israel,” called the “Stern Gang” by the British) was born. They all hated each other.
But among the people, there is no difference at all. They are all Palestinians. Ahed is the heroine of all of them. Perhaps her model played a role in what happened last week.
For some time, the Gaza Strip was quiet. Some kind of modus vivendi had even come into being between the Hamas government and the Israeli one. The Israelis congratulated themselves on their cleverness. And then it happened.
Suddenly, as if from nowhere, the population of Gaza stood up. Hamas organized them to assemble on Friday near the border fence, unarmed. A prolonged campaign of passive resistance was to start.
When I was asked what would happen, I said that the Israeli army would shoot to kill. Simple: Israelis don’t know how to deal with passive resistance. They shoot in order to turn it into violent resistance. With that they know how to deal. With more violence.
And that is exactly what happened last Friday, the first day of the campaign: snipers were posted along the line, with orders to shoot the “ringleaders” — anyone who stood out. 18 unarmed demonstrators were killed, almost a thousand were shot and wounded.
If anyone thought that the democratic world would stand up and condemn Israel, they were sadly wrong. Reactions were feeble, at most. What was revealed was the incredible hold the Israeli government and its Zionist organization has over the world’s political establishments and communication outlets. With few exceptions the atrocious news was not published at all, or as minor items.
But this cannot go on for long. The Gaza protests will continue, especially on Fridays (the Muslim holy day), until May 15, the Naqba (“Catastrophe”) Day, which commemorates the mass flight expulsion of half the Palestinian people from their homes. Palestinian flags will fill screens around the globe.
Ahed will still be in prison.
National Police Commissioner Samuel Espinoza Lindsay’s days of law enforcement were at an end. At age 55 he was retiring, but before he starting drawing his pension checks he took a vacation with accrued leave time. A resident of Vacamonte in Arraijan, he was staying at a home in Altos de Divala, a neighborhood in Chiriqui’s Bugaba district on the evening of April 3 when maleantes entered the residence to rob him. They shot him five times in the chest and abdomen and shortly thereafter he was pronounced dead at the local policlinica.
This was a next to the top level police commander and Chiriqui’s homicide unit and the DIJ took it as the most urgent of investigations. Over the evening of April 5 and pre-dawn hours of the following morning they raided four places and arrested three adult male suspects. The men are being held on murder and armed robbery charges.
In Panama one does not take the Fifth. Different country, different constitution. Here, when a person declines to testify in a proceeding that may get that individual convicted of a crime, it’s Article 25 of the Panamanian constitution that gets cited. It’s functional effect is more or less the same.
On April 2, after a months of absence without a generally known address during which his attorneys move in the courts to get an assurance that he would not be summarily jailed — here, unlike in many jurisdictions, the courts will not refuse to entertain a motion on behalf of a fugitive — Henri Mizrachi appeared before prosecutors to answer questions about the laundering of money for the purchase of Ricardo Martinelli’s media empire with public funds. The former president arranged a series of overpriced public contracts, the excess of which was skimmed off into a company called New Business, which purchased EPASA, the parent company for El Panama America, La Critica and other smaller media properties. After EPASA and other properties were transferred to entities controlled by but not in the name of Ricardo Martinelli, the purchases and operations were funded by exaggerated government advertising buys in those companies. Among the Martinelli front men in New Business, it is alleged, were construction executives Henri Mizrachi and Nicolás Corcione, both also Martinelli appointees to the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) board of directors. Mizrachi asserted his rights under Article 25 at his meeting with prosecutors.
The same day, however, anti-corruption czarina (as in, director of the National Transparency and Access to Information Authority) Angélica Maytín petitioned President Varela to remove Mizrachi and Corcione from the ACP board. This was not on the underlying grounds of the money laundering charges against them. (In addition to the New Business business, Corcione has also been investigated for laundering the proceeds of corrupt courthouse construction and remodeling contracts. In that case a controversial decision that a plea bargain by an accomplice gets Corcione off is under appeal.) Maytín’s reason was that, even if as argued a crook can’t be removed from the board except by order of a court handing down a final conviction, the law that created the ACP specifies certain duties for board members and that excessive absences from meetings is malfeasance for which they might be removed.
After many months of hemming and hawing about the Corcione and Mizrachi cases, Varela accepted Maytín’s argument and submitted it to the Cabinet Council. On April 3 the cabinet voted to remove the two board members, on the ground that since 2015 Mizrachi had been present at 121 board meeting and absent at 52, while Corcione had made 78 meetings and missed 73 in that same period.
Do we want to repeat Corcione’s pleas in a lead story interview with La Estrella? Read it if it interests you and you can stand yeye whining.
The move must be ratified by the National Assembly. So, how many Martinelista die-hards are willing to fall on their swords to keep Mizrachi and Corcione on the board? Can they find any allies among their colleagues? We will see soon enough, but the issue may be allowed to linger without legislative action. There are potential consequences for the partisan divide on the allegedly apolitical board, the Diablo / Corozal port project and whether the ACP director Jorge Luis Quijano gets a second term and if not who would replace him.