Home Blog Page 50

Trashing the climate at landfills in the USA (and here and around the world)

0
Ohio landfill
“Landfills not only contribute to climate change, but they disproportionately impact low-income neighborhoods forced to live near dumps,” said the co-author of a new report. Above we see a gas flare at a landfill site in Kirtland Woods, Ohio. The landfill was closed in 1993, the photo was taken in 2019 and the buried rotting garbage still gives off methane gas. Cropped from a Wikimedia photo by Vince Reinhart.

Environmental Protection Agency fails to address
massive methane emissions from US landfills

by Brett Wilkins – Common Dreams

Methane emissions from US municipal landfills—collectively, one of the nation’s largest sources of the planet-heating greenhouse gas—could be reduced if the Environmental Protection Agency enacted “strong new regulations,” a report released Thursday argues.

The report—entitled Trashing the Climate: Methane From Municipal Landfills—was published by the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), a Washington, DC-based nonprofit. The publication notes that “more than 1,100 municipal landfills emitted at least 3.7 million metric tons of methane in 2021, which had the climate-warming impact of 66 million gasoline-powered vehicles driving for a year or 79 coal-fired power plants.”

“To reduce this major but little-discussed source of potent greenhouse gases, EPA must impose regulations that mandate more gas-collection systems at landfills, require more monitoring and accurate reporting of methane emissions, and encourage more composting, recycling, and reduction in the waste stream by consumers,” the paper asserts.

2

Methane—which has more than 80 times the warming power of carbon dioxide during its first two decades in the atmosphere—is emitted from landfills primarily due to rotting food waste. Americans throw away about 40% of their food, and US food waste soared by 70% between 1990 and 2017, according to the report.

EIP also found that “municipal waste landfills are often located in communities where residents are people of color or have lower incomes.”

“Fifty-four percent of the landfills reporting to EPA’s greenhouse gas database are surrounded by communities, within a one-mile radius, that exceed national averages for people of color or residents considered low-income,” the report notes.

The publication continues:

In Uniontown, Alabama, a community that is 98% Black and 64% below the poverty line, neighbors complain about odors, nausea, headaches, and other illnesses from a landfill that receives 93% of its garbage from out of state. In the Curtis Bay and Brooklyn neighborhoods of Baltimore, a community that is 60% Black or nonwhite Hispanic, a nearby landfill owned by the city is one of the top methane emitters in Maryland.

EIP ranked the 10 leading methane-emitting landfills in 2021, the most recent year for which data is available. Sampson County Landfill in Roseboro, North Carolina tops the list with 32,983 metric tons of methane released—more than 10 times the average landfill.

3

Another problem highlighted in the report is that “EPA’s greenhouse gas numbers and information database are not based on pollution monitoring or sampling. Instead, all data on methane and other greenhouse gas emissions from landfills are estimated using mathematical formulas that likely lowball the real numbers.”

Last year, EIP sued the EPA, alleging the agency underreported landfill pollutant levels due to outdated estimation methods.

“EPA is failing to adequately control methane from landfills, a huge source of greenhouse gases, and we can no longer ignore this problem with the climate crisis heating up ,” EIP senior attorney and report co-author Leah Kelly said in a statement Thursday. “Landfills not only contribute to climate change, but they disproportionately impact low-income neighborhoods and communities of color forced to live near dumps.”

In order to tackle methane pollution from landfills, the report recommends:

• EPA should issue strong new regulations that require more landfills to have methane collection systems and follow better operational standards to make sure these systems really work to reduce pollution;
• EPA should require the direct measurement of methane from landfills through new technology, including ground-based monitors and aerial monitoring systems;
• EPA should improve reporting requirements for landfills across the USA and establish a uniform method for estimating emissions from dumps;
• The federal government and states should encourage consumers and municipal governments to do more composting and recycling and waste less food; and
• Waste incineration should not be considered as a potential solution because it produces toxic air pollutants that tend to harm nearby low-income and minority communities.

“The US must reduce landfill methane, but it must do so without increasing toxic pollution in the air that people breathe and without further threatening the health of low-income communities and communities of color,” the report concludes. “Composting and improved pollution controls are solutions to the problem of landfill methane. Incineration is not a solution; it is exchanging one problem for another.”

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

foot of the foothillsTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

STRI, Nueva prueba diagnóstico para hongos que matan a anfíbios

0
ribit
La nueva prueba ofreció resultados comparables o incluso mejores que los del ensayo estándar recomendado para el diagnóstico de la quitridiomicosis. Detectó variantes indias de quitridiomicosis que no eran identificadas con otras pruebas, y también demostró sensibilidad a cepas de otras partes del mundo. Foto por Brian Gratwicke.

Científicos del Sur Global innovan para monitorear la pandemia de anfibios

por STRI

El Centro de Rescate y Conservación de Anfibios de Panamá del Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales (STRI) en Panamá se asoció con el Centro de Biología Celular y Molecular en India para desarrollar y validar una nueva prueba para la detección de cepas de quitridiomicosis, ofreciendo nuevas pistas sobre una enfermedad que ha causado la disminución dramática de más de 500 especies de anfibios y la extinción de otras 90.

La nueva prueba, descrita en la revista Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, identificó cepas indias no detectadas previamente y detectó también con éxito cepas de otras partes del mundo.La nueva prueba diagnóstica se validó en ranas, sapos, cecilias (anfibios sin extremidades) y salamandras (anfibios con cola) en la India, con resultados comparables o incluso mejores que el ensayo estándar recomendado para el diagnóstico de quitridiomicosis. Su efectividad fue validada con éxito en laboratorios de Panamá y Australia, demostrando que es una alternativa asequible para la vigilancia a gran escala de la quitridiomicosis en diferentes partes del mundo.

La detección rápida de la quitridiomicosis es esencial para controlar y mitigar la enfermedad. Sin embargo, las investigaciones sobre esta infección causada por dos patógenos fúngicos revela un genoma complejo que evoluciona dinámicamente. A medida que evolucionan nuevas cepas en diferentes partes del mundo y se propagan a través del comercio mundial de anfibios, se hace necesario el monitoreo generalizado de las variantes híbridas emergentes. La prueba recién desarrollada ayudará a la detección global, destacando el valor de las colaboraciones científicas internacionales en la búsqueda de soluciones a una amenaza común.

“Este ensayo permitirá a los investigadores estudiar y detectar la propagación de cepas del hongo quítrido anfibio que antes pasaban desapercibidas, especialmente en países alrededor del Océano Índico, donde el comercio ha movido e introducido especies de ranas”, dijo el científico de STRI Roberto Ibáñez, quien colaboró en el estudio.

La nueva prueba también puede ayudar en la detección de reservorios de patógenos que aún no se han identificado. Es decir, especies de anfibios que podrían estar infectados pero no muestran síntomas visibles de la enfermedad o mortalidad y son capaces de transmitir silenciosamente la enfermedad a otras especies susceptibles en su entorno.

“Una cepa del hongo quítrido anfibio provocó una disminución drástica de la población, incluso la desaparición de especies de anfibios en Panamá”, dijo el coautor Ibáñez. “La rana arlequín de Chiriquí (Atelopus chiriquiensis) y la rana dorada panameña (Atelopus zeteki) no se ven desde hace varios años. Algunas especies de ranas han reaparecido en algunas localidades, pero no han recuperado completamente sus niveles de población anteriores. El hongo quítrido anfibio sigue siendo una amenaza para las especies susceptibles en áreas naturales”.

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~

These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

Dinero
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

Tweet

CONAIE, El problema de Ecuador

0
indigenistas

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~

These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

Dinero
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

Tweet

Adames: ¿Abusó de los recursos públicos o le tendieron una trampa?

0
him
him 2

 

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.
 

~ ~ ~

These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information.
Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.

 

Dinero
 

FB_2

 

CUCO

 

CIAM

 

Tweet

Whilde & Farrell, DNA evidence and ethics

0
DNA
In fine detail, checking out the DNA evidence. New York State Police photo.

You shed DNA everywhere you go – trace samples in the water, sand and air
are enough to identify who you are, raising ethical questions about privacy

Human DNA can be sequenced from small amounts of water, sand and air in the environment to potentially extract identifiable information like genetic lineage, gender, and health risks, according to our new research.

Every cell of the body contains DNA. Because each person has a unique genetic code, DNA can be used to identify individual people. Typically, medical practitioners and researchers obtain human DNA through direct sampling, such as blood tests, swabs or biopsies. However, all living things, including animals, plants and microbes, constantly shed DNA. The water, soil and even the air contain microscopic particles of biological material from living organisms.

DNA that an organism has shed into the environment is known as environmental DNA, or eDNA. For the last couple of decades, scientists have been able to collect and sequence eDNA from soil or water samples to monitor biodiversity, wildlife populations and disease-causing pathogens. Tracking rare or elusive endangered species through their eDNA has been a boon to researchers, since traditional monitoring methods such as observation or trapping can be difficult, often unsuccessful and intrusive to the species of interest.

Researchers using eDNA tools usually focus only on the species they’re studying and disregard DNA from other species. However, humans also shed, cough and flush DNA into their surrounding environment. And as our team of geneticists, ecologists and marine biologists in the Duffy Lab at the University of Florida found, signs of human life can be found everywhere but in the most isolated locations.

Animals, humans and viruses in eDNA

Our team uses environmental DNA to study endangered sea turtles and the viral tumors to which they are susceptible. Tiny hatchling sea turtles shed DNA as they crawl along the beach on their way to the ocean shortly after they are born. Sand scooped from their tracks contains enough DNA to provide valuable insights into the turtles and the chelonid herpesviruses and fibropapillomatosis tumors that afflict them. Scooping a liter of water from the tank of a recovering sea turtle under veterinary care equally provides a wealth of genetic information for research. Unlike blood or skin sampling, collecting eDNA causes no stress to the animal.

Genetic sequencing technology used to decode DNA has improved rapidly in recent years, and it is now possible to easily sequence the DNA of every organism in a sample from the environment. Our team suspected that the sand and water samples we were using to study sea turtles would also contain DNA from a number of other species – including, of course, humans. What we didn’t know was just how informative the human DNA we could extract would be.

2
The researchers were able to collect intact human DNA in water samples from a river in Florida. Todd Osborne, CC BY-ND.

To figure this out, we took samples from a variety of locations in Florida, including the ocean and rivers in urban and rural areas, sand from isolated beaches and a remote island never usually visited by people. We found human DNA in all of those locations except the remote island, and these samples were high quality enough for analysis and sequencing.

We also tested the technique in Ireland, tracing along a river that winds from a remote mountaintop, through small rural villages and into the sea at a larger town of 13,000 inhabitants. We found human DNA everywhere but in the remote mountain tributary where the river starts, far from human habitation.

We also collected air samples from a room in our wildlife veterinary hospital in Florida. People who were present in the room gave us permission to take samples from the air. We recovered DNA matching the people, the animal patient and common animal viruses present at the time of collection.

Surprisingly, the human eDNA found in the local environment was intact enough for us to identify mutations associated with disease and to determine the genetic ancestry of people who live in the area. Sequencing DNA that volunteers left in their footprints in the sand even yielded part of their sex chromosomes.

Human eDNA can be collected and analyzed from a variety of sources. Liam Whitmore/Created with BioRender.com, CC BY-NC-ND

Ethical implications of collecting human eDNA

Our team dubs inadvertent retrieval of human DNA from environmental samples “human genetic bycatch.” We’re calling for deeper discussion about how to ethically handle human environmental DNA.

Human eDNA could present significant advances to research in fields as diverse as conservation, epidemiology, forensics and farming. If handled correctly, human eDNA could help archaeologists track down undiscovered ancient human settlements, allow biologists to monitor cancer mutations in a given population or provide law enforcement agencies useful forensic information.

However, there are also myriad ethical implications relating to the inadvertent or deliberate collection and analysis of human genetic bycatch. Identifiable information can be extracted from eDNA, and accessing this level of detail about individuals or populations comes with responsibilities relating to consent and confidentiality.

While we conducted our study with the approval of our institutional review board, which ensures that studies on people adhere to ethical research guidelines, there is no guarantee that everyone will treat this type of information ethically.

Many questions arise regarding human environmental DNA. For instance, who should have access to human eDNA sequences? Should this information be made publicly available? Should consent be required before taking human eDNA samples, and from whom? Should researchers remove human genetic information from samples originally collected to identify other species?

3
The researchers extracted identifiable genetic information from footprints in the sand. David Duffy, CC BY-ND.

We believe it is vital to implement regulations that ensure collection, analysis and data storage are carried out ethically and appropriately. Policymakers, scientific communities and other stakeholders need to take human eDNA collection seriously and balance consent and privacy against the possible benefits of studying eDNA. Raising these questions now can help ensure everyone is aware of the capabilities of eDNA and provide more time to develop protocols and regulations to ensure appropriate use of eDNA techniques and the ethical handling of human genetic bycatch.

Jenny Whilde, Adjunct Research Scientist in Marine Bioscience, University of Florida and Jessica Alice Farrell, Postdoctoral associate, University of Florida

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

foot of the foothillsTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Editorial, The ex-ambassador’s misgivings

0
BNP
Looking back on it, a possible injustice is admitted. But looking forward, what the Panamanian government and its bank did to a man and his family – at the behest of the United States – is now pending before this country’s high court, with astronomical damages reasonably claimed. It’s unlikely that a US House of Representatives dominated by white supremacist Republican would allocate any funds to compensate Panama, its institution or victims who happen to be of Arab ethnicity. Photo of the BNP headquarters on Via España by the Presidencia.

Feeley’s misgivings about the Waked family’s persecution

“The United States is not a perfect democracy and if we have made a mistake, I think it is up to us to correct that mistake. I urge and hope that there will be a review and that the authorities will do their job.” Thus spake John Feeley, the former US ambassador who was the point man here for the hounding and dispossession of Abdul Waked, including the vetting of new owners for La Estrella and El Siglo.

For Panamanian national sovereignty, and for the cause of freedom of the press in general, it’s a grave matter when the government of the United States moves to determine who gets to own large media like the GESE newspapers. It’s also an ugly threat to both those involved and to fundamental freedoms when the American Embassy continues a long-running blacklist against media and individual journalists that don’t report or kill news stories according to the US government’s preferences.

The information control games are notorious, like the continued imprisonment and persecution of Julian Assange. They are also quietly effective, so as to make the one-time de facto Plan Colombia alliance between the United States and the AUC death squads forbidden history in the United States. The AUC later morphed into the successor AGC far-right militia that threatens democracy and violates human rights in Colombia, and into the Clan del Golfo crime cartel that smuggles drugs to the United States and Europe and human beings across the Darien Gap.

 

And WILL THERE BE any US review of what happened of any consequence? Can there be any thorough investigation and correction?

That would have to include a close and fair look at the US Southern Command’s ugly broad-brush smear campaign against Latin Americans of Lebanese descent in particular and against Muslims in Latin America generally. It has been couched in terms of concerns about Iranian influence in the region and fear of Lebanon’s Shiite Hezbollah – “Party of God” – militia and political party, conflating those folks’ violent responses when US forces intervened in Lebanon in the 1980s and 1990s with fears about Islamist terrorism in the 21st century, which has not happened to any significant extent in Latin America. Yet while Lebanese plots in the region are hard to find, the crime wave and cruel terrorism of erstwhile Plan Colombia allies is real and ongoing and rarely make it to the short list of SouthCom briefings to Congress.

It might all be dismissed as another set of historical footnotes best left unspoken. However, Abdul Waked has sued the state-owned Banco Nacional de Panama for his immense financial losses when, at US behest and with US participation, it played a major role in dispossessing him of downtown Panama City’s Soho Mall. Panama’s Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case and Waked is demanding more money than the bank’s current liquid assets. Does a former US ambassador’s misgivings translate to reimbursing Panama and its bank for any losses flowing from a judgment in Waked’s favor?

 

3
Under arrest in Montgomery, Alabama, for “loitering” in 1958. Police photo distributed by AP at the time.

Human salvation lies in the hands of the creatively maladjusted.

Martin Luther King Jr.

Bear in mind…

You ask me why I do not write something.… I think one’s feelings waste themselves in words, they ought all to be distilled into actions and into actions which bring results.

Florence Nightingale

Take forgiveness slowly. Don’t blame yourself for being slow. Peace will come.

Yoko Ono

Mistakes are, after all, the foundations of truth, and if a man does not know what a thing is, it is at least an increase in knowledge if he knows what it is not.

Carl Jung

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

foot of the foothillsTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Martinelli’s would-be revenge: the technicalities turn against him this time

0
him

When used as toys, sooner or later the courts get sick of it

by Eric Jackson

Ricardo Martinelli ran to the United States to avoid being tried on charges of electronic espionage without a warrant. He lost his long fight against extradition and was sent back to Panama.

There ensued this long soap opera, one key aspect of which was an on and off again and on again game about whether the former president was a member of the Central American Parliament, with the legislators’ immunity from prosecution by the ordinary courts that goes with that. Legislators can be investigated and tried for crimes that they committed, but by the Supreme Court rather than lower tribunals.

Inquiries were made, depositions were taken, documents were collected and collated.

Then, the ex-president changed his tune and wasn’t a parliamentarian anymore, so he got the high court to suspend its process and send the file down to an ordinary trial court. WHICH made the unusual move of throwing out all of the evidence that the Supreme Court had put into the record. The trial court ruled that with the resulting lack of evidence, the wiretapping that happened never happened, or if it did Don Ricky had nothing to do with it. An appeals court upheld the verdict and that was that.

Except that Martinelli is in revenge mode. One of the special targets of his wrath is Kenia Porcell, who was attorney general during most of the Varela years after Martinelli’s shift in the Presidencia, and for a few months into the Cortizo years.

Three and a half weeks into the current administration’s term, on July 24, 2019, while she was attorney general, Porcell was interviewed by journalist Álvaro Alvarado and they talked about the eavesdropping case, then still pending.

In March of the next year, the eavesdropping case closed, Martinelli sued Porcell for calumnia e injuria, this country’s version of the criminal defamation law that’s actually two laws. Calumnia is about false and injurious declarations, roughly analogous to libel or slander in the Common Law jurisdictions, and the truth is a defense. Injuria is about declarations that injure a person’s reputation and the truth is not a defense.

In his lawsuit against Porcell Martinelli sought $1 million in damages. He sought to sequester Porcell’s property before the trial in order to ensure that the judgment would be paid. He got a court to order a $120,000 sequestration but shortly after the court officer showed up at her home in Brisas de Golf Porcell posted a bond that has prevented such things as the removal of her furniture. The former attorney general doesn’t have to sleep on the floor yet, let alone the street.

Then, trial court Judge Ana Zita Rowe threw out Martinelli’s lawsuit on the procedural ground that since it was about something that Porcell said as attorney general, only the Supreme Court had jurisdiction to hear that matter. Martinelli’s lawyer, Alfredo Vallarino, appealed that to the next highest court, which ruled in the ex-president’s favor. Porcell promptly appealed that to the Supreme Court via a petition for constitutional protection (amparo de garantías, in Panamanian Spanish legalese).

The high court, on a fragmented vote – six in favor, two dissents and concurring opinion that supported the result but not the majority’s rationale for reaching it – allowed the amparo. That stays all that happened below, including the sequestration of the former attorney general’s assets, pending final determination of the case.

However, the thinking by which the court decided to accept the case probably resolves the case. Was granting an interview and talking to the press about a pending case part of the attorney general’s job? The magistrates found this, and just about every day you can see the prosecutors spinning their various cases to the press, through their Twitter feed and otherwise. The practice is defended as transparency that preserves public confidence in the justice system.

The expected bottom line is that a prosecutor has immunity for official acts. But perhaps the case may live on to see an exception carved out, an abuse found to negate the presumption of immunity or so on.

The high court upheld Judge Rowe’s procedural ruling. Do not apply Common Law distinctions between procedural and substantive law here – it’s a different system. But attorney Vallarino takes the Supreme Court’s acceptance of this matter as a defeat of sorts, and vows to do what he can to reverse it: “We don’t rule out any jurisdiction, including administrative and international routes,” he told La Prensa.

International routes? With a probable money laundering indictment waiting to be unsealed should Martinelli set foot in the USA again? With Spain investigating him for electronic and otherwise stalking of a once-upon-a-time mistress in the Balearics? Big bad Ricardo Martinelli gets to play his games and win, in any other place than Panama? It does seem far-fetched but you never know.

QUESTIONS raised? Many. How good is the Israeli-based but now US majority-owned NSO electronic spying company’s encryption? Does it beat the US National Security Agency’s surveillance? For decades there have been revelations about what the electronic surveillance of the United States and its closest allies can do – those by no means started nor ended with what Edward Snowden had to tell. US courts have sent people to prison for spying on the USA at Israel’s behest. By decision of the US Supreme Court in Washington, the matter of NSO spying continues to percolate in a lower American venue. Systems and counter-systems on all sides are constantly evolving and improving. There are elaborate defenses set up to avoid “What did you know and when and how did you know it?” sorts of questions. They call it protecting sources and methods.

This reporter estimates – but without hard inside data to prove or refute – that in the NSA archives there is rather specific knowledge about the alleged electronic crimes of Ricardo Martinelli Berrocal. It’s kind of hard to imagine that the US position during the extradition fight with Martinelli was not informed by NSA records.

And as to Martinelli’s long-running legal battles here? This attempt of his to play offense has sputtered, but some far more consequential bribery, graft and money laundering cases are pending against him this year, perhaps leading to his disqualification as a candidate next year. The focus will quickly shift well away from Kenia Porcell.

2
The main brains of Martinelli’s entourage are circling the wagons in the face of possible disqualifying criminal convictions.
 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

foot of the foothillsTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

¿Wappin? Covers and tributes / Versiones y homenajes

0
Bessie Smith, from the Bettmann Archives.

It’s creative work, but all music is derivative.
Es trabajo creativo, pero toda la música es derivada.

Monalisa y Rodrigo – Lejos de Ti
https://youtu.be/x6qeoGkTnvQ

Willie Nelson & Bob Dylan – Pancho and Lefty
https://youtu.be/Fd41cVwl9FY

The Corrs – Little Wing
https://youtu.be/hVq8TtPHYaw

Jimi Hendrix – All Along The Watchtower
https://youtu.be/2ddW7MkKj6c

The Beatles – Roll Over Beethoven
https://youtu.be/Hz5jXwOXgKQ

McCall Brothers Band – Crossroads (Robert Johnson Tribute)
https://youtu.be/F2vMnwhYLMw

María Lavalle – Los ejes de mi carreta
https://youtu.be/IKYZeCL9WE8

Valerie Wellilngton – Wasted Life Blues
https://youtu.be/j_9sZuLnlW58

Rubén Blades – La Rosa de os Vientos
https://youtu.be/RyOmx4Hz1XM

Lady Gaga & Sting – Stand By Me
https://youtu.be/wXOWy3zZq-A

Luis Fonsi & Daddy Yankee – Despacito
https://youtu.be/1Tx_pPB2mU8

Contact us by email at / Contáctanos por correo electrónico a fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

 

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

Para defendernos de los piratas informáticos, los trolls organizados y otros actos de vandalismo en línea, la función de comentarios de nuestro sitio web está desactivada. En cambio, ven a nuestra página de Facebook para unirte a la discusión.  

~ ~ ~
These announcements are interactive. Click on them for more information. Estos anuncios son interactivos. Toque en ellos para seguir a las páginas de web.
 

22ENGdonateBUTTONCIAM

 

Tweet

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 

FB CCL

 

$$

 
PDC
 
Dinero

Hightower, Time to fix the US Supreme Court

0
supremes
Dark clouds behind the Supreme Court. The justices aren’t even hiding it anymore. Shutterstock photo.

The Supreme Court is corrupt. Let’s fix it.

by Jim Hightower

When public officials get themselves mired in the muck of corruption, they can always count on Senator Ted Cruz to issue a moral judgment: If the offender is a Democrat, he pronounces the corruption inexcusably grotesque; if it’s a Republican, he wails that the offender is the victim.

For example, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was recently caught (yet again) butt-deep in judicial immorality, taking hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of freebies from a Texas real estate baron who has both a partisan and corporate interest in Thomas’ court rulings.

So, Cruz to the rescue! No judicial impropriety here, he squawks, for this is nothing but a diabolical plot by Democrats to “smear” poor Clarence.

But Thomas is busy smearing himself. From the start of his court tenure, Thomas has been a shameless seeker of personal gain, tucking untold sums from untold sources in the inner pockets of his judicial robes.

He learned to hide his corruption in 2004, when he actually reported taking pricey gifts from a special interest, which got him widely condemned. So, he “reformed.”

No, he didn’t quit taking gimmes — he just quit disclosing them!

Thomas is a supreme grifter, but sadly he’s not alone. Many recent justices have fallen from the pedestal of judicial integrity, cozying up to the moneyed interests. Gifts aside, we now have a hyper-partisan, right-wing Republican majority taking their judicial opinions from those same interests, turning America’s unelected third branch of government into an autocratic, plutocratic political agency.

Then they wonder why their public approval rating – and legitimacy – are in the ditch! Since they won’t reform themselves, we the people must do it for them. To help, go to fixthecourt.com.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

foot of the foothillsTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC

Might the high court void Panama City’s tax hike for lack of consultation?

0
alcalde
The thing about the mayor, with his artificial beach that would need constant sand replacement, and on a horribly polluted part of Panama Bay; and with his idea to replace a reasonably good seafood market with a traffic nightmare, and so on…. His money-driven projects have been so at odds with both reality and those who would be affected that they tend to come to naught. Photo of Mayor Fábrega by the alcaldia.

Supreme Court to rule on the city’s
tax hike on local businesses

by Eric Jackson

Lemme see, against the traditional trend, and down in the polls — what can PRD politicians pull out of the bag of corny tricks?

Recall last year — a president who’s also a rancher and who had famously resigned as Martín Torrijos’s agriculture minister to protest Panama’s “free trade” deal with the USA got surprisingly “realistic” and neoliberal on his arrival at the Presidencia. The worldwide inflation had its roots in an epidemic and a war in one of the world’s great grain-producing regions but Nito also stood by as the ownership of the Panamanian telecommunications industry concentrated and raised prices. An entrenched drug importers’ cartel gave us the region’s highest medicine prices as an epidemic raged. Fuel prices were way up, especially to the chagrin of those who drove for a living. Many of the public school teachers had not been paid.

The president, ailing with a rare blood cancer, went up to the United States for special treatment and left is banking lawyer VP with the fake smile in charge. The better of the teachers’ unions walked out and a great many other working people — including the agricultural produce truckers — joined them. The traditional form of popular protest against government policies — blockage of the roads — ensued for a chaotic July.

So promises, even decrees, were made. A “national dialogue” was convened. The Catholic Church pulled out of the “dialogue” in disgust. Promises, even decrees, were broken. Nearly a year later teachers’ unions are talking about what to do about their unpaid members.

But last August, as the national crisis was easing and people were paying attention to the national dialogue, politicians in the capital were pulling a fast one. With little notice, no formal hearings and the reporters looking at other things, Mayor Fábrega and 19 of the city’s 23 representantes passed a tax hike on Panama City businesses.

A few people did notice and question. So assurances and excuses were forthcoming.

Who are the vast majority of people doing business in the city? It’s the informal sector, which nationwide comprises about half of Panama’s work force. The guy who sells fruit at the traffic intersection. The lady who does pedicures and toenail painting on a sidewalk adjacent to Avenida Central. The man who plays his instrument for what people toss in the hat. The woman who roasts and sells meat on a stick. The photographer, the writer, the courier who isn’t on anybody’s payroll. Mayor José Luis Fábrega Polleri, a mechanical engineer by training and a legislator before he got to city hall, assured THOSE folks that he didn’t intend to tax THEM. The mechanics of extracting blood from stones, you see, don’t especially work.

When businesspeople who were expected to pay noticed, they were blown off by a classic from the multi-partisan bag of Panamanian political tricks. They didn’t NEED to be consulted, you see, because this was not a tax increase but a tax “reorganization.” It was hidden in a resolution about a moratorium on tax and interest payments in the wake of the COVID disaster, the ticket to which the reporters paid their attention. (Ye olde “camarón,” they call this oft-pulled stunt in Panamanian politics.) Citing God, city council president Yoira Perea said she was surprised that anyone would complain.

PLUS, in the absence of anything recognizable as public hearings, the city’s PRD pols pulled out a new requirement — to register an objection someone had to do so in writing through the municipal treasury department. Is there a form for that? They didn’t say, and certainly didn’t publish that.

One of the nation’s business leaders, Panamanian Business Executives Association president Temístocles Rosas, put it this way: Resolution 142 of August 2, 2022 was presented “in a very particular way, highlighting the moratorium but concealing the tax hike.”

One guy who wasn’t long fooled was one of Panama’s activist “people’s lawyers,” Ernesto Cedeño. But even then it took him much time and effort to gather such facts as were allowed to be known and file his lawsuit. That happened this past February 7, and he was soon joined by the heads of the Chamber of Commerce (CCIAP) and the business execs’ association (APEDE). Two of the key witnesses were dissident Panameñista representantes, Ricky Domínguez from Bella Vista and Willie Bermúdez from Don Bosco.

Just a party-line thing? Where was the upwelling of support for the tax hike from the PRD’s Entrepreneurial Front, an important part of the torrijista donor base? And are there actually any Omar Torrijos fans out there, in the city’s PRD rank-and-file, or perhaps more importantly among the Cortizo appointees to the high court? The general actually did have something to say about the matter of consulting people. It’s one of his more celebrated sayings: 

“He who consults more errs less.”

In next year’s elections the PRD is likely to be fragmented at the presidential level, with former PRD president Martín Torrijos — the general’s son — in an alliance with the former Christian Democratic Partido Popular and PRD legislator Zulay Rodríguez running as a neofascist independent. It’s not a stretch to imagine such divisions down at the municipal level as well. This time, with an unpopular tax increase during hard times to bludgeon the incumbents.

On a global level, the PRD, like Spain’s Socialist Workers Party, the British Labour Party, Canada’s New Democratic Party, the German Social Democrats and so on, is a member of the Socialist International. But the Panamanian left has long complained that the Democratic Revolutionary Party isn’t very revolutionary, nor very democratic, nor for that matter committed to any sort of socialist principles. Yet sprinkled among the base, there are many who believe in the stated principles. 

The lawsuit

Cedeño’s lawsuit to nullify the tax hike was promptly accepted by Magistrate Carlos Vásquez. That action was supposed to stay any city action on the tax hike, but some business owners complain that after the measure’s suspension while the matter was before the court, city tax collectors demanded, or collected, the increased amount.

Do we get out of Panamanian law’s favorite realm, the intricacies of procedure, and take a more gringocentric look at economic realities? This is the main reason why Fábrega, and his party’s representantes — those of which entertainer, activist and commentator Rubén Blades describes as a “political patronage party” — so badly need to collect more taxes at the moment:

(A chart of the growth of the municipal payroll under Mayor Fábrega.)

First reports, however, are that in the initial investigative phase of the Supreme Court case the plaintiffs are being grilled about when they learned about the tax hike and if or when they filed some written objection. Does it mean an inclination to rule for the city on some procedural ground? We shall see.

In any case, the tax hike is suspended until a decision is announced, and if that upholds the tax increase it will be a campaign issue for next year’s elections, surely not just at the municipal level.

 

Contact us by email at fund4thepanamanews@gmail.com

To fend off hackers, organized trolls and other online vandalism, our website comments feature is switched off. Instead, come to our Facebook page to join in the discussion.

These links are interactive — click on the boxes

foot of the foothillsTweet

 

VFA_4

 

FB_2

 

Tweet

 
PDC